Trump’s Syrian hit the softest option vis-a-vis Russia

US President Donald Trump receives a briefing on the military strike on Syria from his National Security team, including a video teleconference with Secretary of Defense, James Mattis, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, on Thursday April 6, 2017, in Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead).

All the major English language media interpreted last week’s US strike of the Syrian air base with Tomahawk missiles, as a serious geostrategic action by Donald Trump carrying messages not only to Russia, but also to North Korea and even China. Nothing is less true than that. This was the least the new US President was supposed to do, after the despicable assault effectuated by the supported by Russia Syrian President Bashar al – Assad against his own people. Last Tuesday the Damascus chemical weapons hit the town of Khan Sheikhoun of the Idlib region, and torturously killed 70 people, amongst them 20 children and babies.

The images which shocked the world last week couldn’t be left unanswered by Washington. Otherwise the rumors about Putin’s mysterious leverage on Trump would have gained credibility. To be reminded, that in 2013 the Assad regime was forced to – theoretically- surrender all its chemical weaponry to UN inspectors. This was arranged after Damascus had repeatedly bombed its own people with chemical bombs. At that time, the global resentment against the Assad regime had reached an apex. As a result, Russia and China were convinced by the West to punish Assad.

Damascus did it again

Then Damascus was forced by a unanimous UN Security Council decision to undersign the Chemical Weapons Convention, accept UN controllers on her soil and finally deliver her chemical arsenal. Last Tuesday, it became clear though that all that were sheer hypocrisy and lies. The main force against the 2013 UN action against Assad was Washington. Now, it would have been a disgrace for America, if the latest attack with chemicals against civilians had being unanswered, no matter if Moscow is one hundred percent in support of Assad.

At this point, it must be also reminded that during the 2016 US Presidential electoral race Trump had repeatedly expressed his admiration for Russia and Putin. His adversary, Hillary Clinton, was adamant against any relaxation of America’s tough stance vis-à-vis Russia in both friction zones, Ukraine and Syria. Clinton had proposed that the US should directly threaten or even effectively counter the Russian fighter jets operating in Syria in support of Assad, battering the rebels backed by the West.

Too soft on Russia

No need to remind here the latest developments in Washington, where the Trump administration and the new US President himself came under suspicion for secret dealings with Moscow. James Comey, the head of the FBI, informed the relevant Senate committee, that members of the administration are investigated by the US security services, for unlawful or treasonous contacts with Russians. Michael Flynn, Trump’s security advisor for three weeks was forced to resign for murky and illegal contacts with the Russians. He had personal relations with Putin and had delivered paid speeches in Moscow. Trump’s personal pick as Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, was forced to recuse himself from such investigations implicating relations with Russia, as being himself involved.

Given, then, that some action was necessary, after Assad’s new atrocity with chemical gas bombs on civilians, Trump choose the least effective option. He ordered the US armed forces to hit the Syrian military airfield from which the airplane had set off to drop its atrocious load at night with Tomahawk missiles. Trump made sure that the hit was carried at night, when personnel presence was minimum and no Russian advisors were going about.

Notifying Russia

The Russian air force also uses this airfield and its pilots are quartered a bit further afar in the periphery. Still, Washington, under Trump, made sure that no Russian personnel or fighter planes come under American fire, by timely informing Moscow about the hit. In this way, Washington made sure that her duty to the American people and the world was superficially served, and at the same time the USRussia relations are not threatened. Of course, Moscow felt obliged to loudly protest against the American action all along this past week. However, Rex Tillerson the US State Secretary, has not canceled his visit to Moscow, scheduled for this week.

This limited American reaction to the latest use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime against its own people was then in many ways tolerable from a geostrategic point of view, and consequently it carried no stern messages to Moscow, Pyongyang or Beijing. To this date, there have been noisy Russian protests from Foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov and Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. President Vladimir Putin waited until yesterday to react to the US hit.  He probably didn’t want to  combat this Trump action right away. Putin’s Russia also didn’t react last January after former President Barack Obama had expelled 34 Russian diplomats as spies. It was only a few days before Trump was to take the oath and obviously Putin didn’t want to make things difficult for the new President.

