The India–U.S. trade dispute and India’s evolving geopolitical role

India US

(Naveed Ahmed, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Samir Saran, President, Observer Research Foundation (ORF)


While the strategic partnership between the United States and India remains robust, some analysts see the relationship as becoming significantly strained if current trade disagreements are not managed properly.

To examine the root causes and the potential longer-term consequences of current tensions, and to consider India’s evolving geopolitical strategy, the World Economic Forum spoke with Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation.

How do you see current trade tensions affecting the long-term relationship between the U.S. and India?

These trade tensions are a manifestation of a bilateral relationship that is maturing in the midst of several interrelated structural transformations in the world order. Two interconnected transformations are particularly relevant to friction in the trade relationship: first, the digitalisation of the global economy and second, the politics of ‘techno-nationalism’.

Around the world, there is disagreement over the governance of data and the role of technology in development and security. Countries are used to conceding sovereign power over the course of decades, through long and hardened negotiations on say, trade and migration.

The explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight

India is no different: one only need look at New Delhi’s gradual embrace of liberal internationalism since 1947. But the explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight.

It would be naive to think that a government of over a billion people will cede the management of its democracy and its all-important services sector to technology companies half way across the world.

This is why data localization, e-commerce, mutual legal assistance, and data protection are the most contested issues between the U.S. and India.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

Both countries are routinely termed “natural allies”, but few acknowledge the fact that the maturation of the democratic system in India as well as the expansion of its economy will follow a trajectory different from that of the United States. Rather than viewing ongoing negotiations as part of a process of self-discovery, as it is of self-preservation, the strategic and business communities in the U.S. and India have been talking past each other.

At issue is a fundamental disagreement about how digital technologies will shape our societies. In the United States, there is a firm belief that Silicon Valley can create value in developing economies like India while protecting human rights and cybersecurity.

The Indian perspective is dramatically different. There is a sense that Indian industry and governance propositions must manage the development and deployment of emerging technologies. The assumption that U.S. firms are able to protect the economic rights and civil liberties of Indian users better than its own government has been proven wrong by some recent events and developments.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

While both states have done well in keeping these tensions from affecting the broader bilateral relationship, the question of the digital economy will only continue to get larger and more consequential.

It is incumbent on the United States to acknowledge that cross-border data flows cannot be seen as an isolated issue – as they must be discussed in the broader context of national growth and development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. India, meanwhile, must articulate its policy preferences clearly and quickly – to begin with it must identify sectors and operations in the digital economy where the market can operate without being worried about arbitrary or capricious policies.

There is currently considerable confusion amongst American lawmakers and businesses – as well as stakeholders across the international community – about India’s digital regime. India has dodged the question of data governance at the WTO, at the G20, and at trade negotiations like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.

The global digital economy will take shape without India if Delhi cannot make up its mind.

As the United States looks to impose stronger sanctions on Iran, what are the implications for India, Iran’s second-largest consumer of oil?

In failing to exempt India from its sanctions regime, the United States is, unfortunately, pursuing short-term interests over long-term gain. It is essential to understand that energy trade between India and Iran is only one aspect of a far more crucial trend: the gradual merger of the Asian and European continents that is underway and is largely being effected by one player: China. At the moment, Eurasia is being defined primarily by China’s geo-economic thrust through its Belt and Road Initiative and the attendant politics riding on Beijing’s tracks and roads.

The ‘Eurasian’ supercontinent is fast emerging as the second geography influencing the future world order alongside the Indo-Pacific maritime system. Trade, infrastructure, energy, migration and security interests are all at play here and rules and frameworks that emerge will infect the entire global system. India must remain relevant in this emergence and its partnerships with Iran, Russia and others in the region will be crucial.

Different approaches to the digital economy are likely to grow and become more significant.

 

The United States’ no-compromise policy on the Iran sanctions is unwittingly undermining India’s ability to compete with China’s propositions in the region. Not only does China continue importing oil from Iran, making the latter even more dependent on Beijing’s economy, it also continues to invest in Iran’s infrastructure. India, meanwhile, will be seen in Tehran as an unreliable partner, given its inability to circumvent the sanctions regimes and to develop the Chabahar port.

There is a real risk that the United States will not only cripple its own ability to shape Eurasia in the pursuit of its confrontation with Iran, but that it will also hinder efforts from countries in the European Union or states like India.

India has long-pursued a policy of “strategic autonomy”. Can you define this approach and explain whether you believe it’s still a realistic option for the future?

Strategic autonomy – developed in the wake of the Cold War – is the successor to the politics of the Non-Alignment Movement that was first established in the mid-1950s. The politics of strategic autonomy were born because the Cold War had ended, India was integrating into the global economy, and the mandarins on Raisina Hill realised that domestic growth and national security necessitated new partnerships and new formats of collaboration. And so, from refusing to “align” with power blocs in a bipolar world, India’s diplomacy would now be “autonomous” from the demands of the U.S.–unipolar world order.

