A new roadmap for corporate climate governance

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum. Author: Dominik Breitinger, Project Lead, Climate Governance and Finance, Global Leadership Fellow, World Economic Forum

---

Prompted by extreme weather, calls for corporate climate action have been growing in volume and intensity – from regulators, governments, investors and youth.

Within companies, the board of directors – as the most prominent corporate fiduciaries and ultimately accountable to shareholders – are responsible for overseeing effective management of climate-related impacts. They need to ensure climate risks and opportunities are centrally embedded in company strategy.

To do this effectively, however, directors need the right tools to make the best possible decisions to ensure the long-term resilience of their organizations.

Many – if not most – boardrooms are still grappling with how exactly to frame the risks and opportunities, and embed a viable transition strategy into their business models. In response to growing requests from corporations and investors, the World Economic Forum, in collaboration with PricewaterhouseCoopers, developed a set of climate governance principles. These principles are designed to:

The principles build on the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). They are intended to help boards and senior management consider the quality of climate governance at the organizations they oversee and identify aspects in need of development or enhancement. And they should, ultimately, help companies improve both their climate governance practices as well as their TCFD disclosure guidelines – publicly supported by more than 50% of investors worldwide, who together hold almost $100 trillion of assets under management.

Since the launch of these principles at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos this past January, various non-executive directors have set up national board networks or chapters to systematically roll out and test them. They are sharing good governance practices and challenges across industries and jurisdictions, while engaging with independent subject-matter experts to strengthen their understanding of the issues.

For example, the first director network focused on climate change was established in Italy, hosted by the national association of directors, the NED Community. It organises regular seminars, webinars and conferences, and works closely with its scientific and research partner Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).

In Malaysia, the climate-dedicated director network is hosted by the Institute of Corporate Directors of Malaysia, supported by the Securities Commission Malaysia, Bursa Malaysia. In the UK, the Directors’ Climate Forum “Chapter Zero” is a network of almost 200 directors, hosted by Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge. It organises monthly conferences and workshops and also has a Directors’ Toolkit members can use for self-assessment and to assist their boards as they confront this complex challenge.

Non-executive directors are also advancing this agenda in the Americas, Europe and Australasia – often in partnership with national director associations.

As there is high demand from corporate directors around the globe for further concrete implementation guidance for the principles, the World Economic Forum is deepening and widening the exchange of organized climate-related networks of boards of directors and experts over the coming years.

At the Sustainable Development Impact summit in New York, the World Economic Forum will discuss in depth how to put good climate governance into practice, to support corporate leadership on this crucial journey.

Ultimately, climate change should be part of the governance and stewardship duties of CEOs and directors, in the same way as any other issue prioritised at the board level.

No governance structure will ever control climate change. But a holistic corporate governance architecture will certainly enable a much easier systemic approach to climate risks and opportunities.