Coronavirus has shown us why we urgently need to make a basic income a reality

poverty homeless

(Jonathan Kho, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Guy Standing, Research Professor in Development Studies, University of London

  • COVID-19 could tip our fragile economic system into a depression.
  • Means testing benefits creates a poverty trap discouraging people from taking work.
  • A basic income would increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available.

Having advocated and tested it for over three decades, I have always regarded basic income as mainly justifiable for ethical reasons, for a good society, although the economy could survive without it. Now, in this pandemic, the economy will not survive without it.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Kimmy Bettinger

To understand why, we must appreciate that the oncoming slump was waiting to happen, because the global economic system had become uniquely fragile. It had become rentier capitalism, not free market capitalism, disproportionately benefiting those living on income from property or investments.

Reforms that began in the 1980s under the influence of the Mont Pelerin Society and the Chicago School of Law and Economics created opportunities for powerful interests to erect an institutional system whereby more and more of the income flowed to the owners of assets – physical, financial and so-called intellectual.

A well-known result was that the labour share in national income fell, globally, while a new class structure emerged, with a plutocracy holding obscene wealth and enormous economic and political power, and with a rapidly growing ‘precariat’ enduring bits-and-pieces lives, surviving insecurely on the edge of unsustainable debt.

Labour’s share of income has continued its decline in recent years
Image: ILO

In 1942, William Beveridge produced a report that shaped the postwar era, in which he said the challenge was to slay five Giants – Disease, Idleness, Ignorance, Squalor and Want. I believe that today the combination of rentier capitalism, a technological revolution and rampant globalisation has created eight modern Giants – Inequality, Insecurity, Debt, Stress, Precarity, Automation, Extinction and Neo-Fascist Populism. One could call coronavirus the ninth Giant or the trigger that tips a fragile global system into potential depression.

An analogy is the Spanish flu of 100 years ago. It resulted in over 40 million deaths globally. But, while there was a recession, it was nothing compared with what is coming now. In 1920, the rising economic superpower, the US, was able to bounce back because it had inbuilt resilience. Private debt was less than 50% of GDP, corporate debt was insignificant, finance was not domineering.

By contrast, before the coronavirus pandemic hit, US private debt was over 150% of GDP, corporate debt 73%, and finance accounted for 350% of GDP. Moreover, most of the big corporations were locked in global supply chains, in which disruptions at any point could be expected to disrupt the whole. This was an incredibly fragile economic system.

Even a small recession in such circumstances would have spiralling negative effects. This is not a small one. Many millions of people will be unable to service their debts, resulting in mass homelessness, social illnesses, violence and worse, while numerous corporations and small businesses will become insolvent.

Support for Universal Basic Income in the US, UK and Canada
Support for universal basic income was high even before coronavirus.

We have seen the bail-out take off, with new fancy monetary instruments coming to the fore. A danger is that we will see an attempted repeat of the post-2008 strategy of Quantitative Easing coupled with fiscal austerity, with cuts to public social spending that has left all OECD countries disgracefully ill-prepared for the rescue phase of the pandemic. Inequalities will be intensified and other Giants will be strengthened.

Ultimately, this is the biggest demand shock in modern history. That is where basic income comes into the equation, moving from desirable to essential. After years of intellectual loneliness, basic income is today finding converts and open advocates from across the political spectrum. We must hope that will result in more politicians showing some backbone in this debate.

It will be important to take account of the lessons learned through pilots and other experiments. The design does matter a lot. A basic income is the payment of a modest amount in cash or the equivalent, paid to individuals, not households, which are structured so that vulnerable members could easily be disadvantaged. Individualized gender equality matters at all times.

They are not lump-sum capital payments. That is a mistake being made in several countries. These have several disadvantages, including a “weakness-of-will” effect, inducing a gambling mentality of spending it all in one go, leaving the person vulnerable in the next phase. Regular modest payments induce gradual improving behaviour and capabilities. In our pilots, we have seen how.

