Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU shapes its ambitious strategy on India

Basel III rules relaxed: Banks got it all but become more prone to crisis

It’s time to strengthen global digital cooperation

Finnish Prime Minister calls for a more united EU of concrete actions

UN chief pays tribute to Egypt’s role in avoiding ‘dramatic’ escalation in conflict across the Gaza-Israel border

Parliament votes for €1 billion in aid to Ukraine

Few countries are pricing carbon high enough to meet climate targets

Medical students as the critical link to address climate change

Terror attacks strike people ‘from all walks of life, the UN included’

Finland, Switzerland and New Zealand lead the way at teaching skills for the future

Macron in St. Petersburg didn’t oppose Trump on Iran, in Putin’s presence

Trump ‘used’ G20 to side with Putin and split climate and trade packs

UPDATED: Thousands flee fighting around Libyan capital as Guterres condemns escalation, urges ‘immediate halt’ to all military operations

EU to Turkey: No other ties than €3+3bn to upkeep refugees

DR Congo elections: ‘historic opportunity’ for ‘peaceful transfer of power’ says Security Council

Bankers don’t go to jail because they are more equal than us all

Nearly 900 reportedly killed following ‘shocking’ intercommunal attacks in DR Congo

UNESCO experts ready to assist reconstruction of iconic Notre Dame, following devastating blaze

Eating less beef and more beans would cut deaths by 5-7%

The vicious cycle of poverty and exclusion spreads fast engulfing more children

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

Trump’s self-centered politics unravels

MWC 2016 LIVE: BlackBerry acquires Encription, talks Microsoft and health

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

The Indian miracle state pointing the way to global sustainability

We finally have a life-saving vaccine for Ebola

Here’s how to bring agility into the boardroom

European Parliament strengthens EU consumer protection rules

UN chief encourages victims of terrorism to ‘raise up their voices’

Oslo leads the way in ‘Breathe Life’ campaign for cleaner cities in climate change era

New EU rules cut red tape for citizens living or working in another Member State as of tomorrow

Youth Forum welcomes European Commission proposal to speed up financing for youth employment

India is failing 175 million of its young people. Here’s the solution

Trade surplus up production down in Eurozone

After the Italian ‘no’ and the Brexit, Germans must decide which Europe they want

Protectionism doesn’t stand a chance in the age of connectivity

Venezuela: Parliament recognises Guaidó, urges EU to follow suit

Hazy ‘breakthrough’ saves PM May, leaves Ireland in limbo: Brexit

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

Berlin’s governing elite leads Eurozone to recession to win the September election in Germany

EU to lead one more fight against climate change at G7 summit

Mood changes in Europe in favour of growth and jobs

OECD Secretary-General Gurría welcomes announcement of new trade agreement between the US, Mexico and Canada

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

These European countries produce the most plastic waste per person

UN welcomes progress in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia naming dispute

France breaks budget promises once again and the EU’s finance offices are shaking

COP21 Breaking News_07 December: “The world is expecting more from you than half-measures”, UN Secretary General Bank Ki-moon cries out from Paris

The United States divorce rate is dropping, thanks to millennials

European Parliament approves more transparency and efficiency in its internal rules

Cameroon: Clear ‘window of opportunity’ to solve crises rooted in violence – Bachelet

A Valentine’s Special: we can never overdose on love

This 12-year-old built an underwater robot to fight plastic pollution

Why securing the Internet of Things is crucial to the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Monday’s Daily Brief: biodiversity and forests, labour and road safety, women’s rights, and fallen UN staff remembered

Hundreds of wounded Gaza protesters risk limb amputation without immediate help, warns top UN official

EU Parliament shows its teeth in view of 2014 elections

Data exchanges: Strengthening Europol cooperation with non-EU countries

The Juncker Plan at work: bringing investment back on track in Europe

Global leaders and companies pledge to reduce the gender pay gap by 2030

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s