EU Court of Justice invalidates Safe Harbour and the game for thousands US businesses suddenly changes

A hearing at the European Court of Justice (European Court of Justice, 2010)

A hearing at the European Court of Justice (European Court of Justice, 2010)

In what some American media already call a “dramatic judgement”, the European Court of Justice last week changed the course of history for data protection and handling between the EU and the United States. After having declared the “Safe Harbour” data transfer agreement invalid earlier last week, on October 06, the EU’s highest court last Friday urged the EU and the United to shape a new trans-Atlantic data-transfer deal.

A paper monster

The ruling took immediate effect, and surely opened a big hole in the EU-US business legislation and data protection environments. The decision by the European Court of Justice junked a 15-years-old regulation and indeed left some 4,500 US companies, which have previously relied on Safe Harbour, linger in a potential bureaucratic nightmare. To understand why, it is necessary to take a step back and review some data privacy history.

Background

Since 2000, thousands of US companies have relied on Safe Harbour to comply with the “EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC” (the “Directive”) on the protection of personal data, and – more practically – to transfer personal data from the EU to the US. Indeed the Safe Harbour has been for fifteen years the “bridge” for thousands of businesses to cope with the many differences between the American and the European regulations. While the United States has a patchwork of various state laws on the privacy topic, the EU has a broad overarching law covering all industry sectors , the “Directive”, which prohibits the transfer of personal data outside of the EU unless there is an “adequate level of protection of the data.”

In order to facilitate business, the two superpowers negotiated a “Safe Harbour” agreement that allowed US companies to process and transfer EU citizens’ personal data only after qualifying for certain rules and principles. The Safe Harbour Framework indeed required adherence to guidance materials and seven basic principles: notice, choice, onward transfer, security, data integrity, access and enforcement. Under Safe Harbor, companies were basically free to transfer personal data from the EU to U.S in compliance with the EU Data Protection Directive and European privacy laws.

The NSA Leaks and the Schrems case

Post the Snowden scandal, more than 2 years ago, things have changed though. Edward Snowden’s National Security Agency leaks indeed showed that European data stored by US companies was not safe from surveillance that would be illegal in Europe, and many regulators, organisations and people started to become dig the matter further.

Maximillian Schrems, an Austrian law student and Facebook user, then argued that the Irish Data Protection Commissioner failed to protect him from mass surveillance by the US NSA. Schrems argued that the actions of many large US firms like Facebook, that basically store all – or at least a vast majority of – their customers data in the USA and then transfer personal data to the NSA as part of the infamous PRISM program, did not provide adequate protection of EU citizens’ data being transferred to third countries.

So the European Court of Justice was asked to investigate and to eventually rule on whether the Safe Harbour Framework was able to sufficiently protect the EU citizen under the EU Data Protection Directive. The court found that the Safe Harbour was “inadequate” to serve its original purpose, and that it did not “satisfy the requirements of the directive”.

The Court’s ruling

“The Court declares the Safe Harbour Decision invalid”, the official document by the Curia stated. “This judgment has the consequence that the Irish supervisory authority is required to examine Mr Schrems’ complaint with all due diligence”, it also declared. The document also cited that “even if the Commission has adopted a decision”, the national supervisory authorities, when dealing with a claim, “must be able to examine, with complete independence, whether the transfer of a person’s data to a third country complies with the requirements laid down by the directive”. Those are heavy words which are destined to change the entire game.

What happens now?

The full impact of this decision is currently hard to see, but for sure the future of cross border data transfers between the EU and US becomes now a big question-mark. By scrapping the Safe Harbour, the European Court of Justice has practically and immediately returned the issue to the hands of regulators in each country: from this moment onwards each EU member nation will decide its own way when it comes to interact with the US on data privacy and handling.

The impact on business

From a business point of view, this could turn into a real nightmare for American firms, as we said. US companies (potentially not only tech firms) that do business in Europe could be requested to keep data locally in each country that they operate in. Moreover, the decision creates new legal risks for companies and surely puts at risk all the bloc’s plans to create a single digital market, because it will jeopardize the region and the possibilities of doing business here by non-EU companies. Indeed now it might happen that one country might block a company’s transfer to the US while the regulator in another gives the green light. Indeed pretty fare from the “unity” dream Commissioners are foreseeing.

