Amazon, Luxembourg and Ireland hit by EU’s latest turn of the screw over competition

Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition, in Brussels - Berlaymont, last week. (Copyright European Union, 2017 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Lukasz Kobus)

Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition, in Brussels – Berlaymont, last week. (Copyright European Union, 2017 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Lukasz Kobus)


Last week, the European Commission has ordered Amazon to pay a 250 million euros ($293 million) bill in back taxes to Luxembourg, as a consequence of “undue tax benefits”. The Commission also announced that it is planning to take the Irish government to European court over its failure to recover €13bn in unpaid taxes from Apple Inc., related to a 2016 ruling. The latest moves represent a turn of the screw by Brussels to make US tech giants pay more taxes in Europe, as well as the latest chapter of a discussion on taxes and competition in the bloc.

Background

Launched almost three years ago, in 2014, the European Commission’s investigation concluded that a tax ruling issued by Luxembourg in 2003, and prolonged in 2011, lowered the tax paid by Amazon in Luxembourg “without any valid justification”. The European watchdog indeed alleges that the Seattle, Washington-based company benefited from a so-called sweetheart tax deal for almost a decade, that granted it illegal state support from Luxembourg, the hub for its European operations.

In an official statement, the European Commission explained that Amazon to shifted the vast majority of its profits from an Amazon Group company, that is subject to tax in Luxembourg (Amazon EU the “operating company”), to a company which is not subject to tax (Amazon Europe Holding Technologies). “In particular”, the official EU statement says, “the tax ruling endorsed the payment of a royalty from Amazon EU to Amazon Europe Holding Technologies, which significantly reduced Amazon EU’s taxable profits”.

The ruling

So last Wednesday the European Commission announced it has concluded that Luxembourg granted undue tax benefits to Amazon of around €250 million, and that the EU member State must now recover the illegal aid provided to Amazon. Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: “Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon. As a result, almost three quarters of Amazon’s profits were not taxed”. “In other words, Amazon was allowed to pay four times less tax than other local companies subject to the same national tax rules. This is illegal under EU State aid rules. Member States cannot give selective tax benefits to multinational groups that are not available to others”, she also added.

The European Commission also explained in its official press release that its investigation showed that the level of the royalty payments, endorsed by the tax ruling, was “inflated and did not reflect economic reality”, and that the tax ruling granted a “selective economic advantage to Amazon by allowing the group to pay less tax than other companies subject to the same national tax rules”. In particular, the Commission believes that, thanks to the fact that under Luxembourg’s general tax laws, only the operating company is subject to corporate taxation in Luxembourg, the holding company (Amazon Europe Holding Technologies), received a substantial, unfair advantage.

The reaction

The Financial Times last week quoted Amazon as saying: “We believe that Amazon did not receive any special treatment from Luxembourg and that we paid tax in full accordance with both Luxembourg and international tax law. We will study the commission’s ruling and consider our legal options, including an appeal”. Tech magazine Engadgenet also reported that Amazon said : “Our 50,000 employees across Europe remain heads-down focused on serving our customers and the hundreds of thousands of small businesses who work with us.”

Luxembourg’s government, for its part, said: “As Amazon has been taxed in accordance with the tax rules applicable at the relevant time, Luxembourg considers that the company has not been granted incompatible state aid”.

Boiling Apple

In a separate announcement, the Commission has also announced it is taking further steps against Apple Inc. and, as an actor of the same complex play, against Ireland. On 30 August 2016, a Commission decision concluded that Ireland’s tax benefits to Apple were illegal under EU State aid rules, because it “allowed Apple to pay substantially less tax than other businesses”. Now the European competition watchdog as decided to refer Ireland to the European Court of Justice “for failing to recover from Apple illegal State aid worth up to €13 billion”, as required by a Commission decision.

With an official European Commission statement on October 4, Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said: “Ireland has to recover up to 13 billion euros in illegal State aid from Apple. However, more than one year after the Commission adopted this decision, Ireland has still not recovered the money, also not in part”. “We of course understand that recovery in certain cases may be more complex than in others, and we are always ready to assist. But Member States need to make sufficient progress to restore competition. That is why we have today decided to refer Ireland to the EU Court for failing to implement our decision”, she added.

The deadline for Ireland to implement the Commission’s decision on Apple’s tax treatment was 3 January 2017. “The Commission has therefore decided to refer Ireland to the Court of Justice for failure to implement the Commission decision, in accordance with Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)”, the official EC press release therefore stated.

“Intensive work”

Ireland on Wednesday immediately described as “extremely regrettable” an EU decision to take the country to the European Court of Justice, but promised to collect money owed as soon as possible. Dublin said the Commission’s August order for the U.S. tech giant to pay the unpaid taxes was “unjustified”, but it had agreed to collect the money and was seeking one or more investment managers to handle an escrow account, as reported by Reuters.

