Brexit: PM May must hush Boris Johnson to unlock the negotiations

From left to right: Emmanuel Macron, President of France, Angela Merkel, German Federal Chancellor, Christian Kern, Austrian Federal Chancellor. Shoot location: Tallinn – Estonia. Shoot date: 29/09/2017 Copyright: European Union.

Last Thursday night in Tallinn, the Estonian capital, the French President Emmanuel Macron, backed by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, told the British Prime Minister Theresa May, there will be no change in the agenda of the Brexit talks; first the terms of the divorce will be agreed and then the future trade relations between Britain and the European Union will be discussed. The UK has been insisting that the two subjects must be discussed and decided in parallel. Obviously, London counts on tough bargaining for a future more or less full access to the EU internal markets, against a least costly Brexit for Britain in money and political terms.

Currently, the negotiations are rather stuck in regard to those terms. What May said on Friday 22 September about a transition period, in her much advertised speech staged in Florence, Italy, doesn’t seem to have broken the stalemate. And this despite that it “created a new dynamic”, as the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier conceded. He added though that “the transition should be discussed in the second phase of negotiations”.

A Florentine proposal

From Florence the British MP proposed a two year interim period after March 2019 for the full Brexit terms to be applied. The European Sting followed her there. According to May, during this period, presumably until March 2021, Britain will continue as if it were a member of the EU, with full access to the European internal market and normal participation in the Customs Union. She clarified that the UK is ready to pay for this provisional arrangement the equivalent of the country’s contributions to the EU Budget, amounting to around €20 billion. Understandably, this sum is on top of the ‘cost of the Brexit’ for UK, as Brussels estimated it at anything between €40bn and €60bn.

At this point, we should sum up the state of the Brexit discussions. The EU insists – the 27 leaders have taken unanimously a relevant decision – the talks must first clarify three key issues related to the exit terms and then negotiate the future trade and otherwise relations. 10 Downing Street demands that the exit terms and the future trade agreement should be negotiated in parallel. This was and still is the reason the talks are stuck. Now, Barnier says that not even the ‘interim period’ proposal can be discussed, if the exit terms are not agreed. Let’s dig a bit into those three issues Brussels wants to be agreed first.

It’s always the sovereignty

The future status of mainland citizens who live and work in Britain and vice versa for the Brits in the Continent is the first subject that Brussels wants to be settled. Of the same opinion are the British trade unions representing workers (TUC) and the employers (CBI). London says none will have to leave Britain. There are a lot of details though which have to be clarified in this respect, like the rights of family unification, deciding who has that right, etc. Last Friday, Barnier once more said that those cases have to be judged by the European Courts. Britain denies the jurisdiction of the EU Court after March 2019 and insists it will be the country’s legal system to decide on similar cases.

However, differences about the jurisdiction of the courts appear in equally important topics, like the settlement of commercial disputes after Brexit and until March 2021. Similar issues may arise in relation to the functioning of the Internal Market and the Customs Union. Hypothetically, during the transition period Britain will act as a full member regarding all those key EU institutions. But, there cannot be other magistrates and judges deciding on relevant questions, than the ones of European Courts. There is a huge European legal edifice developed through decades, which regulates both the Internal Market and the Customs Union. It’s absurd to think that the British courts may discuss cases pertaining to central EU institutions.

A matter of pride?

Given the apparent deadlock tough, May’s proposal for an interim period of no change at all, is tantamount to London contemplating to accept the jurisdiction of the EU Court in Britain after Brexit. In Florence, May, addressing the topic of EU citizens living and working in Britain said “we want you to stay, we value you”. And then in relation to which courts will rule on their status and rights she added “on this basis, our teams can reach firm agreement quickly”.

It’s an obvious reference to the prospect, that the final agreement, after voted in the Commons and becoming UK law, may foresee the continuation of the EU Courts jurisdiction in Britain, at least during the interim period. Yet it will be rather difficult for 10 Downing Street to ‘sell’ such an arrangement to the Brexiteer Brits. Boris Johnson, her minister of Foreign Affairs – an unscrupulous populist Brexiteer  repeatedly caught liying flagrantly – has turned the courts’ jurisdiction issue into a matter of ‘national pride’. As if this has not been the case for the last 44 years, after Britain joined the EU 1973.

What else?

The other two issues, to be agreed before trade is discussed, are equally complicated. The second question is the cost London has to pay for the divorce, coming to tens of billions of euros. The discussion has started from a bottom line of €20 billion and  will very probably continue until every other issue is settled, including the court jurisdiction topic. Money can nicely settle differences of ‘pride’. As the American President Abraham Lincoln famously said ‘when someone says it’s a matter of principles not money, then it’s a matter of money’. Nothing can be more true than this in the case of Brexit.

The third topic is of no less importance. It’s about the historically existing but invisible today border line of 499 km, between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. The two parts of Ireland communicate now as if there is no border at all. After Brexit though the northern part will leave the EU as a part of UK, but the Republic will remain in the European Union. Legally and logically then real borders have to be installed , controlling the movements of people, goods and capital.

