Why the Fourth Industrial Revolution could spell more jobs – not fewer

robots1

(Franck V., Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jayant Menon


Ever since Homo erectus carved a piece of stone into a tool, the welfare of humanity has been on the increase. This technological breakthrough led first to the hand axe, and eventually to the iPhone. We have found it convenient to organize the most dramatic period of change between these two inventions – beginning roughly in the year 1760 – into four industrial revolutions.

As each revolution unfolded, dire predictions of massive job losses ensued, increasing each time. The first three are over, and these concerns were clearly misplaced. The number of jobs increased each time, as did living standards and every other social indicator.

McKinsey predicts that 800 million workers could be displaced in 42 countries, or a third of the workforce, because of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). When reminded of the experience with the previous revolutions, the comeback is often that this one is different. Although this has been said at the onset of each revolution, could there be something more to it this time?

 

Disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, blockchain and 3D printing are indeed transforming social, economic and political systems, often in unpredictable ways. The technology itself is difficult to map because its growth rate could be exponential, factorial or higher. It is this unpredictability that is making impact assessments difficult. Difficult – but not impossible.

To begin with, we know that a lot of low-skilled, repetitive jobs are being automated, starting in high-wage countries but quickly spreading to the developing world. And not all high-skilled jobs are immune either.

But are there limits? To answer this question, we need first to understand how work has been transformed, especially with global value chains. Jobs now consist of a bundle of tasks, and this is true for all skill levels. As long as one of the multitude of tasks that a worker performs cannot be technically and economically automated, then that job is probably safe. And there are a lot of jobs like that, although it may not appear so on the surface.

For example, although most tasks performed by waiters can be automated, human interaction is still required. Human hands are also highly complex and scientists have yet to replicate the tactile sensors of animal skin. The robot may deliver your soup, but struggle to place it on your table without spilling it. Apart from what vending machines can dispense, some of the tasks associated with waiting tables will still require humans.

The debate also tends to wrongly focus on gross rather than net jobs, usually unintentionally. But it is the net figure that matters in this debate.

Image: World Economic Forum

For instance, greater automation of production processes will require greater supervision and quality control. Humans will be required to carry out this function. The focus on gross ignores the higher skilled jobs created directly as a result of greater automation.

And as long as the cost of adding more supervisors does not outweigh the savings from automation, the reduction in the price of the final product will spur an increase in demand. If the increase in demand is large enough, it could even expand the number of jobs in factories that automate part, but not all, of their production process. In this case, the automation leads to a net increase in jobs.

A silver lining

There will also be inter-industry effects. Productivity gains from new technology in one industry can lower production costs in others through input–output linkages, contributing to increased demand and employment across industries. Higher demand and more production in one industry raises demand for other industries, and on it goes.

Why, then, the widespread pessimism about the 4IR and jobs?

It could be that it is easier to see how existing jobs may be lost to automation than it is to imagine how new ones may emerge sometime in the future. Simply put, seeing is believing. In a sense, this is like the gross versus net confusion, but separated by time and greater uncertainty.

It is also more sensational to highlight the job-displacing possibilities than the job-creating ones. We also hear more about it because, while the benefits are widely dispersed across the general public through lower prices, the costs are concentrated and can displace low-skilled workers, providing greater incentive to organize and lobby against or complain about the costs.

Furthermore, when there is enough uncertainty, it is generally safer to overstate rather than understate the potential cost to innocent victims of change. All of these factors could combine to explain the unwarranted pessimism over jobs.

But there could be a silver lining to all this negativity. If it leads to greater efforts to reskill and reshape the workforce to better adapt to change, then this is exactly what is required, and there is no overdoing it. Ironically, it could well be this pessimism that produces the preparedness that results in it being misplaced – if not to begin with, then in the end!

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

An EU first: youth Ministers debate youth participation in live broadcast

Stronger partnerships with post-conflict countries needed to ensure ‘path towards durable peace’: UN chief

Pollution could be harming every part of your body. Here’s how

The Tears of lovely Memories

COP24: green, gender focus, as UN’s crucial climate change conference gets underway

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is changing how we grow, buy and choose what we eat

The UK to split if May’s hard or no-deal Brexit is pursued

Road to Brexit: the UK seeks early agreement on Data Privacy with the EU

Gas pipeline in the European Union. (Copyright: EU, 2012 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Ferenc Isza)

EU Investment Bank approves € 1.5bn loan for Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)

Parliament wants to suspend EU accession negotiations with Turkey

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

This is how AI in video games will change the future of work

Foreign investment to be screened to protect EU countries’ strategic interests

Why medicine is relevant to the battle against climate change

The Indian case: health policies need to keep pace with public health literacy

People talk less now than during the Cold War, says Merkel at Davos

Our healthcare systems are ailing. Here’s how to make them better

European Union: Retail sales show deep recession

Mental Health: starting with myself

First seat projections for the next European Parliament

The Collapse of the Brazilian Health Care System

This AI outperformed 20 corporate lawyers at legal work

A day in the life of a refugee: the wait

6 ways to drive funding to transform the fashion industry

“A sustainable economy, low-carbon, resource-efficient, resilient and more competitive on the global stage”, EU Commissioner Vella in a Sting Exclusive

American negotiators can’t pay for their trip to Brussels, EU-US trade agreement freezes

$675 million appeal to stop coronavirus in its tracks, as deaths rise

How sustainable infrastructure can help us fight climate change

EU threatens Japan to suspend FTA negotiations if…

250+ senior claims leaders under one roof, exchanging transformation strategy

Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

An expert explains: the digital risks facing our children during COVID-19

Negotiations on Investment Facilitation at the WTO gain support at Davos

Do we have to choose between creating jobs and protecting the climate?

World Television Day celebrates an integral part of modern life

More electric cars on EU roads by 2030

Here are 6 big ideas to help the environment

Brazilian public health system and universality: a forgotten right!

Republic of Korea President proposes DMZ as future ‘peace and cooperation district’ on Peninsula

Corporations must help shape a better world – or risk being left behind

EU fight against tax-evasion and money laundering blocked by Britain

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

We can save our ocean in three steps – if we act now

Inflation down to 0.7%, unemployment up at 12.2%: Bad omens for Eurozone

Here are three ways organizations can prepare for tomorrow’s world

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

Food finally features in the climate debate. Now what?

Draghi left alone with no hope of boosting EU growth as Merkel just focuses on next elections

To Fight the Pandemic, Put Trust and Cooperation Before Politics

Sanctions on Russia to be the biggest unity test at this European Council

A new tidal energy project just hit a major milestone in Scotland

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

3 reasons why civil society is essential to COVID-19 recovery

These clothes grow with your child

COVID-19 sparked an economic crisis ‘like no other’ – but these measures can help now: WHO, IMF

EU and Australia launch talks for a broad trade agreement

How building renovations can speed up the electric vehicle revolution

UN and partners call for solidarity, as Venezuelans on the move reach 4.5 million

Energy: new ambitious targets on renewables and energy efficiency

Is the ECB ready to flood Eurozone with freshly printed money?

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s