Except Poland, can climate change also wait until 2021 for the EU Market Stability Reserve to be launched?

Miguel Arias Cañete, Member of the EC in charge of Climate Action and Energy, pronounced a speech at the conference on the 'Renewable Energy Solutions for Today's Challenges and Tomorrow's World', which was organised in Brussels (EC Audiovisual Services, 16/03/2015)

Miguel Arias Cañete, Member of the EC in charge of Climate Action and Energy, pronounced a speech at the conference on the ‘Renewable Energy Solutions for Today’s Challenges and Tomorrow’s World’, which was organised in Brussels (EC Audiovisual Services, 16/03/2015)

The EU member states came to an agreement last Wednesday regarding the set up of the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) which will eventually lead to further discussions and negotiations with the European Parliament (EP) on the 30th of March.

The starting date of the MSR is proposed to be 2021, in contrast with what “big” countries such as Germany and U.K. supported. However, the stance of Poland, which is in favor of 2021 since they depend mainly on coal, prevailed during this meeting.

It is about time that a mechanism like MSR is implemented since its outcome will help lower greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 compared to 1990’s levels; something that should be targeted at all costs for the sake of our planet.

EU-ETS, MSR and the carbon allowances

The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is the world’s largest carbon market and its purpose is to encourage corporations to invest in low-polluting technologies and force them to pay for their emissions. This System began ten years ago and we are currently undergoing its third phase. The problem that has been created though is the great amounts of carbon allowances surplus which exists due to the recent financial recession and make it cheaper for companies to use polluting coal than other less polluting energy sources.

The solution to this issue would be the construction of the MSR which would absorb and eliminate most of the  carbon permits surplus and thus increase carbon prices. More specifically, the surplus figures reached 2.1 billion allowances in 2013 leading to carbon’s price fall. The Latvian Presidency of the EU Council, supporting the creation of MSR made the following statement: “The decision is an important step in the fight against climate change and paves the way for the reform of the EU greenhouse gas emission trading scheme (ETS). Man-made greenhouse gases are largely responsible for warming the planet and causing climate change”.

Furthermore, the compromise deal made two days ago mentions that the backloaded allowances must be transferred directly to the MSR. Unallocated allowances that come from plants closures or are meant to be given to new ones will be discussed by the European Council (EC) under the ETS directive.

Poland’s victory

The decision to start the negotiations with the EC in order set up the MSR in 2021 was made after a long meeting. On the one hand, the biggest European economy, Germany, and the U.K. supported the starting date to be in 2017 so as to promote low-emission energy sources. Barbara Hendricks, the Environmental Minister of Germany, expressing her dissatisfaction for this deal said: “The nation will make further efforts in Brussels to ensure the reserve is introduced as soon as possible”.

On the other hand, Poland and a group of alliance countries stood up and voiced that the MSR should begin in 2021. This is mainly due to the fact that Poland is an economy that depends on coal and an earlier MSR date will lead to a huge financial impact.

MSR in 2021: Will it be enough for the climate?

The point that must be stressed out here is whether the decision will be for the sake of the climate or solely for the sake of the interests of some countries. It is a fact that the surplus of carbon allowances damages the smooth operation of this market in the short run and most importantly it can affect the reduction of the gas emissions by the EU ETS in the long run; thus making it inevitable to probably miss the targets set by the 2030 EU climate and energy framework.

The latter clearly reveals that 2021 is not the perfect time for MSR. The EU member states should decide according to what is good for the EU environment and not just to a nation’s interests. Europe has already 10 years of experience in this market and should be able to adjust and evolve faster. The standards and climate targets that have been set till 2030 are high and the EU countries have only 15 years to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20%; an action that so far has taken 25 years.

All in all, it is a very challenging procedure to be able to create the MSR and build up the EU ETS by linking it also to the international emission trading systems but the European institutions must put all their efforts in order to achieve that as soon as possible. The next meeting where the EC representatives will start the negotiations for the ETS reform is only 3 days away.

