The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Photo taken outside the House of Commons on 20 June 2016. Hundreds of people have showed their sorrow and paid tribute to the tragic loss of Jo Cox's life. This photo was taken by the European Sting during its London coverage of the EU referendum (The European Sting, 20/06/2016)

A European Sting Photo taken outside the House of Commons on 20 June 2016. Hundreds of people have showed their sorrow and paid tribute to the tragic loss of Jo Cox’s life. This photo was taken by the European Sting during the newspaper’s London coverage of the EU referendum (The European Sting, 20/06/2016)

The International Monetary Fund last Friday published what will most likely remain its most detailed analysis on a “Brexit” scenario, calling the impact of Britain’s departure from the European Union “negative and substantial”. With only two days to go until the referendum, it is clear more than ever that the economic field now is where the toughest match is being played to convince voters. However, the real impact of such a history-changing move might be only quantified in the years to come.

IMF study

After having promised for a long time its official estimates on a possible Brexit, the IMF last Friday used its annual report on the British economy to weigh the impact of the June 23 vote. Despite still keeping an often claimed “neutral” position on the matter, the IMF leaves no doubt: an exit from the EU would see no economic advantage for British economy, and would only drag the country into uncertainty as a first effect.

A decision by UK voters to exit the EU would subsequently kick off negotiations between the UK and the rest of the EU over the terms of its withdrawal and over the details of its future relationship with the Union. “The UK would likewise need to renegotiate trade relationships with the 60 non-EU economies where trade is currently governed by EU agreements”, the official IMF statement claimed.

This negotiations, according to the IMF, could drag on for years, leading to a period of heightened uncertainty and risk aversion, which in turn would discourage consumption and investment and roil financial markets. “In the long run, most formal assessments agree that the UK would be worse off economically if it were to leave the EU”, IMF officers explained, “as higher trade and financial barriers would lead to lower output and incomes”.

Impact quantified

The IMF explored the potential impact of uncertainty on UK growth during the post-Brexit transition in two different scenarios, referred to as the “limited scenario” and the “adverse scenario”. In the limited scenario, in which uncertainty is relatively moderate and the UK is assumed to negotiate a status similar to what exists between Norway and the EU, output falls by 1.4 percent by 2019 (compared to the baseline case in which the UK remains in the EU). In the adverse scenario of long negotiations and a default to the trade rules of the World Trade Organization, Britain would fall into recession in 2017 and its GDP would plunge by 5.6 percent by 2019, again compared to the baseline case in which the UK remains in the EU.

So in both cases, the IMF findings show that a Brexit would seriously hit British living standards and would anyway have negative impact on macro-economic indicators and employment. “The longer this uncertainty persists, and the less advantageous the outcome of trade negotiations for the UK, the larger are these short- and medium-run costs”, the IMF underscored in its statement. The adverse scenario presented by the IMF of course is not considering the possibility that Britain would secure a trade deal quickly, and that the level of investments and consumer spending would only be limited for a short period – something already experienced during the recent global economic crisis. This is indeed something that a few analysts believe it could happen, as reported by the Economist.

IMF Chief’s words

In a speech in Vienna, IMF Chief Christine Lagarde underlined the importance of a victory of the “remain” vote towards economic benefits. “We have already been on record that the economic risks of leaving are firmly to the downside”, Lagarde said. “There is a clear case as to how the UK has benefited and will continue to benefit from its membership in the European Union”.

“Being part of the EU has greatly aided the transformation of the U.K. into a dynamic and vibrant economy”, Madame Lagarde added. “The U.K. has benefited from the many contributions of talented and hard-working migrants from all over the world, including the EU, while providing record-high levels of employment for all its residents”, she declared.

