What will education look like in 20 years? Here are 4 scenarios

(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Andreas Schleicher, Director, Directorate of Education and Skills, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)


  • The COVID-19 pandemic shows us we cannot take the future of education for granted.
  • By imagining alternative futures for education we can better think through the outcomes, develop agile and responsive systems and plan for future shocks.
  • What do the four OECD Scenarios for the Future of Schooling show us about how to transform and future-proof our education systems?

As we begin a new year, it is traditional to take stock of the past in order to look forward, to imagine and plan for a better future.

But the truth is that the future likes to surprise us. Schools open for business, teachers using digital technologies to augment, not replace, traditional face-to face-teaching and, indeed, even students hanging out casually in groups – all things we took for granted this time last year; all things that flew out the window in the first months of 2020.

To achieve our vision and prepare our education systems for the future, we have to consider not just the changes that appear most probable but also the ones that we are not expecting.

Scenarios for the future of schooling

Imagining alternative futures for education pushes us to think through plausible outcomes and helps agile and responsive systems to develop. The OECD Scenarios for the Future of Schooling depict some possible alternatives:

Future proof? Four scenarios for the future of schooling
Future proof? Four scenarios for the future of schooling Image: OECD

Rethinking, rewiring, re-envisioning

The underlying question is: to what extent are our current spaces, people, time and technology in schooling helping or hindering our vision? Will modernizing and fine-tuning the current system, the conceptual equivalent of reconfiguring the windows and doors of a house, allow us to achieve our goals? Is an entirely different approach to the organization of people, spaces, time and technology in education needed?

Modernizing and extending current schooling would be more or less what we see now: content and spaces that are largely standardized across the system, primarily school-based (including digital delivery and homework) and focused on individual learning experiences. Digital technology is increasingly present, but, as is currently the case, is primarily used as a delivery method to recreate existing content and pedagogies rather than to revolutionize teaching and learning.

What would transformation look like? It would involve re-envisioning the spaces where learning takes place; not simply by moving chairs and tables, but by using multiple physical and virtual spaces both in and outside of schools. There would be full individual personalization of content and pedagogy enabled by cutting-edge technology, using body information, facial expressions or neural signals.

We’d see flexible individual and group work on academic topics as well as on social and community needs. Reading, writing and calculating would happen as much as debating and reflecting in joint conversations. Students would learn with books and lectures as well as through hands-on work and creative expression. What if schools became learning hubs and used the strength of communities to deliver collaborative learning, building the role of non-formal and informal learning, and shifting time and relationships?

Alternatively, schools could disappear altogether. Built on rapid advancements in artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality and the Internet of Things, in this future it is possible to assess and certify knowledge, skills and attitudes instantaneously. As the distinction between formal and informal learning disappears, individual learning advances by taking advantage of collective intelligence to solve real-life problems. While this scenario might seem far-fetched, we have already integrated much of our life into our smartphones, watches and digital personal assistants in a way that would have been unthinkable even a decade ago.

All of these scenarios have important implications for the goals and governance of education, as well as the teaching workforce. Schooling systems in many countries have already opened up to new stakeholders, decentralizing from the national to the local and, increasingly, to the international. Power has become more distributed, processes more inclusive. Consultation is giving way to co-creation.

We can construct an endless range of such scenarios. The future could be any combination of them and is likely to look very different in different places around the world. Despite this, such thinking gives us the tools to explore the consequences for the goals and functions of education, for the organization and structures, the education workforce and for public policies. Ultimately, it makes us think harder about the future we want for education. It often means resolving tensions and dilemmas:

  • What is the right balance between modernizing and disruption?
  • How do we reconcile new goals with old structures?
  • How do we support globally minded and locally rooted students and teachers?
  • How do we foster innovation while recognising the socially highly conservative nature of education?
  • How do we leverage new potential with existing capacity?
  • How do we reconfigure the spaces, the people, the time and the technologies to create powerful learning environments?
  • In the case of disagreement, whose voice counts?
  • Who is responsible for the most vulnerable members of our society?
  • If global digital corporations are the main providers, what kind of regulatory regime is required to solve the already thorny questions of data ownership, democracy and citizen empowerment?

