Jo Cox’s murderer believed the ‘leave’ campaign leaders that the ‘remain’ vote is treason

Jo Cox, photographed here in her maiden speech in the House of Commons, was elected to represent the constituency of Batley and Spen in the 2015 General Election. She was a member of the Communities and Local Government Select Committee of the House of Commons from July 2015 until March 2016. (House of Commons audiovisual services, http://www.parliament.uk).

Jo Cox, photographed here in her maiden speech in the House of Commons, was elected in the 2015 General Election with the Labour Party to represent the constituency of Batley and Spen (West Yorkshire, UK). She was a member of the Communities and Local Government Select Committee of the House of Commons from July 2015 until March 2016. (House of Commons audiovisual services, http://www.parliament.uk).

The assassination of Jo Cox, the Labour Party MP who actively and candidly campaigned for Britain to remain in the European Union, can change the balance between the ‘remain’ and the ‘leave’ vote in Thursday’s referendum. Analysts are sensing that the murder of a solid and amiable advocate of ‘remain’ may reverse the surprising strengthening of the ‘leave’ side during the past two weeks, in a confrontation that has gone rampant in many respects.

Sadly enough, it took a life to change that, obliging those who have pushed the confrontation beyond limits to calm down. We will see here below who has crossed the line. In any case, the assassination of Cox has repercussions also on financial markets, strengthening the Sterling and pushing up the prices of bonds. Market analysts arrived to the conclusion that the murder of Cox can raise the chances for the ‘remain’ vote to win the referendum of 23 June. Let’s start from the beginning.

How the ‘leave’ got the lead

Until last Thursday afternoon, when Cox was slain, the ‘leave’ campaign had a lead in polls. This development was the outcome of an operation organized by the ‘leave’ supporters, who had managed to make ‘chauvinism’ their prime banner, having pushed the economy in second place. Obviously, the ‘leave’ has disadvantages in the economic side. Undoubtedly, the economic uncertainty which would certainly follow a possible ‘leave’ outcome, gives the ‘remain’ campaign a very strong point.

The idea that Brexit advocates ‘sold’ then was that Britain shouldn’t participate in a club, where Germany sets the rules, hiding the fact that Britain can veto every single EU decision. It is thus by making ‘patriotism’ the main issue, the leave supporters managed to gain the lead.

It took a life to stop Brexit

It took a life of a prominent member of the ‘remain’ campaign to reverse Brexit’s lead. The murderer is a mentally unstable chauvinist, who shouted “Britain first” when slaying Cox. It’s a queer revelation to find out, that when scratching the skin of an ultra-patriot usually appears a crook or a mentally disturbed person. The assassin is described as a peaceful person without strong convictions, clearly making his kind of ‘patriotism’ a matter of psychotherapy.

The problem is, however, that the Brexit campaign, with its jingoistic banner for a ‘Free Britain’ energized the sick part in the psyche of the murderer. There is more to it though. The Brexit campaign focused on casting doubt on the patriotism of the ‘remain’ side, using the argument of the ‘German Europe’. As if Britain hasn’t gained over the past decades a very special position in the EU or has lost its power to veto all and every legislative item.

Is Britain a free country?

This quite untrue argument however, captivated the simple mind of Thomas Mair. His extreme right, the rather fascist ideology and his brutal thoughts against the representatives of the ‘remain’ side were greatly supported by ‘authoritative’ people, like the leadership of the Brexit campaign. In reality, their decision to turn the confrontation into a patriotism contest actually armed the hand of the murderer.

The deep conviction of the murderer that he committed a patriotic act by murdering a supporter of the ‘remain’ side was confirmed in court, where he said his name was: “death to traitors, freedom to Britain”. In some respect he was right, because a part of the British establishment “told” him that Britain is not a free country, by being part of ‘German Europe’. In short, the murderer of Jo Cox believed what the ‘leave’ leaders propagated about, that Britain is not a free country. It would be a logical conclusion then that the leave leaders should be charged as abettors to murder.

It appears that the atrocious act of the murderer is not a completely personal affair. His decision, from a political point of view, and even as a psychotic episode, was nurtured by a part of the British establishment, which is the most extreme right and jingoistic group of the conservatives, Nigel Farage’s UKIP included of course.

When Europe was divided

In many respects, the same thing was happening during both world wars. Those who pushed their countries to commence the WWI and WWII carnages belonged to the more jingoistic and aggressive part of the political establishment. Those groups tend to favour divisions in Europe, so that they can maintain their especial position within national borders.

Regrettably, this is the way history is written, when a mishap can change the balance at the limit, between two equally possible outcomes. It’s not the first time though this is happening in Europe, when nationalism blackens logic. The catastrophic two world wars of the last century were in some respects, an outcome of a deplorable ‘patriotic duty’ mind-set. Consenting that Europe cannot be united clearly means division and confrontation.

