The missiles fired against Damascus, Syria divided Europe deeply

Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, received Staffan De Mistura, Special Envoy of the United Nations for Syria. Smiling in Brussels without good reason. Date: 09/01/2018. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont. © European Union , 2018 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Chara Kaminara-Pipitsouli.

Last Friday night till the early hours of Saturday morning the US-France-Britain alliance attacked the Assad/Putin regime of Damascus, with a precipitation of missiles. Seemingly though, the hits have had a greater political impact on Europe than in Syria itself. Germany and Italy, the other two major European Union countries with strong interests in the wider region of Middle East, abstained. They didn’t want to come to direct confrontation with the Russians, who are the main force keeping alive the Assad government in Damascus. Moscow is today the real force opposing the West in the Syrian conflict.

However, after a night during which the West attacked Syria with reportedly more than 100 missiles, the next morning Damascus released a video showing President Bashar al-Assad going about his business as usual. On top of that, the defense ministry of the Russian Federation announced that no missile was targeted to sites in Hmeimim and Tartus, where Russian defense systems are operational. Russian sources also said of the 107 missiles fired, 71 were intercepted.

Targeting chemical weaponry

The chief American general Joseph Dunford, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff said the main target was a research and production center for chemical and biological weapons, in the greater Damascus capital area. A US pentagon spokesman then revealed that 76 missiles were fired against these buildings, destroying all but one, which was partially damaged.

The same source added that the Damascus air space is one of the most heavily defended spots of the world, yet he insisted the attack has decisively crippled the ability of Syria to produce chemical weapons. Reportedly, Britain and France participated by firing missiles also from ships sailing in the Eastern Mediterranean and fighter planes flying outside the Syrian airspace.

As expected, the Syrians and their Russian and Iranian backers tried to belittle the results of the West’s attack. Of course, Damascus, Moscow and Tehran condemned the attack with the strongest terms. A kind of surprise came from Ankara, where the Turkish President Recep Erdogan loudly and clearly approved the attack, despite being a member of an alliance with Russia and Iran. Yet again this was expected, because the Assad regime in Damascus is ‘red cloth’ for Erdogan and Turkey. But let’s go to Europe and evaluate the political impact there, from the western military action in Syria.

The impact on Europe

Starting from Germany the general line Berlin has adopted vis-à-vis the entire Syrian affair is authentically reported, with a few lines in a pertinent article by the prestigious German business news group Handelblatt. It reads as follows “But the chancellor’s (Angela Merkel) reluctance to employ military force is in line with Berlin’s consistent stance on Syria. Germany wants a clearer idea of just what kind of settlement is envisioned to resolve the Syrian conflict. In general, Germany has been averse to employing military force and cautious about how far it will go in confronting Russia”. So, what Chancellor Merkel said last Saturday in relation to the joint US, France and Britain attack was quite eloquent. Speaking in Berlin she stated, “To simply do nothing is also difficult.”

Politically correctness vs military action

In general, Berlin adopts a politically correct attitude in relation to chemical weapons, condemning their use along with the rest of the civilized world. However, making sure that such weapons are not produced and used is a different thing. While the other three western powers are ready to use military force to ascertain it, Berlin stops short of that. Instead, “Ms. Merkel pledged Germany’s support for efforts by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the UN Security Council to call Syria to account for the illegal use of chemical weapons”. Obviously, Germany goes for this mild and reputedly ineffective option, regarding the strict prohibition of the production and use of chemical weapons.

OPCW and the UN have been unable so far to prohibit the production and the use of chemical weapons in Syria, but Berlin doesn’t seem to care much about it. It is more important for Merkel not to press Putin too hard. So, it becomes evident that a lot of things separate Berlin from the Washington – Paris – London alliance. This is not an affair of the last few years though. It has deep roots in the 20th century history.

After two world wars

During the decades after the last world war, the three Atlantic powers had being developing and operating large nuclear and conventional war machines that Germany doesn’t possess. It’s also a historical fact that the three have been using their military might to gain privileged positions in the wider oil rich Middle East region, as well as in Africa and elsewhere in the world, in areas rich in other valuable minerals. In the last century after two world wars, Berlin repeatedly failed to gain a foothold on similar resources.

So, Germany turned to her specialty, in developing and promoting a formidable automotive and other engineering sectors, which cannot fire guided missiles or nukes, but produce a lot of cash. In the end of the day, Germany may be obliged to pay politically and financially dear for fuels and raw materials, but it’s not certain either that the other three have made good ‘investments’ in developing their missile weaponry. The difference of approach between Germany and the France-Britain duo became evident some years ago, when the two aligned with the US – the Atlanticists – and destroyed Libya.

The Atlanticists and Germany

Regarding Syria, the differences of approach between Germany on the one hand and France and Britain on the other, became evident in what the EU leaders in Brussels had to say about the missile attack. Donald Tusk, the President of the EU Council revealed his aggressive attitude against Damascus and Moscow not through the mainstream official channels. He chose to tweet, “Strikes by US, France and UK make it clear that Syrian regime together with Russia & Iran cannot continue this human tragedy, at least not without cost. The EU will stand with our allies on the side of justice”. Tusk is thought to be the Atlanticist angle of the EU leadership.

EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker was much more restrained. He didn’t justify the military attack, he just made a note of it. Then, Juncker had a more German like politically correct conclusion to make. He said “As it enters its 8th year of conflict, Syria desperately needs a lasting ceasefire respected by all parties that paves the way for achieving a negotiated political solution through the United Nations-led Geneva process, to bring peace to the country once and for all”.

Juncker vs Tusk

It’s as if Juncker puts the blame on all sides for the destruction of Syria, by not attacking the ‘unholy’ trio of Damascus, Moscow and Tehran as Tusk did. This said, let’s abandon ‘sides’ taking and come back to the realities of our segregated world.

All in all, the missiles fired by US, France and Britain will not change the fact, that, on the ground, Damascus, Moscow and Tehran are the winners. Last week ‘The European Sting’ analyzed that. The western missiles were just a face saving action. Yet, once more, those 107 Tomahawk and other missiles launched from ships, airplanes and one submarine managed to deeply divide the EU.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

“As German Chancellor I want to be able to cope with the merger of the real and digital economy”, Angela Merkel from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

The EU Commission vies to screen Chinese investment in Europe

European car industry: The Germans want it all

MEPs reject making EU regional funding dependent on economic targets

MEPs approve EU’s spending in 2017

New skills needed for medical students in Industry 4.0

Precision medicine should be accessible to all

Brussels wins game and match in Ukraine no matter the electoral results

3 steps to making multistakeholder partnerships a powerful force

Strength in unity: Commission makes recommendations for the EU’s next strategic agenda 2019-2024

How climate change exacerbates the refugee crisis – and what can be done about it

EU-wide rules for safety of drones approved by European Parliament

Libya: ‘Substantial civilian casualties’ in Derna, UN humanitarian chief ‘deeply concerned’

WHO reports ‘very strong progress’ in battling DR Congo Ebola outbreak

Earth already has a perfect recycling system. So why not use it?

In Japan, if you’re 76 you’re biologically 65

European Commission: the LED lights of your Audi A6 shall save our planet

Former Chilean President Bachelet put forward by UN chief as next High Commissioner for Human Rights

Women’s voices must be heard in the battle to save the ocean

Autumn 2018 Economic Forecast: sustained but less dynamic growth amid high uncertainty

Why Eurozone urgently needs the ECB to print and distribute at least €500 billion

A new kind of company is revolutionising Africa’s gig economy

This Danish scheme is offering free kayak rides… for picking up trash

Donor countries need to reform development finance to meet 2030 pledge

The Parliament paves the way for the creation of the European Banking Union

Nigeria: UN chief ‘appalled’ by killing of aid worker; calls for release of remaining hostages

Hiring is broken. Here’s how to fix it

Governments should renew efforts to reform support to agriculture

Resiliency is the key to strong investments in a chaotic world

EU and China in search of a win-win agreement through strategic cooperation ahead of the EU-China summit

EU to give more power to national antitrust authorities in a bid to secure regulatory fines

‘Business as usual’ will not achieve global education goals

Protectionism doesn’t stand a chance in the age of connectivity

Three tips for breaking through bias and seeing evidence more clearly

How the EU sees its own and Russia’s role in Ukraine

The Eurogroup+ is born to govern the EU Banking Union

European Citizens’ Initiative: A game of much publicity and one big lie

Lithuania vs Parliament over 2014 EU budget

EU elections update: Can the EU voters vote unaffected from fake news and online disinformation?

Can North Korea and the U.S. strike a nuclear deal?

MEPs urge the EU to lead the way to net-zero emissions by 2050

A Sting Exclusive: “Paris is indeed our best bet for a secure climate future”, EU Commissioner for Environment Karmenu Vella cries out from Brussels

Pedal power makes ‘positive impact on climate’, urges UN on World Bicycle Day

Let your fingers do the walking

Free trade agreement between EU and India?

The power of trust and values in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

UN highlights need to solve growing burden of forcibly displaced Africans

These are the countries where it’s still illegal to get an abortion

MWC 2016 LIVE: T-Mobile US reveals 5G trial plans

New Zealand can improve well-being through better policymaking and reforms to housing and migration policy

Don’t let smoking steal life’s breathtaking moments, urges UN health agency

To tackle climate change, we need city diplomacy

EU Parliament: It takes real banks to fight unemployment and recession

Obese people more likely to smoke, says new gene research: WHO

UN rights chief denounces Burundi for ‘belligerent and defamatory’ attack on inquiry team

Saudi Arabia, China, among 14 nations under UN human rights spotlight: what you need to know

Electronic Cigarettes: Are they really as safe as we think?

The sad plight of fledging doctors

Newly displaced fleeing attacks in northeast Nigeria, top 2,000

Why the 33,000 staff European Commission did not have a real contingency plan for the refugee crisis?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s