Thinking about the future requires imagination and also rigour. We must guard against the temptation to choose a favourite future and prepare for it alone. In a world where shocks like pandemics and extreme weather events owing to climate change, social unrest and political polarization are expected to be more frequent, we cannot afford to be caught off guard again.

This is not a cry of despair – rather, it is a call to action. Education must be ready. We know the power of humanity and the importance of learning and growing throughout our life. We insist on the importance of education as a public good, regardless of the scenario for the future.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU finally to extend sanctions on Russia despite arguments; Greece again in Europe’s spotlight

What is the Internet of Things?

Scale of displacement across Myanmar ‘very difficult to gauge’, says UN refugee agency

EU migrant crisis: Germany, France and UK to show the way. Will the rest of the EU follow?

Global Recovery: The EU disburses SDR 141 Million to the IMF’s Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust

Joint  EU-US Statement on  the Global Methane Pledge 

“Joining forces to #BeatPollution”, a Sting Exclusive by the Head of UNEP in Brussels

This is what CEOs around the world see as the biggest risks to business

How scientists are turning living cells into the tiny factories of the future

COVID-19 is threatening the lives of migrant children held in US custody

The COVID-19 recovery can be the vaccine for climate change

At G20 Summit OECD’s Gurría says collective action vital to tackle global challenges

UN rights chief ‘appalled’ by US border detention conditions, says holding migrant children may violate international law

Why trade wars have no winners

GSMA Announces Final Event Lineup for Highly Anticipated 2019 “MWC Los Angeles, in Partnership with CTIA”

EU leading in global agri-food trade

Member States’ compliance with EU law in 2018: efforts are paying off, but improvements still needed

The widely advertised hazards of the EU not that ominous; the sting is financial woes

South Korea once recycled 2% of its food waste. Now it recycles 95%

MEPs adopt Technical Support Instrument to speed up post-COVID-19 recovery

MEPs demand end to EU arms exports to Saudi Arabia

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

Brexit: European Commission publishes Communication on preparing for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU

The gender gap of medicine in 2018

Why our future relies on more inclusive and transparent innovation

What’s behind South Korea’s elderly crime wave?

European Commissioner for Youth wants young people to be at heart of policy making

EU: All economic indicators in free fall

Stop wars disguised as peace missions

Young translators at EU schools – Commission opens registration for 2020 translation contest

Social, cultural diversity ‘an enormous richness, not a threat’ Guterres declares calling on investment for a harmonious future

ECB money bonanza not enough to revive euro area, Germany longs to rule with stagnation

Five avoidable deaths per minute shows urgent need for action on patient safety

Towards a seamless internal EU market for industrial goods

Digital Green Certificate is the right move but speeding up vaccination is key

Myanmar doing too little to ensure displaced Rohingya return: UN refugee agency chief

Brexit: UK business fear of a no-deal scenario preparing for the worst

How man and machine can work together in the age of AI

MWC 2016 LIVE: Orange targets VoLTE and Voice over Wi-Fi; strikes Google partnership

75 years after Auschwitz liberation, antisemitism still threatens ‘foundations of democratic societies’

UNESCO food and culture forum dishes up fresh serving of SDGs

European markets itchy with short-term disturbances

Bioethics: how to recover trust in the doctor-patient relationship

This Kenyan company makes fuel from human poo

“Healthcare system and socioeconomic inequities”-through the lens of developing nations

China repels EU allegations of export subsidies

Germany’s fiscal and financial self-destructive policies

Cameron readies to support ‘yes’ for Britain in the EU

How Bangladesh’s leaders should respond to the economic threats of COVID-19

Civil protection: Parliament strengthens EU disaster response capability

Where are fleeing Afghans finding refuge?

Why the 33,000 staff European Commission did not have a real contingency plan for the refugee crisis?

MEPs approve the EU’s new culture programme

Human Rights breaches in Russia, Afghanistan and Burkina Faso

From raised fists at the 1968 Olympics to taking the knee: A history of racial justice protests in sport

Trump’s Russian affair spills over and upsets Europe

Why is Merkel’s Germany so liberal with the refugees? Did the last elections change that?

MEPs vote for upgrade to rail passenger rights

Mobile technology saving lives: changing healthcare with simple technology solutions

European Defence Fund on track with €525 million for Eurodrone and other joint research and industrial projects

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: