Eurozone: How safe are our deposits? Which banks will survive?

From right to left: Jeroen Dijsselbloem, President of the Eurogroup; Olli Rehn, Vice President of the European Commission, (Council of the European Union photographic library).

From right to left: Jeroen Dijsselbloem, President of the Eurogroup; Olli Rehn, Vice President of the European Commission, (Council of the European Union photographic library).

The Ecofin Council, the EU body that regroups the 27 Ministers of Finance, probably the most powerful institution of the European Union, is to conduct its regular meeting this Monday and Tuesday 13 and 14 May. On its agenda the main item will be a Commission’s proposal for a crucial Directive, establishing a framework for bank recovery and resolution to clear failing or about to fail banks.

This text contains the principles which were applied in the case of the resolution of the Popular (Laiki) Bank of Cyprus and the recovery of the Cyprus Bank, the first and the second biggest bank of the divided by the Turks in 1974 and tormented by the Eurogroup on 2012 island. The European Sting published a relevant article on 31 March under the title “EU Directive makes haircut on uncovered deposits a standard in bank bail-ins”, informing the world that in the European Union deposits will be used from now on in banks’ resolutions and recoveries.

The issue attracted a lot of publicity all over the world because the haircut inflicted on the uncovered deposits (above the benchmark of €100,000) reached 80% in the case of Popular Bank of Cyprus and around 35% in Cyprus Bank. This was the plan B drafted by the Eurogroup to resolve the Cyprus issue.

Which deposits are insured?

The interesting thing however is that the plan A, which was rejected by the Cypriot Parliament, contained a haircut of around 10% also for the deposits below this theoretically insured and inalienable benchmark of €100,000. Yet the never applied plan A, was drafted by the Eurogroup and the Nicosia government. Both of them stating that deposits below €100,000 are safe. How was that possible? The only logical answer is that this insured deposits benchmark of €100,000 is an illusion.

Given that in the European Union there is a constellation of deposit insurance schemes, the Commission wants with this proposal for a Directive to create some common principles in this fragmented market. The fact will remain however that it won’t be a pan European deposit guarantee scheme. Obviously the banks in the core Eurozone countries will secure in this way an advantage in relation with southerner institutions. There is more discriminatory provisions in this new Directive.

Deposit guarantees

The Commission’s proposal goes like this: “The directive would require member states to set up ex-ante resolution funds to ensure that the resolution tools can be applied effectively. Under the presidency’s latest compromise proposal, these national funds would have to reach, within 10 years, a target level of at least 0.5% of covered deposits of all the credit institutions authorised in their country. To reach the target level, institutions would have to make annual contributions based on their liabilities, excluding own funds, and adjusted for risk. Member states would be free to choose whether to merge or keep separate their funds for resolution and deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs). In both cases, the combined target level would be the same. The Council’s general approach on a proposed directive on DGSs, agreed in June 2011, sets its target level at 0.5% of covered deposits. Lending between national resolution funds would be possible on a voluntary basis”.

In reality the Commission wants those Deposit Guarantee Schemes to act along the same lines as the national funds for the resolution and the recovery of banks in all member states. This makes sense because in the event of the resolution of a failing or about to fail bank, the DGSs and the resolution funds will have the same task; to liquidate the assets of the bank and pay the claimants. This brings us the core of next week’s discussion in the Ecofin, which is nothing less than the line of those claimants.

Who will be paid and by whom?

Under this light let’s return back to Cyprus. In the case of the two failed Cypriot lenders, the theoretical and widely advertised guarantee of deposits of up to €100,000 proved to be a fallacy. If there was such a guarantee, then how the Eurogroup and the Cypriot government in their first intervention package, agreed on a haircut of deposits below this benchmark of €100,000? Simply there was not such a possibility in the case of Cyprus or in any other country of the world if a bank run gets hot. This brings us to the other major fallacy of our times, the security of deposits in today’s banking universe where derivatives are thought to have reached $600 – 700 trillion.

