The UN supports Europe’s military action in Libya and the Mediterranean; Russia and China agree

Vera Jourova, European Commissioner for Justice (on the left) and Felix Braz, Minister of Justice of Luxembourg holding a Press conference after the Justice and Home Affairs EU Council meeting on 8-9 October in Luxembourg. The former represents the will of the Brussels Commission and the latter holds the rotating Presidency of this Council, authentically representing the 28 EU governments. (European Council – Council of the European Union, 09/10/2015).

Vera Jourova, European Commissioner for Justice (on the left) and Felix Braz, Minister of Justice of Luxembourg holding a Press conference after the Justice and Home Affairs EU Council meeting on 8-9 October in Luxembourg. The former represents the will of the Brussels Commission and the latter holds the rotating Presidency of this Council, authentically representing the 28 EU governments. (European Council – Council of the European Union, 09/10/2015).

Last Friday 9 October the UN Security Council and its five permanent members unanimously decided to actually trade entire nations and geographical regions between them. To this effect they authorized the European Union to employ warships in the Libyan waters to “board ships for inspection, seize and even dispose of vessels suspected of being used by migrant smugglers”. This is just the surface of it though because Russia and China wouldn’t have agreed without getting concessions from the West of equal importance elsewhere in the world.

For the time being, the US, Britain, Russia France and China (members with veto power) along with 9 non permanent Council members (without veto power, kind of observers) empowered the EU to use military force in international waters to stop the immigration river from flowing towards Europe (Venezuela abstained; the UN Security council comprises 15 members of which only five have the veto power).

EU’s plans go unhindered

However, the relevant EU’s action plan as it has been agreed by its 28 leaders contains three phases including operations in the Libyan waters, the coastal areas and the ports. For the time being, the UN authorized action in the high seas off Libya constituting the second phase of EU’s policy. In the third phase the EU plans military action on Libyan sea and soil.

It becomes clear then, that the EU naval and otherwise military action will not just try to stem the transport of immigrants from Libya to Italy. According to the so-called third phase of this EU project the Union’s military forces will carry out extended operations in Libya’s territorial waters and the coastal areas and ports with or without UN coverage. Let’s take one thing at a time.

Long term action

At the end of the last week of April this year the 28 EU leaders gathered in Brussels and decided to launch naval and otherwise large-scale military operations in the high seas off Libya, in the Libyan waters and eventually on the soil and the sea ports of their Mediterranean neighbor. They decided to use military force knowing very well that this would entail fatalities amongst the locals and the prospective refugees who gather there. At that time the EU leaders said they would ‘seek the UN blessing for all or parts of the plan’, but in reality they meant that they will go ahead anyway.

Last Friday Russia and China didn’t block the Security’s Council approval for the second phase of this scheme; God knows against what concessions. Obviously Moscow has vital interests in Syria to trade with the Westerners and Beijing wants to secure its position in the South China Sea against the Americans. On many occasions in history the great powers traded between them the fate of smaller countries and entire geographical regions. However, every time that such an appalling exchange occurs, it constitutes a stigma and an affront to humanity. This always comes as shock to the wider public opinion, that’s why the details usually come to light some decades later.

Chaos reigns

In the case of Libya, chaos reigns everywhere. There is complete lawlessness with more than 1200 armed groups fighting each other. The West recognizes a government based in a Greek merchant ship anchored outside the port of Benghazi. In view of the impossibility to change that, the EU supported by the US must have in mind to secure a safe coastal zone in order to facilitate its military and ultimately its economic goals in the country and in this wider African region. In the face of it the EU action will aim at reversing the waves of desperate people, who abandon their destroyed homelands hoping to find refuge in Europe.

The Europeans insist that in order to do that they will ‘fight’ the traffickers and sink their boats at sea and in harbor, as if it was possible to tell which vessel can be used to this effect. The first phase of the operations included intelligence gathering around the means and the ways of the human traffickers and has been going on for a few months now.

With or without the UN

The second phase which is now getting the UN blessing has officially commenced on 7 October without the UN’s Security Council having taken a decision until that date. According to an EU Council decision, the “EU Ambassadors within the Political and Security Committee agreed to start the first step of the second phase of the operation as of 7 October 2015 and approved the corresponding rules of engagement”. In short they said they will continue their military engagement without any blessing from the UN, which followed 2 days later.

