The G7 fails to agree on growth but protects the big banks

Informal meeting between the EU and the Ministers for Trade of the G7 on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, (EC Audiovisual Services).

Informal meeting between the EU and the Ministers for Trade of the G7 on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, (EC Audiovisual Services).

Once more the world got together in the G7 group of the industrialised nations and asked Germany to spend more in order to help the rest of the Eurozone and the globe start growing again. The last time was in Washington during the Spring Conference of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, where Berlin was almost isolated in defending the austerity option. Now again during this weekend in the G7 gathering of the seven ministers of Finance, Wolfgang Schäuble, was rather alone in supporting severe austerity.

The members of the G7 group are the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Canada, while the G8 is the G7 and Russia. There is information however that the pressure on Germany were not as strong as last time in Washington. Probably the reason is that Berlin has already agreed to discuss some kind of relaxation regarding spending for growth.

Growth v consolidation

The seven ministers focused on two main issues, growth and banks. Let’s start from the most important one, growth. As it usually happens in such meetings the United States asked the countries with important reserves, like Germany (around $1 trillion) to spend more on growth policies and stop cutting down on government expenses. So Berlin took all the heat. After all this was an internal Atlantic matter. The US expect a lot from Germany.

The British minister of Finance George Osborn however, gave a rather mild version of what happened. He said that, “This meeting confirmed there are more areas of agreement between us on fiscal policy than is commonly assumed.” Osborn added that we “discussed the importance of credible, country-specific, medium-term fiscal consolidation programmes ensuring sustainable public finances and sustainable growth”. Probably Osborn wanted to play down on the differences because the G7 was hosted in Britain.

In any case Osborn puts in central place the antithesis between Washington and Berlin, over Germany’s miser income policies and cut down government spending. It has to be reminded that, the US support, at a large government cost and a mounting public debt, an unstable growth rate of 2% of the GDP. At the same time Germany, despite being a surplus and low debt country, refuses to do the same, breaking away from any Atlantic cooperation is left. On top of that many Eurozone countries apply severe austerity programmes on German insistence. The logic behind the American proposal is that, if Eurozone relaxed this severe austerity policy the Atlantic economy, comprising Western Europe and North America, could probably enter a new growth period, during which the fiscal consolidation would be realised without much pain.

Unfortunately Germany still insists that Eurozone must first achieve fiscal consolidation and then discuss growth. Reportedly Wolfgang Schäuble rejected decisively the American proposal during the G7 meeting and said Eurozone must first regain confidence. The German minister however was not alone in insisting that fiscal consolidation comes first and then the discussion on growth spending.

The Minister of Finance of Holland and President of the Eurogroup, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who loves Teutonic austerity, delivered last week a policy setting speech at a debate in Brussels on the future economic, monetary, banking and political union, hosted by the European Commission. He stressed that, “The EU must not waver in its commitment to achieving sound public finances. The future of the Economic and Monetary Union, but also the future of the European social model, depends on us recognizing clearly that we cannot spend and borrow our way to recovery in a sustainable way. Future investments in education, healthcare and active labour markets policy, are all predicated on sound public finances. Fiscal consolidation may weigh on growth in the short-term, but it is an absolute condition for the EU’s prosperity in the middle and long-term”.

Again Dijsselbloem echoing Berlin’s dictums speaks of short and long-term policies. As if he never has heard anything about the self-feeding vicious cycle of austerity and recession. As the European Sting editor Dennis Kefalakos wrote on 29 April “(fiscal) Relaxation gains everyday more momentum. Last week even Ollie Rehn, the European Commissioner responsible for EU’s economic policies, has joined the club of ‘relaxationists’. First was Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission, who clearly indicated that the presently applied policy mix, containing only austerity, cannot deliver growth”. Seemingly the confrontation between the ‘relaxationists’ and the ‘growth seekers’ holds well, despite some sings for a compromise released from Berlin.

Too big to fail

Unlike the confrontation over austerity and growth the G7 must have found some common grounds on financial/banking issues. Speaking after the meeting Osborn stressed “we should work to make sure that no bank is too big to fail”. A lot of people will question how sincere Osborn was in saying that. The London City is full of such beasts and nobody threatens them with anything more than some fines on being ‘bad boys’ on certain matters, like setting up world interest rates markets.

In Eurozone there is also the same attitude towards the banking sector. Actually the European Union is developing a very detailed legislation (Directive) about bank recovery and resolution, but not for the big guys. It’s not only that. The Commission, the EU Council, the European Parliament and almost all governments have agreed to enact the European Banking Union and charge the European Central Bank with the new task to supervise the 200 ‘systemic’ banks of Eurozone.

Dijsselbloem described all that in detail speaking in Brussels last week. He observed that, “the rapid implementation of agreed rules on bank capital requirements and the Single Supervisory Mechanism is essential…it will place all systemically important Eurozone banks (200) under the direct supervision of the European Central Bank. It will also ensure that when banks are in trouble the alarm bell is sounded early…now we must turn our attention to how we resolve failing banks… A clear hierarchy of claims will need to be agreed in this context…ensuring that the private sector bears the primary responsibility for bank resolution… Furthermore, establishing a Single Resolution Mechanism to ensure the timely and orderly resolution of failed institutions is a priority”.

