Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

ECB’s billions fortify south Eurozone except Greece; everybody rushes to invest in euro area bonds zeroing their yields

Why do medical students seek for work abroad?

Quality Internships: Towards a Toolkit for Employers

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: 195 countries adopt the First Universal Climate Agreement

Let your fingers do the walking

“Only through energy policy we can trigger competitiveness”. The Sting live from #EBS2015: Energy Union – When will it happen?

The European Youth Forum needs better signal for its “call” for Quality Internships

The consequences of Brexit seen by a European young entrepreneur

EU should promote immigration as a humanitarian issue in order to provide a more permanent solution

European Youth Forum demands immediate action & binding agreement on climate change

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

We’ll succeed together

Silk Road Unlimited

EU-India summit: Will the EU manage to sign a free trade agreement with India before Britain?

Is Eurozone heading towards a long stagnation?

EU members commit to build an integrated gas market and finally cut dependency on Russia

It’s Brexit again: Nigel Farage launches a personal campaign to lead the ‘No’ front

A Sting Exclusive: “One year on from the VW scandal and EU consumers are still in the dark”, BEUC’s Head highlights from Brussels

IMF: Sorry Greece it was a mistake of 11% of your GDP

EU: 13 major banks may pay fines 10% of worldwide turnover

EU deserves the title of the Syrian affair merchandiser

The European Youth raises their voices this week in Brussels at Yo!Fest 2015

EU, Brazil to hold high level Summit in Brasilia

Climate change and its adverse impacts on health

MEP Cristiana Muscardini @ European Business Summit 2014: International Trade in Europe

Alexandre in Czech Republic

Eurozone: GDP development heads to naught; the expensive euro serves only Germany

Who will secure Lithuania?

Deep chasm still divides Athens and Brussels; can Eurozone use the nuclear arm of liquidity against Greece?

The financial crisis always prefers the south of Eurozone

Eurozone: The cycle of deficits, debts and austerity revisited

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

The Eurogroup offered a cold reception to IMF’s director for Europe

European Youth Forum and youngest MEPs call on President Juncker to keep his promise to Europe’s youth

EU leads the torn away South Sudan to a new bloody civil war

My twin from Guangzhou

“One Belt One Road”: Its relevance to the European Companies

Global health challenges require global medical students

ITU Telecom World 2017: exploring smart digital transformation

It’s a week dedicated to all EU budgets; seven days that can make or break the Union

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

EU Youth Conference in Riga concludes with recommendations for ministers

On Brexit: the outcome of UK elections next May to be based on false promises?

UK keeps its Brexit plan secret or there is no strategy at all whatsoever?

Spirit unlimited

A silent killer: the impact of a changing climate on health

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

Dealing with stress among healthcare professionals: are we missing the elephant in the room?

Tackling Youth Unemployment

Germany tries to save Europe from war between Ukraine and Russia

What are the real targets of EU’s efforts to fight tax evasion?

NEC @ MWC14: “Smart cities” hold the key to enhancing citizens’ lives and cutting costs

Education and Training: where do we stand in 2014?

Sochi not far away from Ukraine

A Young entrepreneur cries out: “start in Europe, stay in Europe”

A Sting Exclusive: “Youth voice must be heard in climate change negotiations!”, Bérénice Jond Board Member of European Youth Forum demands from Brussels

Half of Eurozone in deflation expecting salvation from monetary measures

Alice in Colombia

Presentation of Juncker’s Investment Plan: Can 315 billion euros save the EU?

The EU slams Theresa May’s Brexit option; sets base for own European defense, security platform

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s