Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Eurogroup: IMF proposes Germany disposes

What will it take for the world’s third-largest economy to empower women?

Latest tragedy in the Mediterranean claims over 100 lives – UN refugee agency

New energy security framework will help meet growing needs in East Africa, sustainably – UN economic wing

The world is too complacent about epidemics. Here’s how to change

Parental leave: why we can’t wait a century for equal rights for women

The Sichuan Province of China presents its cultural treasure to the EU

Make progress or risk redundancy, UN chief warns world disarmament body

State of the Union 2018: The Hour of European Sovereignty

What Ghana can teach us about integrating refugees

UN appeals for international support as flood waters rise in wake of second Mozambique cyclone

‘Continuing absence’ of political solution to Israel-Palestine conflict ‘undermines and compounds’ UN efforts to end wholesale crisis

These technologies are playing a major role at the Cricket World Cup

There are now four competing visions of the internet. How should they be governed?

In tech-driven 21st century, achieving global development goals requires closing digital gender divide

Working together to end the AIDS-HIV pandemic

UN food agency begins ‘last resort’ partial withdrawal of aid to opposition-held Yemeni capital

3 ways to ensure the internet’s future is creative, collaborative and fair

We can’t tell if we’re closing the digital divide without more data

Safer products: stepping up checks and inspections to protect consumers

How transparency can help the global economy to grow

Plastic is a global problem. It’s also a global opportunity

Crowdfunding: what it is and what it may become

Do we really understand the value of independent journalism?

The Sting’s Team

OECD will follow Canadian proceedings addressing allegations of political interference in foreign bribery prosecution

UN calls for funds to ease ‘deteriorating’ humanitarian situation in Gaza and West Bank

The EU Parliament and the ECB unknowingly or unwillingly fail to protect our financial assets

Young activists do the talking as UN marks World Children’s Day

IFMSA and IPSF on the Health of Migrants and Refugees

Do the EU policies on agro-food smell?

How traditional Islamic giving can play a role in the future of aid

For video game addiction, now read official ‘gaming disorder’: World Health Organization

European Court of Justice to Google: It is #righttobeforgotten but not #righttoberemembered

Young people meet in Malta to shape the future of Europe

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Essential services on verge of shutdown in Gaza as emergency fuel set to run out

An American duel in Brussels: Salesforce against Microsoft over Linkedin deal

How solar is powering the Middle East towards renewables

From violence to dialogue: as land conflicts intensify, UN boosts efforts to resolve disputes through mediation

G20 LIVE: Fact Sheet from the G20 Leaders Summit and key outcomes (G20 Antalya 2015 Summary)

Trump beats Clinton but Americans will learn the hard way that the US can’t change with an election

How drones can help rural Africa take flight

It’s time for cybersecurity to go pro bono

Reducing disaster risk is a good investment, and ‘the right thing to do’, says Guterres

Commission launches debate on more efficient decision-making in EU social policy

Facility for Refugees in Turkey: €127 million to boost EU’s largest ever humanitarian programme

€200 million to promote European agri-food products in and outside the EU

Eurozone plans return to growth

THE ROAD TO GANESHA

Barriers to healthcare: are they real?

Treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons marks first anniversary, but still lacks sufficient numbers to become law

How UN cultural treasures helped set the stage for Game of Thrones

EU-Singapore free trade deal gets green light in Trade Committee

Starbucks and FIAT again under Commission’s microscope: is Europe ready to kick multinationals out of the house?

India can soar in the robot age. This is how

UN Security Council urged to act against ‘worst-case scenario’ Syria’s war-battered Idlib

Draghi’s 2018 compromise: enough money printing to revive inflation and check euro ascent

Draghi cuts the Gordian knot of the Banking Union

EU commits €9 million in humanitarian aid for the most vulnerable families in Myanmar

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s