Brexit backers’ point

There’s also those who believe a Brexit would not throw Britain into recession though. Responding to the latest IMF remarks, Matthew Elliott, chief executive of Vote Leave declared that Mr. Lagarde openly decided to forego any mention to possible positive results a Brexit would give. “The IMF has chosen to ignore the positive benefits of leaving the EU and instead focused only on the supposed negatives”, the Guardian quoted Mr. Elliott as saying. “If we vote leave, we can create 300,000 jobs by doing trade deals with fast growing economies across the globe. We can stop sending the £350m we pay Brussels every week. That is why it is safer to vote leave.”

A group of eight well known economists have released a report under the banner of “Economists for Brexit”, explaining how they think leaving the EU would be even good for the UK economy. They predict that, in 2020, the UK economy would grow 3.4% if the UK left the EU, while it would grow only 2.5% if the UK remained, as reported by the BBC. The basis of their assumptions is that after leaving the EU, the UK would trade under World Trade Organisation rules and immediately drop all tariffs on imports from everywhere in the world to reduce the prices of products for people in Britain, the BBC explained in a report at the end of April.

Effects on the Stock exchange

However, negative effects on production and consumer spending are not the only risks that a Britain outside of the EU would have to face. The impacts on Stock Markets, with effects on currencies and possible shockwaves through the global economy, are reported to be consistent. The Bank of England made it clear just one day before the report by the IMF was published: the risk for the pound sterling are real. According to the latest studies by the BOE, indeed, a vote to leave the EU in the referendum would push the pound “sharply lower”.

“In the weeks since the ‘May Report’, an increasing range of financial asset prices has become more sensitive to market perceptions of the likely outcome of the forthcoming EU referendum”, the BOE explained last Thursday in its latest Monetary Policy Summary. “On the evidence of the recent behaviour of the foreign exchange market, it appears increasingly likely that, were the UK to vote to leave the EU, sterling’s exchange rate would fall further, perhaps sharply”, the BOE statement said.

Pound Sterling to fall “sharply”

According to Economist Intelligence Unit, which is part of the Economist Group, the situation would be even worse: the pound would fall 14-15% against the US dollar in the course of this year, and the UK would even risk losing its status as a global financial centre. The pound has already weakened during this tough run to the vote: last Thursday, Sterling fell throughout the afternoon, down around 1.3% against the dollar to $1.4016, but gained ground in late trading to $1.4152. The decision by the BOE to keep interest rates at their record low of 0.5%, with also claims of a Brexit as “the biggest immediate risk to UK financial markets”, say how much BOE officials are worried.

Headaches in America

The Bank of England is not the only one to be suffering from unrest. American businesses are indeed currently weighing possible impacts of a Brexit, and the feelings around those studies are not idyllic. In a recent analysis, the Washington Post calls the possible effects of the UK leaving the 28-country bloc as a threat “to more than a trillion dollars in investment and trade with the United States”. The United States represent indeed the largest single investor in Britain, and the stars-and-stripes press, including the prestigious Washington-based paper, is already counting down risks. Most of US firms indeed believe that a Brexit would jeopardize their access to those markets, as Britain is currently seen as the main gateway to the EU. The Washington Post supposes many US firms would potentially consider relocating their European operations elsewhere.

Facing the unpredictable

All in all, the truth is that no one knows what a leave vote would bring, and nor can anyone measure it. The shockwaves that such a life-changing moment would generate, given the unique nature of it, are truly unpredictable. The world has learnt during the global financial crisis that began in 2008 that is barely impossible to analyse the effects of such enormous potential economic revolutions. While challenged by the BBC on whether there would be a problem with the predictions by the IMF and a possible lack of credibility, IMF Chief Lagarde said that some of them may be right while some other may be wrong. “But when all of them except one particular institution… are heading in the same direction, I think it’s compelling”.

Emanuel Adam, head of policy and trade for BritishAmerican Business, while interviewed by the Washington Post last week said: “Nobody knows at this point how the world would look like with the UK out of the EU”.

“This alone creates an uncertainty that businesses don’t wish to see”, he added, and rather hit a bull’s eye like that.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN chief condemns explosion at election rally in Zimbabwe that injured dozens, including senior politicians

Drawing scenarios for drifting Britain; elections or May’s deadlock?

