The European Union’s Balkan Double Standard

Commissioner Corina Cretu Croatia

Corina Creţu, Member of the EC in charge of Regional Policy, was on visit in May 2016 at Dubrovnik, capital city of Croatia to take part in the 1st Forum of the EU Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region (EUSAIR) © European Union , 2016 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service / Photo: Denis Lovrovic

This article was written for the Sting by one of our passionate readers, Mr Daniel Jankovic. The opinions expressed within reflect only the writer’s views and not The European Sting’s position on the issue.

Over the past several years, analysts and commentators have noticed a rising tide of domestic support for the Croatian homegrown Nazi movement of the Second World War, the Ustashe, which actively exterminated Serbs, Jews, and Roma in the territory it controlled from 1941-45. Far from condemning this alarming development, the Croatian government, the European Union, and non-state actors within it have tacitly and actively supported the rising tide of sympathy towards the Ustashe.

This disconnect between the ostensible “European values” of human rights and tolerance that the European Union claims to represent, and its tacit support of trends towards extremist politics in Croatia will have a significant impact on the increasing trend of Euroscepticism in Serbia and other Balkan states. Furthermore, the Union’s unabashed condemnation of legitimate populist movements in Europe, including but not limited to the Brexit campaign, as “racist” and “xenophobic,” while quietly supporting genuinely extremist political elements will contribute to the increasingly popular perception of the EU as a hypocritical entity.

Surge in Ustasha Sympathy

The Republic of Croatia has, since its independence, often reverted to the imagery of its Second World War predecessor; the Independent State of Croatia (NDH). The NDH was a puppet state sponsored by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, and was administered by the Ustashe. During its brief four-year lifespan, the NDH made use of a form of clerical fascism built on the basis of discrimination and systematized liquidation of non-Croatian elements within its boundaries. It was responsible for the deaths of anywhere between 300,000 to 600,000 Serbs and tens of thousands of Jews and Roma.

While restricted by law, Ustashe symbolism is freely exhibited at sporting events, political rallies, and all manners of public gatherings. The penalties for these displays are often restricted to a small monetary fine. By comparison, German law (Strafgesetzbuch section 86a) stipulates that a fine and/or a sentence of up to three years imprisonment will be administered.

Ustasha support among football hooligans (including a recent event during Euro 2016 where Croatian fans openly brandished swastikas) has been popular for decades; a more alarming trend is the active and tacit support of the Ustashe movement and legacy coming from the Croatian government. Earlier this year, the government of Croatia was condemned for appointing Zlatko Hasanbegovic, a prominent and open admirer of the Ustashe regime to be the country’s minister of culture. Croatia’s president, Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic, is an avid fan of the pro-Ustashe musician Marko Perkovic “Thompson” and, while describing the Ustashe regime as “criminal”, also stated in the past that the NDH “at least protect[ed] the interests of the Croatian people” during its short and incredibly violent reign.

Silence at Best, Encouragement at Worst

Despite ongoing reports by international NGO’s of state-sponsored discrimination against Croatian Serbs and routine desecrations of Serbian churches and cultural monuments at the hands of pro-Ustashe elements in the country, the European Union has remained almost completely silent on the issue of growing pro-Ustashe sympathies in the Croatian government and political scene.

Rather than condemn the rising tide of Ustashe sympathy in the country or denounce the appointment of Ustashe sympathizers to some of the Croatian government’s highest ministries, the European Union has chosen to tacitly support the creeping return of political extremism to Croatia. On June 15th, an exhibition dedicated to Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac was held at the European Parliament, one of the EU’s most important institutions of governance. Cardinal Stepinac, who served as the Croatian Catholic Archbishop of Zagreb from 1937 to 1960, was an active supporter of the Ustashe regime and according to prominent Balkan historian Bernd Jurgen Fischer “had close association with the Ustashe leaders as the archbishop of the capital city, had issued proclamations celebrating independent Croatia, and welcomed the Ustashe leaders.”

The European Union has yet to respond to any of the criticisms lodged against it for hosting an event dedicated to a key supporter of a Nazi-backed regime that murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians during the Second World War.

A recent definition (pictured below) of the Ustashe regime in the leading German language dictionary ‘Duden’ as a “movement which fought against ‘Serbian centralism’” has also provoked a firestorm of controversy and a rapidly growing online petition sponsored by the humanitarian organization 28 Jun. (full disclosure: we are both members of this organization). The definition makes no reference to any of the Ustashe’s well-documented and numerous crimes against civilian populations, giving it the appearance of a legitimate political movement with reasonable aims. These recent events are contributing to the growing sentiment among many Serbs who feel alienated by the European Union, and as if a double standard is being applied with regards to Serbia.

Loss of Credibility

Since Serbia attained candidate status in 2011, the European Union has imposed on it a host of requirements and stipulations that ostensibly deal with human rights and unresolved issues stemming from the Yugoslav Conflicts of the 1990’s. The Serbian government has largely complied with the conditions imposed on it by the European Union and has committed itself to the EU through acts such as extraditing members of its own government and “normalizing” relations with the Republic of Kosovo (a self-declared state which unilaterally declared independence from Serbia in 2008) at the behest of the European Union. Additionally, many EU states voted in favour of a failed UN resolution that sought to classify the controversial events in Srebrenica in 1995 as “genocide”.

