4 key steps to decommissioning coal-fired power plants

(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Arunabha Ghosh, Chief Executive Officer, Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) & Gagan Sidhu, Director, Centre for Energy Finance, Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW)

  • The race is on to meet climate goals – highlighting the urgent need to invest in renewable sources of energy.
  • Large-scale decommissioning of coal-fired power plants, particularly in emerging markets is a mammoth task.
  • We tackle four key issues which must be addressed in order to successfully progress decommissioning.

Concerns surrounding a global climate emergency have brought into sharp focus the need to mobilize increased investment flows towards clean energy. Such flows are needed to fund incremental power generating capacities that are non-polluting.

Capital is already shying away from backing new coal-fired thermal power plants. These complementary imperatives and trends are essential to moderate incremental growth rates in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, even with heightened climate awareness this does not appear sufficient enough anymore.

Emerging markets will have the bulk of growth in global electricity demand over the next two decades, and they are already showing strong signs of a leapfrog to renewables. So, is the power sector in emerging markets the right place to commence a discussion around emissions reduction? And if so, how will their legacy electricity infrastructure be decommissioned?

In India, about 40% of its GHG emissions can be traced to just 633 individual thermal power units (25 MW and above capacity) operating at 189 thermal power plants. There are 1,066 iron and steel units in India, and there are about 300 cement plants excluding mini plants which in aggregate account for a tiny amount of output. But at 5% and 6% respectively, iron and steel and cement account for a far lower share of emissions.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about the transition to clean energy?

Moving to clean energy is key to combating climate change, yet in the past five years, the energy transition has stagnated.

Energy consumption and production contribute to two-thirds of global emissions, and 81% of the global energy system is still based on fossil fuels, the same percentage as 30 years ago. Plus, improvements in the energy intensity of the global economy (the amount of energy used per unit of economic activity) are slowing. In 2018 energy intensity improved by 1.2%, the slowest rate since 2010.

Effective policies, private-sector action and public-private cooperation are needed to create a more inclusive, sustainable, affordable and secure global energy system.

Benchmarking progress is essential to a successful transition. The World Economic Forum’s Energy Transition Index, which ranks 115 economies on how well they balance energy security and access with environmental sustainability and affordability, shows that the biggest challenge facing energy transition is the lack of readiness among the world’s largest emitters, including US, China, India and Russia. The 10 countries that score the highest in terms of readiness account for only 2.6% of global annual emissions.

To future-proof the global energy system, the Forum’s Shaping the Future of Energy and Materials Platform is working on initiatives including, Systemic Efficiency, Innovation and Clean Energy and the Global Battery Alliance to encourage and enable innovative energy investments, technologies and solutions.

Additionally, the Mission Possible Platform (MPP) is working to assemble public and private partners to further the industry transition to set heavy industry and mobility sectors on the pathway towards net-zero emissions. MPP is an initiative created by the World Economic Forum and the Energy Transitions Commission.

Is your organisation interested in working with the World Economic Forum? Find out more here.

On the other hand, road transportation accounts for a sizeable 9% of India’s emissions, but it also has millions of vehicles and owners behind those emissions. The modest number of thermal power units, combined with their outsized contribution to emissions, thus makes the power sector an ideal starting point for any discussion on emissions reduction.

Any large-scale decommissioning of thermal capacities is easier said than done. Four key questions need to be addressed:

1. How much thermal capacity can be reasonably retired?

Examining the energy future that India has charted out for itself helps to put the first question into perspective. By 2030 India is targeting 450 GW of renewable energy-based generating capacity. This is up from 94 GW today. One way of looking at it is that the incremental amount of power expected to be generated from renewables could result in a scope to retire significant thermal capacities. But the reality is more nuanced. In the absence of viable storage at scale, India could arguably need more stable thermal, not less of it, by 2030. After all, the inevitable increase in demand 10 years down the line will also manifest during the times when variable solar and wind simply do not generate.

Approaching the same question from an efficiency perspective yields an altogether different answer. As a recent study concluded, by prioritizing power dispatch from more efficient (and less-polluting) units, India could switch off between 30 GW and 50 GW of thermal capacity without adversely impacting generation and save over $1 billion annually.

Chart shows over $1 billion annual savings by moving to more efficient & lower cost generation mix.
Chart shows over $1 billion annual savings by moving to more efficient & lower cost generation mix. Image: CEEW.

2. How much will the retirement cost?

Whatever the capacity sought to be decommissioned, there will be associated costs. These include payouts to equity investors and creditors, who originally financed construction. They also include payments to the workforce impacted by decommissioning. Another recent study mapped a large cross-section of India’s thermal fleet and estimated the costs associated with retirement ranged on average between $0.41 million per MW to $0.59 million per MW. Not surprisingly, older units mapped were found to be significantly cheaper to decommission, with much lower per MW costs than the above mentioned average range.

3. What is the most appropriate retirement mechanism?

Germany and South Africa have given serious consideration to thermal decommissioning. The former even progressed to successfully conduct its first auction to retire capacity late last year. There was healthy competition for the pool of capital on offer to operators of thermal capacity. Average price discovery came in far lower (approximately 60% lower in fact) than the maximum €/MW compensation and subsequent auctions will have successively lower per MW maximum compensation thresholds.

Robustly designed mechanisms can ensure that decommissioning need not be the onerously expensive exercise that it is often perceived to be. That said, for successful decommissioning, it would be vital to ensure that the political economy aspects of individual countries – regional disparities, impacts on state revenues, etc – are adequately addressed.