Indian leaders often use the phrase of “strategic autonomy” to justify its defence relationship with Russia, energy trade with Iran and other policy choices that may not conform to the interests of its partners, especially the United States. Each of these relationships allows India to be part of developments where U.S. and other Western “powers” are absent. In this way, India has the opportunity to exert influence, and as India’s economic heft increases in the next ten years, its influence to shape these regimes will be more pronounced.

There is, however, a risk that the Indian government could conflate “strategic autonomy” with “strategic ambiguity”.

Autonomous diplomacy is well and good for minor powers in the international system – those that are compelled to choose between competing regimes.

At a time when rules of globalization and international security are being re-written, ambiguity can be fatal to the defence of a liberal system that has served India well.

India’s self-imagination as a “leading power” – one that is propositional and proactive – involves articulating a set of core interests that must be advanced or protected and identifying partnerships and coalitions that can achieve them. India has work to do here.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Sahel States need international support ‘now more than ever’– UN peacekeeping chief

Mali’s ‘self-defence’ groups must face justice, after deadly intercommunal attacks

How drones can manage the food supply chain and tell you if what you eat is sustainable

Coronavirus: Commission approves new contract for a potential COVID-19 vaccine with Novavax

Trump’s Russian affair spills over and upsets Europe

New forms of work: deal on measures boosting workers’ rights

Hiring is broken. Here’s how to fix it

Except Poland, can climate change also wait until 2021 for the EU Market Stability Reserve to be launched?

UK: Customs Union with EU or a longer delay of Brexit

Here’s how businesses can make the circular economy a reality

A young student discusses the determinants of migration in the European Union

Arlington, USA: kick-off of the fifth round of the EU-US boxing match

Mergers: Commission waives the commitments made by Takeda to obtain clearance of its acquisition of Shire

EU boosts sustainable cocoa production in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Cameroon

The hazards of “heroism” in the time of COVID-19

Working together to end the AIDS-HIV pandemic

Migration crisis update: What are the chances of a fair deal at this EU Summit?

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

Draghi hands over to banks €77.7 billion more

Eurostat confirms a dangerously fast falling inflation in Eurozone

Australian homes are turning to solar power in record numbers

The revenge of the fallen

Bosnia and Herzegovina: EU allocates additional €3.5 million to support vulnerable refugees and migrants

Venezuela: ‘Shocked’ by alleged torture, death of navy captain, UN human rights chief urges ‘in-depth’ investigation

EU budget: Commission helps prepare new Cohesion programmes with Regional Competitiveness Index and Eurobarometer

Bias in AI is a real problem. Here’s what we should do about it

The digital building blocks of better communities

Border management: Commission welcomes political agreement towards making European Travel Information and Authorisation System operational

Electronic cigarettes – The alternative we’ve been looking for?

FROM THE FIELD: Balancing act for Philippines farmers

How Bangladesh’s leaders should respond to the economic threats of COVID-19

How to ensure fair AI throughout the supply chain

Commission launches the Fit for Future Platform and invites experts to join

Nigeria: Armed conflict continues to uproot thousands, driving up humanitarian need

Continue reforms to make growth work for all in Spain

Here’s how to rebut the climate doom-mongers

Quarantine: A mental health guide for every mood

Rule of law: First Annual Report on the Rule of Law situation across the European Union

Further reforms can foster more inclusive labour markets in The Netherlands

‘Education transforms lives’ says UN chief on first-ever International Day

Vienna has the world’s best quality of living

Primary Care: a way to provide Palliative Care in Universal Health Coverage

Team Europe: Digital4Development Hub launched to help shape a fair digital future across the globe

Deal reached on EU fund to help regions and businesses adapt to Brexit

More women and girls needed in the sciences to solve world’s biggest challenges

It is impossible to end HIV without SRHR

Europe led by Germany seems vulnerable to Trump’s threats

Work to make the world a better place: 5 things you need to know about ‘green jobs’

The right approach to addressing overcapacity problem from a Chinese perspective

Central Asia: the European Union matches political commitment with further concrete support

Plans to keep EU budget funding in 2020 in the event of a no-deal Brexit

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “If we do not do properly the Paris agreement, then all 16 remaining goals will be undermined”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon cautions from Davos

MWC 2016 LIVE: Gamelab founder talks Apple TV, VR and monetisation

SPB TV @ MWC14: The TV of the Future

ILO and EIB join forces for more and better quality employment

Rural women a ‘powerful force’ for global climate action: UN Secretary-General

Click and Download: your app is ready to help you save lives

Uzbekistan wins its long fight against malaria, as global rates continue to rise

State aid: Commission approves €73 million of Italian support to compensate Alitalia for further damages suffered due to coronavirus outbreak

EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s