Brexit: PM May must hush Boris Johnson to unlock the negotiations

From left to right: Emmanuel Macron, President of France, Angela Merkel, German Federal Chancellor, Christian Kern, Austrian Federal Chancellor. Shoot location: Tallinn – Estonia. Shoot date: 29/09/2017 Copyright: European Union.

Last Thursday night in Tallinn, the Estonian capital, the French President Emmanuel Macron, backed by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, told the British Prime Minister Theresa May, there will be no change in the agenda of the Brexit talks; first the terms of the divorce will be agreed and then the future trade relations between Britain and the European Union will be discussed. The UK has been insisting that the two subjects must be discussed and decided in parallel. Obviously, London counts on tough bargaining for a future more or less full access to the EU internal markets, against a least costly Brexit for Britain in money and political terms.

Currently, the negotiations are rather stuck in regard to those terms. What May said on Friday 22 September about a transition period, in her much advertised speech staged in Florence, Italy, doesn’t seem to have broken the stalemate. And this despite that it “created a new dynamic”, as the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier conceded. He added though that “the transition should be discussed in the second phase of negotiations”.

A Florentine proposal

From Florence the British MP proposed a two year interim period after March 2019 for the full Brexit terms to be applied. The European Sting followed her there. According to May, during this period, presumably until March 2021, Britain will continue as if it were a member of the EU, with full access to the European internal market and normal participation in the Customs Union. She clarified that the UK is ready to pay for this provisional arrangement the equivalent of the country’s contributions to the EU Budget, amounting to around €20 billion. Understandably, this sum is on top of the ‘cost of the Brexit’ for UK, as Brussels estimated it at anything between €40bn and €60bn.

At this point, we should sum up the state of the Brexit discussions. The EU insists – the 27 leaders have taken unanimously a relevant decision – the talks must first clarify three key issues related to the exit terms and then negotiate the future trade and otherwise relations. 10 Downing Street demands that the exit terms and the future trade agreement should be negotiated in parallel. This was and still is the reason the talks are stuck. Now, Barnier says that not even the ‘interim period’ proposal can be discussed, if the exit terms are not agreed. Let’s dig a bit into those three issues Brussels wants to be agreed first.

It’s always the sovereignty

The future status of mainland citizens who live and work in Britain and vice versa for the Brits in the Continent is the first subject that Brussels wants to be settled. Of the same opinion are the British trade unions representing workers (TUC) and the employers (CBI). London says none will have to leave Britain. There are a lot of details though which have to be clarified in this respect, like the rights of family unification, deciding who has that right, etc. Last Friday, Barnier once more said that those cases have to be judged by the European Courts. Britain denies the jurisdiction of the EU Court after March 2019 and insists it will be the country’s legal system to decide on similar cases.

However, differences about the jurisdiction of the courts appear in equally important topics, like the settlement of commercial disputes after Brexit and until March 2021. Similar issues may arise in relation to the functioning of the Internal Market and the Customs Union. Hypothetically, during the transition period Britain will act as a full member regarding all those key EU institutions. But, there cannot be other magistrates and judges deciding on relevant questions, than the ones of European Courts. There is a huge European legal edifice developed through decades, which regulates both the Internal Market and the Customs Union. It’s absurd to think that the British courts may discuss cases pertaining to central EU institutions.

A matter of pride?

Given the apparent deadlock tough, May’s proposal for an interim period of no change at all, is tantamount to London contemplating to accept the jurisdiction of the EU Court in Britain after Brexit. In Florence, May, addressing the topic of EU citizens living and working in Britain said “we want you to stay, we value you”. And then in relation to which courts will rule on their status and rights she added “on this basis, our teams can reach firm agreement quickly”.

It’s an obvious reference to the prospect, that the final agreement, after voted in the Commons and becoming UK law, may foresee the continuation of the EU Courts jurisdiction in Britain, at least during the interim period. Yet it will be rather difficult for 10 Downing Street to ‘sell’ such an arrangement to the Brexiteer Brits. Boris Johnson, her minister of Foreign Affairs – an unscrupulous populist Brexiteer  repeatedly caught liying flagrantly – has turned the courts’ jurisdiction issue into a matter of ‘national pride’. As if this has not been the case for the last 44 years, after Britain joined the EU 1973.

What else?

The other two issues, to be agreed before trade is discussed, are equally complicated. The second question is the cost London has to pay for the divorce, coming to tens of billions of euros. The discussion has started from a bottom line of €20 billion and  will very probably continue until every other issue is settled, including the court jurisdiction topic. Money can nicely settle differences of ‘pride’. As the American President Abraham Lincoln famously said ‘when someone says it’s a matter of principles not money, then it’s a matter of money’. Nothing can be more true than this in the case of Brexit.

The third topic is of no less importance. It’s about the historically existing but invisible today border line of 499 km, between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. The two parts of Ireland communicate now as if there is no border at all. After Brexit though the northern part will leave the EU as a part of UK, but the Republic will remain in the European Union. Legally and logically then real borders have to be installed , controlling the movements of people, goods and capital.