“What we need now is to work closely with the Americans to find a solution to get a safe ‘Safe Harbour’, which is in the interest of both Europeans and Americans”, briefly stressed Andrus Ansip, European Commission Vice-President in charge of digital single market. Mr. Ansip also said he would be meeting with businesses next week to discuss practical concerns but urged the EU and the U.S. to continue work towards creating a new Safe Harbour agreement.

A Trans-Atlantic case

Last weeks’ decision once again unveils the many differences between two of the worlds’ pioneers in privacy and data protection laws, which as one can imagine we’ll have huge impacts in the negotiations of trans-Atlantic deals such as TTIP.

It is impossible to determine in detail now the scale of the shock the ruling by the ECJ will have on real economy, but it will for sure add pressure on the ongoing negotiations between the two blocks around data protection, and possibly on all the other matters which are found on the Transatlantic table of negotiations.

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

9 climate tipping points pushing Earth to the point of no return

Aviation Safety: Commission adopts new EU Air Safety List

GSMA announces new keynote speakers for 2018 Mobile World Congress

Boom in Artificial Intelligence patents, points to ‘quantum leap’ in tech: UN report

‘Urgent need’ to stop Mali violence with ‘effective’ military response: UN expert

Commission publishes the first report on the issuance of a Eurobond

EU unveils plan to accelerate Capital Markets Union ahead of London’s departure from the bloc

Election 2019: New, Updated seat projection for new Parliament

Here’s how the EU is doing on gender equality

UN spotlights wellbeing of seafarers on International Day

Burning Amazon rainforests: Darting towards the doom of Human Race

UN agency warns conditions around Yemen’s key port city of Hudaydah still ‘very bad’, as staff rush to deliver aid

Can North Korea and the U.S. strike a nuclear deal?

A Europe that Protects: Commission calls for decisive action on security priorities

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “It is the implementation, Stupid!”, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaueble points the finger to Greece from Davos

The power of partnership: joining forces to fight financial crime

A question of trust: the UN political chief working behind the scenes to prevent tomorrow’s wars

UN experts warn Assange arrest exposes him to risk of serious human rights violations

Human rights breaches in Guinea Conakry and Madagascar

UN rights experts call on Russia to release Ukrainian film-maker whose life is in ‘imminent danger’

Human rights ‘core to sustainable development’: deputy UN chief

Brexit: No deal without marginalizing the hard Tory Eurosceptic MPs

These scientists are using sound waves to filter plastic fibres from washing machine wastewater

UN chief and senior officials show solidarity with DR Congo during three-day visit

How a possible EU budget deficit affects the migration crisis

How curiosity and globalization are driving a new approach to travel

The UK is on a record-breaking run of coal-free power

How smarter machines can make us smarter humans

European Youth Forum on Summit on Jobs and Growth

Here are 3 alternative visions for the future of work

Lithuania needs to get rid of the victim mentality

The refugee crisis seen through the eyes of a young doctor from Turkey

Hostages to a rampant banking system

These countries are all building brand-new cities

Could robot leaders do better than our current politicians?

Coronavirus containment is the key, as infections tick up: Tedros

A biodiversity scientist explains the problem with our neat lawns

Parliament and Council agree drastic cuts to plastic pollution of environment

Venezuela: MEPs demand free presidential elections and an end to repression

Make this the year of ‘transformative solutions’ to avert disastrous climate change: UN Deputy Chief

Destabilizing Lebanon after burning Syria; plotting putsch at home: King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia

Syria: UN food relief agency ‘doing everything we can’ to reach Idlib civilians

How speaking ‘parentese’ to your child could make them a faster learner

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

Unemployment and exclusion brings EU cities to boiling point

Large parts of the world are growing more fragile. Here are 5 steps to reverse course

Don’t take African generosity towards refugees for granted, says UN refugee chief

The reason the world showed limited empathy to the Orlando victims

We are ‘burning up our future’, UN’s Bachelet tells Human Rights Council

Actions not words: what was promised at the UN’s landmark climate summit?

Benefits of rural migration effect often overlooked, new UN report suggests

Coronavirus: UN health agency moves fast to tackle ‘infodemic’; Guterres warns against stigmatization

These are 2018’s stats of the year

A reality check on inclusive innovation

Questions and Answers on issues about the digital copyright directive

ECB describes in detail how it exploits the poor

Security Council urged to help spare Syrians from ‘devastation’

The EU Spring Summit set to challenge austerity

EU-wide rules for safety of drones approved by European Parliament

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s