EU opens a third antitrust file against Google

Google Logo 2016The European Commission announced last Thursday that is taking “further steps” in investigation against Google, officially accusing the company of having restricted consumer choice by blocking rivals in online search advertising. Although it sounds like there’s absolutely nothing new about this new complaint against Google, the latest antitrust charge filed by the Commission, which is the third since early 2015, it may surely open a new chapter in the long standing “EU vs. Google” story.

Two charges

With an official statement, the European Commission has announced no less than two charge sheets, known as “statements of objections”, and has sent it to Google. Formally, with the first Statement of Objections, the Commission has reinforced its preliminary conclusion that Google has abused its dominant position by “systematically favouring its comparison shopping service in its search result pages”. The move is explained in detail in the official EC statement published on that same day.

Comparison shopping

The European Commission issued its first Statement of Objections against Google on the subject of comparison shopping in April 2015, and now confirms it also carried out further investigations since then. Last Thursday’s Statement of Objections indeed represents a reinforcement of the Commission’s preliminary conclusions and outlines “a broad range of additional evidence and data”, as declared by the Commission. “Google has come up with many innovative products that have made a difference to our lives”, Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said. “But that doesn’t give Google the right to deny other companies the chance to compete and innovate”, she added.

According to the Commission, the additional evidence relates to the way Google “favours its own comparison shopping service over those of competitors, the impact of a website’s prominence of display in Google’s search results on its traffic, and the evolution of traffic to Google’s comparison shopping service compared to its competitors”, to use the exact words of the Commission’s spokesperson. “The Commission is concerned that users do not necessarily see the most relevant results in response to queries”, the statement says. “Today, we have further strengthened our case that Google has unduly favoured its own comparison shopping service in its general search result pages. It means consumers may not see the most relevant results to their search queries”, Commissioner Vestager also stressed.

The AdSense problem

The second accusation is about Google’s “AdSense for Search” platform, through which Google acts as an intermediary for websites such as retailers, telecom operators and newspapers. The Commission officially raises concerns that the Mountain View, California-based firm has breached the EU antitrust rules by putting restrictions on the ability of certain third party websites to display search advertisements from its competitors. According to the European Commission Google has “prevented existing and potential competitors, including other search providers and online advertising platforms, from entering and growing in this commercially important area”.

This latest accusation refers to what the Commission sees as Google’s “original sin” of having abused its 80 % market share “dominant position” in the European Economic Area (EEA), specifically in the placement of search advertising on third party websites. A large proportion of Google’s revenues from search advertising intermediation indeed stems from its agreements with a limited number of large third parties, and the Commission has concerns that in those agreements Google might have breached the bloc’s antitrust laws by requesting conditions of exclusivity and the right to authorise competing ads.

A reply to Google

This new round of antitrust charges represents a massive reply to all the proofs of innocence that Google has showcased through the year, a big. An example of that lies on its its first accusation, the one regarding comparison shopping, where the Commission has completely rejected Google’s claim that the EU watchdog had failed to take into account competition from online retailers Amazon and eBay. Google’s argument indeed was that comparison shopping services should not be considered in isolation, but together with the services provided by merchant platforms. Last week, the Commission openly said it will continue to consider that comparison shopping services and merchant platforms belong to separate markets.

“The latest round of charges underscores the European Commission’s commitment to the case and signals that serious penalties against Google are likely”, Mr. Albert Foer, a senior fellow at the American Antitrust Institute, told Reuters last week. “My sense is that we are talking about something more substantial than a slap on the wrist, and also that’s why this has been going on for so long”, he said.

Alphabet under the lens

Moreover, this new round of charges carries a big element of novelty: the Commission decided to initiate proceedings also against Alphabet, Google’s parent company, which “was created after the Commission had initiated proceedings against Google”, as said in the statement by the Commission. “Both Statements of Objections summarised above are addressed to Google and Alphabet”, the statement also said, adding that also the April 2015 Statement of Objections has been notified to Alphabet.

This is the first time Alphabet itself gets dragged onto the field, which is another proof of how the EU-Google question is definitely far from a conclusion. Google’s AdWords and AdSense programmes have been on the Commission’s radar since 2010, under Vestager’s predecessor, Mr. Joaquin Almunia. Google for more than two years tried to negotiate a settlement with the EU, and almost got it, before Mr. Almunia left his cabinet. Ms. Vestager recently said that bringing the thorny matter to a final stage is her top priority, although there’s still no visible resolution ahead.