The Irish question

However, if real hard borders are installed everybody agrees that Northern Ireland will be greatly destabilized. Building control posts and customs booths in the only land border between the UK and the EU may trigger economic and political disorder in the north. So, both Brussels and London have accepted that not-burdened communication between the two parts of Ireland should be safeguarded. This may require large investments in technology and personnel in order to make the border almost indiscernible. However, the final arrangement on the island depends largely on the overall agreement between the UK and the EU.

In conclusion, if what happened in Tallinn will be repeated at the 19 October EU Summit, Britain will be compelled to conform to the realities of Brexit. To do this, 10 Downing Street would be obliged to get rid of extremist Brexiteers like Boris Johnson. He has recently published 4000 words in a daily newspaper, to strongly oppose a smooth Brexit.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Depression is the no. 1 cause of ill health and disability worldwide

3 ways to ensure the internet’s future is creative, collaborative and fair

Trump-China trade war lingers upsetting global economy and stock markets

UN chief calls for ‘united front’ against anti-Semitism after US synagogue mass-shooting

Although Greece is struggling to pay salaries and pensions Varoufakis is “optimistic”; the Sting reports live from EBS 2015

Draghi to hold on zero interest rates until he leaves ECB

How cities are failing to be inclusive – and what they can do about it

Trump doesn’t only target Germany, aims to crack the entire EU

How much time has the ‘European Union of last chance’ left?

High unemployment to continue haunting the EU

EU job-search aid worth €9.9m for 1,858 former Air France workers

Water reuse: Commission proposes measures to make it easier and safer for agricultural irrigation

Conflict diamonds and climate change: Cooperate, don’t compete over natural resources urges Guterres

EU to relocate 40,000 migrants across the bloc: first step of a long due substantial reform?

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

EU summit: Are the London Tories planning an exit from the EU?

COP21 Breaking News_09 December: The Draft Agreement Updated

In DR Congo, UN Security Council says December polls are ‘historic opportunity’ for country

What do toilets have to do with climate change?

How to talk about climate change: 5 tips from the front lines

EU Council agrees to reform the system for motor vehicles but with “restricted” power for the Commission

Egypt: The road to hell paved with western advices for democracy

UN mourns death of former Secretary-General Kofi Annan, ‘a guiding force for good’

Trade in fake Italian goods costs economy billions of euros

Eurozone: Economic sentiment-business climate to collapse without support from exports

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

Why are the Balkans’ political leaders meeting in Geneva this week?

China is adding a London-sized electric bus fleet every five weeks

Use space technology to build a better world for all, urges UN chief

Europe split in confronting the US sanctions on Iran, Washington isolated

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

A new era of computing is coming. How can we make sure it is sustainable?

Greece’s future solely in the hands of Tsipras; he can direct the poor country any way he likes

A Sting Exclusive: “Regional Policy: a fully-fledged investment policy”, Commissioner Cretu reveals live from European Business Summit 2015

Mali: Presidential elections critical to consolidate democracy, says UN peacekeeping chief

This is why people live, work and stay in a growing city

How fungi could save the world

Mali: Presidential elections critical to consolidate democracy, says UN peacekeeping chief

MWC 2016 LIVE: Telenor CEO calls on operators to embrace Mobile Connect initiative

2016 crisis update: the year of the Red Fire Monkey burns the world’s markets down

This AI is working with a fleet of drones to help us fight ocean plastic

Energy: new target of 32% from renewables by 2030 agreed by MEPs and ministers

UN chief calls for ‘immediate end’ to escalation of fighting in southwestern Syria, as thousands are displaced

Draghi strives to control the unruly exploitation of financial markets by banking leviathans

Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

Parliament ready to fight for a different EU budget

‘Well-being of two million’ in Gaza at stake as emergency fuel runs dry: UN humanitarian coordinator

The eight types of AI you should know about

INTERVIEW: Advancing human rights, a ‘never ending process’ says new UN rights chief

Greferendum: the biggest political gaffe in western modern history to tear Europe apart? #Grexit #Graccident

Girls still being treated as aliens in medicine in the 21st century

‘Crippling to our credibility’ that number of women peacekeepers is so low: UN chief

Blockchain could boost global trade by $1 trillion

EU voters not interested in the European Parliament elections. What’s behind this European Titanic?

Real EU unemployment rate at 10.2%+4.1%+4.7%: Eurostat Update

Can indoor farming feed the world?

Half the world’s population is still offline. Here’s why that matters

Greenhouse gas levels in atmosphere break another record, UN report shows

The challenges of Chinese investment in Latin America

The EU lets the bankers go on rigging the benchmarks

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Of the three issues, the most formidable, it seems to me, is the 499 kms of Irish/Ulster frontier. Unless one can imagine each individual carrying a miniature GPS embedded in his skull, (which any professiona terrorist will refuse or will know how to neutralize) I don’t see how electronics could create a virtual border allowing both immigration security and customs be enforced.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s