Coronavirus has shown us why we urgently need to make a basic income a reality

poverty homeless

(Jonathan Kho, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Guy Standing, Research Professor in Development Studies, University of London

  • COVID-19 could tip our fragile economic system into a depression.
  • Means testing benefits creates a poverty trap discouraging people from taking work.
  • A basic income would increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available.

Having advocated and tested it for over three decades, I have always regarded basic income as mainly justifiable for ethical reasons, for a good society, although the economy could survive without it. Now, in this pandemic, the economy will not survive without it.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Kimmy Bettinger

To understand why, we must appreciate that the oncoming slump was waiting to happen, because the global economic system had become uniquely fragile. It had become rentier capitalism, not free market capitalism, disproportionately benefiting those living on income from property or investments.

Reforms that began in the 1980s under the influence of the Mont Pelerin Society and the Chicago School of Law and Economics created opportunities for powerful interests to erect an institutional system whereby more and more of the income flowed to the owners of assets – physical, financial and so-called intellectual.

A well-known result was that the labour share in national income fell, globally, while a new class structure emerged, with a plutocracy holding obscene wealth and enormous economic and political power, and with a rapidly growing ‘precariat’ enduring bits-and-pieces lives, surviving insecurely on the edge of unsustainable debt.

Labour’s share of income has continued its decline in recent years
Image: ILO

In 1942, William Beveridge produced a report that shaped the postwar era, in which he said the challenge was to slay five Giants – Disease, Idleness, Ignorance, Squalor and Want. I believe that today the combination of rentier capitalism, a technological revolution and rampant globalisation has created eight modern Giants – Inequality, Insecurity, Debt, Stress, Precarity, Automation, Extinction and Neo-Fascist Populism. One could call coronavirus the ninth Giant or the trigger that tips a fragile global system into potential depression.

An analogy is the Spanish flu of 100 years ago. It resulted in over 40 million deaths globally. But, while there was a recession, it was nothing compared with what is coming now. In 1920, the rising economic superpower, the US, was able to bounce back because it had inbuilt resilience. Private debt was less than 50% of GDP, corporate debt was insignificant, finance was not domineering.

By contrast, before the coronavirus pandemic hit, US private debt was over 150% of GDP, corporate debt 73%, and finance accounted for 350% of GDP. Moreover, most of the big corporations were locked in global supply chains, in which disruptions at any point could be expected to disrupt the whole. This was an incredibly fragile economic system.

Even a small recession in such circumstances would have spiralling negative effects. This is not a small one. Many millions of people will be unable to service their debts, resulting in mass homelessness, social illnesses, violence and worse, while numerous corporations and small businesses will become insolvent.

Support for Universal Basic Income in the US, UK and Canada
Support for universal basic income was high even before coronavirus.

We have seen the bail-out take off, with new fancy monetary instruments coming to the fore. A danger is that we will see an attempted repeat of the post-2008 strategy of Quantitative Easing coupled with fiscal austerity, with cuts to public social spending that has left all OECD countries disgracefully ill-prepared for the rescue phase of the pandemic. Inequalities will be intensified and other Giants will be strengthened.

Ultimately, this is the biggest demand shock in modern history. That is where basic income comes into the equation, moving from desirable to essential. After years of intellectual loneliness, basic income is today finding converts and open advocates from across the political spectrum. We must hope that will result in more politicians showing some backbone in this debate.

It will be important to take account of the lessons learned through pilots and other experiments. The design does matter a lot. A basic income is the payment of a modest amount in cash or the equivalent, paid to individuals, not households, which are structured so that vulnerable members could easily be disadvantaged. Individualized gender equality matters at all times.

They are not lump-sum capital payments. That is a mistake being made in several countries. These have several disadvantages, including a “weakness-of-will” effect, inducing a gambling mentality of spending it all in one go, leaving the person vulnerable in the next phase. Regular modest payments induce gradual improving behaviour and capabilities. In our pilots, we have seen how.

