The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Iliana Ivanova (on the right), the ECA member responsible for auditing of the Youth Guarantee project and the drafting of the report entitled “Young and unemployed in Europe: obstacles ahead for the EU's Youth Guarantee”. (ECA Audiovisual Services, Copyright: EU)

Iliana Ivanova (on the right), the ECA member responsible for auditing of the Youth Guarantee project and the drafting of the report entitled “Young and unemployed in Europe: obstacles ahead for the EU’s Youth Guarantee”. (ECA Audiovisual Services, Copyright: EU)

Last week the European Court of Auditors (ECA) published a report on the “risks to the successful implementation of the EU Youth Guarantee”. The ECA review, while noting that according to the Commission the available funding for this much advertised EU project is estimated at €16.7 billion for the 2014-2020 period including national resources, it also observes that as specified by the “International Labour Organization, the cost of implementing the scheme could potentially reach €21bn per annum”. (ECA, Press Release Luxembourg, 24 March 2015. The full report is available at http://www.eca.europa.eu ).

What is the Youth Guarantee?

The “Youth Guarantee” project was adopted by the European Council of the 28 EU leaders in July 2013. From the very beginning it was poorly financed with €6bn in EU resources for a seven years period (2014-2020) for a scheme aimed at making sure that within four months, all youths in the EU under the age of 25 after leaving formal education get an offer of a job, an apprenticeship or a traineeship. According to what the 28 leaders advertised at the time, the job offered had to be of “good quality” suited to their education, skills and experience. Alternatively the youth was supposed to be offered the chance to acquire the skills and experience required to find a job of “good quality” in the future through an apprenticeship, a traineeship or continued education.

The above mentioned ECA’s reference to the massive discrepancy between the available resources as designed by the EU and the potential cost for the full implementation of the project as calculated by the ILO, decries the chasm between targets and means of the entire scheme. In this way the ECA without expressly blasting this EU program, exposes the ineffectiveness of it. By the same token, the ECA in an indirect manner reveals the senselessness of the relevant decision of the 28 EU leaders.

Still without a job

According to the latest Eurostat (the EU statistical service) estimates almost 5 million youths (under the age of 25) were unemployed in the EU-28 area in June 2014, of whom over 3.3 million in the euro area. This means that the youth unemployment rate in the EU is 22% or more than one in five young EU citizens cannot find a job; in Greece and Spain it is one in two. The ECA audit estimates also that “there is a gap of nearly 50 percentage points between the Member State with the lowest rate of youth unemployment (Germany at 7.8 % in June 2014) and the one with the highest rate (Spain at 53.4 % in June 2014)”.

The scheme is co-financed by the EU and the national budgets. The public funding can be supplemented by private funds (e.g. by investments from companies in apprenticeship schemes or training schemes financed by private foundations). In April 2014 one year after implementation, the scheme was still not working. At that time the European Economic and Social Committee issued a Press release saying the “Commission and the Council … opted to link this program to a fund supporting structural measures (Structural Funds) but lost sight of the main objective – to offer a tool for emergency action”.

Caught in a Catch-22

What the EESC says here is that the project was undermined by the EU bureaucracy and the fiscal restraints in the countries which needed it most. Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland couldn’t develop the project, because the support from the EU Structural Funds is accorded under lengthy procedures and only if the member state spends an equal amount of money. The countries which needed the project most couldn’t spend more money on it, because they still are under a regime of strict fiscal restrictions imposed by the EU. Consequently the scheme worked only in a few member states the ones that needed it the least, like Austria and Finland.

Coming back to the ECA report, two years after the introduction of the ‘Youth Guarantee’ project, Iliana Ivanova, the Court’s member responsible for auditing it commented last week that, “We have identified as potential risks the adequacy of the scheme’s funding, the ‘good quality’ nature of the offer it proposes to young jobless people and the way in which the Commission monitors and reports on the results of the scheme. Addressing these risks early is key for the effectiveness of the Youth Guarantee.” Unfortunately it’s already rather too late to save the program, especially after ILO’s estimate that the cost of fully implementing “the scheme could potentially reach €21 billion per annum”.

No jobs, education or training for 7.5 million youths

The ‘Youth Guarantee’ scheme aims at helping some 7.5 million young Europeans in total who are not in employment, education or training. Until this very day all those people are still without a job, further education or training. The ECA auditors note that the socio-economic costs of this reality “through unemployment benefits and foregone earnings and taxes… according to EU Agency Eurofound estimates, amount to €153 billion a year – over 1 % of EU GDP”. Still the mainstream economic policies in Eurozone favor balanced or surplus government budgets which abridge EU spending, by cutting down social expenditure.

