This is why we should test everyone for COVID-19

(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Reda Cherif, Senior Economist, IMF & Fuad Hasanov, Senior Economist, IMF


  • The potential benefits of a universal testing programme far outweigh any downsides.
  • The barriers – such as a lack of expert consensus and the costs involved – can all be overcome.
  • By deploying universal testing, we can avoid a third wave and the devastating consequences that would result.

Many experts have recognized the merits of universal testing for COVID-19, arguing that the benefits outweigh the costs by a huge margin. To cite a few, Paul Romer, a Nobel laureate in economics, Michael Mina, an epidemiologist from Harvard University, the Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, our own IMF working paper, and many commentators have argued for a universal testing and isolation policy (TIP) to vanquish the pandemic and reopen economies safely.

It has been shown unambiguously that continuous testing of the population at a relatively high rate – between 10-20% of the population each day – would squash the spread of the virus and prevent any resurgence. A TIP against COVID-19 would help identify infection clusters early and deal with them in a targeted and inexpensive way. This approach would preclude imposing numerous restrictions on economic and social activities, which are extremely costly.

Universal testing would cost about 3% (at $5 per test and 15% population testing rate) of the $3 trillion fiscal support provided by the US in 2020 and less than 1% of the economic and social losses ($16 trillion) incurred during the pandemic. In other words, it would still be worth implementing universal testing even if the chance of success were less than 1%.

A major difficulty in addressing the challenge of universal testing is that it lies at the confluence of many fields of expertise such as epidemiology, medicine, economics, public health and industrial systems. As a result, there is still no consensus among experts. The arguments levelled against universal testing include potential inefficacies due to many false negatives and people skipping quarantine, the infeasibility of producing so many tests, the need for the regulatory approval of non-diagnostic tests, and potential costs resulting from the production and distribution of tests and quarantines based on false positives. Others argue that it would provide a false sense of security by negating other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as mask-wearing and social distancing, or, that if it fails, it would endanger the public’s trust in other NPIs such as lockdowns.

These hurdles could be overcome and must not preclude experimentation with universal testing, given that it is economically worthwhile even with a 1% chance of success. The downsides of false negatives or quarantine avoidance can be compensated for with a higher rate of testing. The recently developed rapid antigen tests are cheap, scalable and precise, resulting in a much smaller number of false negatives and false positives. Even though these tests are less precise than some other tests used to diagnose the disease, universal testing is not about diagnosing patients; rather, it is about identifying the infected – what we call epidemiological testing. In addition, while other NPIs are still important in a transition period, once the curve is squashed, universal testing would allow lifting all other NPIs and help reopen large swathes of the economy while waiting for the vaccine.

Universal testing has reduced infections and deaths from COVID-19 in US care homes
Universal testing has reduced infections and deaths from COVID-19 in US care homes Image: Johns Hopkins Medicine

Breaking this tug-of-war among experts and experimenting with a universal testing strategy as a hedge against the pandemic require Rooseveltian resolve. This implies foregoing a ‘laissez-faire’ approach to production and implementing an industrial policy to ramp up the production of tests quickly. State intervention is required to tackle the market failures stemming from demand uncertainty, capacity constraints, coordination failures, externalities and market power. All the bottlenecks along the way, including regulatory approval and the engagement of the private sector in production, need to be cleared. This challenge looks miniscule compared to the goal president Roosevelt put forth before the nation in 1940 when he announced that the US needed to produce more combat airplanes in the next year than it produced cumulatively since the first flight of the Wright brothers in 1903. Three years later, the US was producing more than 50,000 combat airplanes annually, a 30-fold increase from the 1940 level.

Given the high expected economic return of universal testing, a complete reliance on a vaccine against the virus to end the pandemic represents an ‘incredible certitude‘ and ignores the risk-based approach. It is not certain at all when a safe and effective vaccine will be globally available; even worse, a virus mutation could render the newly developed vaccine obsolete. Even if the world had to wait for just a few more months, it would still be economically justified to experiment with universal testing.

Policy-makers should first acknowledge that experimenting with a hedging solution is necessary while waiting for the vaccine. It is even more paramount in developing countries as vaccines might reach them much later than advanced countries. Moreover, scaling up universal testing should follow experimentation in phases, which are similar to the development of a vaccine. The first phase would run trials on neighbourhoods and small towns and study existing experiences to select a set of testing technologies to scale up. The MIT and Georgetown University campuses in the US have successfully reopened while keeping outbreaks at bay by testing students and staff twice a week. The second phase would involve selected cities learning from others about the logistics of large-scale testing and isolation. Indeed, China has done this in the cities of Wuhan and Qingdao and successfully contained the outbreaks. Slovakia has embarked on testing most of its 4.5 million citizens within a few weeks, while Liverpool is the pilot city for the UK’s Operation Moonshot universal testing strategy. The third phase would scale it up nationally to make testing routine.

We now need some more Rooseveltian resolve to experiment with testing and the eventual scale up to the national and global level as well as international collaboration to share experiences. Policy-makers, together with the private sector, can provide the necessary resources to make universal testing a reality and avoid the next wave of the pandemic with its incalculable consequences.