In conclusion, the American hit against Assad doesn’t constitute a widening of the US policy targets in Syria and the wider region, nor does it carry any new and severe messages to the world. Yesterday afternoon, Rex Tillerson ,in an interview with CBS channel had nothing to say against Assad remaining in power, even when asked directly on that. This is in direct contrast to what severe Hillary Clinton would have done opposing Russia and Assad, had she won the last November election.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU agricultural production no more a self-sufficiency anchor

Time to be welcome: Youth work and integration of young refugees

EU rewards organisations that make eco-innovation pay

Education expenditure in the EU not hurt much by crisis

COP21 Business update: Companies urge now for carbon pricing as coal is still a big issue

In China things are moving in the right direction

Ukraine-EU deal sees the light but there’s no defeat for Russia

Unemployment and stagnation can tear Eurozone apart if austere policies persist

“Will TTIP solve the massive EU-US unemployment? Absolutely not!” A revealing Sting Exclusive with Tim Bennett from the Transatlantic Business Council

Italy’s dilemma after Merkel-Hollande agreed loose banking union

New skills needed for medical students in Industry 4.0

Is Erdogan losing game and match within and without Turkey?

The European Commission to stop Buffering

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

EU Commission expects consumer spending to unlock growth

The Commission tries to stop the ‘party’ with the structural funds

Why are the financial markets shivering again?

The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

Mobile 360 Africa 11-13 July 2017

A money laundering case on Vatican Bank’s road to renovation

Entrepreneurship in a newly shaped Europe: what is the survival kit for a young Catalan and British entrepreneur in 2018?

India’s Largest Entrepreneurship Event is Back! (23-24th August 2016)

A Sting Exclusive: Paris Climate Change Summit, a defining moment for humanity, by Ulf Björnholm Head of UNEP Brussels

Industrial products: Lifting the last impediments in the EU single market

Finance for SMEs: Alternative supply mechanisms do exist

EU Parliament semi worried over democratic deficit

Pro-EU forces won a 70% triumph in the European elections

Italy’s Letta: A European Banking Union soon or Eurozone collapses

ECB asks for more subsidies to banks

Europe’s top court hears Intel and sends € 1.06 bn antitrust fine to review

Theresa May’s global Britain against Philip Hammond’s Brexit fog

What lessons to draw from the destruction of Syria

A sterilised EMU may lead to a break up of Eurozone

Lack of involvement, or lack of opportunities?

Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

European Commission determined to conclude EU-Mercosur trade deal this year despite French concerns

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

The EU Parliament unanimously rejects Commission’s ideas about ‘seeds’

“As German Chancellor I want to be able to cope with the merger of the real and digital economy”, Angela Merkel from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

“Beating pollution for our planet”, a Sting Exclusive by Mr Erik Solheim, the Executive Director of the United Nations Environment

COP21 Breaking News_09 December: The Draft Agreement Updated

The inhumane face of crisis mirrored in numbers

How the Irish people were robbed by banks, the Commission and their own government

The DNA of the future retail CEO

Travel the world, find yourself

Bank resolutions to remain a politically influenced affair

Mental health in medical students: the deciphered quandary

The Peoples are missing from EU’s monetary union

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

The Irish Presidency bullies the Parliament over EU budget

G20 LIVE: “International communities and leaders have great expectations for 2016 G20 summit in Hangzhou China”, Mr Wang Xiaolong, the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s special envoy stresses live from G20 in Antalya Turkey

EU Parliament says ‘no’ to austerity budget

ZTE @ MWC14: ZTE excels in all areas at this year’s Mobile World Congress

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

EU and Japan agree on free-trade deal and fill the post-TPP void

Can the EU afford to block China’s business openings to Europe by denying her the ‘market economy status’?

A shortened EU Summit admits failures, makes risky promises

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s