What is the evidence on wearing masks to stop COVID-19?

masks 2020

(Maiko Valentino, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: David Alexander Walcott, Global Shaper, Kingston Hub,


  • Eastern countries have advocated for the use of masks and have begun to contain the virus.
  • Healthcare workers should receive masks first. That does not mean they are ineffective for the general population.
  • Research shows masks are effective as stopping the spread of respiratory illnesses.

Masks are the new gold. Varying recommendations exist surrounding the use of N95 masks – the most popular commodity that has emerged in the face of this pandemic. Though all regions have universally aligned on the need for risk mitigation, the differences between recommendations on use of N95s is subtle but palpable.

While key Western institutions – the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Surgeon General in the US and several other public health agencies in the West – advise against the donning of surgical or N95 masks by the general public, Eastern countries have strongly advocated for their use and have somehow begun to successfully contain the virus. Is there something we are missing?

Why are we not using masks?

Contrary to the Far East, our society has never had a culture of using masks among the general public, and – consistent with this – the stated position of several influential institutions has been that masks are not recommended in protecting the general public from COVID-19. Some have strengthened their position to state that masks are also not effective when used by the general population. One has to reflect on the origins of these recommendations.

A valid argument against the mass use of masks is the notion that they would deplete the resources available for healthcare workers. Many healthcare workers who require masks for adequate levels of personal protection are unable to access them, while they have been hoarded – and effectively weaponized – by fearful consumers and opportunistic merchants.

Masks must first go to our frontline soldiers. However, this does not immediately suggest that masks are ineffective in protecting the general population. These two points have unfortunately been conflated in the court of public opinion. Should we be aiming to best allocate the existing mask volumes to healthcare workers, or should we be aiming to best allocate masks to our healthcare workers and supply the general public? The difference between those two objectives is subtle but material.

Another common argument against widespread use of masks is built upon the acknowledgement that it is costly to furnish several billion people with masks that are disposable. Evidently, mass access to masks will come at a price, however it must first be considered that the alternative – potential economic disaster – is significantly more costly. Furthermore, while single use of masks is justifiable for a healthcare worker, it is not clear that masks cannot be reused by a healthy individual. Even if this individual were asymptomatically infected, masks may offer tremendous benefit in reducing the spread of disease by those without symptoms.

The case for masks

Many regions that have successfully controlled the incidence rate of COVID infections have entrenched cultures of wearing masks, perhaps with the exception of Germany – which had implemented early and meticulous testing protocols to quickly break chains of infection.

China, Japan, Hong-Kong and South Korea all exercised various degrees of austerity in promoting widespread use of masks, particularly for individuals who are likely to engage in interpersonal contact. Notwithstanding that additional strategies have also been implemented – thorough testing, effective contact tracing, mandated social distancing – all of these countries have effectively managed risk.

Areas that have not effectively managed risk, such as New York and Milan, do not have mandated widespread wearing of masks. Though it is currently impossible to conclusively attribute this difference in outcomes to widespread use of masks, we are invited to reconsider its effectiveness as an intervention.

In addition to anecdotal observations, several scientific studies show that masks reduce the risk of respiratory infection in healthcare workers. Meta-analyses showed that “surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measuresin reducing risk of infection in healthcare workers. Many such studies are observational in nature and, naturally, one would request a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to be the ultimate arbiter of this debate. Fortunately, RCTs on mask usage exist, and one was indeed conducted in 2008 to examine the use of masks in households to prevent respiratory virus transmission. An 80% reduction in contracting respiratory illness among compliant patients was seen. When masks are worn, they are extremely efficacious.

What is the World Economic Forum doing about the coronavirus outbreak?

A new strain of Coronavirus, COVID 19, is spreading around the world, causing deaths and major disruption to the global economy.

Responding to this crisis requires global cooperation among governments, international organizations and the business community, which is at the centre of the World Economic Forum’s mission as the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation.

The Forum has created the COVID Action Platform, a global platform to convene the business community for collective action, protect people’s livelihoods and facilitate business continuity, and mobilize support for the COVID-19 response. The platform is created with the support of the World Health Organization and is open to all businesses and industry groups, as well as other stakeholders, aiming to integrate and inform joint action.

As an organization, the Forum has a track record of supporting efforts to contain epidemics. In 2017, at our Annual Meeting, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) was launched – bringing together experts from government, business, health, academia and civil society to accelerate the development of vaccines. CEPI is currently supporting the race to develop a vaccine against this strand of the coronavirus.

What are we aiming for?

Ultimately, we must reflect on the key global outcome that is being pursued. If we are aiming for the pandemic to run out of steam, the central goal of any intervention should be to bring R0 (the average number of people that are infected by one infected person) below 1, implying that the infection rate no longer grows exponentially.

