Coronavirus has shown us why we urgently need to make a basic income a reality

poverty homeless

(Jonathan Kho, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Guy Standing, Research Professor in Development Studies, University of London

  • COVID-19 could tip our fragile economic system into a depression.
  • Means testing benefits creates a poverty trap discouraging people from taking work.
  • A basic income would increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available.

Having advocated and tested it for over three decades, I have always regarded basic income as mainly justifiable for ethical reasons, for a good society, although the economy could survive without it. Now, in this pandemic, the economy will not survive without it.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Kimmy Bettinger

To understand why, we must appreciate that the oncoming slump was waiting to happen, because the global economic system had become uniquely fragile. It had become rentier capitalism, not free market capitalism, disproportionately benefiting those living on income from property or investments.

Reforms that began in the 1980s under the influence of the Mont Pelerin Society and the Chicago School of Law and Economics created opportunities for powerful interests to erect an institutional system whereby more and more of the income flowed to the owners of assets – physical, financial and so-called intellectual.

A well-known result was that the labour share in national income fell, globally, while a new class structure emerged, with a plutocracy holding obscene wealth and enormous economic and political power, and with a rapidly growing ‘precariat’ enduring bits-and-pieces lives, surviving insecurely on the edge of unsustainable debt.

Labour’s share of income has continued its decline in recent years
Image: ILO

In 1942, William Beveridge produced a report that shaped the postwar era, in which he said the challenge was to slay five Giants – Disease, Idleness, Ignorance, Squalor and Want. I believe that today the combination of rentier capitalism, a technological revolution and rampant globalisation has created eight modern Giants – Inequality, Insecurity, Debt, Stress, Precarity, Automation, Extinction and Neo-Fascist Populism. One could call coronavirus the ninth Giant or the trigger that tips a fragile global system into potential depression.

An analogy is the Spanish flu of 100 years ago. It resulted in over 40 million deaths globally. But, while there was a recession, it was nothing compared with what is coming now. In 1920, the rising economic superpower, the US, was able to bounce back because it had inbuilt resilience. Private debt was less than 50% of GDP, corporate debt was insignificant, finance was not domineering.

By contrast, before the coronavirus pandemic hit, US private debt was over 150% of GDP, corporate debt 73%, and finance accounted for 350% of GDP. Moreover, most of the big corporations were locked in global supply chains, in which disruptions at any point could be expected to disrupt the whole. This was an incredibly fragile economic system.

Even a small recession in such circumstances would have spiralling negative effects. This is not a small one. Many millions of people will be unable to service their debts, resulting in mass homelessness, social illnesses, violence and worse, while numerous corporations and small businesses will become insolvent.

Support for Universal Basic Income in the US, UK and Canada
Support for universal basic income was high even before coronavirus.

We have seen the bail-out take off, with new fancy monetary instruments coming to the fore. A danger is that we will see an attempted repeat of the post-2008 strategy of Quantitative Easing coupled with fiscal austerity, with cuts to public social spending that has left all OECD countries disgracefully ill-prepared for the rescue phase of the pandemic. Inequalities will be intensified and other Giants will be strengthened.

Ultimately, this is the biggest demand shock in modern history. That is where basic income comes into the equation, moving from desirable to essential. After years of intellectual loneliness, basic income is today finding converts and open advocates from across the political spectrum. We must hope that will result in more politicians showing some backbone in this debate.

It will be important to take account of the lessons learned through pilots and other experiments. The design does matter a lot. A basic income is the payment of a modest amount in cash or the equivalent, paid to individuals, not households, which are structured so that vulnerable members could easily be disadvantaged. Individualized gender equality matters at all times.

They are not lump-sum capital payments. That is a mistake being made in several countries. These have several disadvantages, including a “weakness-of-will” effect, inducing a gambling mentality of spending it all in one go, leaving the person vulnerable in the next phase. Regular modest payments induce gradual improving behaviour and capabilities. In our pilots, we have seen how.

