Brexit: PM May must hush Boris Johnson to unlock the negotiations

From left to right: Emmanuel Macron, President of France, Angela Merkel, German Federal Chancellor, Christian Kern, Austrian Federal Chancellor. Shoot location: Tallinn – Estonia. Shoot date: 29/09/2017 Copyright: European Union.

Last Thursday night in Tallinn, the Estonian capital, the French President Emmanuel Macron, backed by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, told the British Prime Minister Theresa May, there will be no change in the agenda of the Brexit talks; first the terms of the divorce will be agreed and then the future trade relations between Britain and the European Union will be discussed. The UK has been insisting that the two subjects must be discussed and decided in parallel. Obviously, London counts on tough bargaining for a future more or less full access to the EU internal markets, against a least costly Brexit for Britain in money and political terms.

Currently, the negotiations are rather stuck in regard to those terms. What May said on Friday 22 September about a transition period, in her much advertised speech staged in Florence, Italy, doesn’t seem to have broken the stalemate. And this despite that it “created a new dynamic”, as the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier conceded. He added though that “the transition should be discussed in the second phase of negotiations”.

A Florentine proposal

From Florence the British MP proposed a two year interim period after March 2019 for the full Brexit terms to be applied. The European Sting followed her there. According to May, during this period, presumably until March 2021, Britain will continue as if it were a member of the EU, with full access to the European internal market and normal participation in the Customs Union. She clarified that the UK is ready to pay for this provisional arrangement the equivalent of the country’s contributions to the EU Budget, amounting to around €20 billion. Understandably, this sum is on top of the ‘cost of the Brexit’ for UK, as Brussels estimated it at anything between €40bn and €60bn.

At this point, we should sum up the state of the Brexit discussions. The EU insists – the 27 leaders have taken unanimously a relevant decision – the talks must first clarify three key issues related to the exit terms and then negotiate the future trade and otherwise relations. 10 Downing Street demands that the exit terms and the future trade agreement should be negotiated in parallel. This was and still is the reason the talks are stuck. Now, Barnier says that not even the ‘interim period’ proposal can be discussed, if the exit terms are not agreed. Let’s dig a bit into those three issues Brussels wants to be agreed first.

It’s always the sovereignty

The future status of mainland citizens who live and work in Britain and vice versa for the Brits in the Continent is the first subject that Brussels wants to be settled. Of the same opinion are the British trade unions representing workers (TUC) and the employers (CBI). London says none will have to leave Britain. There are a lot of details though which have to be clarified in this respect, like the rights of family unification, deciding who has that right, etc. Last Friday, Barnier once more said that those cases have to be judged by the European Courts. Britain denies the jurisdiction of the EU Court after March 2019 and insists it will be the country’s legal system to decide on similar cases.

However, differences about the jurisdiction of the courts appear in equally important topics, like the settlement of commercial disputes after Brexit and until March 2021. Similar issues may arise in relation to the functioning of the Internal Market and the Customs Union. Hypothetically, during the transition period Britain will act as a full member regarding all those key EU institutions. But, there cannot be other magistrates and judges deciding on relevant questions, than the ones of European Courts. There is a huge European legal edifice developed through decades, which regulates both the Internal Market and the Customs Union. It’s absurd to think that the British courts may discuss cases pertaining to central EU institutions.

A matter of pride?

Given the apparent deadlock tough, May’s proposal for an interim period of no change at all, is tantamount to London contemplating to accept the jurisdiction of the EU Court in Britain after Brexit. In Florence, May, addressing the topic of EU citizens living and working in Britain said “we want you to stay, we value you”. And then in relation to which courts will rule on their status and rights she added “on this basis, our teams can reach firm agreement quickly”.

It’s an obvious reference to the prospect, that the final agreement, after voted in the Commons and becoming UK law, may foresee the continuation of the EU Courts jurisdiction in Britain, at least during the interim period. Yet it will be rather difficult for 10 Downing Street to ‘sell’ such an arrangement to the Brexiteer Brits. Boris Johnson, her minister of Foreign Affairs – an unscrupulous populist Brexiteer  repeatedly caught liying flagrantly – has turned the courts’ jurisdiction issue into a matter of ‘national pride’. As if this has not been the case for the last 44 years, after Britain joined the EU 1973.

What else?

The other two issues, to be agreed before trade is discussed, are equally complicated. The second question is the cost London has to pay for the divorce, coming to tens of billions of euros. The discussion has started from a bottom line of €20 billion and  will very probably continue until every other issue is settled, including the court jurisdiction topic. Money can nicely settle differences of ‘pride’. As the American President Abraham Lincoln famously said ‘when someone says it’s a matter of principles not money, then it’s a matter of money’. Nothing can be more true than this in the case of Brexit.

The third topic is of no less importance. It’s about the historically existing but invisible today border line of 499 km, between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. The two parts of Ireland communicate now as if there is no border at all. After Brexit though the northern part will leave the EU as a part of UK, but the Republic will remain in the European Union. Legally and logically then real borders have to be installed , controlling the movements of people, goods and capital.