Let’s hope that it would be effective and a fair “Green compromise” will be struck for the entire Old Continent and the planet as a whole.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

A voice from Syria: the positive prospect of clinical research despite the excruciating circumstances

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

EU readies for eventual annulment of the Turkish agreement on immigrants-refugees

Can We(esterners) ever understand (the) Chinese

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

Juncker Investment Plan for Europe welcomed by European Youth Forum

Spirit unlimited

Switzerland to introduce strict restrictions on executive pay

The 13th round of TTIP negotiations hits a wall of intense protests and growing concerns

Refugee crisis update: EU still lacks solidarity as Hungary and Slovakia refuse to accept EU Court’s decision

The battle for the 2016 EU Budget to shake the Union; Commission and Parliament vs. Germany

Trailing the US-EU economic confrontation

Is it true that the G20 wants to arrest tax evasion of multinationals?

Conflicting statistics and bad banks haunt the Eurozone

The EU risks trade relations with China over the Tata hype about steel

The European Parliament x-rays the troika’s doings

How ‘small’ is Europe in Big Data?

Has the EU economy truly revived from the financial crisis?

Jo Cox’s murderer believed the ‘leave’ campaign leaders that the ‘remain’ vote is treason

A Sting Exclusive: “The challenge of Society’s digital transformation”, Spanish Minister of Spain for Industry, Energy and Tourism José Manuel Soria live from European Business Summit 2015

Vĕra Jourová, European Commissioner in charge of Justice

The New EU-US “Shield” for data privacy is full of holes

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile Connect availability hits 2B

Long live Eurozone’s bank supervisor down with the EU budget supremo

Poverty and social exclusion skyrocket with austerity

The EU threatens to impose extra import duties on Chinese products

Court of Auditors: EU spending infested with errors well above the materiality threshold of 2%

Inegalitarian taxation on labour haunts Europe’s social model

New round of bargaining for the 2014 EU budget late in autumn

What are the real targets of EU’s efforts to fight tax evasion?

Does the Greek deal strengthen the Eurozone? Markets react cautiously

A new European banking space is born this year

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

Russia and the EU ‘trade’ natural gas supplies and commercial concessions in and out of Ukraine

The EU responds to US challenges by fining Apple with €13 billion

The EU Commission openly repudiates the austere economic policies

EU and African leaders to jointly tackle the migration crisis across the Mediterranean

Eurozone: A Sluggish economy offers no extra jobs

EU: 13 major banks may pay fines 10% of worldwide turnover

Eurozone: The crisis hit countries are again subsidizing the German and French banks

European Business Summit 2013: Where Business and Politics shape the future

The Chinese spirit

Trade protectionism and cartels threaten democracy

The G7 fails to agree on growth but protects the big banks

The European Internet is not neutral and neither is the Commissioner

“Is Europe innovative? Oh, Yes we are very innovative!”, Director General of the European Commission Mr Robert-Jan Smits on another Sting Exclusive

A Sting Exclusive: “Sustainable development goals: what role for business?” Commissioner Mimica asks live from European Business Summit 2015

Theresa May’s global Britain against Philip Hammond’s Brexit fog

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

The time is up but the game is still not over for Greece: negotiations continue in anticipation of a new deal

Solitary Britain sides with US aggressing Russia and chooses hard Brexit

Auditors say EU spending delivers limited value for money but the timing of their report poses questions

On Brexit: the outcome of UK elections next May to be based on false promises?

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

War of words in Davos over Eurozone’s inflation/deflation

Businesses succeed internationally

EU out to conquer African Union summit

Why and how Germany had it again its own way in Cyprus

The European Youth raises their voices this week in Brussels at Yo!Fest 2015

JADE Handover Ceremony at the European Parliement

EU Parliament: Follow the fraudulent money and confiscate it

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s