The basic income should be quasi-universal. It should not be called a universal basic income, because for pragmatic reasons it would have to apply only to usual legal residents, not to citizens living abroad or to recent migrants, for otherwise it could lead to a flood of migration and to xenophobic opposition. This is not a call to omit help for migrants and refugees. They should be helped by other schemes, and by more than they have been.

A basic income system should be designed in such a way that everybody has equal basic security, or equal command over subsistence resources. This means that all those with extra costs of living and diminished earnings capacity, such as those with disabilities or frailties, should be provided with supplements that in effect give them a basic income equal to everybody else.

The basic income must not be means-tested. Targeted schemes directed at the poor are superficially attractive for those who know little about social policy. But there is an adage attributed to Richard Titmuss that benefits that are only for the poor are invariably poor benefits. Targeting requires means-testing, which in turn implies that an impoverished person who tries to raise their earned income faces a poverty trap, losing benefits, in many cases leaving them worse off it they take a low-wage job. This is economic illiteracy. And research all over the world shows that every means-tested benefit involves high exclusion errors, in which large numbers of those who should receive the benefits do not do so. Advocates of means-testing should face up to that once and for all.

Crucially, a basic income system should be a source of abiding basic security, that is, be guaranteed and non-withdrawable. In that regard, governments would be well-advised to make it clear that it would be paid monthly for at least the duration of the pandemic and recession. That security is psychologically important. It is one reason for not using the language of “helicopter money”. Another is that this conveys an image of fluttering banknotes dropping to where the fittest would grab them first.

Finally, a basic income system could be an automatic macro-economic stabiliser, as old-style welfare schemes were supposed to be. That is, the amount could be adjusted by an independent commission according to the depth of the recession or strength of economic recovery.

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the coronavirus outbreak?

A new strain of Coronavirus, COVID 19, is spreading around the world, causing deaths and major disruption to the global economy.

Responding to this crisis requires global cooperation among governments, international organizations and the business community, which is at the centre of the World Economic Forum’s mission as the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum has created the COVID Action Platform, a global platform to convene the business community for collective action, protect people’s livelihoods and facilitate business continuity, and mobilize support for the COVID-19 response. The platform is created with the support of the World Health Organization and is open to all businesses and industry groups, as well as other stakeholders, aiming to integrate and inform joint action.

As an organization, the Forum has a track record of supporting efforts to contain epidemics. In 2017, at our Annual Meeting, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) was launched – bringing together experts from government, business, health, academia and civil society to accelerate the development of vaccines. CEPI is currently supporting the race to develop a vaccine against this strand of the coronavirus.

A basic income, while it must be only one of a bundle of remedial policies, is much more sensible economically and socially than the alternative being implemented by some countries, namely providing substantial wage subsidies. These will be chaotic to administer, inefficient, disgracefully regressive, and involve perverse economic incentives. If an employee is given 75% or 80% of his wages on condition that he does no work, that is obviously a disincentive to do any work. It too is economic illiteracy. And what moral principle is served in having the state gifting a high-income earner five or more times as much as a low-paid member of the precariat? That is what they are doing.

By contrast with subsidies that trap people in what may be dead jobs, and means-tested benefits that put people in poverty traps, a basic income would actually increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available, because the person would merely pay the standard rate of tax on any earned income and not face a poverty trap of what in most countries is 80% or more for low-income people going from benefits to the sort of low-wage jobs they could obtain.

In sum, a basic income could provide the demand for basic goods and services the economy will need and give people and their communities the resilience we will all need. And the beauty is in the tail. It will make it easier and more rewarding to use our time more in caring for others, for those we love and for the communities we should wish to rebuild.

