Hazy ‘breakthrough’ saves PM May, leaves Ireland in limbo: Brexit

In the early hours of Friday 8 December, Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, received Theresa May, the British Prime Minister in the Berlaymont building. Date: 08/12/2017. Location: Brussels – EC / Berlaymont. © European Union, 2017 / Photo: Etienne Ansotte.

With only a couple of hours sleep in the very early hours of last Friday, the British PM Theresa May boarded a RAF aircraft and landed in Brussels before dawn. Weary as she was, she rushed to Berlaymont building, the EU Commission headquarters. There she met Jean-Claude Juncker the President of the European Commission and together they delivered a Press Conference to a few journalists, exhausted from a sleepless night. During the preceding hours some secure telephone lines between London, Belfast, Dublin and Brussels were overloaded.

It was before sunrise the two leaders informed the world the Brexit negotiators had just succeeded in drafting the text for the much sought breakthrough after a many months stalemate. They said there was agreement on the three preconditions, so the negotiations can move forward to the second phase. While the prerequisites regard the past, the two sides can now pass to shaping their future. This is to be done by establishing the outlook of the trade (goods and services) relations, between the EU and the UK for the next decades. Apparently, securing an orderly Brexit must have come as a great relief to the British business and financial world, and gave PM May political breathing room.

96 points in 15 pages

The 15 page agreement covers all the three prerequisites. Firstly, it settles the status of mainland Europeans and the British citizens, who live and work in the wrong side of the English Channel, ‘La Manche’ (articles 6 to 41). The misty arrangement of the Irish question comes second. This is about making sure there will be no bard border enacted, between the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland on the 499 km border line, which theoretically divides them (articles 42 to 56).

Last but not least, with the next thirty articles (57 to 86) the two sides have defined the way to estimate the divorce alimony Britain has to pay as well as the sharing out of some items of the common household, like the European Investment Bank. By the same token, the two sides agreed an interim period of two years (2019-2021) during which things will be evolving “as if Britain would have remained in the Union”. Other thorny separation issues, like the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Britain after the Brexit, take up the last 10 articles of the text.

Squaring the cycle in Ireland

After the agreement was published on Friday morning, almost all commentators agreed that the Irish question was far from being resolved. According to Reuters report, “It’s still a fudge,” said one senior EU official in reference to the Irish question. “They put off squaring the circle till later. But how can they do it?” This newspaper feels justified though for having presented this deadlock some days earlier. The European Sting on 27 November published an article entitled, “Britain offers more money for an orderly Brexit but the Irish question resurges”.

Northern Ireland is to leave the EU together with the UK, while Eire will remain an integral part of the EU. On 27 November the Sting wrote: “Liam Fox British international Trade Minister said there can be no arrangement on this Irish issue before the future trade relations between the EU and the UK are agreed. Theoretically, after Brexit there has to be enacted a hard border separating the UK from the EU, cutting Ireland in two. On the other side of the fence the Irish EU Commissioner Phil Hogan said Dublin would ‘continue to play tough’ over its threat to veto talks about trade after Brexit unless Britain provided guarantees over the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic. Eire would never accept a hard border along the 499 km line”.

Who needs borders?

On top of that, the Protestant Anglophile right wing DUP political party of Northern Ireland vies exactly for the opposite. They want to leave the EU on the same terms as the rest of the UK. But this can only be served by the enactment of a hard border. Whatever Brexit arrangement is finally agreed, it will certainly provide for an exit from EU’s internal market and customs union. In such a case, the EU cannot leave a hole of 499 km in its customs border with the UK. It’s logically impossible then, that the Brexit pact leaves both sides happy. The Eire wanting no borders at all and the DUP wanting a hard one. The senior EU official who spoke to Reuters was quite right speaking about ‘squaring the cycle’.

Liam Fox is also correct. That’s why the two negotiating parties actually left the solution of the Irish problem to be formulated alongside the talks about the future trade relations. This brings us to the more recent Sting title of 4 December, describing what the real problem is: “EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?” Last Friday Donald Tusk the President of the European Council, commenting after the text of the Agreement was published, concluded his relevant intervention: “Since the Brexit referendum, a year and a half has passed. So much time has been devoted to the easier part of the task. And now, to negotiate a transition arrangement and the framework for our future relationship, we have de facto less than a year”.

The British dilemma

True – it will be extremely difficult then for the deeply divided British political system to answer this question in less than a year. It took them eighteen months to come to terms with their divorce obligations. The main culpable parties for that are the unruly Brexiteers, who have indoctrinated a very large part of the Brits, with the opium of nationalism. To their kind, it will be a shocking revelation when they realize that the consequences of leaving the EU constitute the worst option for their country.

In the coming months, the talks about the future trade relations, bit by bit will be revealing the mass illusion the Brits have fallen victims to, believing the lies of unscrupulous populist Brexiteer leaders like Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage. Of course, not all the Brits fell for this trap. The country remains split between Brexiteers and Bremainers.

