EU to give more power to national antitrust authorities in a bid to secure regulatory fines

Press conference by Margrethe Vestager, member of the European Commission in charge of Competition, on the merger of Dow/DuPont. Date: 27/03/2017. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union, 2017 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart.

Last week, the European Commission has proposed a new set of rules to give national antitrust authorities more power and resources against anti-competitive practices. The proposed rules, which followed a public consultation that was launched last year, are intended to make the bloc’s national competition agencies more autonomous but also more reactive against multinational firms over regulatory cases. Indeed the proposed rules would enlarge the national watchdogs’ operative range, ultimately allowing them access to mobile phones, laptops and tablets.

Background

Antitrust rules within the European Union are administrated by the Council Regulation 1/2003 since it came into force in May 2004, changing the previous notification system, under which companies notified agreements to the Commission for approval under the antitrust rules. After ten years, The Commission’s Communication on Ten Years of Council Regulation 1/2003 (COM (2014) 453) identified a number of potential areas of action to make the national competition authorities more effective enforcers, and opened the way to new discussions. By way of follow-up, the Commission carried out a public consultation between November 2015 and February 2016 and listed options for a series of action with both the national competition authorities and the Member State ministries.

More powers needed

Indeed last Wednesday’s move came as a result of those consultations, which found shortcomings in the local competition agencies’ equipment and in the way they were structured, preventing them from doing their work effectively. “It is vital that national competition authorities have all the powers they need to do their job as effectively as possible”, said Margrethe Vestager, Commissioner in charge of competition policy, last week in an official statement. “For the last two years, we’ve been discussing whether that is already the case. And the message that’s come back is that national competition authorities do need more complete powers, in order to give consumers the best possible protection from anticompetitive behaviours”, Commissioner Vestager declared.

Enlarged rights

The proposal indeed aims at ensuring that national agencies have enough practical resources to carry out their activity effectively, such as funding and staff, but also enough power to do so. A big theme around the proposed new rules is actually the enlargement of the operative range of the local watchdogs, and so the right to search mobile phones, laptops and tablets for evidence of wrongdoing. “Today’s proposal seeks to ensure that national competition authorities have legal guarantees of independence, as well as appropriate funding and staffing to do their job properly”, said Commissioner Vestager.

The Commission’s scope is to create a sort of “common competition enforcement area”, as well as provide the national competition authorities with a minimum common “toolkit” and effective enforcement powers. “[The proposal] is about the establishment of minimum guarantees and standards to empower national authorities to reach their full potential”, said Vestager. “Every national authority is different, of course. […] But these authorities face similar challenges. And that’s what today’s proposal aims to address”, she also said.

A way to monitor multinationals

Antitrust experts and many European media outlets are also convinced that the EU antitrust authority was also concerned about looser antitrust systems in some countries where multinational firms can easily avoid paying regulatory fines, especially where they do not have a legal presence. New planned rules on parent company liability and succession would indeed prevent companies from dodging fines via corporate restructuring, a common practice in many European states. “The rules we propose aim to ensure the imposition of fines that really deter law-breaking. And they will also make sure that companies cannot escape the payment of fines by restructuring and also that fines can be enforced against companies in other EU countries”, Commissioner Vestager said.

Powers and responsibilities

“Of course, with great power comes great responsibility. All competition authorities must use their authority appropriately, fully respecting companies’ rights of defence”, Commissioner Vestager also added, underlying what looks to be already the hottest theme for multinational companies in the proposed reform. “Companies have the right to know the case against them, and to have a chance to respond. Today’s proposal therefore emphasises the fact that competition authorities must respect these rights, in line with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights”.

A study by the European Commission revealed that, from 2004 till 2014, over 85% of all the decisions that applied EU antitrust rules were taken by national competition authorities. The EC said that, since 2004, the Commission and national competition authorities have adopted over 1,000 decisions. The proposal will now need approval from EU member states and the European Parliament before it can become adopted. Once adopted, Member States have to transpose the provisions of the Directive into national law.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Eurozone banks to separate risky activities: Can they stay afloat?

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

Migration crisis update: The “Habsburg Empire” comes back to life while EU loses control

EU agrees on Ukraine – Georgia visa-free travel amid veto risks and populist fears

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

Facebook wins EU approval for WhatsApp acquisition; just a sign of the times

ECB again to subsidize euro area banks with more than one trillion euro

Youth Forum welcomes positive ruling on non-EU student visas

MWC 2016 LIVE: GTI shifts to phase two – 5G – after hitting milestones

EU responds to terror fallout by eroding borderless Europe and molesting the refugees

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

Do academia and banks favour a new Middle Ages period?

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

On Youth Education: “Just a normal day in the life of a medical student”

Businesses succeed internationally

Let your fingers do the walking

The inhumane face of crisis mirrored in numbers

EU to spend €135.5 billion in 2014 or 6.5% less than this year

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

The JADE Spring Conference 2017 is casting its shadows before

Why will Paris upcoming “loose” climate change agreement work better than the previous ones?

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

The EU Commission by serving the banks offers poor support to European mainstream political parties

eGovernmnet for more efficiency, equality and democracy

“These Romans are crazy”, the “Greek Gauls” will be shouting today in Brussels hoping Caesar backs off

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

FIAT Chrysler: from Geneva Motor show to the World, and back

A Sting Exclusive: EU Commissioner Mimica looks at how the private sector can better deliver for international development

EU economic governance: More exploitation for the weaker countries

A Monday to watch the final act of a Greek tragedy; will there be catharsis or more fear?

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

European Youth Capital 2018 : Cascais

The European giant tourism sector in constant growth

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

Italy’s Letta: A European Banking Union soon or Eurozone collapses

Paris agreed with Berlin over a loose and ineffective banking union

Fostering global citizenship in medicine

Bertelsmann Stiftung @ European Business Summit 2014: Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP) needs balanced approach

The Ecofin Council creates officially the clan of ‘undead’ banks

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

EU crisis aggravates structural differences, threatens cohesion

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

ECB’s unconventional monetary measures give first tangible results

TTIP 9th Round marked by American disappointment: Will some optimism save this trade agreement?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s