The basic income should be quasi-universal. It should not be called a universal basic income, because for pragmatic reasons it would have to apply only to usual legal residents, not to citizens living abroad or to recent migrants, for otherwise it could lead to a flood of migration and to xenophobic opposition. This is not a call to omit help for migrants and refugees. They should be helped by other schemes, and by more than they have been.

A basic income system should be designed in such a way that everybody has equal basic security, or equal command over subsistence resources. This means that all those with extra costs of living and diminished earnings capacity, such as those with disabilities or frailties, should be provided with supplements that in effect give them a basic income equal to everybody else.

The basic income must not be means-tested. Targeted schemes directed at the poor are superficially attractive for those who know little about social policy. But there is an adage attributed to Richard Titmuss that benefits that are only for the poor are invariably poor benefits. Targeting requires means-testing, which in turn implies that an impoverished person who tries to raise their earned income faces a poverty trap, losing benefits, in many cases leaving them worse off it they take a low-wage job. This is economic illiteracy. And research all over the world shows that every means-tested benefit involves high exclusion errors, in which large numbers of those who should receive the benefits do not do so. Advocates of means-testing should face up to that once and for all.

Crucially, a basic income system should be a source of abiding basic security, that is, be guaranteed and non-withdrawable. In that regard, governments would be well-advised to make it clear that it would be paid monthly for at least the duration of the pandemic and recession. That security is psychologically important. It is one reason for not using the language of “helicopter money”. Another is that this conveys an image of fluttering banknotes dropping to where the fittest would grab them first.

Finally, a basic income system could be an automatic macro-economic stabiliser, as old-style welfare schemes were supposed to be. That is, the amount could be adjusted by an independent commission according to the depth of the recession or strength of economic recovery.

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the coronavirus outbreak?

A new strain of Coronavirus, COVID 19, is spreading around the world, causing deaths and major disruption to the global economy.

Responding to this crisis requires global cooperation among governments, international organizations and the business community, which is at the centre of the World Economic Forum’s mission as the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum has created the COVID Action Platform, a global platform to convene the business community for collective action, protect people’s livelihoods and facilitate business continuity, and mobilize support for the COVID-19 response. The platform is created with the support of the World Health Organization and is open to all businesses and industry groups, as well as other stakeholders, aiming to integrate and inform joint action.

As an organization, the Forum has a track record of supporting efforts to contain epidemics. In 2017, at our Annual Meeting, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) was launched – bringing together experts from government, business, health, academia and civil society to accelerate the development of vaccines. CEPI is currently supporting the race to develop a vaccine against this strand of the coronavirus.

A basic income, while it must be only one of a bundle of remedial policies, is much more sensible economically and socially than the alternative being implemented by some countries, namely providing substantial wage subsidies. These will be chaotic to administer, inefficient, disgracefully regressive, and involve perverse economic incentives. If an employee is given 75% or 80% of his wages on condition that he does no work, that is obviously a disincentive to do any work. It too is economic illiteracy. And what moral principle is served in having the state gifting a high-income earner five or more times as much as a low-paid member of the precariat? That is what they are doing.

By contrast with subsidies that trap people in what may be dead jobs, and means-tested benefits that put people in poverty traps, a basic income would actually increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available, because the person would merely pay the standard rate of tax on any earned income and not face a poverty trap of what in most countries is 80% or more for low-income people going from benefits to the sort of low-wage jobs they could obtain.

In sum, a basic income could provide the demand for basic goods and services the economy will need and give people and their communities the resilience we will all need. And the beauty is in the tail. It will make it easier and more rewarding to use our time more in caring for others, for those we love and for the communities we should wish to rebuild.

We may even find that by reducing inequality and insecurity, it will also help us confront the existential threat of global warming and ecological decay. That is the promise, if we have the courage.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Sustainable Development Summit: ‘We must step up our efforts – now’, Guterres declares

Why is the World Health Organisation so much needed?

