Why the Fourth Industrial Revolution could spell more jobs – not fewer

robots1

(Franck V., Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jayant Menon


Ever since Homo erectus carved a piece of stone into a tool, the welfare of humanity has been on the increase. This technological breakthrough led first to the hand axe, and eventually to the iPhone. We have found it convenient to organize the most dramatic period of change between these two inventions – beginning roughly in the year 1760 – into four industrial revolutions.

As each revolution unfolded, dire predictions of massive job losses ensued, increasing each time. The first three are over, and these concerns were clearly misplaced. The number of jobs increased each time, as did living standards and every other social indicator.

McKinsey predicts that 800 million workers could be displaced in 42 countries, or a third of the workforce, because of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). When reminded of the experience with the previous revolutions, the comeback is often that this one is different. Although this has been said at the onset of each revolution, could there be something more to it this time?

 

Disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, blockchain and 3D printing are indeed transforming social, economic and political systems, often in unpredictable ways. The technology itself is difficult to map because its growth rate could be exponential, factorial or higher. It is this unpredictability that is making impact assessments difficult. Difficult – but not impossible.

To begin with, we know that a lot of low-skilled, repetitive jobs are being automated, starting in high-wage countries but quickly spreading to the developing world. And not all high-skilled jobs are immune either.

But are there limits? To answer this question, we need first to understand how work has been transformed, especially with global value chains. Jobs now consist of a bundle of tasks, and this is true for all skill levels. As long as one of the multitude of tasks that a worker performs cannot be technically and economically automated, then that job is probably safe. And there are a lot of jobs like that, although it may not appear so on the surface.

For example, although most tasks performed by waiters can be automated, human interaction is still required. Human hands are also highly complex and scientists have yet to replicate the tactile sensors of animal skin. The robot may deliver your soup, but struggle to place it on your table without spilling it. Apart from what vending machines can dispense, some of the tasks associated with waiting tables will still require humans.

The debate also tends to wrongly focus on gross rather than net jobs, usually unintentionally. But it is the net figure that matters in this debate.

Image: World Economic Forum

For instance, greater automation of production processes will require greater supervision and quality control. Humans will be required to carry out this function. The focus on gross ignores the higher skilled jobs created directly as a result of greater automation.

And as long as the cost of adding more supervisors does not outweigh the savings from automation, the reduction in the price of the final product will spur an increase in demand. If the increase in demand is large enough, it could even expand the number of jobs in factories that automate part, but not all, of their production process. In this case, the automation leads to a net increase in jobs.

A silver lining

There will also be inter-industry effects. Productivity gains from new technology in one industry can lower production costs in others through input–output linkages, contributing to increased demand and employment across industries. Higher demand and more production in one industry raises demand for other industries, and on it goes.

Why, then, the widespread pessimism about the 4IR and jobs?

It could be that it is easier to see how existing jobs may be lost to automation than it is to imagine how new ones may emerge sometime in the future. Simply put, seeing is believing. In a sense, this is like the gross versus net confusion, but separated by time and greater uncertainty.

It is also more sensational to highlight the job-displacing possibilities than the job-creating ones. We also hear more about it because, while the benefits are widely dispersed across the general public through lower prices, the costs are concentrated and can displace low-skilled workers, providing greater incentive to organize and lobby against or complain about the costs.

Furthermore, when there is enough uncertainty, it is generally safer to overstate rather than understate the potential cost to innocent victims of change. All of these factors could combine to explain the unwarranted pessimism over jobs.

But there could be a silver lining to all this negativity. If it leads to greater efforts to reskill and reshape the workforce to better adapt to change, then this is exactly what is required, and there is no overdoing it. Ironically, it could well be this pessimism that produces the preparedness that results in it being misplaced – if not to begin with, then in the end!

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

MEPs propose measures to combat mobbing and sexual harassment

EU Commission: The banks are not obliged to finance the real economy

How much more social deterioration can the EU people endure?

ECB guarantees the liquidity of the Atlantic financial volume

Only the Americans are unhappy with the ceasefire agreement in eastern Ukraine

UN rights chief welcomes new text to protect rights of peasants and other rural workers

Khashoggi case highlights ‘very worrying practice’ of overseas abductions, says UN expert

Security Council urges ‘maximum restraint’ around Gulf region as Iran and United States trade diplomatic blows in New York

Three ways Finland leads the world – and education isn’t one of them

Siemens-Alstom merger: Can Germany and France lobby to circumvent EC’s rejection, against EU consumers’ interests?

Trade barriers: EU removes record number in response to surge in protectionism

G20 LIVE: “United States and Turkey stand in solidarity with France and its people in handing the perpetrators of this crime and bringing them to justice”, US President Barack Obama underlines from G20 in Antalya Turkey

Kazakhstan continues to push for a nuclear-free world

Germany’s strong anti-bribery enforcement against individuals needs to be matched by comparably strong enforcement against companies

Afghanistan: Bring ‘architects’ of latest ‘appalling’ suicide bombing to justice, says deputy UN mission chief

Drones are saving lives in Tanzania’s remote communities

Reusable packaging: 6 benefits beyond sustainability

Finland has giant supermarkets that only stock second-hand goods

Macron leads EU-wide minimum wage call as Merkel, Medvedev warn of global injustice

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

Eurozone: Even good statistics mean deeper recession

Court of Auditors: EU budget money is there to be spent not to create value

International Literacy Day: What you need to know about youth literacy

What does Tsipras have to offer to the rest of Europe? Is it worth an early advance of €10 billion? Berlin sturdily denies it

New Zealand will have a new ‘well-being budget,’ says Jacinda Ardern

Hate speech exacerbating societal, racial tensions with ‘deadly consequences around the world’, say UN experts

Why financial services can kickstart Africa’s digital economy

Where are the charities in the great Artificial Intelligence debate?

Is your smart home as safe as you think?

DPRK reports ‘little progress’ since historic June 2018 summit with US

EU security and defence industry prepares positions for ‘producers’ and ‘customers’

6 facts to know about EU alternative investment funds

European Union supports survivors of sexual violence in conflict

3 unexpected consequences of the US-China trade war

Mergers: Commission approves the acquisition of Flybe by Connect Airways, subject to conditions

EU to give more power to national antitrust authorities in a bid to secure regulatory fines

What is inclusive capitalism, and why does it matter?

Peacekeeping chief highlights challenges facing UN Police

This is how social media giants are helping stop the spread of measles

The EU’s trading partners: US, China and the rest

China has made a shocking food production discovery – electro culture

Did young people just kill television?

Parliament to ask for the suspension of EU-US deal on bank data

New legislation on transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment model in the food chain

When will Eurozone’s unemployment rate stop being Europe’s worst nightmare?

COP21 Breaking News: Paris Pact on Water and Climate Change Adaptation Announced

Earth already has a perfect recycling system. So why not use it?

Drinking water: new plans to improve tap water quality and cut plastic litter

Gaza: deadly violence continues to escalate, top UN officials work to restore calm

Seven trends shaping the future of the mining and metals industry

Why is the EU launching a doomed policy in stopping immigrant waves? What are the real targets?

EU to relocate 40,000 migrants across the bloc: first step of a long due substantial reform?

China hopes EU Commissioner De Gucht drops super anti-dumping tariff on solar panels

Medical students: The need for emigration

Nuclear test ban treaty critical to global collective security – UN chief

Few countries are pricing carbon high enough to meet climate targets

Hollande protects the euro from the attacks of extremists

A shocking new report reveals what we’ve done to the natural world

US cities are going to keep getting hotter

Does research make sense any more? The dire need for new ways to measure success

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s