Europe’s top court hears Intel and sends € 1.06 bn antitrust fine to review

Last week the European Court of Justice, Europe’s highest court, ruled that US chipmaker Intel’s € 1.06 billion ($1.26 billion) antitrust fine be re-examined by a lower court. The ECJ found that the General Court, which upheld the hefty fine imposed on Intel by the Commission for abuse of a dominant position in the market, did not examine carefully enough Intel’s position, and so sent back the case to be reconsidered. The move not only represents a victory for Intel, but could also open a new chapter in antitrust cases involving US tech giants such as Google and Qualcomm.

Background

On May 13, 2009, the European Commission imposed a fine of €1.06 billion on US-based microchip manufacturer Intel for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 central processing units (CPUs), in infringement of the competition rules of the EU and the European Economic Area. According to the Commission, Intel abused its dominant market position by implementing a strategy aimed at foreclosing its main competitor, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), from October 2002 to December 2007.

At the time, the Commission said Intel’s abuse was characterised by several measures like offering rebates on the sale of CPUs to some computer manufacturers like Dell, Lenovo, HP and NEC on the condition that they purchased from Intel, and by paying a retailer, Media-Saturn-Holding, to sell computers with only Intel chips installed in them. According to the Commission, those rebates and payments induced the loyalty of the four manufacturers listed above and of Media-Saturn, and thus significantly diminished the ability of Intel’s competitors to compete on the merits of their x86 CPUs. Therefore, the Commission imposed a € 1.06 bn fine on the Santa Clara, California-based company in 2009, an action that was supported by the General Court in a 2014 decision, which dismissed an appeal by Intel against the fine.

Last week’s surprise

However, Intel challenged again the judgment of the General Court before the Court of Justice, by saying that that General Court failed to examine more thoroughly its arguments when assessing its appeal. The General Court allegedly “erred in law by failing to examine the rebates at issue in the light of all the circumstances of the case”, as declared by the ECJ. So last Wednesday Europe’s highest court said in an official statement that, whilst the Commission had emphasised that the rebates at issue were by their very nature capable of restricting competition, “it nevertheless carried out an in-depth examination of the circumstances of the case in its decision, which led it to conclude that an as efficient competitor would have had to offer prices which would not have been viable”.

In its official statement, the Luxembourg-based ECJ said that, as a consequence of the General Court failing to examine all of Intel’s arguments concerning the efficient competitor test (‘AEC test’) in particular, it therefore “sets aside the judgment of the General Court as a result of that failure in its analysis of whether the rebates at issue were capable of restricting competition”. “The Court refers the case back to the General Court so that it may examine, in the light of the arguments put forward by Intel, whether the rebates at issue are capable of restricting competition”, the document said.

Reactions

Wednesday’s ruling means that the years-long battle between the EU and Intel may drag on for potentially longer. “We welcome today’s landmark ruling,” Intel general counsel Steven Rodgers said. “While this case concerns events that happened more than a decade ago, we have always believed that our actions were lawful and did not harm competition. We look forward to the next step in this process, in what is a respectful disagreement between Intel and the EC’s competition regulators”.

“I cannot comment how companies will proceed or assess the judgment”, the New York Times quoted Ricardo Cardoso, a spokesman for the Commission, as saying at a news conference last week. “We ourselves still have to look carefully into the details of the judgment”. The chipmaker’s stock was up 2 percent, to $35.72, in midday trading in New York on Sept. 7.

Future impacts

The move by the Court of Justice clearly raises the prospect that the 2009 fine could be reduced, but it does not strike down the original ruling. Intel is still likely to be fined in the European Union as well as to receive precise instructions on how to drive its business activities in the bloc. However, last week decision may also represent a new starting point in competition cases in the region. The EU’s antitrust watchdog has indeed many open cases on the desk against US-based tech giants, such as Google, Microsoft and Apple, which have generally tended to accept EU anti-trust penalties so far. Many now see last Wednesday’s ruling as a door for those companies to see fighting the EU in court as a viable option.

Veronica Roberts, a London-based partner at Herbert Smith Freehills, told the New York Times last week that the ruling on Wednesday could ultimately give businesses “more confidence that they could win a case on appeal if they come under investigation”. Andrew Ward, a partner at Madrid-based law firm Cuatrecasas, told Reuters days before last week’s judgement that a loss in such a high-profile case would, for the ECJ, be “embarrassing”, adding that it might mean that some long-established processes would need to be “reassessed”. “Losing against Intel would clearly be a blow to the Commission and a confidence boost for Google, since on the face of it the theory of harm is much more established in the Intel case”, he said.