The Irish question

However, if real hard borders are installed everybody agrees that Northern Ireland will be greatly destabilized. Building control posts and customs booths in the only land border between the UK and the EU may trigger economic and political disorder in the north. So, both Brussels and London have accepted that not-burdened communication between the two parts of Ireland should be safeguarded. This may require large investments in technology and personnel in order to make the border almost indiscernible. However, the final arrangement on the island depends largely on the overall agreement between the UK and the EU.

In conclusion, if what happened in Tallinn will be repeated at the 19 October EU Summit, Britain will be compelled to conform to the realities of Brexit. To do this, 10 Downing Street would be obliged to get rid of extremist Brexiteers like Boris Johnson. He has recently published 4000 words in a daily newspaper, to strongly oppose a smooth Brexit.

 

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Changing healthcare systems with simple technological solutions

The financial sector cripples Eurozone growth prospects

Women must be at ‘centre of peacekeeping decision-making’, UN chief tells Security Council

Black babies more likely to survive when cared for by Black doctors, suggests new study

Ahead of key UN-backed Marrakech migration conference, youth recount harrowing journeys

Is your smart home as safe as you think?

Deal on faster exchange of non-EU nationals’ criminal records

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

Space science now a ‘fundamental pillar’ of 21st century human development: top UN space official

It’s time to ‘eliminate the scourge of conflict-related sexual violence’, urges UN chief

Commission assesses and sets out reform priorities for the countries aiming to join the EU

UN-led Yemen ceasefire monitoring team gets ready to begin operations

Further reforms needed for a stronger and more inclusive Argentine economy

Germany tries to save Europe from war between Ukraine and Russia

EU leaders slammed on anti-tax evasion inaction and expensive energy

What’s an ‘essential service’? Not knowing could block access to key digital services during COVID

DiscoverEU: 15,000 travel passes up for grabs to explore the EU this summer

Artificial Intelligence raises ethical, policy challenges – UN expert

Brussels to tear down the trade wall with Mexico as opposed to Trump’s “walls”

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health

5 surprising ways digital technology is changing childhood

EU Youth Conference in Amsterdam: enabling young people to engage in a diverse, connected and inclusive Europe

CEOs as activists: should leaders speak up about social causes?

Alarming number of Ebola deaths in DRC a ‘rallying cry’ to scale up treatment

Three trends shaping the future of mobility in 2020

How Africa’s women can drive the 4IR forward

More attacks, ‘persisting security challenges’ threaten progress in West Africa, Sahel

EU-China: Council authorises signature of the agreement on geographical indications

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Argentina Accepts KP Amendment

Remarks by H.E. Ambassador Zhang Ming At the Reception in Celebration of the 70th Anniversary of the Founding of the People’s Republic of China

‘I thought I’d never get out alive’ – the Muslim director who interviewed neo-Nazis

Dark spots on EU humanitarian aid spending

Want a fairer society? This economist says he has the answer

European Commission calls on national political parties to join efforts to ensure free and fair elections in Europe

Norway is known for its cold weather – but it’s been in the grip of a severe heatwave

UK must end ‘unlawful’ administration of Chagos Archipelago ‘as rapidly as possible,’ top UN court rules

We need better alignment between climate and trade. Here’s a roadmap

Using the quarantine to your advantage

ECB reaches the boundaries of its mandate to revive the entirety of Eurozone

Green Deal: measures to step up the fight against global deforestation

Tourism and transport: Commission’s guidance on how to safely resume travel and reboot Europe’s tourism in 2020 and beyond

Macron defends the idea of European sovereignty

At last some rules on banks

Vaccines: from miracle to possible danger

Iran: BBC and other broadcast journalists harassed; families threatened – UN experts

The European Commission, European Investment Bank and Breakthrough Energy Ventures establish a new €100 million fund to support clean energy investments

Coronavirus Response: Commission welcomes ‘Best Practices’ to provide relief for consumers and businesses

Better air pollution data is helping us all breathe easier. Here’s how

How a 3-point plan could help rebuild business for the long-term

Corruption undermines democracy and contributes to instability, warns senior UN anti-crime official

Close to final agreement on the EU Banking Union

5 charts that explain big challenges facing Italy’s new government

Take Care of In Order to Be Taken Care of

We’re all in the same boat on the SDGs. Here’s how we steer a course

Global aid needed for healthcare

European Commission: Does Apple, Starbucks and Fiat really pay their taxes?

Practicing healthcare: Skills of a good healthcare professional and its effects

How Sierra Leone is using 3D printing to become a model state

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Latest news from Monday’s World Health Organization briefing

Security Council gravely concerned by Ebola outbreak in DR Congo, demands immediate end to violence hampering response

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Of the three issues, the most formidable, it seems to me, is the 499 kms of Irish/Ulster frontier. Unless one can imagine each individual carrying a miniature GPS embedded in his skull, (which any professiona terrorist will refuse or will know how to neutralize) I don’t see how electronics could create a virtual border allowing both immigration security and customs be enforced.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s