The missiles fired against Damascus, Syria divided Europe deeply

Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, received Staffan De Mistura, Special Envoy of the United Nations for Syria. Smiling in Brussels without good reason. Date: 09/01/2018. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union , 2018 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Chara Kaminara-Pipitsouli.

Last Friday night till the early hours of Saturday morning the US-France-Britain alliance attacked the Assad/Putin regime of Damascus, with a precipitation of missiles. Seemingly though, the hits have had a greater political impact on Europe than in Syria itself. Germany and Italy, the other two major European Union countries with strong interests in the wider region of Middle East, abstained. They didn’t want to come to direct confrontation with the Russians, who are the main force keeping alive the Assad government in Damascus. Moscow is today the real force opposing the West in the Syrian conflict.

However, after a night during which the West attacked Syria with reportedly more than 100 missiles, the next morning Damascus released a video showing President Bashar al-Assad going about his business as usual. On top of that, the defense ministry of the Russian Federation announced that no missile was targeted to sites in Hmeimim and Tartus, where Russian defense systems are operational. Russian sources also said of the 107 missiles fired, 71 were intercepted.

Targeting chemical weaponry

The chief American general Joseph Dunford, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff said the main target was a research and production center for chemical and biological weapons, in the greater Damascus capital area. A US pentagon spokesman then revealed that 76 missiles were fired against these buildings, destroying all but one, which was partially damaged.

The same source added that the Damascus air space is one of the most heavily defended spots of the world, yet he insisted the attack has decisively crippled the ability of Syria to produce chemical weapons. Reportedly, Britain and France participated by firing missiles also from ships sailing in the Eastern Mediterranean and fighter planes flying outside the Syrian airspace.

As expected, the Syrians and their Russian and Iranian backers tried to belittle the results of the West’s attack. Of course, Damascus, Moscow and Tehran condemned the attack with the strongest terms. A kind of surprise came from Ankara, where the Turkish President Recep Erdogan loudly and clearly approved the attack, despite being a member of an alliance with Russia and Iran. Yet again this was expected, because the Assad regime in Damascus is ‘red cloth’ for Erdogan and Turkey. But let’s go to Europe and evaluate the political impact there, from the western military action in Syria.

The impact on Europe

Starting from Germany the general line Berlin has adopted vis-à-vis the entire Syrian affair is authentically reported, with a few lines in a pertinent article by the prestigious German business news group Handelblatt. It reads as follows “But the chancellor’s (Angela Merkel) reluctance to employ military force is in line with Berlin’s consistent stance on Syria. Germany wants a clearer idea of just what kind of settlement is envisioned to resolve the Syrian conflict. In general, Germany has been averse to employing military force and cautious about how far it will go in confronting Russia”. So, what Chancellor Merkel said last Saturday in relation to the joint US, France and Britain attack was quite eloquent. Speaking in Berlin she stated, “To simply do nothing is also difficult.”

Politically correctness vs military action

In general, Berlin adopts a politically correct attitude in relation to chemical weapons, condemning their use along with the rest of the civilized world. However, making sure that such weapons are not produced and used is a different thing. While the other three western powers are ready to use military force to ascertain it, Berlin stops short of that. Instead, “Ms. Merkel pledged Germany’s support for efforts by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the UN Security Council to call Syria to account for the illegal use of chemical weapons”. Obviously, Germany goes for this mild and reputedly ineffective option, regarding the strict prohibition of the production and use of chemical weapons.

OPCW and the UN have been unable so far to prohibit the production and the use of chemical weapons in Syria, but Berlin doesn’t seem to care much about it. It is more important for Merkel not to press Putin too hard. So, it becomes evident that a lot of things separate Berlin from the Washington – Paris – London alliance. This is not an affair of the last few years though. It has deep roots in the 20th century history.

After two world wars

During the decades after the last world war, the three Atlantic powers had being developing and operating large nuclear and conventional war machines that Germany doesn’t possess. It’s also a historical fact that the three have been using their military might to gain privileged positions in the wider oil rich Middle East region, as well as in Africa and elsewhere in the world, in areas rich in other valuable minerals. In the last century after two world wars, Berlin repeatedly failed to gain a foothold on similar resources.

So, Germany turned to her specialty, in developing and promoting a formidable automotive and other engineering sectors, which cannot fire guided missiles or nukes, but produce a lot of cash. In the end of the day, Germany may be obliged to pay politically and financially dear for fuels and raw materials, but it’s not certain either that the other three have made good ‘investments’ in developing their missile weaponry. The difference of approach between Germany and the France-Britain duo became evident some years ago, when the two aligned with the US – the Atlanticists – and destroyed Libya.