Companies like Qualcomm, which faces EU charges of using anti-competitive methods and of making illegal payments to a major customer, and Google, accused over its Android smartphone operating system and online search advertising, indeed could be the most directly affected by the ruling. Google currently faces a € 2.4 billion penalty in Europe, which represents the EU’s biggest fine of all time, surpassing the former € 1.06 bn record related to the EU vs Intel long standing dispute. The Mountain View, California-based company appealed yesterday against the record fine in attempt to overturn a EU decision imposed in July.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

Africa’s inspiring innovators show what the future could hold

Teamgum @ TheNextWeb 2014

Amazon on fire: the interference in global health

Nigeria: UN chief ‘appalled’ by killing of aid worker; calls for release of remaining hostages

Partnerships with civil society and youth ‘essential’ for a future that leaves no one behind: General Assembly President

Athens searches frantically for a new compromise between politics and economic reality

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Albinism, displacement in Central America, family-friendly nations, updates on the Gulf and Darfur

Facebook engineer working at the company’s HQ, Menlo Park, CA (Copyright: Facebook Inc., Source: Facebook Inc.’s website, newsroom)

Facebook goes under formal EU privacy scrutiny after latest massive data breach

Four ways innovation can help to beat heart disease

Foreign Investment Screening: new European framework to enter into force in April 2019

Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

Central America: drought, resulting crop losses threaten food security of two million people, UN warns

OECD, BSR and Danone launch 3-year initiative to strengthen inclusive growth through public-private collaboration

Here’s how to make ‘value-based healthcare’ a reality

Yemen: Tackling the world’s largest humanitarian crisis

The growing cyber-risk to our electricity grids – and what to do about it

Antitrust: Commission consults stakeholders on guidance for national courts when handling disclosure information

The European Union is strengthening its partnership with Senegal with €27.5 million

We must move from egocentric to ecocentric leadership to safeguard our planet

European Youth Forum welcomes the European Commission’s proposed revision of the Union Code on Visas, however it does not go far enough

Measles in Europe: infection rates highest in a decade, says UN health agency

5 neuroscience hacks that will make you happier

Family incomes stagnate in the EU; people excluded from ‘moderate recovery’

COP21 Paris agreement: a non legally-binding climate pact won’t stop effectively global warming while EU’s Cañete throws hardest part to next Commission

We need a global convention to end workplace sexual harassment

Half the population of Yemen at risk of famine: UN emergency relief chief

UN report on Syria conflict highlights inhumane detention of women and children

IMF: Sorry Greece, Ireland, Portugal we were wrong!

Is it impossible to place the banks under control?

Larger species are more at risk of extinction than smaller ones – here’s why

Currency Union might not let an independent Scotland join the EU as the “Yes” front now leads

Scotland “shows the way” to separatist movements as Catalonia calls a vote on independence

IMF: When high yield goes boom

To Brexit or not to Brexit: British exceptionalism doesn’t allow any Obama telling Brits what to do

Reading this alone? Recent surveys reveal the curious truth about loneliness

Migration crisis update: lack of solidarity not only among EU leaders but also EU officials

Continue reforms to make growth work for all in Spain

Achieving targets on energy helps meet other Global Goals, UN forum told

Banks worth $47 trillion adopt new UN-backed climate, sustainability principles

Meet Alice, the battery-powered plane that could herald the age of electric air travel

State aid: France to recover €8.5 million of illegal aid to Ryanair at Montpellier airport

How microfinance develops decent work

Humane leadership must be the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s real innovation

The new ethical dilemmas in medicine of the 21st century

Countdown To GSMA Mobile World Congress Shanghai 2018 Is On

5 lessons for social entrepreneurs on how to change the system

Internet of Things: a Force for Good or Evil?

Human rights: breaches in Russia, the Rakhine State and Bahrain

Reading the smoke signals: The long-term consequences of Amazon wildfire on global health

UN experts warn Assange arrest exposes him to risk of serious human rights violations

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

Secretary-General condemns attacks on UN peacekeepers in Mali

In 2020 Asia will have the world’s largest GDP. Here’s what that means

Everything you need to know about water

Fairer food supply chain: Agriculture MEPs clamp down on unfair trading

How innovation from within is transforming International Organizations as well as lives

MWC 2016 LIVE: BT chief aims to be at UK 5G forefront

Finland should do more to improve job prospects of low-skilled youth

European Parliament and Eurovision sign partnership for European Elections

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s