Growing concerns

Google now could face fines up to 10 % of its global turnover for each case, if found guilty of breaking the region’s antitrust rules. Still such threat doesn’t seem too much of a risk to Google’s business, which was flying around $75 billion in revenue in 2015. However, many sources close to the company are reportedly saying that the concern around the matter is rapidly growing inside the US tech giant’s offices.

“We believe our innovations and product improvements have increased choice for E.U. consumers and promote competition”, a Google’s spokesperson commented on Twitter last week, which is the company’s only reply to date. Google also said that it would provide a “detailed” response to Europe’s latest charges in due course.

Google and Alphabet have 8 weeks to respond to the first Statement of Objections and 10 weeks to provide a response to the second.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Berlin favours economic and social disintegration in certain Eurozone countries

Global Citizen – Volunteer Internships

Better air pollution data is helping us all breathe easier. Here’s how

Preventing and resolving conflicts must form ‘backbone’ of collective efforts – UN chief

Public opinion misled by the Commission on air transport safety

Parliament pushes for cleaner cars on EU roads by 2030

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

Mainland Europe adopts Germanic cartel business patterns

70 years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, this is why we need dignity more than ever

Afghanistan: UN mission condemns deadly attack near Kabul airport

France is bringing back national service

Further reforms will promote a more inclusive and resilient Indonesian economy

Schengen: new rules for temporary checks at national borders

A Sting Exclusive: “Paris and beyond: EU action and what COP21 should deliver”, Green MEP Keith Taylor discusses from Brussels 

3 ways governments and carmakers can keep up with the future of transport

Alcoholic drinks: Commission tables update of rules governing alcohol excise duties

The West – the EU and the US – is writing off Turkey’s Erdogan

Immigrant integration policies have improved but challenges remain

MEPs agree on new rules to tax digital companies’ revenues

Banks can fight financial crime. But we can’t do it alone

An American duel in Brussels: Salesforce against Microsoft over Linkedin deal

OECD Donor countries need to reform development finance to meet 2030 pledge

From diamonds to recycling: how blockchain can drive responsible and ethical businesses

Nature is our strongest ally in ensuring global water security

The future of crypto-assets, from opportunities to policy implications

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe needs decisive progress for stronger cybersecurity”, EU Commissioner Gabriel highlights from Brussels

Ceasefire holds in Tripoli, but core problems remain, says UN Libya mission chief

Draghi, Letta: All Eurozone countries must be able to borrow like Germany

Macron crowned king of Europe in Washington D.C.; just a working meeting with Trump for Merkel

Entrepreneurship in a newly shaped Europe: what is the survival kit for a young Catalan and British entrepreneur in 2018?

The Oslo model: how to prepare your city for the electric-vehicle surge

Venezuelan exodus to Ecuador reaches record levels: UN refugee agency steps up aid

FROM THE FIELD: A UN peacekeepers-eye view of DR Congo

In Bali, UN chief Guterres outlines importance of international financial cooperation for sustainable development

European Commission recommends to the European Council (Article 50) to find that decisive progress has been made in Brexit negotiations

CHALLENGING THE ZEITGEIST OF DIGITAL – Change making projects innovate mobile support for refugees, inclusive environments, early breast cancer detection and more

How a new approach to meat can help end hunger

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

EU cracks under the weight of its policy on the Ukraine-Russia nub

False promises to Small and Medium Enterprises

Summer JADE Meeting 2015: We came curious, we left inspired

EU Commission retracts on the Chinese solar panel case

iSting: Change Europe with your Writing

We lack a global framework for saving our environment. Here’s how we change that

Further reforms needed for a stronger and more integrated Europe

UN chief welcomes Taliban’s temporary truce announcement, encourages all parties to embrace ‘Afghan-owned peace’

Have central banks missed the exit train?

Germany resists Macron’s plan for closer and more cohesive Eurozone; Paris and Berlin at odds

World response to AIDS epidemic at a ‘critical juncture’

How India is harnessing technology to lead the Fourth Industrial Revolution

“Two Pack” approved: Is democracy chased away from Brussels?

Devastating storms like Hurricane Florence ‘unusual this far north’: UN weather agency

My twin from Guangzhou

Advocate General ‘outlaws’ Data Retention Directive

MWC 2016 LIVE: GTI shifts to phase two – 5G – after hitting milestones

UN, Somali Government seek $80 million in immediate relief for flood-affected populations

Greece begins a new chapter following the conclusion of its stability support programme

This Norwegian cruise line plans to power its ships with rotting fish

Three ways the Fourth Industrial Revolution is shaping geopolitics

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s