Why the merchant ships can pollute the atmosphere with CO2 quite freely

Environment Council - December 2014. EU Ministers of Environment met in Brussels on 17 December 2014. Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (in the forefront) also participated in the meeting. (European Council - Council of the European Union, Audiovisual service presse.audiovisuel@consilium.europa.eu)

Environment Council – December 2014. EU Ministers of Environment met in Brussels on 17 December 2014. Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (in the forefront) also participated in the meeting. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Audiovisual service presse.audiovisuel@consilium.europa.eu)

Last Wednesday the European Union Environment ministers reached an agreement… essentially to not to impose rules or duties on CO2 emissions from ships. Cunningly, the relevant Council Press release said that the 28 ministers “reached an agreement on new EU-wide rules for CO2 emissions from ships”. Until today, ocean-going shipping is the only sector of transport still escaping any gas emission rules or taxation, and apparently that is not going to change in the foreseeable future. This is not an EU peculiarity, but a worldwide generosity to mercantile marine and of course to ship-owners. But can the EU Council mislead the public opinion that flagrantly? It seems that it can.

Let’s see where the Catch 22 lies. Starting from the beginning, the Council obviously deceives us all, when it refers to ‘new rules’ in relation to CO2 emissions of ocean-going ships. Simply there aren’t any. Yes, there are rules about the cleanness and the sulphur content of the fuel used by ships, when they call at EU ports. Those rules have been imposed a long time ago, because the sulphur dioxide emissions (SO2) had been unbearable for many overcrowded European seaports.

New rules? What new rules?

However, no controls or any rules of any kind whatsoever exist to this date on CO2 emissions from ships, when they reach an EU port, let alone when they relentlessly steam ahead on the lawless international waters of the congested sea routes. Not to forget that invariably all the air and land transport means are meticulously controlled and in many ways taxed according to their CO2 emissions. Probably not as much as some people might want, but surely they pay for their gas emissions. Not the ships.

There is one argument usually advanced by politicians, when the discussion reaches the burning questions of pollution and taxation, in relation to the merchant marine; they claim that ‘ships fare on international high seas and nobody can catch them there’. Unquestionably, this is a good reasoning and will be dealt here below. In any case tough merchant ships have to reach a European port, if they are to be involved in the lucrative transport activities associated to EU’s international trade of mammoth dimensions.


Not to forget that the EU was quite capable of forcing the international shipping community to build double-hulled tanker ships. Brussels simply set a date after which no single-hulled oil tankers could call at a European port. It was enough to change the picture of the oil tanker industry. This proves that if the EU had the political will, it could impose more rules on the shipping marine. Simply in the case of CO2 emissions the EU seems to lack the willingness. A series of accidents involving oil tankers and huge quantities of oil spills destroying miles of European coasts, forced the EU to act. The European beaches seem to have a strong representation in Brussels, while the stratosphere doesn’t.

Coming back to the Council’s Press Release, it gives the impression of having some kind of answers to the question of controlling the CO2 emission of ships, while they rove on international waters. It says, “From 1 January 2018, ship-owners will be obliged to monitor emissions for each ship on a per voyage and an annual basis. There are also provisions on monitoring and reporting, verification and accreditation, and compliance and publication of information as well as international cooperation”.

Generous to ship-owners

The first striking point in this text is the generous six years adjournment, given to ship-owners before the application of any measure. Secondly, there is a conspicuous absence of reference to a duty payment, related even remotely to the volume of the emissions of the vessel. This is in direct contrast with the practices followed in the cases of land and air means of transport, which are thoroughly controlled and taxed according to their CO2 emissions. Not to say anything about the heavily burdened with levies on CO2 volumes, produced in the electricity generation sector.

Now let’s challenge the other Catch 22 included in the above passage of the Council’s Press release. It says that ship-owners will be obliged to measure – obviously with devices installed on their ships – the CO2 emitted. Then it adds that there will be “provisions on monitoring and reporting, verification and accreditation, and compliance and publication of information as well as international cooperation”.

Playing with the meters

Now let’s become as cynical as ship-owners are. For one thing, all those meters and installations to measure the exhaust of the combustion can be compromised while at high seas and restored to regular when calling at a port. The Press release though provides more possibilities to neutralise the entire effort, in case that the CO2 measuring devices cannot be rigged. It says “there will be provision…on…international cooperation”.

It seems that this is the heart or probably the tomb of the entire affair. The hidden Catch 22 is that the EU will expect the Asian, African and North and South American countries to cooperate, in order the Union to introduce a reliable method to measure CO2 emissions of ships. Obviously until the entire world is ready to apply the same measures as the EU, Europe won’t do anything on its own.