The basic income should be quasi-universal. It should not be called a universal basic income, because for pragmatic reasons it would have to apply only to usual legal residents, not to citizens living abroad or to recent migrants, for otherwise it could lead to a flood of migration and to xenophobic opposition. This is not a call to omit help for migrants and refugees. They should be helped by other schemes, and by more than they have been.

A basic income system should be designed in such a way that everybody has equal basic security, or equal command over subsistence resources. This means that all those with extra costs of living and diminished earnings capacity, such as those with disabilities or frailties, should be provided with supplements that in effect give them a basic income equal to everybody else.

The basic income must not be means-tested. Targeted schemes directed at the poor are superficially attractive for those who know little about social policy. But there is an adage attributed to Richard Titmuss that benefits that are only for the poor are invariably poor benefits. Targeting requires means-testing, which in turn implies that an impoverished person who tries to raise their earned income faces a poverty trap, losing benefits, in many cases leaving them worse off it they take a low-wage job. This is economic illiteracy. And research all over the world shows that every means-tested benefit involves high exclusion errors, in which large numbers of those who should receive the benefits do not do so. Advocates of means-testing should face up to that once and for all.

Crucially, a basic income system should be a source of abiding basic security, that is, be guaranteed and non-withdrawable. In that regard, governments would be well-advised to make it clear that it would be paid monthly for at least the duration of the pandemic and recession. That security is psychologically important. It is one reason for not using the language of “helicopter money”. Another is that this conveys an image of fluttering banknotes dropping to where the fittest would grab them first.

Finally, a basic income system could be an automatic macro-economic stabiliser, as old-style welfare schemes were supposed to be. That is, the amount could be adjusted by an independent commission according to the depth of the recession or strength of economic recovery.

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the coronavirus outbreak?

A new strain of Coronavirus, COVID 19, is spreading around the world, causing deaths and major disruption to the global economy.

Responding to this crisis requires global cooperation among governments, international organizations and the business community, which is at the centre of the World Economic Forum’s mission as the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum has created the COVID Action Platform, a global platform to convene the business community for collective action, protect people’s livelihoods and facilitate business continuity, and mobilize support for the COVID-19 response. The platform is created with the support of the World Health Organization and is open to all businesses and industry groups, as well as other stakeholders, aiming to integrate and inform joint action.

As an organization, the Forum has a track record of supporting efforts to contain epidemics. In 2017, at our Annual Meeting, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) was launched – bringing together experts from government, business, health, academia and civil society to accelerate the development of vaccines. CEPI is currently supporting the race to develop a vaccine against this strand of the coronavirus.

A basic income, while it must be only one of a bundle of remedial policies, is much more sensible economically and socially than the alternative being implemented by some countries, namely providing substantial wage subsidies. These will be chaotic to administer, inefficient, disgracefully regressive, and involve perverse economic incentives. If an employee is given 75% or 80% of his wages on condition that he does no work, that is obviously a disincentive to do any work. It too is economic illiteracy. And what moral principle is served in having the state gifting a high-income earner five or more times as much as a low-paid member of the precariat? That is what they are doing.

By contrast with subsidies that trap people in what may be dead jobs, and means-tested benefits that put people in poverty traps, a basic income would actually increase the incentive to take whatever jobs become available, because the person would merely pay the standard rate of tax on any earned income and not face a poverty trap of what in most countries is 80% or more for low-income people going from benefits to the sort of low-wage jobs they could obtain.

In sum, a basic income could provide the demand for basic goods and services the economy will need and give people and their communities the resilience we will all need. And the beauty is in the tail. It will make it easier and more rewarding to use our time more in caring for others, for those we love and for the communities we should wish to rebuild.

We may even find that by reducing inequality and insecurity, it will also help us confront the existential threat of global warming and ecological decay. That is the promise, if we have the courage.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Migration has set EU’s political clock ticking; the stagnating economy cannot help it and Turkey doesn’t cooperate

South Asia can become an innovation hub. Here’s how

Why a global recession isn’t inevitable

What does artificial intelligence do in medicine?