In any case, the anti-EU Conservative MPs have now swallowed the hard Brussels terms for an orderly Brexit and backed May in accepting them. They were forced to do so by the Damoclean Sword of the highly possible win of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, in the eventuality of another early election had the May government fallen apart.

A new menace

As Tusk said, the two negotiation teams have to accomplish the Herculean Task of setting the terms for the future trade relations between the EU and the UK in less than a year. To this end, Tusk will propose and the European Council of the 27 leaders on 14 December is to approve the passage to the second phase of the Brexit negotiations. Luckily enough, though, the Council is expected to also approve an interim period of two years after the Brexit day of 29 March 2019, with no changes at all.

This will bring us to March 2021 and, until then, the Tories’ nightmare may have come true. Jeremy Corbyn may have become Prime Minister. But then his target won’t be the EU but the giant London City banks which have already sensed the danger. The financial leviathans have already declared that Corbyn is more dangerous for them than Brexit.

All in all, the Agreement text as presented before dawn on Friday says in its preface,“nothing is agreed until everything is agreed”. The British people will most certainly have the opportunity to vote again in a legislative election before the closing date of 29 March 2021. The outcome of that vote can swiftly rewrite the entire Brexit scenario.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Everyone has ‘a moral imperative’ to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities, says UN chief

Germany’s strong anti-bribery enforcement against individuals needs to be matched by comparably strong enforcement against companies

‘Step backwards’ for Bosnia’s autonomous Serb region as assembly reneges on Srebrenica genocide report

Main results of Environment Council of 09 October 2018

UN agencies call for more resettlement and end to detention of asylum seekers in Libya

UN Chief ‘strongly rejects’ Guatemala decision to expel anti-corruption body

North Korea: ‘Time to talk human rights’, says UN expert

Use “blockchain” model to cut small firms’ costs and empower citizens, urge MEPs

UN General Assembly President defends ‘landmark’ migration compact

UN chief hears ‘heartbreaking accounts’ of suffering from Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh; urges international community to ‘step up support’

Is ECB helping Germany to buy cheaply the rest of Europe?

This is how AI can help you make sense of the world

EU prepares for the worst case scenario as Turkey seems to be withdrawing from the migration deal

Love Affair with Some(one)/(thing)

Moving from commitment to action on LGBTI equality

Four ways innovation can help to beat heart disease

VAT: EU Member States still losing almost €150 billion in revenues according to new figures

Draghi keeps the euro cheap, helps debt refinancing, recapitalization of banks and growth

The remote doctor in the 21st century

UN chief hails victory of ‘political will’ in historic Republic of North Macedonia accord

A Sting Exclusive: “Youth voice must be heard in climate change negotiations!”, Bérénice Jond Board Member of European Youth Forum demands from Brussels

Fresh airstrikes kill dozens in conflict-ravaged Syria

At last Britain considers a super-soft Brexit

How Germany strives to mold ECB’s monetary policy to her interests

Costa Rica is one of the world’s happiest countries. Here’s what it does differently

Trump doesn’t only target Germany, aims to crack the entire EU

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

European Parliament and Eurovision sign partnership for European Elections

Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition, in Brussels - Berlaymont, last week. (Copyright European Union, 2017 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Lukasz Kobus)

Amazon, Luxembourg and Ireland hit by EU’s latest turn of the screw over competition

What we can learn from Asia’s courts of the future

At last a solid base for the European Banking Union

An alternative view of Globalization 4.0, and how to get there

The EU condemns Faroe Islands and Iceland to poverty

Trade wars won’t fix globalization. Here’s why

YouTube stars get creative at UN, to promote tolerance

GSMA head urges regulators to help Europe regain leadership

‘Bring to life’ precious moments caught on film or tape, UN agency urges on World Day

Remembering Kofi Annan

Mining the deep seabed will harm biodiversity. We need to talk about it

What Ghana can teach us about integrating refugees

Assembly of European Regions @ European Business Summit 2014: The European regions on the path to recovery

European Youth Forum on Summit on Jobs and Growth

G20 LIVE: G20 leaders reaffirm OECD’s role in ensuring strong, sustainable and inclusive growth

‘Global sisterhood’ tells perpetrators ‘time is up’ for pandemic of violence

Energy Union: EU invests a further €800 million in priority energy infrastructure

Japanese law professor elected new judge at the International Court of Justice

The horrific trend of the anti-vaccine movement in Turkey

European Commission: the LED lights of your Audi A6 shall save our planet

This is the state of the world’s health, in numbers

3 things the G20 can do to save the World Trade Organization

FROM THE FIELD: Urban Mexico moves toward better livelihoods, cleaner cities

What fighting malaria can teach us about linking purpose and business

Recession: the best argument for growth

Chronic illnesses: UN stands up to stop 41 million avoidable deaths per year

Cryptocurrency mining could become the new face of energy storage. Here’s how

Blockchain could boost global trade by $1 trillion

We need to talk about how we define responsibility online – and how we enforce it

As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights turns 70 – is it time for a new approach?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s