Now, almost two years after July 2013 when the 28 EU leaders introduced the ‘Youth Guarantee’ program it is pretty clear that they didn’t mean to really proclaim war against youth unemployment but rather just to be seen as doing so.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Trump ‘used’ G20 to side with Putin and split climate and trade packs

Portugal: €4.66 million in aid for 1,460 dismissed workers and jobless young

More than nine in ten children exposed to deadly air pollution

Security Council hails ‘historic and significant’ joint peace declaration by Ethiopia and Eritrea

Why private investment in deforestation-free commodity production needs to be scaled up

European elections: A chance to repel both nationalism and no-deal Brexit

Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries

UN Environment Assembly 2017: where the world convenes to #BeatPollution

Wide-ranging reforms needed to ensure Italy’s economic recovery

Key economic forum in Russia: New technology a ‘vector of hope’ but also ‘a source of fear’ says Guterres

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

Brussels to tear down the trade wall with Mexico as opposed to Trump’s “walls”

The widely advertised hazards of the EU not that ominous; the sting is financial woes

Preparing the future today: World Health Organisation and young doctors

New UN agriculture agency report underscores value of fishing in fight against global hunger

Voices of young climate action activists ‘give me hope’ says UN chief

‘Two pack’ austerity package in force but with less vigor

These countries are ranked highest – and lowest – for human development

Brexit talks: 2nd round fails to bring the EU and the UK closer on key issues

What are the real targets of EU’s efforts to fight tax evasion?

Instability in Africa’s Sahel, spreading outwards, Security Council told

Emergency meeting called as Ebola spreads to Congolese city – UN health agency

We probably should go back to the therapy in Primary Healthcare

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

Thursday’s Daily Brief: impact of bad working conditions, Syria and Libya humanitarian news, human rights in Bahrain, families reunified in South Sudan

Is it too soon to hope for a tobacco free Romania?

UN rights chief ‘strongly’ condemns ‘shocking’ mass executions in Saudi Arabia

“Austerity was not the alternative!”, President Hannes Swoboda of the European Socialists and Democrats on another Sting Exclusive

How fintech is making investment accessible

EU attempts to make new deal with Turkey as relations deteriorate

Data and the future of financial services

The completion of the European Banking Union attracts billions of new capital for Eurozone banks

3 ways AI will change the nature of cyber attacks

Commission’s spending totally uncontrolled

“ASEM: Global Partners for Global Challenges”, a Sting Exclusive by China’s Ambassador to the EU

Is there a drug for every disease?

Myanmar Government side-lining democratic reform, resorting to military era repression: UN expert

“C’est la vie”? French recession and unemployment to linger in Eurozone

The Future of Retail: Changing shopping patterns will mean retailers need to invest in costly and complex solutions

Multilateralism more vital than ever, as World War centenary looms: Security Council

How a new approach to meat can help end hunger

FROM THE FIELD: Heeding the call for women’s rights around the planet

Inflation and interest rates indicate urgent need for action

The Ukrainian crisis to destabilize Europe and the world for a long time

Trump blocks US warmongers from bombing Iran

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

EU job-search aid worth €9.9 million for 1,858 former Air France workers

EU Banks still get subsidies from impoverished citizens

UK Labour Party leader Corbyn readies to change Brexit political backdrop

Despite progress, companies face gender equality ‘backlash’: UN business body

‘Once-in-a-generation opportunity’ will be squandered, warns Guterres, unless social, economic, environmental challenges are met

EU elections: The louder the threats and the doomsaying the heavier the weight of the vote

‘More time’ agreed for buffer zone, to spare three million Syrian civilians in Idlib

Countdown To GSMA Mobile World Congress Shanghai 2018 Is On

Memoirs from a unique trip to China: “my new old dragon” (Part I)

Here are three ways Africa’s youth are defeating corruption

Social, cultural diversity ‘an enormous richness, not a threat’ Guterres declares calling on investment for a harmonious future

MEPs and European Youth Forum call on EU to Invest in Youth

Crackdown on Christians in Eritrea spurs UN expert to press Government ‘to live up to its international commitments’

How can education empower youth to become tomorrow’s leaders

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s