Brexit: PM May must hush Boris Johnson to unlock the negotiations

From left to right: Emmanuel Macron, President of France, Angela Merkel, German Federal Chancellor, Christian Kern, Austrian Federal Chancellor. Shoot location: Tallinn – Estonia. Shoot date: 29/09/2017 Copyright: European Union.

Last Thursday night in Tallinn, the Estonian capital, the French President Emmanuel Macron, backed by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, told the British Prime Minister Theresa May, there will be no change in the agenda of the Brexit talks; first the terms of the divorce will be agreed and then the future trade relations between Britain and the European Union will be discussed. The UK has been insisting that the two subjects must be discussed and decided in parallel. Obviously, London counts on tough bargaining for a future more or less full access to the EU internal markets, against a least costly Brexit for Britain in money and political terms.

Currently, the negotiations are rather stuck in regard to those terms. What May said on Friday 22 September about a transition period, in her much advertised speech staged in Florence, Italy, doesn’t seem to have broken the stalemate. And this despite that it “created a new dynamic”, as the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier conceded. He added though that “the transition should be discussed in the second phase of negotiations”.

A Florentine proposal

From Florence the British MP proposed a two year interim period after March 2019 for the full Brexit terms to be applied. The European Sting followed her there. According to May, during this period, presumably until March 2021, Britain will continue as if it were a member of the EU, with full access to the European internal market and normal participation in the Customs Union. She clarified that the UK is ready to pay for this provisional arrangement the equivalent of the country’s contributions to the EU Budget, amounting to around €20 billion. Understandably, this sum is on top of the ‘cost of the Brexit’ for UK, as Brussels estimated it at anything between €40bn and €60bn.

At this point, we should sum up the state of the Brexit discussions. The EU insists – the 27 leaders have taken unanimously a relevant decision – the talks must first clarify three key issues related to the exit terms and then negotiate the future trade and otherwise relations. 10 Downing Street demands that the exit terms and the future trade agreement should be negotiated in parallel. This was and still is the reason the talks are stuck. Now, Barnier says that not even the ‘interim period’ proposal can be discussed, if the exit terms are not agreed. Let’s dig a bit into those three issues Brussels wants to be agreed first.

It’s always the sovereignty

The future status of mainland citizens who live and work in Britain and vice versa for the Brits in the Continent is the first subject that Brussels wants to be settled. Of the same opinion are the British trade unions representing workers (TUC) and the employers (CBI). London says none will have to leave Britain. There are a lot of details though which have to be clarified in this respect, like the rights of family unification, deciding who has that right, etc. Last Friday, Barnier once more said that those cases have to be judged by the European Courts. Britain denies the jurisdiction of the EU Court after March 2019 and insists it will be the country’s legal system to decide on similar cases.

However, differences about the jurisdiction of the courts appear in equally important topics, like the settlement of commercial disputes after Brexit and until March 2021. Similar issues may arise in relation to the functioning of the Internal Market and the Customs Union. Hypothetically, during the transition period Britain will act as a full member regarding all those key EU institutions. But, there cannot be other magistrates and judges deciding on relevant questions, than the ones of European Courts. There is a huge European legal edifice developed through decades, which regulates both the Internal Market and the Customs Union. It’s absurd to think that the British courts may discuss cases pertaining to central EU institutions.

A matter of pride?

Given the apparent deadlock tough, May’s proposal for an interim period of no change at all, is tantamount to London contemplating to accept the jurisdiction of the EU Court in Britain after Brexit. In Florence, May, addressing the topic of EU citizens living and working in Britain said “we want you to stay, we value you”. And then in relation to which courts will rule on their status and rights she added “on this basis, our teams can reach firm agreement quickly”.

It’s an obvious reference to the prospect, that the final agreement, after voted in the Commons and becoming UK law, may foresee the continuation of the EU Courts jurisdiction in Britain, at least during the interim period. Yet it will be rather difficult for 10 Downing Street to ‘sell’ such an arrangement to the Brexiteer Brits. Boris Johnson, her minister of Foreign Affairs – an unscrupulous populist Brexiteer  repeatedly caught liying flagrantly – has turned the courts’ jurisdiction issue into a matter of ‘national pride’. As if this has not been the case for the last 44 years, after Britain joined the EU 1973.

What else?

The other two issues, to be agreed before trade is discussed, are equally complicated. The second question is the cost London has to pay for the divorce, coming to tens of billions of euros. The discussion has started from a bottom line of €20 billion and  will very probably continue until every other issue is settled, including the court jurisdiction topic. Money can nicely settle differences of ‘pride’. As the American President Abraham Lincoln famously said ‘when someone says it’s a matter of principles not money, then it’s a matter of money’. Nothing can be more true than this in the case of Brexit.

The third topic is of no less importance. It’s about the historically existing but invisible today border line of 499 km, between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. The two parts of Ireland communicate now as if there is no border at all. After Brexit though the northern part will leave the EU as a part of UK, but the Republic will remain in the European Union. Legally and logically then real borders have to be installed , controlling the movements of people, goods and capital.

