Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The teaching of Palliative Care for future health professionals and its inclusion in Universal Coverage Health

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: 195 countries adopt the First Universal Climate Agreement

SPB TV @ MWC14: The TV of the Future

Shaping the Conference on the Future of Europe

Unemployment is down across the world’s largest economies

Khashoggi murder trials must public and meet international standards, UN expert urges

Afghanistan: EU reinforces humanitarian support with €40 million as crisis worsens

Several crises in one: what effects will COVID-19 have on the global risk landscape?

These countries are all building brand-new cities

Coronavirus is creating retirement insecurity. These 10 steps can diffuse the timebomb of an ageing population

Lessons from dealing with the collapse of Lehman Brothers

Even in the world’s richest countries, kids might not have what they need to learn at home

Challenges facing the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns

5 ways to boost sustainable trade in the world’s poorest countries

COVID-19 and indigenous peoples in Brazil: a neglected population and the importance of the vaccine

Syria’s Idlib ‘on the brink’ of a nightmare, humanitarian chiefs warn, launching global solidarity campaign

7 steps to make electricity systems more resilient to climate risks

Z, V or ‘Nike swoosh’ – what shape will the COVID-19 recession take?

How AI is shaping financial services

Deadly swine fever threatens Asia, UN agriculture agency warns, urging regional collaboration

Reading this alone? Recent surveys reveal the curious truth about loneliness

OECD survey reveals many people unhappy with public services and benefits

The ethical dilemmas of medicine

Girls still being treated as aliens in medicine in the 21st century

MEPs call for the protection of fundamental values in the EU and worldwide

6 women of history who shaped the world, from a Hawaiian queen to a Chinese empress

Asylum Seeker Accommodation and Mental Health

Around 600,000 Afghan children face death through malnutrition without emergency funds: UNICEF

10 expert predictions for the next decade in Chinese AI

Developed and developing financial markets are more similar than you think. Here’s why

Von der Leyen on Europe Day: What does Europe mean to me and why is solidarity more valid than ever

The EU prepares for the end of LIBOR: the Commission welcomes the agreement reached between the European Parliament and the Council on financial benchmarks

Multilateralism must weather ‘challenges of today and tomorrow’ Guterres tells Paris Peace Forum

China-EU Trade and Economic Relations in Numbers

Parliament boosts consumer rights online and offline

If this is Globalization 4.0, what were the other three?

Towards a stronger and more resilient Schengen area

Dreaming of China

Germany and Europe prepare for Trump’s America

As Alan Turing makes the £50 note, how do countries design their currencies?

Is continuous sanctioning the way to resolve the Ukrainian crisis?

EU Summit/Migration: Parliament calls for joint solutions based on solidarity

FROM THE FIELD: Free tutorials in Mali, ‘a life-saver’ for Fatouma

Why forensic science is in crisis and how we can fix it

Commission’s feeble response to financial benchmarks fraud

How the US should react to the pandemic, according to Bill Gates

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights marks its 10th anniversary

Here are three ways Africa’s youth are defeating corruption

daniela-runchi-jade-president__

A Sting Exclusive: “Education in Europe, fostering skills development inside and outside the school system”

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

Europe divided: 30 years on from the fall of the Berlin Wall

What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

UN launches new fund to advance sustainable development in Aral Sea region

COP21 Breaking News_09 December: List of Recent Climate Funding Announcements

Human rights defenders, too often left defenceless themselves – UN expert

Health worker´s empathy and their power to change the world

Eurozone: Inflation plunge to 0.4% in July may trigger cataclysmic developments

UN spotlights digitization of audiovisual archives to preserve human history on World Day

State aid: Commission approves €1.1 billion Polish scheme to further support companies affected by coronavirus outbreak

The feminisation of medicine and persistence of stereotypes

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: