EU Court of Justice invalidates Safe Harbour and the game for thousands US businesses suddenly changes

A hearing at the European Court of Justice (European Court of Justice, 2010)

A hearing at the European Court of Justice (European Court of Justice, 2010)

In what some American media already call a “dramatic judgement”, the European Court of Justice last week changed the course of history for data protection and handling between the EU and the United States. After having declared the “Safe Harbour” data transfer agreement invalid earlier last week, on October 06, the EU’s highest court last Friday urged the EU and the United to shape a new trans-Atlantic data-transfer deal.

A paper monster

The ruling took immediate effect, and surely opened a big hole in the EU-US business legislation and data protection environments. The decision by the European Court of Justice junked a 15-years-old regulation and indeed left some 4,500 US companies, which have previously relied on Safe Harbour, linger in a potential bureaucratic nightmare. To understand why, it is necessary to take a step back and review some data privacy history.

Background

Since 2000, thousands of US companies have relied on Safe Harbour to comply with the “EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC” (the “Directive”) on the protection of personal data, and – more practically – to transfer personal data from the EU to the US. Indeed the Safe Harbour has been for fifteen years the “bridge” for thousands of businesses to cope with the many differences between the American and the European regulations. While the United States has a patchwork of various state laws on the privacy topic, the EU has a broad overarching law covering all industry sectors , the “Directive”, which prohibits the transfer of personal data outside of the EU unless there is an “adequate level of protection of the data.”

In order to facilitate business, the two superpowers negotiated a “Safe Harbour” agreement that allowed US companies to process and transfer EU citizens’ personal data only after qualifying for certain rules and principles. The Safe Harbour Framework indeed required adherence to guidance materials and seven basic principles: notice, choice, onward transfer, security, data integrity, access and enforcement. Under Safe Harbor, companies were basically free to transfer personal data from the EU to U.S in compliance with the EU Data Protection Directive and European privacy laws.

The NSA Leaks and the Schrems case

Post the Snowden scandal, more than 2 years ago, things have changed though. Edward Snowden’s National Security Agency leaks indeed showed that European data stored by US companies was not safe from surveillance that would be illegal in Europe, and many regulators, organisations and people started to become dig the matter further.

Maximillian Schrems, an Austrian law student and Facebook user, then argued that the Irish Data Protection Commissioner failed to protect him from mass surveillance by the US NSA. Schrems argued that the actions of many large US firms like Facebook, that basically store all – or at least a vast majority of – their customers data in the USA and then transfer personal data to the NSA as part of the infamous PRISM program, did not provide adequate protection of EU citizens’ data being transferred to third countries.

So the European Court of Justice was asked to investigate and to eventually rule on whether the Safe Harbour Framework was able to sufficiently protect the EU citizen under the EU Data Protection Directive. The court found that the Safe Harbour was “inadequate” to serve its original purpose, and that it did not “satisfy the requirements of the directive”.

The Court’s ruling

“The Court declares the Safe Harbour Decision invalid”, the official document by the Curia stated. “This judgment has the consequence that the Irish supervisory authority is required to examine Mr Schrems’ complaint with all due diligence”, it also declared. The document also cited that “even if the Commission has adopted a decision”, the national supervisory authorities, when dealing with a claim, “must be able to examine, with complete independence, whether the transfer of a person’s data to a third country complies with the requirements laid down by the directive”. Those are heavy words which are destined to change the entire game.

What happens now?

The full impact of this decision is currently hard to see, but for sure the future of cross border data transfers between the EU and US becomes now a big question-mark. By scrapping the Safe Harbour, the European Court of Justice has practically and immediately returned the issue to the hands of regulators in each country: from this moment onwards each EU member nation will decide its own way when it comes to interact with the US on data privacy and handling.

The impact on business

From a business point of view, this could turn into a real nightmare for American firms, as we said. US companies (potentially not only tech firms) that do business in Europe could be requested to keep data locally in each country that they operate in. Moreover, the decision creates new legal risks for companies and surely puts at risk all the bloc’s plans to create a single digital market, because it will jeopardize the region and the possibilities of doing business here by non-EU companies. Indeed now it might happen that one country might block a company’s transfer to the US while the regulator in another gives the green light. Indeed pretty fare from the “unity” dream Commissioners are foreseeing.