“It is extremely regrettable that the Commission has taken this action, especially in relation to a case with such a large-scale recovery amount,” Irish finance ministry said in a statement. “Irish officials and experts have been engaged in intensive work to ensure that the State complies with all its recovery obligations as soon as possible, and have been in constant contact with the European Commission and Apple on all aspects of this process for over a year”.

Open disputes

Amazon’s and Apple’s cases are two of the four among such tax probes launched by the European Commission since 2013, although there are more competition-related cases opened on the desk of EU regulators, including FIAT, McDonald’s and Google. The Commission has indeed promised it will scrutinize tax arrangements between large multinationals and the bloc’s member states, as part of a major reform of EU tax rules, including changes to cross-border VAT that is due to be discussed in the coming days and weeks.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

“Only through energy policy we can trigger competitiveness”. The Sting live from #EBS2015: Energy Union – When will it happen?

The 28 EU leaders show contempt for the European Elections results

‘Exercise restraint’ Guterres urges Sri Lankans, as political crisis deepens

Austria’s EU Presidency: Chancellor Sebastian Kurz aims to “build bridges”

Consumer protection: Deal on EU-wide rules for those sold faulty products

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

A Europe that protects: Continued efforts needed on security priorities

Two out of every five American couples now meet online

MEPs want to ensure sufficient funding for Connecting Europe’s future

Germany fears that Americans and Russians want to partition Europe again

MEPs strengthen EU financial watchdogs

Is there a cure for corruption in Greece?

Yemen: Security Council backs new mission in support of key port city truce

Foreign investment to be screened to protect EU countries’ strategic interests

Yemen: Committee brings warring parties to the table in Hudaydah, builds on ceasefire

The growing cyber-risk to our electricity grids – and what to do about it

North Korean families facing deep ‘hunger crisis’ after worst harvest in 10 years, UN food assessment shows

For how long will terror and economic stagnation be clouding the European skies?

Knowledge management and entrepreneurship: short term vs. long term perspective

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: sexual violence in conflict, a malaria vaccine trial, updates on Libya, Ebola in DR Congo, Sri Lanka and Mali

How Japan can take the lead with an ageing workforce

What do toilets have to do with climate change?

GSMA Announces First Keynote Speakers for 2019 “MWC Los Angeles, in Partnership with CTIA”

UN postal agency ‘regrets’ US withdrawal

High-technology manufacturing saves the EU industry

Why the financial scandals multiply?

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

Cyprus tragedy reveals Eurozone’s arbitrary functioning

When it comes to envirotech adoption, NGOs can lead us out of the woods

EU citizens disenchanted with Economic and Monetary Union over rising poverty and high unemployment

Statement by the Brexit Steering Group on UK government White paper

‘Revved up climate action’ needed to counter ‘prolonged’ and deadly storms like Cyclone Idai: Guterres

Berlin repels proposal for cheaper euro

Facebook-Cambridge Analytica: MEPs demand action to protect citizens’ privacy

UN chief commends African Union on adoption of institutional reforms

This new solar technology can be printed or woven into fabric

Oslo leads the way in ‘Breathe Life’ campaign for cleaner cities in climate change era

Soil pollution ‘jeopardizing’ life on Earth, UN agency warns on World Day

Earthquake: Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena

These five exercise trends will help society and your health

Yemen: ‘A great first step’ UN declares as aid team accesses grain silo which can feed millions

Worldwide terror attacks have fallen for the third year in a row

Trump doesn’t only target Germany, aims to crack the entire EU

Commuters in these cities spend more than 8 days a year stuck in traffic

Another doomed EU attempt to interfere in Libya?

Pride in practice: Equality in access to health services for the LGBT community in a third-world country

Here are 4 of the most politically charged World Cup games ever played

Prospect of a nuclear war ‘higher than it has been in generations’, warns UN

Why Sweden’s cashless society is no longer a utopia

UN rights expert calls for civilian protection as fighting escalates between military and armed group

Why we need a new social contract for data in healthcare

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

Eurogroup president swallows statement on savings confiscation

European Youth, quo vadis?

Security Council downsizes AU-UN mission in Darfur, eying eventual exit

Remembering Kofi Annan

#TakeYourSeat at the UN Climate Change Conference: a way for all people to join the global conversation

Brexit: when the hubris of one man can set the UK, the EU and the entire world on fire

Colombia offers nationality rights to Venezuelan children born there: UN hails ‘very important step’

The ECB will do whatever it takes to set the Eurozone economy again in motion

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s