Oh, well, you are wrong, Google responds to the European Commission

Google EU Antitrust CaseMany months post the European Commission filed formal antitrust actions against Google, the American tech-giant issued its response to the Commission last week. Google, which has always denied the European Union’s antitrust charges, this time decided to formalise its response and speak wide open.

In short, the high interests and the enormous weight the case has in antitrust files in Europe, have been stamped by Google in a 150 pages document, and then condensed into a post that appeared on Google’s European blog last Thursday.

Google attacks

“We’ve taken seriously the concerns in the European Commission’s Statement of Objections (SO) that our innovations are anti-competitive”, declared Kent Walker, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Google, to open the company’s statement on their official blog. “The response we filed today shows why we believe those allegations are incorrect, and why we believe that Google increases choice for European consumers and offers valuable opportunities for businesses of all sizes”, he added.

Mr. Walker basically resumed the case where it was left a few months ago, when the European Commission formally opened the Google’s case, alleging the company’s search results unfairly favoured its own shopping services over third-party sites. “The SO says that Google’s displays of paid ads from merchants (and, previously, of specialized groups of organic search results) “diverted” traffic away from shopping services”, said Walker. “But the SO doesn’t back up that claim, doesn’t counter the significant benefits to consumers and advertisers, and doesn’t provide a clear legal theory to connect its claims with its proposed remedy”.

Five-year investigation

It is evident how Google now wants to formally attack the accusations by the European Commission, without leaving any space for doubts or misunderstanding. But the question here is whether it is now too late to convince the European watchdog. The antitrust charge followed a five-year investigation by the EU against the company and came to the formal EU conclusion that Google harms both its rivals and consumers with unfair competition.

EU concerns

Google now says that all accusations by the European Commission are situated far from reality, and that its shopping service not only gives fair space to all competitors, but indeed benefits customers and businesses without unlawfully distorting the market. Back in April, EU’s Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager  felt “concerned that the company has given an unfair advantage to its own comparison shopping service, in breach of EU antitrust rules”. She also said that “Google now has the opportunity to convince the Commission to the contrary”.

“We don’t think this format is anti-competitive”, now Mr. Walker responds to Commissioner Vestager’s concerns. “On the contrary, showing ads based on structured data provided by merchants demonstrably improves ad quality and makes it easier for consumers to find what they’re looking for. We show these ad groups where we’ve always shown ads […] and we use specialised algorithms to maximize their relevance for users. Data from users and advertisers confirms they like these formats. That’s not ‘favoring’ – that’s giving our customers and advertisers what they find most useful”.

A brief analysis

Even if we assumed that all that Mr. Walker says is true, an important observation is due here. Google says its online-shopping service has indeed advantaged competitors, rather than damaging them. Mr. Walker, for instance, underlined how web traffic to other price-comparison sites has been increased by 227% over the past decade, and how Google delivered more than 20 billion free clicks to aggregators over the last decade in the countries covered by the SO. However, he never mentioned how Google’s own traffic has increased in the same time frame, or how the data collection has improved. It is only through the data a dominant firm collects, and the more users it gets, that it can improve its service, and to extend its lead over rivals. This, we believe, is a crucial point.

High-priced risks

Commissioner Vestager’s spokesperson Ricardo Cardoso confirmed she had received Google’s reply. Mr. Walker concluded the statement on Google’s blog saying that they “look forward to discussing our response and supporting evidence with the Commission”. “We will carefully consider Google’s response before taking any decision on how to proceed and do not want to prejudge the final outcome of the investigation”, EU’s Cardoso replied.

Now it is high time to see what impact Google’s clear-cut reply will have. If found guilty of violating EU law, the Mountain View, California-based company, could face fines of up to €6 billion, roughly 10 percent of the company’s operating revenue. That’s certainly no peanuts at all.

The European Sting will keep following this important case.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Greece @ MWC14: Greek-born mobile champions at MWC 2014

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

G20 LIVE: G20 Statement on the fight against terrorism

Joris in Indonesia

Google strongly rejects EU antitrust charges and now gets ready for the worst to come

The US repelled EU proposals on common rules for banks

Eurozone 2013: Where to?

How much more social deterioration can the EU people endure?

Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

The succesful cooperation

Italy’s rescue operation Mare Nostrum shuts down with no real replacement. EU’s Triton instead might put lives at risk

Unanswered questions for Europe’s youth in President Juncker’s State of Union

It ain’t over until Google says it’s over

Migration crisis: how big a security threat it is?

Greece returns to markets at a high cost to taxpayers, after four years out in the cold

Why Commissioner Rehn wants us all to work more for less

TTIP: why it is worth not to pull the covers over your head?

EU Commission: a rise in wages and salaries may help create more jobs

Tax evasion and fraud threaten the European project

Fostering global citizenship in medicine

No way out for Eurozone’s stagnating economy

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Cross-roads

The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Is the EU competent enough to fight human smuggling in 2015?

OECD tells Eurozone to prepare its banks for a tsunami coming from developing countries

How Germany strives to mold ECB’s monetary policy to her interests

Banks suffocate the real economy by denying loans

Will Brexit shatter the EU or is it still too early to predict?

Assembly of European Regions @ European Business Summit 2014: The European regions on the path to recovery

Breaking barriers between youth in the new tech era: is there an easy way through?

IMF’s Lagarde indirectly cautioned Eurozone on deflation

Population in crisis hit EU countries will suffer for decades

Any doubt?

EU threatens Japan to suspend FTA negotiations if…

Migration crisis, a human crisis after all

The Banking Union divides deeply the European Union

A new crop of EU ‘Boards’ override the democratic accountability and undermine the EU project

Germany tries to save Europe from war between Ukraine and Russia

EU to gain the most from the agreement with Iran

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

Azerbaijan chooses Greek corridor for its natural gas flow to EU

ECOFIN: Protecting bankers and tax-evaders

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

Migration Crisis: how to open the borders and make way for the uprooted

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Why growth is now a one way road for Eurozone

The impossible end of the war in Syria

Access to healthcare: what do we lack?

Does EURES really exist?

Brussels wins game and match in Ukraine no matter the electoral results

New VAT rules in the EU: how a digital sea could have become an ocean

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

ECB should offer more and cheaper liquidity if Eurozone is to avoid recession

Commission goes less than mid-way on expensive euro

Except Poland, can climate change also wait until 2021 for the EU Market Stability Reserve to be launched?

Why banks escape from competition rules but not pharmaceutical firms

What the US and the world can expect from the 8 November election?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s