The benefits of a cashless society

Japan must urgently address long-standing concerns over foreign bribery enforcement

Coronavirus: Commission proposes to activate fiscal framework’s general escape clause to respond to pandemic

A Valentine’s Special: giving back, a dialogue of love

If on a summer’s night: is UK businesses’ “new deal” the only key to the “best of all worlds”?

World Retail Congress Dubai 2016: Retail’s night of nights

Virus Coronavirus: No time to die

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

Palestine refugees’ relief chief warns Security Council money to fund Gaza operations will run out in mid-June

Africa-Europe Alliance: Four new financial guarantees worth €216 million signed under the EU External Investment Plan

European Junior Enterprises to address the significant skills mismatch in the EU between school and employment

What happiness can teach us about how we measure human development

Celebrities are helping the UK’s schoolchildren learn during lockdown

Taking fast road to ‘e-mobility’ central to a sustainable future: COP24

US-China trade war is a ‘lose-lose’ situation for them and the world, warn UN economists

This digital currency could build a more sustainable global economy

UN relief chief urges Security Council to back aid delivery, more funding for millions of Syrians hit by harsh weather

EU to finance new investment projects with extra borrowing; French and Italian deficits to be tolerated

Could the fourth wave of globalization help to end epidemics?

EU adopts rebalancing measures in reaction to US steel and aluminium tariffs

UN chief welcomes start of Church-mediated national dialogue in Nicaragua

It’s time for global businesses to accept local responsibility

WHO working to save lives following powerful earthquake in Albania

Parliament demands ban on neo-fascist and neo-Nazi groups in the EU

We won’t win the online security war without people power

Grave concern over escalating humanitarian crisis, casualties, displacement across northwest Syria: UN

Banks can fight financial crime. But we can’t do it alone

China-EU Summit on 16-17 July 2018: “Work together to address common challenges”, by China’s Ambassador to the EU

Juncker Plan exceeds original €315 billion investment target

Rising inequality affecting more than two-thirds of the globe, but it’s not inevitable: new UN report

25 years on from genocide against the Tutsi, UN Chief warns of ‘dangerous trends of rising xenophobia, racism and intolerance’

How cities, not states, can solve the world’s biggest problems

Mergers: Commission prohibits proposed merger between Tata Steel and ThyssenKrupp

Microplastics have been found in Rocky Mountain rainwater

Mali: Two peacekeepers dead after dawn attack, several injured – UN Mission

Russia and the West to partition Ukraine?

RescEU: MEPs vote to upgrade EU civil protection capacity

Professional practices of primary health care for Brazilian health and gender inequality

Universities need strategic leadership. Here’s what it looks like

The health of the human being in coexistence with a transformative biosphere

Voices of Afghan women ‘must be heard at the table in the peace process and beyond’ UN deputy chief tells Security Council

Managing and resolving conflicts in a politically inclined group of team members

Telemedicine and the Brazilian reality

UN’s Grandi slams ‘toxic language of politics’ aimed at refugees, migrants

G20 to Germany: Abandon miser policies

German elections: Is Merkel losing ground or Shultz is winning?

EU paves the way for a stronger, more ambitious partnership with Africa

‘An unprecedented fiscal response’ – political and business leaders on managing the coronavirus crisis

Urgent action needed to address growing opioid crisis

I have a rare disease. This is my hope for the future of medicine

Bill Gates’ top 10 breakthrough technologies of 2019

Eurobarometer: protecting human rights tops citizens’ list of EU values

Global aid appeal targets more than 93 million most in need next year

Help prevent children ‘from becoming victims in the first place’, implores Guterres at campaign launch

Don’t let the virus quarantine your mind –Ways to strengthen “Mental” immunity

The developing countries keep the world going

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s