Why the merchant ships can pollute the atmosphere with CO2 quite freely

Environment Council - December 2014. EU Ministers of Environment met in Brussels on 17 December 2014. Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (in the forefront) also participated in the meeting. (European Council - Council of the European Union, Audiovisual service presse.audiovisuel@consilium.europa.eu)

Environment Council – December 2014. EU Ministers of Environment met in Brussels on 17 December 2014. Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (in the forefront) also participated in the meeting. (European Council – Council of the European Union, Audiovisual service presse.audiovisuel@consilium.europa.eu)

Last Wednesday the European Union Environment ministers reached an agreement… essentially to not to impose rules or duties on CO2 emissions from ships. Cunningly, the relevant Council Press release said that the 28 ministers “reached an agreement on new EU-wide rules for CO2 emissions from ships”. Until today, ocean-going shipping is the only sector of transport still escaping any gas emission rules or taxation, and apparently that is not going to change in the foreseeable future. This is not an EU peculiarity, but a worldwide generosity to mercantile marine and of course to ship-owners. But can the EU Council mislead the public opinion that flagrantly? It seems that it can.

Let’s see where the Catch 22 lies. Starting from the beginning, the Council obviously deceives us all, when it refers to ‘new rules’ in relation to CO2 emissions of ocean-going ships. Simply there aren’t any. Yes, there are rules about the cleanness and the sulphur content of the fuel used by ships, when they call at EU ports. Those rules have been imposed a long time ago, because the sulphur dioxide emissions (SO2) had been unbearable for many overcrowded European seaports.

New rules? What new rules?

However, no controls or any rules of any kind whatsoever exist to this date on CO2 emissions from ships, when they reach an EU port, let alone when they relentlessly steam ahead on the lawless international waters of the congested sea routes. Not to forget that invariably all the air and land transport means are meticulously controlled and in many ways taxed according to their CO2 emissions. Probably not as much as some people might want, but surely they pay for their gas emissions. Not the ships.

There is one argument usually advanced by politicians, when the discussion reaches the burning questions of pollution and taxation, in relation to the merchant marine; they claim that ‘ships fare on international high seas and nobody can catch them there’. Unquestionably, this is a good reasoning and will be dealt here below. In any case tough merchant ships have to reach a European port, if they are to be involved in the lucrative transport activities associated to EU’s international trade of mammoth dimensions.


Not to forget that the EU was quite capable of forcing the international shipping community to build double-hulled tanker ships. Brussels simply set a date after which no single-hulled oil tankers could call at a European port. It was enough to change the picture of the oil tanker industry. This proves that if the EU had the political will, it could impose more rules on the shipping marine. Simply in the case of CO2 emissions the EU seems to lack the willingness. A series of accidents involving oil tankers and huge quantities of oil spills destroying miles of European coasts, forced the EU to act. The European beaches seem to have a strong representation in Brussels, while the stratosphere doesn’t.

Coming back to the Council’s Press Release, it gives the impression of having some kind of answers to the question of controlling the CO2 emission of ships, while they rove on international waters. It says, “From 1 January 2018, ship-owners will be obliged to monitor emissions for each ship on a per voyage and an annual basis. There are also provisions on monitoring and reporting, verification and accreditation, and compliance and publication of information as well as international cooperation”.

Generous to ship-owners

The first striking point in this text is the generous six years adjournment, given to ship-owners before the application of any measure. Secondly, there is a conspicuous absence of reference to a duty payment, related even remotely to the volume of the emissions of the vessel. This is in direct contrast with the practices followed in the cases of land and air means of transport, which are thoroughly controlled and taxed according to their CO2 emissions. Not to say anything about the heavily burdened with levies on CO2 volumes, produced in the electricity generation sector.

Now let’s challenge the other Catch 22 included in the above passage of the Council’s Press release. It says that ship-owners will be obliged to measure – obviously with devices installed on their ships – the CO2 emitted. Then it adds that there will be “provisions on monitoring and reporting, verification and accreditation, and compliance and publication of information as well as international cooperation”.

Playing with the meters

Now let’s become as cynical as ship-owners are. For one thing, all those meters and installations to measure the exhaust of the combustion can be compromised while at high seas and restored to regular when calling at a port. The Press release though provides more possibilities to neutralise the entire effort, in case that the CO2 measuring devices cannot be rigged. It says “there will be provision…on…international cooperation”.

