The India–U.S. trade dispute and India’s evolving geopolitical role

India US

(Naveed Ahmed, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Samir Saran, President, Observer Research Foundation (ORF)


While the strategic partnership between the United States and India remains robust, some analysts see the relationship as becoming significantly strained if current trade disagreements are not managed properly.

To examine the root causes and the potential longer-term consequences of current tensions, and to consider India’s evolving geopolitical strategy, the World Economic Forum spoke with Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation.

How do you see current trade tensions affecting the long-term relationship between the U.S. and India?

These trade tensions are a manifestation of a bilateral relationship that is maturing in the midst of several interrelated structural transformations in the world order. Two interconnected transformations are particularly relevant to friction in the trade relationship: first, the digitalisation of the global economy and second, the politics of ‘techno-nationalism’.

Around the world, there is disagreement over the governance of data and the role of technology in development and security. Countries are used to conceding sovereign power over the course of decades, through long and hardened negotiations on say, trade and migration.

The explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight

India is no different: one only need look at New Delhi’s gradual embrace of liberal internationalism since 1947. But the explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight.

It would be naive to think that a government of over a billion people will cede the management of its democracy and its all-important services sector to technology companies half way across the world.

This is why data localization, e-commerce, mutual legal assistance, and data protection are the most contested issues between the U.S. and India.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

Both countries are routinely termed “natural allies”, but few acknowledge the fact that the maturation of the democratic system in India as well as the expansion of its economy will follow a trajectory different from that of the United States. Rather than viewing ongoing negotiations as part of a process of self-discovery, as it is of self-preservation, the strategic and business communities in the U.S. and India have been talking past each other.

At issue is a fundamental disagreement about how digital technologies will shape our societies. In the United States, there is a firm belief that Silicon Valley can create value in developing economies like India while protecting human rights and cybersecurity.

The Indian perspective is dramatically different. There is a sense that Indian industry and governance propositions must manage the development and deployment of emerging technologies. The assumption that U.S. firms are able to protect the economic rights and civil liberties of Indian users better than its own government has been proven wrong by some recent events and developments.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

While both states have done well in keeping these tensions from affecting the broader bilateral relationship, the question of the digital economy will only continue to get larger and more consequential.

It is incumbent on the United States to acknowledge that cross-border data flows cannot be seen as an isolated issue – as they must be discussed in the broader context of national growth and development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. India, meanwhile, must articulate its policy preferences clearly and quickly – to begin with it must identify sectors and operations in the digital economy where the market can operate without being worried about arbitrary or capricious policies.

There is currently considerable confusion amongst American lawmakers and businesses – as well as stakeholders across the international community – about India’s digital regime. India has dodged the question of data governance at the WTO, at the G20, and at trade negotiations like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.

The global digital economy will take shape without India if Delhi cannot make up its mind.

As the United States looks to impose stronger sanctions on Iran, what are the implications for India, Iran’s second-largest consumer of oil?

In failing to exempt India from its sanctions regime, the United States is, unfortunately, pursuing short-term interests over long-term gain. It is essential to understand that energy trade between India and Iran is only one aspect of a far more crucial trend: the gradual merger of the Asian and European continents that is underway and is largely being effected by one player: China. At the moment, Eurasia is being defined primarily by China’s geo-economic thrust through its Belt and Road Initiative and the attendant politics riding on Beijing’s tracks and roads.

The ‘Eurasian’ supercontinent is fast emerging as the second geography influencing the future world order alongside the Indo-Pacific maritime system. Trade, infrastructure, energy, migration and security interests are all at play here and rules and frameworks that emerge will infect the entire global system. India must remain relevant in this emergence and its partnerships with Iran, Russia and others in the region will be crucial.

Different approaches to the digital economy are likely to grow and become more significant.

 

The United States’ no-compromise policy on the Iran sanctions is unwittingly undermining India’s ability to compete with China’s propositions in the region. Not only does China continue importing oil from Iran, making the latter even more dependent on Beijing’s economy, it also continues to invest in Iran’s infrastructure. India, meanwhile, will be seen in Tehran as an unreliable partner, given its inability to circumvent the sanctions regimes and to develop the Chabahar port.

There is a real risk that the United States will not only cripple its own ability to shape Eurasia in the pursuit of its confrontation with Iran, but that it will also hinder efforts from countries in the European Union or states like India.

India has long-pursued a policy of “strategic autonomy”. Can you define this approach and explain whether you believe it’s still a realistic option for the future?

Strategic autonomy – developed in the wake of the Cold War – is the successor to the politics of the Non-Alignment Movement that was first established in the mid-1950s. The politics of strategic autonomy were born because the Cold War had ended, India was integrating into the global economy, and the mandarins on Raisina Hill realised that domestic growth and national security necessitated new partnerships and new formats of collaboration. And so, from refusing to “align” with power blocs in a bipolar world, India’s diplomacy would now be “autonomous” from the demands of the U.S.–unipolar world order.

