America writes-off Iran, blocks Europe’s Tehran talks

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivers a speech, entitled, “After the Deal: A New Iran Strategy”, at the Heritage Foundation, in Washington, D.C, on May 21, 2018. (From US Department of State Official Blog).

While the European Union and more so Germany have being relentlessly working to save the nuclear non-proliferation deal with Iran, last Monday the new US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, shattered any opening for negotiations with Tehran. Until Pompeo dropped his bombshell, the EU was discussing a new pact with Iran, on the basis of the 2015 P5+1 Agreement, plus some more terms in order to meet the demands of the White House.

Last Sunday Miguel Arias Canete, the European Commissioner for energy was in Tehran and said the government there wanted the 28 nations bloc to take action fast, in order to preserve its oil trade with this country. It seems Pompeo doesn’t leave now any opening for a new agreement with the Islamic Republic under no circumstances. Let’s start from the beginning.

The P5+1 Agreement

To be reminded, in 2015 the so called P5+1 non-nuclear proliferation agreement with Iran was flamboyantly co-signed by the US, France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China. It fore-showed the end of Iran’s nuclear program and the relevant checks and verifications. In return the six powers agreed to lift the two decades old devastating sanctions on Iran. In this way the Islamic Republic gained access to world markets not only for her crude oil sales, but also for the imports of consumer products, technology and more. However, on 8 May the American President Donald Trump pulled the US out from the P5+1 Agreement with Iran and urged the allies of his country to do the same.

The French President Emmanuel Macron, while in a state visit in Washington unsuccessfully tried to change Trump’s mind. Russia and China both denounced Trump’s withdrawal. As for the three European signatory powers Britain, France and Germany, they are more or less united in trying to salvage the Iranian Deal. In more than one way they are still working to either gain exonerations from the new American sanctions like France or otherwise sidestep them as Germany does.

Germany to lose more

The Teutons are the biggest exporters to Iran. Hundreds of big multinationals, medium and small German business are present, invest or plan to do so in Iran. From an economic point of view, Germany is to lose the most, if the country doesn’t find a way to overstep the American sanctions to be soon imposed. The key problem is that in order a German company to be able to continue doing business in Iran, it mustn’t have any contact whatsoever with the US markets, businesses or even American people. The American authorities will be watchful and ready to grab and punish anybody and anything under their jurisdiction, that breaks the sanctions in any indirect or direct way.

Until last Monday the Europeans together with the rest of the world were in consultations with Iran. Their aim is to salvage any parts of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Agreement and possibly widen it, to include the demands of the White House. In this way, the US could drop the new sanctions and undersign a new stronger agreement. In view of that, the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was expected to deliver a statement on what really America demands from Tehran. Alas, the list Pompeo presented last Monday demanded the…impossible. What he practically asks Iran to comply with, goes so deep into the functioning of the Islamic Republic’s structures, that the independent commentators equated it with an attempt of regime change.

Asking the Iranians to topple their government

The US Foreign Secretary went as far as to ask the Iranian people to send away their elected President Hassan Ruhani and the Foreign Minister Javad Zarif; that is; to topple the government. From the tribune of the Heritage Foundation, Pompeo said, if Iran doesn’t comply with his list of demands, America will punish the country and her people with “the strongest sanctions in history and crush Iranian operatives abroad”.

On the same occasion, the U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo demanded rather impossible changes to force Iran reverse its recent expansion of military and political influence throughout the Middle East, up to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Only then America will be ready to lift the sanctions, Pompeo concluded. That is…never.

What the US Foreign Secretary did was to practically stop only before declaring war on Iran, although he later on indirectly likened it with Libya. In that last case the US, Britain and France openly, plainly and unprovoked overthrew the Gaddafi regime, killing him and destroying all state and government structures of the country. There is nothing left standing to this day in this completely destroyed country. As it turned out, the US, France and Britain decided in cold blood to obliterate the Mediterranean country, without having bargained anything with the Gaddafi regime.

Iran is not Libya

However, in the case of Iran, the Europeans insist in negotiating with Tehran, pressing the country to accept the Western demands, but not the ‘holistic’ kind Pompeo presented. Obviously, they do not share the likely American intentions to totally cripple the Shia Muslim Iran as the Sunni Gulf Kingdoms and Israel wish. Iran is not Libya in every respect.

As things are developing, the Washington administration and more precisely the White House are making life difficult to European, who are still trying to salvage the P5+1 Agreement. Even the closest US ally, Britain is taken aback with what the US wants in Iran. According to Reuters, Boris Johnson the British Foreign Secretary from Argentina, dismissed Pompeo’s list of demands as infeasible.

