The India–U.S. trade dispute and India’s evolving geopolitical role

India US

(Naveed Ahmed, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Samir Saran, President, Observer Research Foundation (ORF)


While the strategic partnership between the United States and India remains robust, some analysts see the relationship as becoming significantly strained if current trade disagreements are not managed properly.

To examine the root causes and the potential longer-term consequences of current tensions, and to consider India’s evolving geopolitical strategy, the World Economic Forum spoke with Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation.

How do you see current trade tensions affecting the long-term relationship between the U.S. and India?

These trade tensions are a manifestation of a bilateral relationship that is maturing in the midst of several interrelated structural transformations in the world order. Two interconnected transformations are particularly relevant to friction in the trade relationship: first, the digitalisation of the global economy and second, the politics of ‘techno-nationalism’.

Around the world, there is disagreement over the governance of data and the role of technology in development and security. Countries are used to conceding sovereign power over the course of decades, through long and hardened negotiations on say, trade and migration.

The explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight

India is no different: one only need look at New Delhi’s gradual embrace of liberal internationalism since 1947. But the explosion of digital platforms has pulled the rug from beneath governments: it has taken away their agency over their populations and businesses overnight.

It would be naive to think that a government of over a billion people will cede the management of its democracy and its all-important services sector to technology companies half way across the world.

This is why data localization, e-commerce, mutual legal assistance, and data protection are the most contested issues between the U.S. and India.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

Both countries are routinely termed “natural allies”, but few acknowledge the fact that the maturation of the democratic system in India as well as the expansion of its economy will follow a trajectory different from that of the United States. Rather than viewing ongoing negotiations as part of a process of self-discovery, as it is of self-preservation, the strategic and business communities in the U.S. and India have been talking past each other.

At issue is a fundamental disagreement about how digital technologies will shape our societies. In the United States, there is a firm belief that Silicon Valley can create value in developing economies like India while protecting human rights and cybersecurity.

The Indian perspective is dramatically different. There is a sense that Indian industry and governance propositions must manage the development and deployment of emerging technologies. The assumption that U.S. firms are able to protect the economic rights and civil liberties of Indian users better than its own government has been proven wrong by some recent events and developments.

Image: Trade At A Crossroads: A Vision for the US–India Trade Relationship, Atlantic Council

While both states have done well in keeping these tensions from affecting the broader bilateral relationship, the question of the digital economy will only continue to get larger and more consequential.

It is incumbent on the United States to acknowledge that cross-border data flows cannot be seen as an isolated issue – as they must be discussed in the broader context of national growth and development in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. India, meanwhile, must articulate its policy preferences clearly and quickly – to begin with it must identify sectors and operations in the digital economy where the market can operate without being worried about arbitrary or capricious policies.

There is currently considerable confusion amongst American lawmakers and businesses – as well as stakeholders across the international community – about India’s digital regime. India has dodged the question of data governance at the WTO, at the G20, and at trade negotiations like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.

The global digital economy will take shape without India if Delhi cannot make up its mind.

As the United States looks to impose stronger sanctions on Iran, what are the implications for India, Iran’s second-largest consumer of oil?

In failing to exempt India from its sanctions regime, the United States is, unfortunately, pursuing short-term interests over long-term gain. It is essential to understand that energy trade between India and Iran is only one aspect of a far more crucial trend: the gradual merger of the Asian and European continents that is underway and is largely being effected by one player: China. At the moment, Eurasia is being defined primarily by China’s geo-economic thrust through its Belt and Road Initiative and the attendant politics riding on Beijing’s tracks and roads.

The ‘Eurasian’ supercontinent is fast emerging as the second geography influencing the future world order alongside the Indo-Pacific maritime system. Trade, infrastructure, energy, migration and security interests are all at play here and rules and frameworks that emerge will infect the entire global system. India must remain relevant in this emergence and its partnerships with Iran, Russia and others in the region will be crucial.

Different approaches to the digital economy are likely to grow and become more significant.

 

The United States’ no-compromise policy on the Iran sanctions is unwittingly undermining India’s ability to compete with China’s propositions in the region. Not only does China continue importing oil from Iran, making the latter even more dependent on Beijing’s economy, it also continues to invest in Iran’s infrastructure. India, meanwhile, will be seen in Tehran as an unreliable partner, given its inability to circumvent the sanctions regimes and to develop the Chabahar port.

There is a real risk that the United States will not only cripple its own ability to shape Eurasia in the pursuit of its confrontation with Iran, but that it will also hinder efforts from countries in the European Union or states like India.

India has long-pursued a policy of “strategic autonomy”. Can you define this approach and explain whether you believe it’s still a realistic option for the future?

Strategic autonomy – developed in the wake of the Cold War – is the successor to the politics of the Non-Alignment Movement that was first established in the mid-1950s. The politics of strategic autonomy were born because the Cold War had ended, India was integrating into the global economy, and the mandarins on Raisina Hill realised that domestic growth and national security necessitated new partnerships and new formats of collaboration. And so, from refusing to “align” with power blocs in a bipolar world, India’s diplomacy would now be “autonomous” from the demands of the U.S.–unipolar world order.

Indian leaders often use the phrase of “strategic autonomy” to justify its defence relationship with Russia, energy trade with Iran and other policy choices that may not conform to the interests of its partners, especially the United States. Each of these relationships allows India to be part of developments where U.S. and other Western “powers” are absent. In this way, India has the opportunity to exert influence, and as India’s economic heft increases in the next ten years, its influence to shape these regimes will be more pronounced.

There is, however, a risk that the Indian government could conflate “strategic autonomy” with “strategic ambiguity”.

Autonomous diplomacy is well and good for minor powers in the international system – those that are compelled to choose between competing regimes.

At a time when rules of globalization and international security are being re-written, ambiguity can be fatal to the defence of a liberal system that has served India well.

India’s self-imagination as a “leading power” – one that is propositional and proactive – involves articulating a set of core interests that must be advanced or protected and identifying partnerships and coalitions that can achieve them. India has work to do here.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Myanmar: New UN envoy offers to serve ‘as a bridge’, recognizes ‘positive steps’ over Rakhine state

EU rewards organisations that make eco-innovation pay

A digital tax sounds like a great idea. Here’s why it might not be universally popular

The third bailout agreement for Greece is a done deal amid European economies full of problems

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

‘Exercise restraint’ Guterres urges Sri Lankans, as political crisis deepens

Low quality healthcare is increasing the burden of illness and health costs globally

LGBTQI+ and health care: do they deserve more attention from medical universities?

vSudan: UN chief calls for ‘positive momentum’ as civilian rule talks stall between military and opposition

Spending on health increase faster than rest of global economy, UN health agency says

Ukraine: Is there a political force able to undo the division?

Hackers are causing blackouts. It’s time to boost our cyber resilience

UN rights chief ‘deeply concerned’ over Jehovah’s Witness sentencing in Russia

Banks and businesses must step up and work together to fight climate change

How to talk to people about mental health – and support one another

German and French bankers looted the Irish and Spanish unemployed

Greening the Belt and Road is essential to our climate’s future

Cameron’s Conservatives and UKIP are exploiting and cultivating anti-EU immigration sentiment but Labour party isn’t?

We can feed the world in a sustainable way, but we need to act now

5 ways to bridge the global health worker shortage

What my transgender child can teach us about the workforce of the future

Why today’s leaders need to know about the power of narratives

Finland, Switzerland and New Zealand lead the way at teaching skills for the future

African economies sustain progress in domestic resource mobilisation

UK voters sent strong message to May and Corbyn for soft Brexit

Macron plans for Europe, Brexit and banks but vague on France

Monday’s Daily Brief: #ClimateAction for the Pacific, Gaza blockade, attack in Burkina Faso

How the diaspora is helping Venezuela’s migration crisis

Clean Mobility: Commission tables proposal on car emissions testing in real driving conditions

Child victims of DRC Ebola outbreak need ‘special attention and care’: UNICEF

From low-earth orbit, ‘envoys’ of humanity join UN space forum

UN chief welcomes prisoner exchange between the Russia and Ukraine

DiscoverEU: 15,000 travel passes up for grabs to explore the EU this summer

Will technology connect or divide us? The challenge for leaders in Globalization 4.0

We probably should go back to the therapy in Primary Healthcare

How cities, not states, can solve the world’s biggest problems

We need to measure innovation better. Here’s how

Getting African Women into the Boardroom

Moving from a promise made in Sweden towards hope for peace in Yemen

Serious concerns over Sahel, require ‘urgent action’: Senior UN Africa official

How to make primary healthcare a favourable career choice for medical students: Strategies and reflections

Eurozone examines the prospect of issuing debt paper jointly

Universal access to energy is a major challenge for the Arab world. Here’s why

Multiprofessional action against the indiscriminate use of antibiotics

Impressions of China

Threat from petty criminals who turn to terrorism, a growing concern, Security Council hears

Britain, EU take edgy steps to unlock Brexit talks as the war of words rages

UN launches new fund to advance sustainable development in Aral Sea region

Threats from mammoth banks and Brussels fuel May’s poll rates

Why carbon capture could be the game-changer the world needs

Make this the year of ‘transformative solutions’ to avert disastrous climate change: UN Deputy Chief

World’s human rights watchdog spotlights Afghanistan, Yemen and 12 others: Here’s the scoop

Trump systematically upsets global order and trade: Where does this end?

Energy Union: EU’s effort towards a cleaner climate with integrated energy market

2013, a Political Odyssey: What future for Italy?

Eurozone: How can 200 banks find €400 billion?

‘Foreign children’ in overwhelmed Syrian camp need urgent international help, says top UN official

Continue ‘their mission’ urges UN chief, as the victims of the Baghdad bombing are remembered, 15 years on

3 autonomous vehicle trends to follow in 2019

What does reimagining our energy system look like?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s