4. Who should pay for the retirement?

Perhaps the most contentious of the four questions is how to fund the decommissioning costs. Even the most well-designed mechanisms cannot eliminate them altogether. The fact that emissions reduction benefits transcend borders points squarely in the direction of an equitable sharing of the costs involved as desirable. This is particularly relevant for the many developing economies which host significant thermal fleets but which have not contributed to the bulk of the aggregate concentrations of GHGs in the atmosphere. Meeting their rising energy needs and financing the energy transition/leapfrog in emerging markets will be central to a successful outcome at COP26.

Finalising the Article 6.4 market mechanism of the Paris Agreement – and the associated challenge of transitioning Clean Development Mechanism activities and associated certified emission reductions – features high on the agenda. Including decommissioning as an eligible activity under the Article 6.4 regime would be one of several ways in which equitable sharing of costs could be explored.

Moving forward

The idea of decommissioning polluting thermal capacities at scale has moved from the margins of the climate change discourse squarely to its centre. There are a number of countries, both developed and developing, which host significant thermal capacities. Millions of people in these countries generate livelihoods, directly and indirectly, thanks to thermal power. Hundreds of billions of dollars of capital have been invested into thermal power. Progressing thermal decommissioning from discourse to action essentially involves answering the four questions highlighted above and helping countries chart their respective decommissioning pathways. Wishing away a problem is no solution to the climate crisis; it needs strategic attention and engagement.

This agenda blog is part of a series dedicated to Mobilizing Investment for Clean Energy in Emerging Economies. The project, driven by multiple stakeholders associated with the World Economic Forum, is designed to uncover barriers, identify solutions and enable collaborative actions to significantly scale investments for clean energy in emerging and developing markets.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Australia urged to evacuate offshore detainees amid widespread, acute mental distress

Any doubt?

From funders to partners: elevating community expertise to help communities thrive

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

London is becoming the world’s first National Park City

Yemen consultations have started, insists top UN negotiator

Commission approves emergency measures to protect eastern Baltic cod

How data can help mining companies tackle their trust deficit

From drought to floods in Somalia; displacement and hunger worsen, says UN

From raised fists at the 1968 Olympics to taking the knee: A history of racial justice protests in sport

Will the European Court of Justice change data privacy laws to tackle terrorism?

This is how travel hotspots are fighting back against overtourism

Do all you can to resolve climate change ‘sticking points’ UN chief urges South-East Asian leaders, in Bali

Four lessons from Africa on building effective business ecosystems

Australian homes are turning to solar power in record numbers

European research priorities for 2021-2027 agreed with member states

Meeting the basic needs of our healthcare workers

Mental health: a medical school’s demand

Embracing the diversity in a multicultural city of Romania

The EU Commission lets money market funds continue the unholy game of banks

How the power of sport can bring us together and drive social justice

EU Blue Card: Commission welcomes political agreement on new rules for highly skilled migrant workers

Why building consumer trust is the key to unlocking AI’s true potential

Ukraine’s new political order not accepted in Crimea

Protecting European consumers: toys and cars on top of the list of dangerous products

This is how New York plans to end its car culture

Progress against torture in Afghan detention centres, but Government needs to do more, says UN report

European Citizens’ Initiative: Commission registers ‘Mandatory food labelling Non-Vegetarian / Vegetarian / Vegan’ initiative’

Is South Korea set to lose from its FTA with the EU?

Anti-vaccers: does the empty can rattle the most?

The role of public affairs in student NGOs

Future Forces Forum: Prague will be hosting the most important project in the field of Defence and Security

Latin America’s cities are ready to take off. But their infrastructure is failing them

Political power of women suffering ‘serious regression’, General Assembly President warns

7 top things to know about coronavirus today

How global trade can save lives and livelihoods – and help protect the planet

EU job-search aid worth €9.9 million for 1,858 former Air France workers

European Semester 2018 Spring Package: Commission issues recommendations for Member States to achieve sustainable, inclusive and long-term growth

COVID-19: Save European culture and values, MEPs tell Commission

Children suffering ‘atrocities’ as number of countries in conflict hits new peak: UNICEF

We need to rethink ESG to ensure access to water and sanitation for all

International Court of Justice orders Pakistan to review death penalty for Indian accused of spying

Rise in violent conflict shows prevention ‘more necessary than ever’: UN chief

Top UN political official updates Security Council on Iran nuclear deal

It’s not summer holidays what lead to the bad August of the German economy

How can the world end viral hepatitis by 2030? 5 experts explain

How to talk about climate change: 5 tips from the front lines

Failure to open accession talks with Albania and North Macedonia is a mistake

Myanmar doing too little to ensure displaced Rohingya return: UN refugee agency chief

Further reforms in Sweden can drive growth, competitiveness and social cohesion

EU-UK relations: solutions found to help implementation of the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland

Statistics show the ugly face of youth training schemes

Croatian Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

Media and entertainment in flux: it’s time for the close-up

5 droughts that changed human history

Are the G20 leaders ready to curb corporate tax-avoidance?

European Youth, quo vadis?

China is the first non-EU country to invest in Europe’s €315 billion Plan

EU institutions agree on priorities for coming years: A common agenda for our recovery and renewed vitality

Coronavirus Global Response: EIB and Commission pledge additional €4.9 billion

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s