The Irish question

However, if real hard borders are installed everybody agrees that Northern Ireland will be greatly destabilized. Building control posts and customs booths in the only land border between the UK and the EU may trigger economic and political disorder in the north. So, both Brussels and London have accepted that not-burdened communication between the two parts of Ireland should be safeguarded. This may require large investments in technology and personnel in order to make the border almost indiscernible. However, the final arrangement on the island depends largely on the overall agreement between the UK and the EU.

In conclusion, if what happened in Tallinn will be repeated at the 19 October EU Summit, Britain will be compelled to conform to the realities of Brexit. To do this, 10 Downing Street would be obliged to get rid of extremist Brexiteers like Boris Johnson. He has recently published 4000 words in a daily newspaper, to strongly oppose a smooth Brexit.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

A new European banking space is born this year

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: Another sleepless night for the negotiators before Indaba meeting

Refugee crisis update: Commission still in panic while Turkey is to be added in the equation

Draghi’s ‘quasi’ announcement of a new era of more and cheaper money

When is Berlin telling the truth about the EU banking union?

Will ECB win against low inflation by not following Quantitave Easing?

Does the EU want GMOs and meat with hormones from the US?

European Union: More taxes out of less income

Is there a chance for the West to win the war on terror?

European Youth Forum welcomes establishment of new Youth Intergroup in the European Parliament

Press coverage of migration crisis in Europe: a call for collaborative action

Convincing the Germans to pay also for the unification of Eurozone

Scotland and First Minister Salmond enter the most challenging battlefield for independence: Europe

Refugee crisis update: Commission is struggling alone with little help from EU or G7 leaders

New skills needed for medical students in Industry 4.0

JADE May Meeting last call for participants – join us in Zagreb

Who really cares for the environment?

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

“The winner is who can accelerate the transition to a new digital era”. The Sting reports live from EBS 2015: a Digital Europe 4.0

Eurozone: Retail sales betray economic frailty

Britain in and out of the EU

Does the Greek deal strengthen the Eurozone? Markets react cautiously

JADE visits Lithuanian Junior Initiatives

Greferendum: the biggest political gaffe in western modern history to tear Europe apart? #Grexit #Graccident

Why the ECB suddenly decided to flood banks with money?

European Sting Cookie Policy

JADE Spring Meeting 2015: a step forward for Youth Entrepreneurship

Draghi left alone with no hope of boosting EU growth as Merkel just focuses on next elections

More state aid to big firms, no special provisions for the SMEs

Germany and France only care about keeping their borrowing cheap

The refugee crisis brings to light EU’s most horrible flaws and nightmares

Youth unemployment: No light at the end of the tunnel

The EU slowly exits from “Excessive Deficit Procedure” and hopefully from ‘Excessive Austerity Procedure’ too

Access to ‘affordable’ medicines in India: challenges & solutions

Arlington, USA: kick-off of the fifth round of the EU-US boxing match

We are close yet so far…

Cloud computing under scrutiny in the EU?

YO!Fest back in Strasbourg for the 2nd edition of the European Youth Event – 20-21 May 2016

Neelie Kroes at the European Young Innovators Forum: Unconvention 2014

The 28 EU leaders show contempt for the European Elections results

Will Europe be a different place this Monday?

EU is now giving Google new monopolies to the detriment of European citizens and Internet companies

We’ll succeed together

Will Merkel ever steer the EU migration Titanic and restore her power in Germany?

SCADA Security Conference 2017 in Prague, Czech Republic

MWC 2016 LIVE: Telenor CEO calls on operators to embrace Mobile Connect initiative

China’s stock markets show recovery signs while EU is closely watching in anticipation of the €10bn investment

IMF’s Lagarde indirectly cautioned Eurozone on deflation

Who is to lose from the 6-month extension of the EU economic sanctions against Russia?

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

G20 LIVE: G20 leaders reaffirm OECD’s role in ensuring strong, sustainable and inclusive growth

Maros Sefcovic Canete European Commission Energy

Better late than never? Commission runs now to fight energy dependency on Russia with the sustainable energy security package

US, Russia oblige each other in Syria and Ukraine selling off allies

The historic accomplishment of a seamless EU patent and intellectual property space

Greece did it again

The European Parliament wants to stay in one place

How to test if Kiev’s ‘Maidan’ was an authentic revolt or a well-planned operation

A Sting Exclusive: why the environment is important to your health, by UNEP’s Head for Europe

Tsipras imposes more austerity on insolvent Greece; plans to win new early election soon

The Europe we want: Just, Sustainable, Democratic and Inclusive

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Of the three issues, the most formidable, it seems to me, is the 499 kms of Irish/Ulster frontier. Unless one can imagine each individual carrying a miniature GPS embedded in his skull, (which any professiona terrorist will refuse or will know how to neutralize) I don’t see how electronics could create a virtual border allowing both immigration security and customs be enforced.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s