Christopher Clark, professor of Modern History at Cambridge, in his famous book ‘The Sleepwalkers”, about “How Europe went to war in 1914”, implies by this title that this devastating conflict, which led to a global catastrophe, the WWI, could have been avoided.

The carnage that followed the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary can be considered as an accident on a political platform which could have led either way. Unfortunately, in 1914 it was the nationalistic side that prevailed. It would have been the same in today’s Britain, if it wasn’t for Jo Cox to pay with her life the possible reverse from ‘leave’ to ‘remain’.

The adult Brits to decide

It’s up to the adult Brits then to make the final decision on the crucial matter of dividing or keeping Europe united. In 1914 it was a handful of men in power, who drove the world to the most atrocious confrontation, which lasted for twenty years. WWII in many respects was the continuation of WWI.

If the result of the 23 June vote is a cataclysmic ‘leave’, it will again be the entire Old Continent and the whole world to bear the consequences, of a decision taken by around half of the British adults. Again, the decision of the few will have irrevocable effects on many, because hundreds of millions of people in Europe and the rest of the globe would be affected rather badly, if Britain votes to leave the EU.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Cameron’s “No Brexit” campaign wins top business support as Tory front breaks

Seaweed, enzymes and compostable cups: Can ‘Big Food’ take on plastic and win?

A new European banking space is born this year

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

Low quality healthcare is increasing the burden of illness and health costs globally

Can the US deal a blow to EU and Russia together over Ukraine?

Do men and women really have different leadership styles?

The German banks first to profit from public subsidies of trillions

How leaders can use ‘agile governance’ to drive tech and win trust

Right2Water initiative: Is the Commission ready to listen to citizens?

Removing sweets from supermarket checkouts could help fight obesity

EU budget: Commission proposes to increase funding to support the environment and climate action

EU-China relations under investigation?

UN Security Council urged to act against ‘worst-case scenario’ Syria’s war-battered Idlib

Costa Coffee products (Copyright: Costa Coffee; Source: Costa Coffee website, Press area)

The start of the “Caffeine rush”: Coca-Cola acquires Costa Coffee days after Nestlé-Starbucks deal

‘Time is of the essence’ for refugees on Greek islands – UN agency

The JADE Spring Conference 2017 is casting its shadows before

EU Migrant Crisis: Italian Coast Guard Headquarters and Italian Navy to give host national opening addresses at Border Security 2016 in Rome

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Launch of CREWS, climate risk & early warning systems

Feeding families remains complex task in war-torn Syria – UN relief agency

FROM THE FIELD: How the smell of fresh bread transformed one refugee life

ECB: The bastion of effective and equitable Europeanism keeps up quantitative easing

High-technology manufacturing saves the EU industry

EU: The Member States to pay for national banking problems

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

Is deflation a real danger for Eurozone?

To Brexit, or not to Brexit…rather not: 10 Downing Street, London

A Sting Exclusive: “Delivering on the Environmental Dimension of the new Sustainable Development Agenda”, Ulf Björnholm underscores from UNEP Brussels

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

Saudi Arabia: UN experts push for prompt release of women human rights defenders

Finally an answer to the hottest question of European youth today: How to make sure Juncker’s Investment Plan works for youth

UN gender agency hails record-breaking number of women in new US Congress as ‘historic victory’

MEPs to vote on overhaul of road transport rules in July

YO!FEST ENGAGES 8,000 YOUNG EUROPEANS IN FUTURE OF EU

Youth2030: UN chief launches bold new strategy for young people ‘to lead’

Parliament compromises on Banking Union but sends market abusers to jail

The succesful cooperation

Polish PM chooses to focus on economy, amid questions on rule of law in Poland

Education and Training: where do we stand in 2014?

What makes America the world’s most competitive economy?

Sustainability, peace, security ‘best guarantee against instability’ Guterres to Security Council

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

G20 LIVE: World Leaders in Turkey for G20 Summit. Global Economy will be discussed in Antalya

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

The US bugged Europe: Is this news?

EU should promote immigration as a humanitarian issue in order to provide a more permanent solution

The European Parliament fails to really restrict the rating agencies

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

Cyber defence: MEPs call for better European cooperation

Is Eurozone heading for disinflation?

The US + Britain trivialize mainland Europe, NATO and the EU

5G mobile is nearly here – but we should share networks to make it affordable

Women’s rights in Asia – how far have we come?

Trying to cure bank cancer with analgesics

Migration Crisis: how to open the borders and make way for the uprooted

Data show EU Economy in a stubbornly subdued state

MEPs propose more transparent legislative drafting and use of allowances

The next EU President will first have to drink his tea at Downing Street

European Union: From financial consolidation to deeper political division

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s