Masks have a compounding effect in that they both protect an individual from transmitting and being exposed to infection. The impact of this could, conceivably, be a dramatic reduction of R0. If we are to assume masks are 80% effective in preventing spread on an individual basis, the overall risk-reduction in a single interaction between two people should be 96%. If we are to be conservative and assume that low compliance and mask-quality reduce individual risk by 50% instead of 80%, the overall risk reduction within a single interaction between two people is 75%.

If R0 is approximately 4, and we practice existing risk-mitigating strategies such as hand-hygiene and social distancing in addition to wearing masks, it is highly plausible that R0 will be reduced to below 1. Any series of interventions which bring R0 below 1 is the difference between unconstrained growth and eventually stopping the spread of infection. This should be thoroughly considered.

We recognize and support the CDC, WHO and other key institutional leaders that are heroically leading the charge against COVID-19 and invite all stakeholders to acknowledge that – if there is even dubious benefit to the widespread use of masks – consideration is merited. In addition to the general low-risk nature of this intervention, the anecdotal and scientific evidence that surrounds their widespread use is indeed cause for pause, and our thoughts on their utility in this fight should be subjected to objective and sober scrutiny. It could very well be the proverbial little hinge that swings the big door in this fight for humanity.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN chief welcomes resolution to 27-year-old disagreement over renaming the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The US pipeline attack shows the energy sector must act now on cybersecurity. Here are 6 ways how

How trade-based money laundering works and its impact on world finances

Why is the World Health Organisation so much needed?

Remarks by Commissioner Lenarčič on the deployment of EU Medical Teams to Italy

The link between migration and technology is not what you think

UN space-based tool opens new horizons to track land-use on Earth’s surface

‘The clock is ticking’ on meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, says UN deputy chief

UN agencies call for more resettlement and end to detention of asylum seekers in Libya

NextGenerationEU: Commission gets ready to raise up to €800 billion to fund the recovery

Here are six bold ideas to accelerate sustainable energy innovation

Logo Mania: A call to action to our crisis of connection

Judges urge Security Council to serve interests of all UN Member States

Why financial services can kickstart Africa’s digital economy

Parliament approves seven-year EU budget 2021-2027

IMF: World cup and productivity

Connected Claims Europe on 18-19 September 2019, in association with The European Sting

A shocking new report reveals what we’ve done to the natural world

Bosnia and Herzegovina: EU allocates additional €3.5 million to support vulnerable refugees and migrants

Eurozone bank rescues ‘a la carte’ until 2015 then only bail-ins

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

Nothing about us without us: how youth empowerment creates lasting change in the climate meltdown

It’s time for the circular economy to go global – and you can help

Dark spots on EU humanitarian aid spending

A reflection of health inequity in recent epidemics

Fuel crisis rapidly draining last ‘coping capacities’ of Palestinians in Gaza

MEPs hail minimum global corporate tax rate deal as historic

Closing VAT loopholes for sales through online platforms

COVID-19 Myths and Facts

A Sting Exclusive: EU Commission’s Vice President Šefčovič accentuates the importance of innovation to EU’s Energy Union

Brexit: €5 billion to help EU countries mitigate social and economic impact

Improvements to pension systems have made them better placed to deliver pensions

Easing ‘classroom crisis’ in Côte d’Ivoire, brick by (plastic) brick

State aid: Commission approves €1.1 billion Polish scheme to further support companies affected by coronavirus outbreak

ECB: The bastion of effective and equitable Europeanism keeps up quantitative easing

State aid: Commission approves German aid scheme to support airports affected by the coronavirus outbreak

Bertelsmann Stiftung @ European Business Summit 2014: Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TTIP) needs balanced approach

Green light for VAT overhaul to simplify system and cut fraud

What does strategy have to do with a platform approach?

This is the IMF’s latest take on the economy in 2020

EuroLat plenary in Panama: control of trade talks and fight against crime

Commission paralysed before the banking leviathan

Coronavirus: EU channels further support to Nepal and repatriates EU citizens

Vaccine hesitancy: a pregnancy related issue?

Impressions of China

Challenges in accessing Palliative Care from the perspective of Universal Health Coverage

4 innovative renewable energy projects powering Europe’s green future

South Korea once recycled 2% of its food waste. Now it recycles 95%

Is a deal over EU budget possible today?

EU agricultural production no more a self-sufficiency anchor

Partner countries get €3bn in loans to prop up economies affected by pandemic

Our food system is no longer fit for the 21st century. Here are three ways to fix it

IMF: The global economy keeps growing except Eurozone

The US banks drive the developing world to a catastrophe

Team Europe: Digital4Development Hub launched to help shape a fair digital future across the globe

UN chief pays tribute to Egypt’s role in avoiding ‘dramatic’ escalation in conflict across the Gaza-Israel border

3 ways to fight short-termism and relaunch Europe

More than speed: 5G could become the next big economic driver

Smart cities must pay more attention to the people who live in them

COVID-19 poses a dramatic threat to life in conflict zones

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s