The Irish question

However, if real hard borders are installed everybody agrees that Northern Ireland will be greatly destabilized. Building control posts and customs booths in the only land border between the UK and the EU may trigger economic and political disorder in the north. So, both Brussels and London have accepted that not-burdened communication between the two parts of Ireland should be safeguarded. This may require large investments in technology and personnel in order to make the border almost indiscernible. However, the final arrangement on the island depends largely on the overall agreement between the UK and the EU.

In conclusion, if what happened in Tallinn will be repeated at the 19 October EU Summit, Britain will be compelled to conform to the realities of Brexit. To do this, 10 Downing Street would be obliged to get rid of extremist Brexiteers like Boris Johnson. He has recently published 4000 words in a daily newspaper, to strongly oppose a smooth Brexit.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How we can win the war against antibiotic resistance

Record-breaking heatwaves killed about 1,500 people in France

UN chief condemns air strike that hit school bus in northern Yemen, killing scores of children

Charges against Baha’i in Yemen must be dropped: UN experts urge release of detainees

Better outreach to citizens needed to improve effectiveness of European Commission’s public consultations, say Auditors

This South African lawyer is reading while running marathons – for book donations

Intervene, don’t overthink – the new mantra of systems design

How storytelling can be a force for social change

Brexit talks started with a London handicap and Brussels’ sternness

Why the 33,000 staff European Commission did not have a real contingency plan for the refugee crisis?

MEPs call for EU rules to better protect minorities’ rights

The EU learns about fishing and banking from tiny Iceland

Tougher defence tools against unfair imports to protect EU jobs and industry

Iceland’s slowdown underlines the need to fix structural issues

The COP22 is under full deployment while Donald Trump threatens openly to withdraw the US from the Paris agreement

Britain aligns with EU rivaling US on trade and Iran, abandons bilateral ‘Midsummer Night’s Dream’

The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

Parliaments broadly agree on next steps for economic, monetary union

One million facing food shortages, nutrition crisis after Mozambique cyclones: UNICEF

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

UN chief ‘alarmed’ by violations of UN-backed ceasefire in Libya

Millions denied citizenship due to ideas of national, ethnic or racial ‘purity’: UN rights expert

Why press freedom should be at the top of everyone’s agenda

ECB money bonanza not enough to revive euro area, Germany longs to rule with stagnation

Erasmus+: an expected budget of €3 billion to be invested in young Europeans and to help create European Universities in 2019

Court of Auditors: EU spending infested with errors well above the materiality threshold of 2%

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

A Sting Exclusive: “Regulators and the shipping industry collaborating for a sustainable future”, written by the Secretary General of IMO

Nicaragua ‘crisis’ still cause for concern amid murder, torture allegations: Bachelet

Tax evasion and fraud threaten the European project

Meet Cipta: the comic book hero using her powers to tackle bullying in schools

The Ecofin deceives the SMEs with the EIB €10bn capital increase

What does a good digital ID look like?

“The markets have moved on renewables, policy makers must keep up”, A Sting Exclusive by Erik Solheim, Head of UN Environment

Future of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh ‘hangs in the balance’ – UNHCR chief

How can batteries become more sustainable? This young scientist might have the answer

G20 LIVE: “Our response needs to be robust…otherwise we will only find the fire we are trying to put out”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon just lit up G20 in Antalya Turkey

The Future of Retail: Changing shopping patterns will mean retailers need to invest in costly and complex solutions

EU and New Zealand launch trade negotiations

Lagarde’s metamorphoses, not a laughing matter

The ‘abuse of food relief in Yemen’ must end now

We know ethics should inform AI. But which ethics?

China greenlights first underwater high-speed railway

EU Youth Conference concludes in Luxembourg with concrete plans on how to create real youth participation

EU Parliament shows its teeth in view of 2014 elections

How to stop data leaks

2019 Innovation Scoreboards: The innovation performance of the EU and its regions is increasing

Youth platforms call on German Government to break down legal barriers for young volunteers and pupils

Economic growth ‘exceeds expectations’ but trade tensions are rising: UN report

Now’s the time to take up cycling – here are 6 reasons why

Much more than a ‘lifeline’ for millions of households, remittances can spur global growth, says UN agency

‘Ticking bomb’ health warning over deteriorating conditions facing Cyclone Idai victims

Rapid action needed for people to meet challenges of changing world of work

UN agency chiefs condemn Saudi-coalition led air strike that killed dozens in western Yemen

UN General Assembly President defends ‘landmark’ migration compact

Antibiotics are contaminating the world’s rivers

How young entrepreneurs should be supported: what assistance should governments provide?

Around 23 million boys have married before reaching 15; ‘we can end this violation’ says UNICEF chief

A dangerously hot climate, simmering political tensions: ‘This is not the summer of our youth,’ UN chief warns

Yemen ceasefire deal: ‘Potential’ now to restore humanitarian lifeline to millions

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Of the three issues, the most formidable, it seems to me, is the 499 kms of Irish/Ulster frontier. Unless one can imagine each individual carrying a miniature GPS embedded in his skull, (which any professiona terrorist will refuse or will know how to neutralize) I don’t see how electronics could create a virtual border allowing both immigration security and customs be enforced.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s