Given the fact that the European Union has both passively supported the rise tide of extremist political inclinations in one of its member states by refusing to condemn it and actively supported it by hosting exhibitions in its honor, Serbs’ enthusiasm for joining the EU will likely continue to wane. The European Union has demonstrated a lack of integrity and even-handedness in upholding its stated human rights values by enforcing relatively harsh standards for Serbia while imposing virtually none on Croatia, even going as far as openly supporting some of Croatia’s worst historical human rights abusers. Coupled with growing Eurosceptic sentiments in both Serbia and Europe as a whole, the European Union’s quiet support of radicalized politics in Croatia could jeopardize the EU’s strategic goals of acquiring Serbia as a member.

Furthermore, the double standard shown by the European Union in its dealings with Croatia and Serbia represent yet another example of the moral hypocrisy of the European Union. While top EU officials were quick to denounce legitimate populist movements such as the Brexit campaign as racist and xenophobic, those same officials and institutions have done nothing but tacitly support genuinely extremist politics in Croatia. Eurosceptic parties such as Front Nationale and the Austrian Freedom Party are routinely branded as “far right” and “radical” while political extremism in Croatia is allowed to flourish. If the European Union does not take steps to meaningfully combat this moral hypocrisy, then it is likely that the trend of increasing skepticism towards the Union will continue to rise unabated.

About the authors

Daniel Jankovic is a graduate of the University of Alberta’s History and Economics program. He studies history and economics, and has an avid interest in political discourse and international relations, especially in regard to the Balkans of Southeastern Europe. He recently completed an in-depth analysis on the death of the residential bar and its social impact in the Balkans. The paper is slated to be published in several academic journals in the upcoming year. He is an active member of 28. Jun, a Canada-based not-for-profit organization and is launching Konstantine, a digital magazine about current events in the Balkans in Winter 2016.

Advertising

Join the Hive!

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Rare diseases are more common than you might think

Eurozone: Uncertain future with unemployment ravaging the South

European Semester Winter Package: assessing Member States’ progress on economic and social priorities

At UN, Middle East countries discuss steps towards regional nuclear-free zone

3 ways business leaders can build digital trust

‘The time for action is now’ senior UN peacekeeping official says, urging support for regional force combating Sahel terrorism

There are more than 1 billion guns in the world and this is who owns them

From rescue animals to electric buses, California is introducing bold new rules

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

Young people are not a nameless, faceless mass. So why do we treat them as such?

‘Emulate his example’ urges UN chief as world celebrates Nelson Mandela: a ‘global advocate for dignity and equality’

Agreement reached on new EU Solidarity Corps

Let’s Learn

UNICEF chief hopes 2020 will be ‘a year of peace’ for Syria’s children

Chart of the day: Why marine protected sites matter more than ever

Stable growth momentum in the OECD area

‘Everyone needs to do more’ to help suffering Venezuelans, says UN Emergency Relief Coordinator

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

Spanish and Polish voters are crying out for an imminent European change while US urge now Germany to change route

Continuing incarceration of women’s rights activists in Saudi Arabia, ‘reprehensible’: UN experts

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

EU budget: Stepping up the EU’s role as a security and defence provider

Here are three ways organizations can prepare for tomorrow’s world

A Sting Exclusive: “Global Climate: Our Common Responsibility”, S&P MEP Miriam Dalli underlines from Brussels

Eurozone: Retail sales betray economic frailty

Anti-vaccination movement affecting youth in Europe

3 leaders on creating a pipeline for female talent in business

New UN forestry project bids to help countries meet climate change commitments

Promoting Health in the Brazilian Amazon: one nation but many cultures

Switzerland has the most highly skilled workers in the world. This is why

The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Smart devices must come with trust already installed

This is the environmental catastrophe you’ve probably never heard of

EU-China Light Bridge in Brussels signals the bright coming of the Year of The Dog

Asylum seekers in Sri Lanka fear for their safety, in wake of Easter Sunday terror attacks

Informal meeting of heads of state or government, Sibiu, 09/05/2019

Elections in Europe: No risks for the EU, leaders readying to face Trump-Brexit

MEPs push for high ambitions at the COP25 in Madrid

‘Cataclysmic events’ in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, began ‘global push’ against nuclear weapons says Guterres, honouring victims

How Finland is fighting fake news – in the classroom

How can consumers be effectively protected from insurance sellers?

UN forum to explore use of outer space to improve lives, protect planet

Security Council renews Central African Republic arms embargo

EU plans pan-European network of cybersecurity services

4 reasons cities should embrace Universal Basic Income

The Working Methods of the von der Leyen Commission: Striving for more at home and in the world

Central American migrants must be protected, urge UN experts

World faces ‘climate apartheid’ risk, 120 more million in poverty: UN expert

From UN Assembly podium, Central African Republic leader appeals for lifting arms embargo

Greece and Ukraine main items on EU28 menu; the course is set

Greece returns to markets at a high cost to taxpayers, after four years out in the cold

Nearly $4 billion needed to protect 41 million children from conflict and disaster

DR Congo: Ebola response resumes despite ‘risky environment’

Memoirs from a unique trip to China: “my new old dragon” (Part II)

MEPs propose more transparent legislative drafting and use of allowances

Fuel crisis rapidly draining last ‘coping capacities’ of Palestinians in Gaza

Scientists now think air pollution is fuelling violent crime

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

On the euro but out of it?

UK economy in dire straits: leading banks now officially plan to Brexit too

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Double standard is mentioning Stepinac and not mentioning rehabilitation of Chetniks and Draza in Serbia.

    Same bearded Serb rape mobs that were devestating Croatia in 90s.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s