Deposits under the axe

In any case almost all deposits in Cyprus Popular Bank and the Bank of Cyprus above the €100,000 benchmark were given a very deep haircut of up to 80% in an operation called bail-in. Bail-in means that the intervening authorities are using all the assets of the institution to pay the claimants. If this is not enough, they turn to creditors and at the end they give a haircut to deposits. They use first the unsecured deposits to pay the secured ones, and if the unsecured cannot do the job the secured deposits simply get a haircut. This is what happened in Cyprus and will constitute the platform or the template from now on. According to an announcement by the Council on this issue, “The presidency will focus the (Ecofin’s) Council discussion on the design of the bail-in tool. This tool would enable resolution authorities to write down or convert into equity the claims of the shareholders and creditors of institutions which are failing or likely to fail”.

Some lines below the announcement say: “The presidency has identified three main approaches, with possible variations, to the design of the bail-in tool:
* Harmonised approach: A limited number of defined exclusions from bail-in and insured depositor preference (i.e. DGSs would be bailed in after other senior unsecured creditors). Uninsured deposits (i.e. deposits above EUR 100,000) would be automatically bailed in.
* Discretionary approach: With limited flexibility for national resolution authorities to exclude liabilities for financial stability reasons or to ensure continuity of banks’ critical functions. Discretionary exclusions could apply to uninsured deposits, in particular those held by individuals or SMEs, and to short-term debt as well as to liabilities arising from derivatives or from participation in payment, clearing and settlement systems with a remaining maturity of less than one month.
* Mixed approach: Uninsured depositor preference (i.e. they would be bailed in, but after other senior unsecured creditors) and a combination of defined and discretionary exclusions”.

The sequence of losses

All that can be translated as it follows. Shareholders don’t stand a chance, the same is true for uninsured creditors and depositors. When all that money is not enough to cover the insured deposits, the DGSs will be called in to cover the deposits of up to €100,000. What if the DGSs resources are not enough for that? The Directive doesn’t say anything about that but it is obvious that the insured deposits have only a “preference”. If there is no money, the insured depositors will also suffer losses. The possibility of the national DGSs to lend money to each other is for the good times. When it rains, everybody needs their umbrellas! In other words, during the next crisis the banks will surely lead the world be prepared and keep money in the pillow!

There is something else though. What will happen until all those DGSs are in place? The Presidency’s announcement says that the Ecofin will discuss that too: “Bail-in start date: Under the current proposal, member states would have to introduce the bail-in instrument by January 2018. However, some member states have suggested bringing the date for ward to January 2015”.

Those dates coincide with the creation of the banking union where the European Central Bank will be supervising a round number of 200 major banks and indirectly guaranteeing their prudence and ultimately their solvency. Obviously those 200 financial firms will be enjoying a very special advantage having the ECB to guarantee their creditworthiness. Towards the same time the national DGSs will be ready to guarantee to every bank depositor those €100,000.

Now imagine a situation where a German bank is included in the 200 supervised by the ECB and its depositors are guaranteed their first €100,000 by the German DGS. On the other side of the street, there is a Greek bank not included in the 200 and its depositors are protected by the Greek DGS. Where would you put not only €100,000 in deposits but as much as you have? No answer needed, it’s a rhetoric question.
This major disadvantage for the Greek or Spanish or Italian bank will deprive it not only from customers but it will increase its cost to attract money. Consequently the Greek bank will not be able to offer competitive loans and probably it will be driven to the ‘butchers’ for a bail-in and a probable resolution.

There is no question that as long as the banks are free to play with our money in the $600-700 trillion derivatives market, nobody can guarantee our deposits. In a crisis, the ECB will probably act as ultimate lender, but only to those 200 banks it oversees. What about the rest? God knows! European banks are reportedly exposed to derivatives with $150 trillion. Which government or central bank can rescue them in a crisis?

Seemingly what will be very vividly discussed next week in Brussels will be the agreement on which are the 200 banks that the ECB is to take aboard. As for the bail-in authorities and the DGSs, nobody believes that in a new credit crisis any of those ‘creatures’ will survive. Only the 200 will be saved by the printing machine of the ECB. But this is the ultimate discrimination.