The 2017 science fiction TV series Counterpart, in which an identical parallel world is stricken by a pandemic, foretells eerily our current situation of social distancing, mask-wearing, and billboards urging citizens to wash their hands. The parallel world’s persistently depressed economy could become our future if we do not fully hedge against this pandemic now.

The views expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Legendary Harlem Globetrotters slam-dunk at the UN, with message that brings families, nations together

‘Severe’ new US asylum restrictions will put vulnerable families at risk, UN refugee agency says

Sexual education in a school at the Brazilian Amazon

COP21 Breaking News: “There is an ecological debt that the world needs to pay back to Africa”, French President Francois Hollande promises 2 Billion euros by 2020 from Paris

3 reasons why data is not the new oil – and why this matters to India

Mexico needs a new strategy to boost growth, fight poverty and improve well-being for all

Bangladesh: Head of UN refugee agency calls on Asia-Pacific leaders to show ‘solidarity’ with Rohingya refugees

Clean Mobility: Commission tables proposal on car emissions testing in real driving conditions

The end of Spitzenkandidat: EU leaders concluded unexpectedly on EU top jobs

Statement by Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager on State aid measures to address the economic impact of COVID-19

Impact investment favours expats over African entrepreneurs. Here’s how to fix that

Reconciliation helps ‘repair fractures’, enable lasting peace, Security Council hears

How the tech sector can power the shift to a sustainable economy

It’s time to end the stigma around mental health in the workplace

‘Humiliation was the worst’; Holocaust survivor at UN, asks world to act with ‘empathy and compassion’

UN chief appeals to G7 leaders for ‘strong commitment’ and political will to tackle climate emergency

Why strive for Industry 4.0

The gender gap of medicine in 2018

How a new approach to meat can help end hunger

What next for Europe? Three (completely) different Davos views

Young health workforce – a core of effective primary healthcare?

‘€1 million’ fines for rescue boats prompts UN concern for future sea operations

The COVID-19 vaccine’s challenges

European financial values on the rise

UN programme to help spare millions from child marriage, extended to 2023

3 ways to improve diversity and inclusion in your organization

Two major EU projects falter; the Schengen Agreement now freezes and Eurozone fails to resolve the Greek enigma

‘Abhorrent’ ambulance attack in Libyan capital imperils life-saving work, warns UN

Coronavirus: Eight macro-financial assistance programmes agreed to support enlargement and neighbourhood partners

Air pollution: How to end the deaths of 7 million people per year?

India is now the world’s 5th largest economy

Parliament declares the European Union an ‘‘LGBTIQ Freedom Zone’’

Algeria must stop arbitrary expulsion of West African migrants in desert: UN migration rights expert

Cameron postpones speech in Holland

China-EU Summit on 16-17 July 2018: “Work together to address common challenges”, by China’s Ambassador to the EU

Respect for fundamental rights and freedoms key for peaceful polls in DRC – UN mission chief

Brexit effect: Public opinion survey shows that EU is more appreciated than ever

Afghanistan probe: ‘at least 60 civilians’ killed after US military airstrikes on alleged drug labs

Amid global ‘learning crisis’, Parliaments can ensure adequate resources for education, says UN Assembly President

Long-term EU budget: MEPs slam cuts to culture and education

‘End the ongoing atrocities’ against people with albinism in Malawi, say UN rights experts

This Netherlands football stadium creates its own energy and stores it in electric car batteries

The US will impose tariffs on Mexico, says President Trump

Challenges facing the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns

Commission opens infringement procedures against 24 Member States for not transposing new EU telecom rules

3 reasons we should all care about biodiversity

Air pollution: How to end the deaths of 7 million people per year

UN human rights ruling could boost climate change asylum claims

Australia urged to evacuate offshore detainees amid widespread, acute mental distress

Coronavirus spread now a global emergency declares World Health Organization

China Unlimited – The chinese tourism in Lisbon

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed wins Nobel Peace Prize

UN experts decry torture of Rakhine men and boys held incommunicado by Myanmar’s military

‘Champion for multilateralism’ readies to hand over UN General Assembly gavel

UN recognises role of sport in achieving sustainable development

Commission presents review of EU economic governance and launches debate on its future

Inclusion, empowerment and equality, must be ‘at the heart of our efforts’ to ensure sustainable development, says UN chief

EU Security Union Strategy: connecting the dots in a new security ecosystem

Pharmaceuticals conceal drug side effects with the EU’s Court blessing

The EU moulds a new compromise for growth and financial sustainability

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Today you test yourself and tomorrow you can be infected

    • yes, that is the point! by testing tomorrow you would know and can isolate vs if you did not test and know you would infect 10s to 100s.

  2. Written by two IMF economists. They should stick to ruining economies the traditional way. Thanks, but no thanks.

Trackbacks

  1. […] Muy buen análisis de por qué debemos hacer tests para batir al covid 19: link […]

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s