We may even find that by reducing inequality and insecurity, it will also help us confront the existential threat of global warming and ecological decay. That is the promise, if we have the courage.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Italian electoral results to change Eurozone climate and weight on the Cyprus issue

5G in Russia: a local and global view on the way forward, in association with The European Sting

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Safeguarding civilians, strengthening Ebola response in DR Congo, marking Fistula Day, updates on CAR and Syria

Stateless Rohingya refugee children living in ‘untenable situation’, UNICEF chief

London to say hello or goodbye to Brussels this week

EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa: new actions of almost €150 million to tackle human smuggling, protect vulnerable people and stabilise communities in North Africa

The crunch ‘COP 24’ UN climate change conference: what’s at stake and what you need to know

How digital entrepreneurs will help shape the world after the COVID-19 pandemic

2019: An unpredictable, confrontational and financially ominous year

ITU Telecom World 2019 will take place on 9-12 September in Budapest, Hungary

Is Europe ready to cooperate with the rest of the world? Can Germany change its selfish policies?

We can meet the SDGs using the wisdom of crowds. Here’s how

Draghi repels Trump’s threats, rejects Schauble’s dictums

China is a renewable energy champion. But it’s time for a new approach

Societies must unite against ‘global crisis of antisemitic hatred’, Guterres urges

4 lessons on human cooperation from the fight against Ebola

REACT-EU: EU support to mitigate immediate effects of the COVID-19 crisis

Trade war or not New York bankers will have it their way

How Africa and Asia are joining forces on universal healthcare

Devastating storms like Hurricane Florence ‘unusual this far north’: UN weather agency

Commission launches new edition of the Cultural and Creative Cities Monitor 2019

Finland has giant supermarkets that only stock second-hand goods

EU trade agreements deliver on growth and jobs, support sustainable development

From ‘strength to strength’ UN-African Union security partnership growing, Security Council hears

Why it’s time to take central banks’ digital currencies seriously

Brexit may finally not really happen; The Brits have second thoughts

Coronavirus (COVID-19) update: Busting the myth by looking at the facts

The Ecofin deceives the SMEs with the EIB €10bn capital increase

‘Embrace the transformation’ to a carbon-neutral world by 2050, UN chief tells COP25

Removing sweets from supermarket checkouts could help fight obesity

Aid funding for Occupied Palestinian Territories at ‘all-time low’

4 innovative renewable energy projects powering Europe’s green future

‘Cataclysmic events’ in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, began ‘global push’ against nuclear weapons says Guterres, honouring victims

Female African coders ‘on the front-line of the battle’ to change gender power relations: UN chief

US and China in painstaking efforts to conclude trade talks

Horse meat runs faster than authorities…

If a virus could sing … Could this musical version of COVID-19 help us defeat the disease?

Compensation for damages by the State for infringement of EU law: the European Commission refers Spain to the Court of Justice for its rules on the compensation for damages incurred by private parties

Amid pandemic detours, mental health matters

How to make primary healthcare a favourable career choice for medical students: Strategies and reflections

Brexit: MEPs concerned over reported UK registration plans for EU27 citizens

5 amazing people fighting to save the oceans

Eurozone’s north-south growth gap to become structural

Lithuania should find its own way in the EU

Children are forgetting the names for plants and animals

How to promote Primary Healthcare to the Young Healthcare Workforce?

UN and partners call for solidarity, as Venezuelans on the move reach 4.5 million

What the COVID-19 pandemic teaches us about cybersecurity – and how to prepare for the inevitable global cyberattack

Will the three major parties retain control of the new EU Parliament?

5 surprising ways digital technology is changing childhood

The story of 2018, in 10 charts

3 ways AI will change the nature of cyber attacks

Celebrating Gaston Ramon – the vet who discovered vaccinology’s secret weapon

India’s economy is an ‘elephant that is starting to run’, according to the IMF

State aid: Commission approves €9 billion Italian “umbrella” scheme to support economy in coronavirus outbreak

What options the new President of Ukraine has?

Negotiated two-State solution still ‘the only option’ for Palestine: Guterres

Some endangered languages manage to thrive. Here’s how

Meet the woman prescribing books as a cure

What does ‘excess deaths’ mean – and can it give a clearer picture of the number of coronavirus fatalities?

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s