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Costa Rica is one of the world’s happiest countries. Here’s what it does differently

GSMA announces speakers for Mobile 360 Series-West Africa

Less than half of EU travellers are aware of EU Passenger Rights

A Sting Exclusive: “Cybersecurity Act for a cyber-bulletproof EU”, by EU Vice-President Ansip

AI-assisted recruitment is biased. Here’s how to make it more fair

Climate change recognized as ‘threat multiplier’, UN Security Council debates its impact on peace

UN’s Guterres condemns ongoing airstrikes on Syria’s hospitals, medical workers

Mergers: Commission approves GlaxoSmithKline’s acquisition of Pfizer’s Consumer Health Business, subject to conditions

Coronavirus (COVID-19): Latest news from Monday’s World Health Organization briefing

UN condemns deadly attack against G5 Sahel force headquarters in Mali

Amidst ‘high political tension’, UN chief appeals to G20 leaders for stronger commitment to climate action, economic cooperation

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is changing how we grow, buy and choose what we eat

Monday’s Daily Brief: numbers of hungry people rising, millions of children need vaccines, Mali children need more protection

Climate change update: consistent global actions urgently needed as we are running out of time

UN experts urge India to align new anti-trafficking bill with human rights law

25 years on from genocide against the Tutsi, UN Chief warns of ‘dangerous trends of rising xenophobia, racism and intolerance’

New EU rules to boost crowdfunding platforms and protect investors

These countries spend the most on education

How a possible EU budget deficit affects the migration crisis

South Eurozone countries threatened by rising borrowing cost and expensive euro

Thought AIs could never replace human imagination? Think again

Rohingya refugee shelters ‘washed away’ in Bangladesh monsoon rains: UN agency

Why are the financial markets shivering again?

This year’s Earth Hour is going digital due to the COVID-19 pandemic

This South African lawyer is reading while running marathons – for book donations

Why infrastructure is the only way to fight a COVID-19 recession in the US

Statement by OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría on the outcome of COP 25

Impact investment favours expats over African entrepreneurs. Here’s how to fix that

Politics still matter in the US but not in Europe

Will COVID-19 lead to the global resurgence of other deadly diseases?

Germany fears that Americans and Russians want to partition Europe again

A shortened EU Summit admits failures, makes risky promises

How can we produce enough protein to feed 10 billion people?

Young activists share four ways to create a more inclusive world

Should we be worried about third-hand smoke?

UN mission in DR Congo appeals for calm as violent protests continue

EU elections 2019: Rise of nationalist trends and populism in Europe challenges the EU edifice

Madagascar villagers learn dangers of outdoor defecation

UN human rights report cites ‘multiple root causes’ of deadly Chile protests

World Health Day: Statement by Commissioner Stella Kyriakides

Philippe de Backer of ALDE at European Business Summit 2015 stresses: “Reinvent your business”

The Linde Group Logo (Source: The Linde Group website, Press Services, 2018)

EU starts in-depth investigation of Linde-Praxair merger over competition concerns

European Youth, quo vadis?

Flying high: how India could lead the world in drones

UN cooperation with League of Arab States ‘pivotal’, UN chief tells Security Council

North Korean families facing deep ‘hunger crisis’ after worst harvest in 10 years, UN food assessment shows

UN chief lauds Fijians as ‘natural global leaders’ on climate, environment, hails ‘symbiotic relationship’ with land and sea

Africa is launching the world’s largest free trade area – but these are the stumbling blocks

‘Address root causes’ of instability in Mali through ‘aid and support’ urges UN chief

Can North Korea and the U.S. strike a nuclear deal?

Suffering of thousands of war-affected Syrian children ‘unprecedented and unacceptable’

How to make PHC a favourable career choice for medical students: Strategies and reflections

Restoring prospect of peace in Middle East is ‘our shared responsibility’ UN envoy tells Security Council

UN announces roadmap to Climate Summit in 2019, a ‘critical year’ for climate action

Universal Health Coverage will ‘drive progress’ on 2030 Development Agenda

Understanding and demystifying the new outbreak of Coronavirus

This Netherlands football stadium creates its own energy and stores it in electric car batteries

The UK referendum has already damaged Europe: even a ‘remain’ result is not without cost to Britain and the EU

This Dutch company makes environmentally-friendly paint

Would you let an AI vote for you?

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. The Cyprus bail-in started it all – Whether Mr Dijsselbloem cares or not he has now set in motion a hugely risky redistribution of assets and deposits as wealthy Europeans look to spread their risk and reduce their asset concentration in any one bank. This capital migration will undoubtedly see a number of European banks severely weakened and the end game could be very messy. http://getwd50.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-dutch-cap-set-to-create-another.html?view=flipcard

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s