Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN agencies welcome green light for Rohingya projects in northern Myanmar; urge ‘more effective access’

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

This is why obesity is classified as a type of malnutrition

Predicting two more years of economic stagnation

“A sustainable economy, low-carbon, resource-efficient, resilient and more competitive on the global stage”, EU Commissioner Vella in a Sting Exclusive

The UK is on a record-breaking run of coal-free power

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

Future EU farm policy: Agriculture MEPs urge fair funding, no renationalisation

Two EU Commissioners fire at will against the US

Medical ethics in the age of the social media influencers

International data flows: Commission launches the adoption of its adequacy decision on Japan

Siemens-Alstom merger: Will the EC succumb to Franco-German pressures for the sake of May’s EU Elections?

‘Highly explosive’ escalation of conflict and displacement across Syria’s Idlib, says top UN official

On World Bee day, human activity blamed for falling pollinator numbers

3 natural mysteries that could be explained by quantum physics

New rules on drivers’ working conditions and fair competition in road transport

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

Afghanistan extends ceasefire with Taliban; UN urges both sides to work towards lasting peace

Greece will probably stay in the Eurozone but at what cost?

Parallel downfalls of Merkel and Deutsche Bank threaten Germany and Europe

More than four in 10 women, live in fear of refusing partner’s sexual demands, new UN global study finds

Canada needs to increase foreign aid flows in line with its renewed engagement

The power of trust and values in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

UN climate summit aims to speed up transition to cleaner, greener future

3 ways firms can master the digital challenges of the 4IR

EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey: EUR 400 million Special Measure on education adopted

Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon

Libya on verge of civil war, threatening ‘permanent division’, top UN official warns Security Council

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

Sherpa climbers carried out the highest-ever spring clean. This is what they found

Trump’s Russophiles under investigation, Europe remains ‘en garde’

Ukraine turns again to the EU for more money

EU-Russia relations: the beginning of a warmer winter?

Competing with Apple and leading innovation: Google’s world replies to EU on android charges

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: The health of capitalism won’t be the only worry for those who head for Davos

China rare earth prices soar on their potential role in trade war

South Sudan’s peace process ‘precarious, but progress in being made’, Security Council hears

Africa-Europe Alliance: European Commission committed to a sustainable African agri-food sector

3 ways to rebuild trust in how we regulate technology

The Next Web 2014, the biggest European conference on Internet so far and the Absence of Brussels from Amsterdam

UN rights expert calls for civilian protection as fighting escalates between military and armed group

Brazil’s hopeless future of science

The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

UN chief applauds Bangladesh for ‘opening borders’ to Rohingya refugees in need

There’s a global learning crisis and it’s leaving millions without basic skills

COP24: green, gender focus, as UN’s crucial climate change conference gets underway

How technology is driving a fourth wave of environmentalism

Nearly $4 billion needed to protect 41 million children from conflict and disaster

“A global threat lies ahead worsened after the EU’s green light to the Bayer-Monsanto merger”, a Sting Exclusive by the President of Slow Food

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

Why is the Strait of Hormuz so important?

Eurozone dignitaries play with people’s life savings

Factories are no longer the sure route to prosperity. Here’s why

This AI can predict your personality just by looking at your eyes

Commuters in these cities spend more than 8 days a year stuck in traffic

Finland has a new eco-fashion line – clothes made from trees

The EU pollution rights trading system frozen

The UN went to one of the world’s richest countries to look at poverty – this is what it found

Destroying nuclear waste to create clean energy? It can be done

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s