The operational name of this plan is ‘EUNAVFOR Med’. Evidently the Europeans understood that this name leaves an extremely military taste, which is rather unfit for the eight o’clock news and thus renamed it “Sophia”. They chose a name with a peaceful aura which they had already given to a baby born on one of the war ships operating off Libya.

The public relations experts must have thought that if a baby is born and named Sophia in one of those war ships, their cannons would cease to be made of steel and the public opinion can believe that they are there for humanitarian reasons.

Whatever the outcome of this operation, the West seems determined to promote its positions in the wider Maghreb region (Northwest Africa) and the Middle East including Syria. It is also evident that Russia and China can accept or even cooperate if their share is right.

The problem is that the willingness and the fire power of the five UN permanent members is not enough to turn things to an arrangement of their liking. Once the devil is out of the bottle nobody can guarantee that it will not behave as devils do and thus stop triggering bombs as the last one in the Turkish capital Ankara. The more than 100 fatalities and the hundreds of injured innocent protesters cannot be incorporated in any logical plan.

Only the devil and some infernal cycles work in this way.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Destabilizing Lebanon after burning Syria; plotting putsch at home: King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

EU members commit to build an integrated gas market and finally cut dependency on Russia

Migration has set EU’s political clock ticking; the stagnating economy cannot help it and Turkey doesn’t cooperate

Earthquake: Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena

European Youth Forum celebrates 20 years of fighting for youth rights

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

Junior Enterprises as a solution for Youth Entrepreneurship

China and UK relations post Brexit as EU addresses Chinese takeovers

European Young Innovators Forum @ European Business Summit 2014: Europe for StartUps, vision 2020

Turkey’s Erdogan provokes the US and the EU by serving jihadists and trading on refugees

The banks want now free capital from taxpayers

What do Europeans believe about the crisis and the possible way out?

Tackling youth unemployment through the eyes of a European entrepreneur

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

Europe’s top court hears Intel and sends € 1.06 bn antitrust fine to review

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

France and Poland to block David Cameron’s plans on immigration

Manufacturers Get Smarter for Industry 4.0

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

Elections results: Austerity’s black to prevail in the new multicolored German government

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Managers’ pay under fire

A new world that demands new doctors in the fourth industrial revolution

Governments and non-state actors need to take urgent action to meet Paris Agreement goals

European Commission: Does Apple, Starbucks and Fiat really pay their taxes?

The Americans are preparing for the next financial crisis

Kellen Europe Hosts EuroConference 2016

Failing to see reality or deceiving the masses? The EU about poverty and social exclusion

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

Eurostat overturns Commission’s assessment of the economy

Can the Americans alone determine the future of Syria?

EU Parliament: It takes real banks to fight unemployment and recession

Is there a chance for the West to win the war on terror?

On Grexit: Incompetence just launched the historic Ultimatum that could open “pandora’s box”

Refugee crisis: Commission proposes a new plan urging EU countries to help Italy

The challenges of mental health: an inconvenient reality

Rising political extremism in Europe escapes control

European Youth Forum demands immediate action & binding agreement on climate change

Four major resources for new European young entrepreneurs

Far from a healthy Health Workforce: lack of workforce planning leaves our citizens without access to proper care

“BEUC cautions against TTIP that would seek to align EU and US chemicals management frameworks”

Crimean crisis: not enough to slow down European indices

Access to health in the developped and developing world

Macro-Financial Assistance: Europe’s way to control Ukraine?

Eurozone: Economic Sentiment Indicator recovering losses

Dutch voters reject EU-Ukraine partnership and open a new pandora’s box for the EU

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: There is a new draft agreement on the negotiating table

CDU-SPD agree the terms for EU’s Banking Union

Who threatens the lives and livelihoods of Ukrainians?

JADE Testimonial #3: Sebastian @ Fundraising

At last a solid base for the European Banking Union

How Greece was destroyed

Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

Youth unemployment: No light at the end of the tunnel

Let the Italians have it their way, it may be good for all Eurozone

The MWC14 Sting Special Edition

Berlin repels proposal for cheaper euro

Is the EU’s enlargement over-stretched?

G20: Less growth, more austerity for developing countries

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s