The Atlanticists and Germany

Regarding Syria, the differences of approach between Germany on the one hand and France and Britain on the other, became evident in what the EU leaders in Brussels had to say about the missile attack. Donald Tusk, the President of the EU Council revealed his aggressive attitude against Damascus and Moscow not through the mainstream official channels. He chose to tweet, “Strikes by US, France and UK make it clear that Syrian regime together with Russia & Iran cannot continue this human tragedy, at least not without cost. The EU will stand with our allies on the side of justice”. Tusk is thought to be the Atlanticist angle of the EU leadership.

EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker was much more restrained. He didn’t justify the military attack, he just made a note of it. Then, Juncker had a more German like politically correct conclusion to make. He said “As it enters its 8th year of conflict, Syria desperately needs a lasting ceasefire respected by all parties that paves the way for achieving a negotiated political solution through the United Nations-led Geneva process, to bring peace to the country once and for all”.

Juncker vs Tusk

It’s as if Juncker puts the blame on all sides for the destruction of Syria, by not attacking the ‘unholy’ trio of Damascus, Moscow and Tehran as Tusk did. This said, let’s abandon ‘sides’ taking and come back to the realities of our segregated world.

All in all, the missiles fired by US, France and Britain will not change the fact, that, on the ground, Damascus, Moscow and Tehran are the winners. Last week ‘The European Sting’ analyzed that. The western missiles were just a face saving action. Yet, once more, those 107 Tomahawk and other missiles launched from ships, airplanes and one submarine managed to deeply divide the EU.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Politicization of migrant ‘crisis’ in Hungary making them scapegoats, independent UN human rights expert warns

5 things you need to know about water

Thomas Cook bankruptcy: Better consumer and employee protection needed

Auditors say EU spending delivers limited value for money but the timing of their report poses questions

Larger species are more at risk of extinction than smaller ones – here’s why

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

Here’s a reason to feel cheerful – the world is full of Good Samaritans

Why is black plastic packaging so hard to recycle?

One-in-five suffers mental health condition in conflict zones, new UN figures reveal

Deal on faster exchange of non-EU nationals’ criminal records

The AI moment: preparing for the revolution

I accidentally went viral on TikTok. I learned we failed our youngest generation.

World’s 1.8 billion youth must ‘have a say in the future of the planet’

Ebola Outbreak in Democratic Republic Congo is ‘largely contained’: WHO

Why sustainable packaging is good for profits as well as the planet

JADE visits Lithuanian Junior Initiatives

We are close yet so far…

Climate Change and Human Health: Two Faces of The Same Coin

A few, or rather two, trade and economic alliances may rule our brave new world

Ensure that widows are ‘not left out or left behind’, UN chief urges on International Day

Is Germany closer to Russia than the West? Nord Stream II and Iran count more

As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights turns 70 – is it time for a new approach?

Here’s how to prepare South-East Asia’s young people for the future

The creative technology and its advancements

Human rights: breaches in Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan

The Commission unsuccessfully pretends to want curbing of tax evasion

2019 ‘a critical year’ for Somali politics and development says Security Council

Violence will not deter Somali people in their pursuit of peace, says UN chief, in wake of lethal attacks

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

Eurozone: Inflation plunge to 0.4% in July may trigger cataclysmic developments

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

COP24: green, gender focus, as UN’s crucial climate change conference gets underway

UN mission in DR Congo appeals for calm as violent protests continue

UN climate summit aims to speed up transition to cleaner, greener future

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “It is the implementation, Stupid!”, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaueble points the finger to Greece from Davos

Can big events really go plastic-free? A water capsule made from seaweed may be the answer

This is what happened to CO2 emissions in the EU last year

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Globally, youth are the largest poverty-stricken group, says new UN report

EU Commission spends billions without achieving targets

Climate Change Revolution: by-laws for the world

Attempt to defy international law over Golan Heights sovereignty ‘doomed to failure’ Security Council hears

EU Commission accuses Germany of obstructing growth and the banking union

New chapters in EU-China trade disputes

New EU rules to boost crowdfunding platforms and protect investors

European Commission steps up protection of European intellectual property in global markets

This one small change could transform education for millions

3 reasons why Singapore is the smartest city in the world

Better ID card security to curb document fraud

Eurogroup asked to reduce public debts of its member states

More than half of the global population is now online

Crime and drugs in West and Central Africa: Security Council highlights ‘new alarming trends’

What cybersecurity professionals can learn from triathletes

Central Africans ‘need our help now’: UN’s deputy relief chief

Fairer and clearer rules on social benefits for EU mobile workers agreed

Erdogan vies to become Middle East Sultan over Khashoggi’s killing

Venezuela: European Parliament calls for additional sanctions

“BRI cooperation is entering a new stage: we need a new and more constructive approach rather than waste time on suspicion”, China’s Ambassador to EU Zhang Ming underlines live from European Business Summit 2019 in Brussels

6 ways to future-proof universities

How global tech can drive local healthcare innovation in China

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s