The Dutch minister of Finance, without saying it clearly he makes here a strong distinction between the 200 systemic banks of Eurozone and the rest 4,800. Resolution will be needed only for some of the many. The 200, placed under the guidance of ECB, cannot fail because they are covered by the quasi guarantee of the central bank. This is what he meant but didn’t dare to say it. Exactly what happens in the US, where the big ones can never fail.

Nothing has really changed in the United States after the crisis of 2008 and the big banks are always free to ‘create’ as much money as they like, by undertaking excessive risks with other people’s money. If they fail again, and they will, the Washington government will be obliged again to pay for their rescue, exactly because, they are “too big to fail”.

In Eurozone also there are some national banking groups in Germany, France, Holland and elsewhere which are also “too big to fail”. Berlin and Paris have already expressed some reserves over the European Banking Union. Obviously they want this new institution to safeguard primarily their huge national banking groups. Resolution and recovery cannot refer to them.

The safe 200

As a result, it is not by accident that in around 2015, when this new Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive will be in force, at the same time the European Central Bank will place under its surveillance the 200 systemic banks of the euro area. In this way the ECB will guarantee that those banks are absolutely safe. As a result those lenders will pay much less for their own borrowing and thus gain an advantage against the rest of the industry.

In short the G7 group hardly agreed on anything. Germany keeps insisting that austerity comes first, and will back slightly from this position only if the pressure from the rest of its Eurozone peers becomes unbearable. As for the banking sector, the ‘too big to fail” continue to call the rules of the game on both sides of the Atlantic. It is probably true that Osborn has not many friends in London…

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Retirees will outlive their savings by a decade

India’s 1.3 billion residents start 21-day lockdown – Today’s coronavirus updates

Why we need a Paris Agreement for nature

EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey: €6 billion to support refugees and local communities in need fully mobilised

How to build a paradise for women. A lesson from Iceland

New European frontiers for renewable energy development

The reason the world showed limited empathy to the Orlando victims

Health inequalities in the 21st century

Millions at risk if Syria’s war moves to last redoubt of Idlib, warns senior aid official

Me and China

UN human rights chief warns of women’s rights complacency

The entire Australian state of New South Wales is in drought

Trade war or not New York bankers will have it their way

Huge areas of the Arctic are on fire – here’s what that means for the planet

ECB with an iron hand disciplines the smaller Eurozone member states; latest victim: Greece

Urgent action needed to address growing opioid crisis

Bill Gates’ top 10 breakthrough technologies of 2019

UN expresses concern following wave of street protests in Iraq and elsewhere

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

The world needs a grand coalition to tackle climate change

US, Russia oblige each other in Syria and Ukraine selling off allies

Quantum leap: why the next wave of computers will change the world

Pandemic: another look at the self

Infrastructural and system barriers to Universal Health Coverage: get in my patient’s shoes

5G mobile is nearly here – but we should share networks to make it affordable

‘No safe level of air pollution’: Major study links cardiac arrests with fine particulate matter exposure

One small flight for a drone, one ‘big leap’ for global health

Is poverty and exclusion the necessary price for EU’s recovery?

Why exchange programs are essential for the medical students of the 21st century

Road injuries leading cause of death for the young, despite safety gains: UN report

‘World has failed’ victims of genocide too often: Guterres

The MH17 tragedy to put a tombstone on Ukrainian civil war

Can we measure the temperature of human cells? A young scientist explains

We must help developing countries escape commodity dependence

“Is Europe innovative? Oh, Yes we are very innovative!”, Director General of the European Commission Mr Robert-Jan Smits on another Sting Exclusive

2016 crisis update: the year of the Red Fire Monkey burns the world’s markets down

The deforestation risks lurking in the banking sector

Novartis and Johnson & Johnson to deprive Europeans of their right to Health

October’s EU strong digital mix: From Safe Harbour to Net Neutrality, Roaming and Snowden

It’s time for global businesses to accept local responsibility

Destabilizing Lebanon after burning Syria; plotting putsch at home: King and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia

Human rights chief calls for international probe on Venezuela, following ‘shocking accounts of extrajudicial killings’

CO2 emissions around the world

Quality Education on the table at the European Parliament

As the inventor of copy and paste dies, here are other computing innovations we take for granted

6 innovative technologies about to transform our infrastructure

Wednesday’s Daily brief: Day 3 of anti-hatred summit, UNFPA turns 50, Ben Stiller #WithRefugees, updates on Abyei

Is Data Privacy really safe seen through Commissioner’s PRISM?

Berlin vies for a Germanic European Central Bank

Parliament wants to suspend EU accession negotiations with Turkey

Changing the EU copyright law won’t bring us much closer to Digital Single Market

Top UN officials sound alarm as Yemen fighting nears vital hospital in port city of Hudaydah

Eurozone has practically entered a deflation trap

ILO’s Bureau for Employers´Activities to publish new study on women in business and management

COP21 Breaking News_05 December: Children Will Bear the Brunt of Climate Change: UNICEF

‘Unconscionable’ to kill aid workers, civilians: UN Emergency Coordinator

Ebola outbreak in DR Congo declared over, now let’s tackle other health challenges: WHO chief

Electronic cigarette: a still controversial qualitative imbalance

Ahead of State of the Union the European Youth Forum highlights lack of action on youth employment

UN chief hails ‘positive developments’ towards ending political crisis in Bolivia

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s