Indian leaders often use the phrase of “strategic autonomy” to justify its defence relationship with Russia, energy trade with Iran and other policy choices that may not conform to the interests of its partners, especially the United States. Each of these relationships allows India to be part of developments where U.S. and other Western “powers” are absent. In this way, India has the opportunity to exert influence, and as India’s economic heft increases in the next ten years, its influence to shape these regimes will be more pronounced.

There is, however, a risk that the Indian government could conflate “strategic autonomy” with “strategic ambiguity”.

Autonomous diplomacy is well and good for minor powers in the international system – those that are compelled to choose between competing regimes.

At a time when rules of globalization and international security are being re-written, ambiguity can be fatal to the defence of a liberal system that has served India well.

India’s self-imagination as a “leading power” – one that is propositional and proactive – involves articulating a set of core interests that must be advanced or protected and identifying partnerships and coalitions that can achieve them. India has work to do here.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The completion of the European Banking Union attracts billions of new capital for Eurozone banks

This company is breeding millions of insects in the heart of London

‘Once lost, hearing doesn’t come back,’ World Health Organization warns on World Hearing Day

Access to health in the developped and developing world

European Commission adopts new list of third countries with weak anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regimes

Does the West play the Syrian game in Egypt?

Who really cares about the 26.2 million of EU jobless?

Senior UN adviser sees ‘rare’ victory for humanitarian diplomacy as aid convoy reaches desert camp in Syria

Macron crowned king of Europe in Washington D.C.; just a working meeting with Trump for Merkel

Rise in violent conflict shows prevention ‘more necessary than ever’: UN chief

Knowledge management and entrepreneurship: short term vs. long term perspective

Making Europe’s businesses future-ready: A new Industrial Strategy for a globally competitive, green and digital Europe

3 ways governments and carmakers can keep up with the future of transport

The Greta effect? Why businesses are more committed to climate action in 2020

The Great Reset requires FinTechs – and FinTechs require a common approach to cybersecurity

How Japan and Singapore are reinventing old age

The Parliament paves the way for the creation of the European Banking Union

Is academia losing its chance to capitalize on technology?

A brief history of vaccines and how they changed the world

We need to change the fast fashion model. Here’s how

End ‘shame, isolation and segregation’ of fistula sufferers, urges UN reproductive health chief

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

On International Day, UN stands in solidarity with some 20 detained staff

How to survive the COVID-19 lockdown with a newborn baby

We won’t win the online security war without people power

‘Millions facing starvation’ – Global political and business leaders on the economic impact of COVID-19

The eight types of AI you should know about

Coronavirus: the truth against the myths

African elephants under continued threat of poaching, warns UN-backed report

Cybersecurity should be a source of hope, not fear. Here are 5 reasons why

2013, a Political Odyssey: What future for Italy?

Investment and Financing under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): EU and Chinese stakeholders share their views at European Business Summit 2018

Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into proposed acquisition of Metallo by Aurubis

Climate action ‘both a priority and a driver of the decade’: Guterres

Who is to pay the dearest price in a global slowdown?

Scientists have created biodegradable microneedles to fight eye disease

Vendor Pulse – 2000

Female African coders ‘on the front-line of the battle’ to change gender power relations: UN chief

Energy Union: Commission calls on Member States to step up ambition in plans to implement Paris agreement

Youth and Participation: are the people rising up in Spain? 


The children’s continent: keeping up with Africa’s growth

EU regional differences betray an unjust arrangement

Better housing means better health and well-being, stress new WHO guidelines

A pandemic of solidarity? This is how people are supporting one another as coronavirus spreads

Q and A on the draft digital copyright directive

The financial war touches Frankfurt and Berlin

Is your smart home as safe as you think?

German banks suffer of nausea amidst rough seas

Financiers can turn the world into a dirty and dangerous place

Tackling the toxic norms that hold women back in Asia

Our children’s career aspirations have nothing in common with the jobs of the future

EU budget: Commission takes steps to make €11.5 billion available for crisis repair and recovery in 2020

How nudge theory can help empty our plastic-filled ‘drawers of shame’

Appalling overall unemployment in Eurozone at 20.6%

The EU finally seizes the opportunity to support the sharing economy?

GSMA Announces Final Event Lineup for Highly Anticipated 2019 “MWC Los Angeles, in Partnership with CTIA”

‘The green economy is the future,’ UN chief says in Beijing, urging climate solutions that strengthen economies, protect the environment

On International Youth Day the European Youth Forum calls for true youth participation

Ensuring the ‘lungs of the planet’ keep us alive: 5 things you need to know about forests and the UN

3 steps to strengthen Europe’s competitiveness in the digital age

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s