Africa is helping the drone industry get off the ground. Here’s how

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

We dream of being a part of the European family, says FYROM PM

The global appetite for meat is growing, and it’s harming the planet

Innovation for a smarter world: ITU Telecom World 2018

UN relief chief urges Security Council to back aid delivery, more funding for millions of Syrians hit by harsh weather

UN experts urge India to align new anti-trafficking bill with human rights law

This is how people in Europe are helping lead the energy charge

A refugee from Syria cries out: “I’m not just a number!”

South Sudan: ‘Horrific acts’ by government may constitute ‘war crimes’ says UN, demanding justice

No improvement in respect for EU values: MEPs cut support for Turkey by €70m

How trade wars pose a threat to the global economy

Primary Healthcare vs Specialization Careers, how to promote PHC to the Young Health Workforce?

Scores of Rohingya refugee shelters in Bangladesh destroyed by flooding

Traditional knowledge at ‘core’ of indigenous heritage, and ‘must be protected’, says UN Forum

Political power of women suffering ‘serious regression’, General Assembly President warns

Seaweed, enzymes and compostable cups: Can ‘Big Food’ take on plastic and win?

Chile ups foreign bribery enforcement but flawed case resolutions are insufficient to ensure transparency and accountability

Migrant children at US border have right to protection and ‘be with their families’: UNICEF chief

Afghanistan: UN mission welcomes new polling dates following election delays

Conflict prevention, mediation: among ‘most important tools’ to reduce human suffering, Guterres tells Security Council

Cryptocurrency mining could become the new face of energy storage. Here’s how

Five-year low inflation for Eurozone and now Mario has to finally wake up the Germans

Africa Forum aims to boost business, reduce costs, help countries trade out of poverty

Draghi cuts the Gordian knot of the Banking Union

Drinking coffee could help you live longer, research finds

Draghi to hold on zero interest rates until he leaves ECB

How tech companies compare at protecting your digital rights

Access to health in the developping world

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

Can the EU afford a trade war with China?

Youth for Climate Change

EU gas market: new rules agreed will also cover gas pipelines entering the EU

Gaza probe finds ‘reasonable grounds’ Israeli forces committed international human rights violations

Trump and Brexit: After the social whys the political whereto

As human caravan moves through Mexico, ‘full respect’ needed for national control of borders: UN chief

DR Congo elections: ‘historic opportunity’ for ‘peaceful transfer of power’ says Security Council

5 ways Denmark is preparing for the future of work

How will the NATO-EU competition evolve in the post Brexit era?

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

EUREKA @ European Business Summit 2014: A European patent system can help European businesses lead industrial research and innovation on a global scale

UN rights office calls for action to end ‘repression and retaliation’ in crisis-torn Nicaragua

New rules for temporary border controls within the Schengen area

UN experts report: Business ‘dragging its feet’ on human rights worldwide

Heat-resistant crops, ‘green’ infrastructure, can prepare Near East and North Africa to better tackle droughts – UN agency

The big five EU telecom operators in dire straights

Batteries included: how better storage can transform renewable energy

LIFE Programme: Member States to benefit from quarter of a billion euros of investments in environment, nature and climate action

‘Informing is not a crime’ UN chief calls for better protection of journalists, press freedom

Alexis Tsipras against internal and external “enemies” in pursue of a two-phase deal now

EU and China resolve amicably solar panel trade dispute

Why rich countries are seeing more poverty

Europe enters uncharted waters with Kiev-Moscow standoff

More state aid to big firms, no special provisions for the SMEs

Angola’s President João Lourenço calls for stronger EU-Africa cooperation

Human rights chief calls for international probe on Venezuela, following ‘shocking accounts of extrajudicial killings’

UN urges ‘restraint’ in Bangladesh’s post-presidential election violence

Algorithms are being used to convict criminals and decide jail time. We need to make sure they are fair

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s