Parliament calls on EU Commission to step up action against dangerous chemicals

If airlines were a country they’d be one of the world’s top 10 greenhouse gas emitters

‘Essential step’ towards universal health care made at pivotal UN conference

The deforestation risks lurking in the banking sector

Tech can reach the world’s unbanked women – but only if they tell us how it should work

Tax and fiscal policies central to governments’ responses to Covid-19 crisis

The eight types of AI you should know about

144 years on, Universal Postal Union meets to define its 21st Century role

Can alternatives to rhino horn save these gentle giants?

It will take a lot more than free menstrual pads to end period poverty

A Valentine’s Special: we can never overdose on love

European Accessibility Act: Parliament and Council negotiators strike a deal

ECB’s €1.14 trillion again unifies Eurozone; Germany approves sovereign debt risks to be pooled

Mobility in 2020: a female perspective

SDGs and the historical and economic impact on Brazilian health

Rapid action needed for people to meet challenges of changing world of work

An expert explains: How to turn industrial carbon emissions into building materials

Quelling antimicrobial resistance: a clinico-pharmacological exigency

Autumn 2018 Economic Forecast: sustained but less dynamic growth amid high uncertainty

Future EU-UK Partnership: European Commission receives mandate to begin negotiations with the UK

Drugs cost too much. There is a better way to fund medical innovation

What can the private sector do to alleviate the refugee crisis?

What’s behind South Korea’s elderly crime wave?

‘Eden bonds’: how rewilding could save the climate and your pension

Pesticides: MEPs propose blueprint to improve EU approval procedure

7 innovative projects making cities more sustainable

UN launches new project to address link between terrorism, arms and crime

Mood changes in Europe in favour of growth and jobs

Peru should help more young vulnerable people into work

Climate change will shrink these economies fastest

The eighth round of TTIP negotiations concludes in Brussels amid scepticism and new fears

The ethical dilemmas of medicine

It’s time to fulfil the promises made to women 25 years ago

Security Union: political agreement on strengthened Schengen Information System

Why did Cameron gain absolute majority? What will he do now? Will he vote ‘yes’ in Britain’s in – out EU referendum?

New Zealand has unveiled its first ‘well-being’ budget

One-third of young people still optimistic despite COVID’s dramatic hit on education and jobs

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

Obese people more likely to smoke, says new gene research: WHO

Statement by Cecilia Malmström, Member of the EC in charge of Trade, on the successful conclusion of the final discussions on the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) – Brussels, 08 Dec 2017. (Copyright: European Union; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Georges Boulougouris)

The EU and Japan seal free trade pact that will cover 30% of global GDP

UN relief official in Yemen condemns ‘horrific’ attack on passenger buses

Brexit is happening now but the UK hasn’t really assessed the impact of a “no-deal” divorce

Frans Timmermans on the European Green Deal as a growth strategy at the Bruegel Annual Meetings

West Bank: ‘imminent’ demolition of Palestinian village could be ‘war crime’ – ICC Prosecutor

American women are 50% more likely to die in childbirth than their mothers

Security Council unanimously agrees to extend UN Cyprus Mission amid political impasse

UN chief pays tribute to ‘enduring contributions’ to regional, international diplomacy of Oman’s late Sultan Qaboos

How the powerful science of behaviour change can make us healthier

“Hasta la vista” Google says to Spain and now Europe is next?

Draghi strives to control the unruly exploitation of financial markets by banking leviathans

Contact the Sting

If this is Globalization 4.0, what were the other three?

Why a cash-free future might not be as close as you think

UN launches innovative programme to detect and disrupt terrorist travel

Eurozone’s credibility rock solid

EU and China seize momentum to enhance trade agreements in response to Trump’s administration

Afghan refugees: €21 million in humanitarian aid for host communities and vulnerable populations in Pakistan and Iran

Amazon, a pair of shoes and my Data Privacy walks away

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s