Oh, well, you are wrong, Google responds to the European Commission

Google EU Antitrust CaseMany months post the European Commission filed formal antitrust actions against Google, the American tech-giant issued its response to the Commission last week. Google, which has always denied the European Union’s antitrust charges, this time decided to formalise its response and speak wide open.

In short, the high interests and the enormous weight the case has in antitrust files in Europe, have been stamped by Google in a 150 pages document, and then condensed into a post that appeared on Google’s European blog last Thursday.

Google attacks

“We’ve taken seriously the concerns in the European Commission’s Statement of Objections (SO) that our innovations are anti-competitive”, declared Kent Walker, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Google, to open the company’s statement on their official blog. “The response we filed today shows why we believe those allegations are incorrect, and why we believe that Google increases choice for European consumers and offers valuable opportunities for businesses of all sizes”, he added.

Mr. Walker basically resumed the case where it was left a few months ago, when the European Commission formally opened the Google’s case, alleging the company’s search results unfairly favoured its own shopping services over third-party sites. “The SO says that Google’s displays of paid ads from merchants (and, previously, of specialized groups of organic search results) “diverted” traffic away from shopping services”, said Walker. “But the SO doesn’t back up that claim, doesn’t counter the significant benefits to consumers and advertisers, and doesn’t provide a clear legal theory to connect its claims with its proposed remedy”.

Five-year investigation

It is evident how Google now wants to formally attack the accusations by the European Commission, without leaving any space for doubts or misunderstanding. But the question here is whether it is now too late to convince the European watchdog. The antitrust charge followed a five-year investigation by the EU against the company and came to the formal EU conclusion that Google harms both its rivals and consumers with unfair competition.

EU concerns

Google now says that all accusations by the European Commission are situated far from reality, and that its shopping service not only gives fair space to all competitors, but indeed benefits customers and businesses without unlawfully distorting the market. Back in April, EU’s Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager  felt “concerned that the company has given an unfair advantage to its own comparison shopping service, in breach of EU antitrust rules”. She also said that “Google now has the opportunity to convince the Commission to the contrary”.

“We don’t think this format is anti-competitive”, now Mr. Walker responds to Commissioner Vestager’s concerns. “On the contrary, showing ads based on structured data provided by merchants demonstrably improves ad quality and makes it easier for consumers to find what they’re looking for. We show these ad groups where we’ve always shown ads […] and we use specialised algorithms to maximize their relevance for users. Data from users and advertisers confirms they like these formats. That’s not ‘favoring’ – that’s giving our customers and advertisers what they find most useful”.

A brief analysis

Even if we assumed that all that Mr. Walker says is true, an important observation is due here. Google says its online-shopping service has indeed advantaged competitors, rather than damaging them. Mr. Walker, for instance, underlined how web traffic to other price-comparison sites has been increased by 227% over the past decade, and how Google delivered more than 20 billion free clicks to aggregators over the last decade in the countries covered by the SO. However, he never mentioned how Google’s own traffic has increased in the same time frame, or how the data collection has improved. It is only through the data a dominant firm collects, and the more users it gets, that it can improve its service, and to extend its lead over rivals. This, we believe, is a crucial point.

High-priced risks

Commissioner Vestager’s spokesperson Ricardo Cardoso confirmed she had received Google’s reply. Mr. Walker concluded the statement on Google’s blog saying that they “look forward to discussing our response and supporting evidence with the Commission”. “We will carefully consider Google’s response before taking any decision on how to proceed and do not want to prejudge the final outcome of the investigation”, EU’s Cardoso replied.

Now it is high time to see what impact Google’s clear-cut reply will have. If found guilty of violating EU law, the Mountain View, California-based company, could face fines of up to €6 billion, roughly 10 percent of the company’s operating revenue. That’s certainly no peanuts at all.

The European Sting will keep following this important case.



















Featured Stings

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

How many more financial crises in the West can the world stand?

Azerbaijan chooses Greek corridor for its natural gas flow to EU

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

Volkswagen scandal update: “We want clarity fast, but it is equally important to have the complete picture”, Commission’s spokesperson underscores from Brussels

European Confederation of Junior Enterprises hosts in Geneva the Junior Enterprise World Conference

A day in the life of a refugee: the role of nations and citizens of the world

The 27 EU leaders did nothing to help May unlock the Brexit talks

German elections: Is Merkel losing ground or Shultz is winning?

Copyright: European Union , 2017; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Frank Molter

EU hits deadlock on the future of glyphosate a month before deadline

Jade Spring Meeting 2017 – day 2: Coporate workshops, general assembly and magna moment

COP21 Breaking News: Conference of Youth Focuses on Hard Skills to Drive Greater Climate Action

The three US financial war fleets

Can the EU afford a trade war with China?

Why do medical students need to emigrate to become doctors in 2017?

Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

Draghi’s top new year resolution: Quantitative Easing

Eurozone: Inflation plunge to 0.4% in July may trigger cataclysmic developments

A rapid deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the war-torn Yemen

From Grexit to Brexit: UK industry now says the in/out referendum is good for your health

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

The European Youth Forum needs better signal for its “call” for Quality Internships

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

Opening Remarks by H.E. Ambassador Yang Yanyi, Head of the Chinese Mission to the EU at the Chinese Fashion Night

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

Eurozone: How safe are our deposits? Which banks will survive?

Eurozone banks to separate risky activities: Can they stay afloat?

The EU Parliament endorses tax on financial transactions

The US + Britain trivialize mainland Europe, NATO and the EU

Lithuania vs Parliament over 2014 EU budget

The US may be “open” to reviving TTIP, while the EU designs the future of trade with China

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

German stock market is not affected by the Greek debt revolution while Athens is running out of time

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

China revisited by the former Ambassador of Hungary to China

The West castigates Turkey’s Erdogan for the ruthless political cleansing

Eurozone has practically entered a deflation trap

A Sting Exclusive, the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger writes for the Sting on “EU Industry: a major energizer”

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

Managers’ pay under fire

Why Eurozone can afford spending for growth

EU Commission says falling labour remuneration leads to deflation and damages growth prospects

Mario Draghi didn’t do it but Kim Jong-un did

E-Government can be a remedy for the crisis

Education expenditure in the EU not hurt much by crisis

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

EU is now giving Google new monopolies to the detriment of European citizens and Internet companies

EU Commission: Banking and energy conglomerates don’t threaten competition!

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

Eurozone’s bank resolution mechanism takes a blow

UK’s PM Theresa May asks for a two-year Brexit transition plan as negotiations round kicks off

Twenty days that may remold the future of Europe

France and Poland to block David Cameron’s plans on immigration

A new proposal breaks the stalemate over the Banking Union

Can the EU last long if it cuts Cyprus out?

UN Environment Assembly 2017: where the world convenes to #BeatPollution

The UK to split if May’s hard or no-deal Brexit is pursued

Finally an answer to the hottest question of European youth today: How to make sure Juncker’s Investment Plan works for youth

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

China Unlimited: the dragon’s long and winding road

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s