Shipowners may rest reassured

It’s more than certain then that the merchant marine doesn’t run any danger of being subject to measuring or even levied for its CO2 emissions. At least not in the foreseeable future. Ship-owners may rest reassured that the EU will never subject them to this extra cost, which can burden the European exports and imports, with an unwanted and ‘senseless’ cost. If the rest of the world doesn’t want it why should we rush? Not to forget that the Commission was pressed on many occasions to make a proposal to measure or even tax the CO2 emissions of ships, but until recently it resisted them all. Now that the EU’s executive arm was forced, for some reason, to act, it paid attention to make it toothless.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Back to the future: flying cars are becoming a reality

5 things to know about how coronavirus has hit global energy

Researchers have invented a brick that can build itself

Cédric in India

Hackers can use public USB chargers to steal personal data. Here’s what you need to know about ‘juice jacking’

Code of Practice against disinformation: Commission calls on signatories to intensify their efforts

Why private investment in deforestation-free commodity production needs to be scaled up

Inclusion, empowerment and equality, must be ‘at the heart of our efforts’ to ensure sustainable development, says UN chief

New EU-UK agreement is welcome but thorough scrutiny remains, insist lead MEPs

Google strongly rejects EU antitrust charges and now gets ready for the worst to come

Delay is over: Work begins to shine spotlight on where companies pay their taxes

EU-Japan relations: Foreign Affairs MEPs back Strategic Partnership Agreement

Affordable, accessible and safe medicines for all: the Commission presents a Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe

Member states jeopardising the rule of law will risk losing EU funds

Does the West reserve the fate of Libya and Syria for others? How does this relate to the EU’s Neighborhood Policy?

NEC @ European Business Summit 2014: The Digitally Enabled Grid

Alarming level of reprisals against activists, human rights defenders, and victims – new UN report

Brexit: Only Corbyn and May in concert can make the needed compromises

Economic Outlook: Weak trade and investment threaten long-term growth

Plastic Oceans: MEPs back EU ban on polluting throwaway plastics by 2021

COVID made many of us avoid public transport – what will it take to get us back on the bus?

What does leadership mean in an age of perpetual change?

European creativity and digital economy are drowning in a copyright swamp

Taxation: Commission refers Poland to Court for failing to remove certain tax exemptions on the use of energy products by highly polluting businesses

UN genocide adviser welcomes historic conviction of former Khmer Rouge leaders

COVID-19: Single market must emerge stronger from the crisis, say MEPs

Global warming: our responsibility

Negotiations on Investment Facilitation at the WTO gain support at Davos

Available mental health services: is it only about professionals or institutions?

Microsoft says the internet is getting a little nicer

WHO launches COVID-19 health alert service with Facebook and WhatsApp – Updates from Friday’s WHO briefing

Virus Coronavirus: No time to die

Japan’s agro-food sector would benefit greatly from policies to boost innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainable resource use

South-South Cooperation ‘accelerates’ us toward 2030 goals, UN Chief says on International Day

UN chief condemns killing of ‘blue helmets’ in DR Congo, as violence erupts prior to elections

Are ECB’s €500 billion enough to revive Eurozone? Will the banks pass it to the real economy?

South Korea: A cherished partner for the EU

Coronavirus: truth and myth on personal risk perception

Distributed ownership: what it means and how it could transform India

Letter to The European Sting from Italy

The impact of mobile and rapid digital adoption on how India consumes

A Sting Exclusive, the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger writes for the Sting on “EU Industry: a major energizer”

More than half of EU consumers have environmental impact in mind when shopping, new survey reveals

Societies must unite against ‘global crisis of antisemitic hatred’, Guterres urges

Is this the way to finally beat corruption?

A Sting Exclusive: “Paris and beyond: EU action and what COP21 should deliver”, Green MEP Keith Taylor discusses from Brussels 

David Attenborough: The planet can’t cope with overpopulation

This is what the world’s CEOs really think of AI

No tears for Cyprus in Brussels and Moscow

How bad is the Eurozone economy? The ECB thinks too bad

Change is happening – and young people are leading the way forward

Employment and Social Developments in Europe: 2018 review confirms positive trends but highlights challenges, in particular linked to automation and digitalisation

Burned in the Amazonian forest: Your health may be in danger

What the world will look like after the Iran and 5+1 deal; the US emerges as major power broker in Middle East

UN launches new project to address link between terrorism, arms and crime

Eurozone closer to a deflation – stagnation trap

How young people can help respond to the coronavirus outbreak

A Sting Exclusive: “Delivering on the Environmental Dimension of the new Sustainable Development Agenda”, Ulf Björnholm underscores from UNEP Brussels

Superconductors: the miracle materials powering an energy revolution

How 3 MENA business leaders are building resilient companies post-COVID-19

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s