It seems that this is the heart or probably the tomb of the entire affair. The hidden Catch 22 is that the EU will expect the Asian, African and North and South American countries to cooperate, in order the Union to introduce a reliable method to measure CO2 emissions of ships. Obviously until the entire world is ready to apply the same measures as the EU, Europe won’t do anything on its own.

Shipowners may rest reassured

It’s more than certain then that the merchant marine doesn’t run any danger of being subject to measuring or even levied for its CO2 emissions. At least not in the foreseeable future. Ship-owners may rest reassured that the EU will never subject them to this extra cost, which can burden the European exports and imports, with an unwanted and ‘senseless’ cost. If the rest of the world doesn’t want it why should we rush? Not to forget that the Commission was pressed on many occasions to make a proposal to measure or even tax the CO2 emissions of ships, but until recently it resisted them all. Now that the EU’s executive arm was forced, for some reason, to act, it paid attention to make it toothless.














the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How TV has brought mental health issues into the light – and helped to banish stigma

Young people all over the world come together to demand paid good quality internships

Agreement reached on new EU Solidarity Corps

UN resolution paves way for mass use of driverless cars

Superconductors: the miracle materials powering an energy revolution

3 reasons why AI won’t replace human translators… yet

Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte: “Europe must listen to the people”

FROM THE FIELD: Finding refuge in the ‘beautiful game’

‘The best-selling brand today is fear’: UN chief highlights urgent need to address global ‘deficit of trust’

What does the future of energy look like, how do we get there, and who will benefit?

Judges urge Security Council to serve interests of all UN Member States

Europe, US and Russia haggle over Ukraine’s convulsing body; Russians and Americans press on for an all out civil war

Paris, Rome, Brussels and Frankfurt to confront Berlin over growth and the Athens enigma

Over 40 million people still victims of slavery

One migrant child reported dead or missing every day, UN calls for more protection

Combatting terrorism: EP special committee calls for closer EU cooperation

UN launches drive to highlight environmental cost of staying fashionable

Password managers aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. Here’s why

Huge areas of the Arctic are on fire – here’s what that means for the planet

Guatemala Dos Erres massacre conviction welcomed by UN human rights office

Is it too soon to hope for a tobacco free Romania?

Obese people more likely to smoke, says new gene research: WHO

Those who produce food are among world’s hungriest – UN rights expert

How to get young people in Europe to swipe right on voting

Theresa May in search of a magic plan to invoke Article 50 and start Brexit negotiations now

UN gender agency hails record-breaking number of women in new US Congress as ‘historic victory’

Girls groomed for suicide missions fight back against the extremists of Lake Chad

Migration and asylum: EU funds to promote integration and protect borders

Multilateralism’s ‘proven record of service’ is focus of first-ever International Day

One-sixth of the world’s economy has now pledged to cut CO2 to zero by 2050

3 lessons from India in creating equal access to vaccines

Peru should help more young vulnerable people into work

Environmental labelling, information and management schemes are central to the circular economy

Towards a seamless internal EU market for industrial goods

Climate changes and the imminent public health crises

Commission’s spending totally uncontrolled

What do the economic woes of Turkey, Argentina and Indonesia have in common?

Finnish Council Presidency priorities debated in plenary

Lack of basic water facilities risks millions of lives globally: UN health agency

Politics needs to “Youth UP” in order the ensure the future of our democracies

New Zealand will have a new ‘well-being budget,’ says Jacinda Ardern

A for-profit project has improved nutrition in Rwanda – is it a model that can eliminate hunger across Africa?

The Franco-German axis considers that all EU needs now is more armaments

These are America’s most dangerous jobs

Eurozone: Economic Sentiment Indicator recovering losses

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

‘Abhorrent’ ambulance attack in Libyan capital imperils life-saving work, warns UN

As Alan Turing makes the £50 note, how do countries design their currencies?

Japanese law professor elected new judge at the International Court of Justice

Healthcare for refugees: a necessary symbiosis of medicine and politics

Yemen: UN Envoy ‘guilty’ of optimistic hope that war is ‘nearing the end’

Got the blues? Head for some green spaces

For Youth Rights: steps forward for better protection.

Boris Johnson’s no-deal Brexit to differ when issued from 10 Downing St.

Gender equality and medicine in the 21st century

IMF launches a new offensive against Germany

UN experts cite ‘possible exploitation’ of workers hired to clean up toxic Japanese nuclear plant

This Japanese TV show about work-life balance is a big hit – here’s why

COP21 Breaking News_09 December: List of Recent Climate Funding Announcements

The remote doctor, can it ever work?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s