“What we need now is to work closely with the Americans to find a solution to get a safe ‘Safe Harbour’, which is in the interest of both Europeans and Americans”, briefly stressed Andrus Ansip, European Commission Vice-President in charge of digital single market. Mr. Ansip also said he would be meeting with businesses next week to discuss practical concerns but urged the EU and the U.S. to continue work towards creating a new Safe Harbour agreement.

A Trans-Atlantic case

Last weeks’ decision once again unveils the many differences between two of the worlds’ pioneers in privacy and data protection laws, which as one can imagine we’ll have huge impacts in the negotiations of trans-Atlantic deals such as TTIP.

It is impossible to determine in detail now the scale of the shock the ruling by the ECJ will have on real economy, but it will for sure add pressure on the ongoing negotiations between the two blocks around data protection, and possibly on all the other matters which are found on the Transatlantic table of negotiations.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

A Sting Exclusive: “Our ambition is by 2020 Indonesia to become an emerging power of World’s Maritime Access”, reveals the Chargé d’Affaires at the Embassy of Indonesia in Brussels, treating WEF, ASEAN and EU-Indonesia relations on the eve of the World Economic Forum East Asia 2015 in Jakarta

Meet the Junior Enterprise network at JEWC 2014!

EU revengefully shows no mercy to Cameron by demanding a fast and sloppy Brexit now

Brussels to tear down the trade wall with Mexico as opposed to Trump’s “walls”

Commission’s Youth Initiative fails first hurdle by not sufficiently consulting young people

The EU threatens to occupy Libya militarily; is another colonial war brewing?

The quality of health education around the globe

Changing the EU copyright law won’t bring us much closer to Digital Single Market

Italy’s dilemma after Merkel-Hollande agreed loose banking union

Is Erdogan ready to tear down the bridges with Europe and the West?

Forget about growth without a level playing field for all SMEs

My ‘’cultural’’ contacts with China

Turkey presents a new strategy for EU accession but foreign policy could be the lucky card

The global issue of migration in 2017

When is Berlin telling the truth about the EU banking union?

ECB again to subsidize euro area banks with more than one trillion euro

German heavy artillery against Brussels and Paris

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Global Business Community Comes to Paris with Solutions for Taking On the Climate Challenge Across the Board

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

Germany rules the banking industry of Eurozone

Modern humanitarian aid at times of global crises

EU’s Finance Ministers draft plan to raise tax bills of online giants like Google and Amazon

The vicious cycle of poverty and exclusion spreads fast engulfing more children

Are ECB’s €500 billion enough to revive Eurozone? Will the banks pass it to the real economy?

‘Internal security’ or how to compromise citizens’ rights and also make huge profits

Predicting two more years of economic stagnation

EU to give more power to national antitrust authorities in a bid to secure regulatory fines

Dreaming of China

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

Eurozone cannot endure any longer youth marginalisation

The EU lets the bankers go on rigging the benchmarks

The West and Russia impose a new order on the world

Switzerland to introduce strict restrictions on executive pay

How China Mended My Heart

Memoirs from a unique trip to China: “my new old dragon” (Part II)

Google and Apple suddenly realise that doing business in EU is tough?

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

The West and Russia accomplished the dismembering and the economic destruction of Ukraine

COP21 Business update: Companies urge now for carbon pricing as coal is still a big issue

An Easter Special: Social protection of migrants in Europe as seen through the eyes of European youth

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

The fatal consequences of troika’s blind austerity policy

Utmost hypocrisy emitted by EU’s energy regulation

EU Commission retracts on the Chinese solar panel case

“Private” sea freight indexes hide Libor like skeletons?

Close to final agreement on the EU Banking Union

France pushes UK to stay and Germany to pay

Ship Recycling is the Commission’s Titanic

“These Romans are crazy”, the “Greek Gauls” will be shouting today in Brussels hoping Caesar backs off

European Business Summit 2014: Sting Report, Day I

Biggest London City Banks ready to move core European operations to Frankfurt or Dublin?

The European Youth Forum needs better signal for its “call” for Quality Internships

Can Greece’s devastating economy deal with the migration crisis?

The EU Spring Summit set to challenge austerity

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

GREXIT final wrap-up: nobody believed Aesop’s boy who cried wolf so many times

How close is Eurozone to a new recession which may trigger formidable developments?

A Sting Exclusive: “Digital and mobile technologies are helping to achieve an economic success in Spain”, the Spanish Secretary of State for Telecommunications and Information Society Víctor Calvo-Sotelo reveals to the Sting at Mobile World Congress 2015

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s