Threatening the Europeans

Pompeo, though, had more to tell Europeans. The previous day he presented his devastating list for Iran, he had turned to America’s allies. He said, he was expecting the European Union to cooperate in confronting “Iran’s nuclear program, missile development and role in regional conflicts”. According to Reuters, a State Department source observed this cooperation will be the “foundation to continue to work together, moving forward.”

Reading this statement in another way, it says if the Europeans do not cooperate with US against Iran, then the US won’t ‘work together’ with them anymore, nor will there be ‘moving forward’ together for America and Europe. If this is not a direct threat between ‘allies’, then words have lost their meaning.

The Americans may mean all that and actually proceed with their threats or possibly refrain in the future from so aggressive actions. Nevertheless, their actions and threats have so far derailed international trade and global order and turned the world into a very unpredictable and dangerous place to live in, for hundreds of millions of people.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Bid to raise $5.5 billion for millions of Syrians and their host communities

How revealing the cost of coal makes us all better off

Turkey: MEPs cut support by €70m due to no improvement in respect for EU values

Extra mild ECB tapering of QE and zero interest rates keep euro low

Crimea: The last bloodless secession of a Ukraine region?

Posting of workers: final vote on equal pay and working conditions

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

More attacks, ‘persisting security challenges’ threaten progress in West Africa, Sahel

An open letter to Europe’s leaders

Opponents of constitutional change in Burundi face torture and execution: UN investigators

Member states jeopardising the rule of law will risk losing EU funds

“Beyond the beach: tackling plastic pollution upstream”, a Sting Exclusive by Erik Solheim, Head of UN Environment

No recovery for EU economy in sight and a Brexit can aggravate things for everyone

Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution threatens our enviroment. How should we respond?

As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights turns 70 – is it time for a new approach?

These coastal countries are sinking the fastest

An alternative view of Globalization 4.0, and how to get there

These are the countries that eat the most meat

Here are 5 reasons why the ocean is so important

Everything you need to know about Ireland’s economy (Post Brexit)

DR Congo: ‘No time to lose’ says newly appointed UN Ebola response coordinator

How tech companies compare at protecting your digital rights

A Year in China

The ITU Telecom World on 14-17 November in Bangkok, Thailand

Cryptocurrency mining could become the new face of energy storage. Here’s how

EU and Amazon cut deal to end antitrust investigation over e-books deals

How to survive and thrive in our age of uncertainty

What do Europeans believe about the crisis and the possible way out?

Indonesia’s imams are joining the fight against plastic bags

Retirees will outlive their savings by a decade

Attack on UN compound in Somalia may be ‘violation of international humanitarian law’

The time is up but the game is still not over for Greece: negotiations continue in anticipation of a new deal

Can China deal with climate change without the U.S.?

Upgraded EU visa information database to increase security at external borders

4 ways to keep the momentum rolling on mental health

The Parliament defies a politically biased Banking Union

EU27 leaders unite on Brexit Guidelines ahead of “tough negotiations” with Theresa May

These Dutch microgrid communities can supply 90% of their energy needs

South Sudan’s peace process ‘precarious, but progress in being made’, Security Council hears

Do the giant banks ‘tell’ Britain to choose a good soft Brexit and ‘remain’ or else…?

EU/Africa, Caribbean and Pacific: towards which partnership?

The Linde Group Logo (Source: The Linde Group website, Press Services, 2018)

EU starts in-depth investigation of Linde-Praxair merger over competition concerns

New General Assembly President brings ‘valuable insights’ into key UN challenges

MEPs commend Ukraine‘s reform efforts and denounce Russian aggression

Central America: drought, resulting crop losses threaten food security of two million people, UN warns

Eurozone stuck in a high risk deflation area; Draghi expects further price plunge

This is how Britain saved some of its most precious wildlife from the threat of extinction

UNICEF warns of ‘lost generation’ of Rohingya youth, one year after Myanmar exodus

What if big-tech companies became non-profits?

GSMA Mobile 360 Series – MENA in Dubai, in Association with The European Sting

Safer products: stepping up checks and inspections to protect consumers

Trade is not a weapon. Let’s not use it as one

How businesses can navigate a global economic slowdown

UNICEF backpacks used as a haunting symbol to call for greater protection of children living in conflict

Why is the EU launching a doomed policy in stopping immigrant waves? What are the real targets?

Central Africans ‘need our help now’: UN’s deputy relief chief

Australia needs to intensify efforts to meet its 2030 emissions goal

‘Highly explosive’ escalation of conflict and displacement across Syria’s Idlib, says top UN official

France v Croatia: How the World Cup finalists stack up off the pitch

African continent ‘an example of solidarity’ towards migrants and refugees: UN chief

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s