Tax havens cost governments $200 billion a year. It’s time to change the way global tax works

Panama papers

Panama City, Panama (Yosi Bitran, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Ludvig Wier, Postdoctoral researcher, UC Berkeley

  • New research suggests 40% of multinational profits are shifted to tax havens and that 10% of the world’s largest multinational firms are responsible for 98% of this activity;
  • The result is $200 billion in lost global tax revenue;
  • A globally agreed, minimum corporate tax rate and treating a multinational as one firm, not a collection of national entities, could change this.

About 40% of multinational profits or $650 billion are shifted each to such tax havens by multinational firms from all countries. The price tag on this type of behavior? $200 Bn. lost in global tax revenue. The reason that this behavior is possible is an antiquated tax code designed in the 1920’s. The solution will be a global overhaul of the corporate tax code: and this overhaul might not be that far away. In this article I investigate the question: What would a fair, functional global tax system look like in 2030 and how bleak is the alternative?

First things first: How is it that companies can use tax havens to avoid paying taxes all together? The answer lies in the current international tax code that treats a multinational firm not as one firm, but as a collection of national entities. For today’s global companies, each dollar of reported income in the US or Germany will be taxed at close to 30%, whereas income reported in Bermuda will be taxed at 0%. Tax minimizing strategies that shift profits to various low-tax regimes have been documented at major multinationals including Amazon, Google, IKEA, Nike and many others.

In my research with Thomas Tørsløv and Gabriel Zucman we document the global scope of this behavior. We estimate that 40% of multinational profits are shifted to tax havens based on new macroeconomic data known as foreign affiliate statistics. These statistics record the amount of wages paid by affiliates of foreign multinational companies and the profits these affiliates make. In other words, they allow us to break down national accounts aggregates (wages paid by corporations, operating surplus of corporations, etc.) into ‘local firms’ and ‘foreign firms’. We draw on these statistics to create a new global database recording the profits reported in each country by local versus foreign corporations.

Using this database, we construct and analyse a simple macro statistic: the ratio of pre-tax corporate profits to wages. Thanks to the new data exploited in our paper, we can compute this ratio for foreign versus local firms separately in each country. Our investigation reveals spectacular findings.

In non-haven countries, foreign firms are systematically less profitable than local firms. In tax havens, by contrast, they are systematically more profitable – and hugely so, as you can see in the chart below. While for local firms the ratio of taxable profits to wages is typically around 30%-40%, for foreign firms in tax havens the ratio is an order of magnitude higher – as much as 1600% in Ireland. In other words we find that enormous profits are reported by multinational firms in tax havens and that these profits do not match the actual economic activity in those tax havens.

Foreign firms are systemically more profitable in tax havens than local firms
Foreign firms are systemically more profitable in tax havens than local firms

Which countries win and lose in this game for profits?

Overall, we find that the world loses 10% of corporate tax receipts, or $200bn dollars. By going to our website,, you can explore our interactive map to see which countries attract and lose profits in this shell game.

The map covers 86 countries that constitute 92% of global economic activity and more than 70% of world population. By clicking on each country you can see the amount of profits shifted to tax havens and to which havens the profits were shifted. You can also see the implied loss of corporate income tax revenue.

Some countries are marked in green; these are tax havens. For the tax havens we report how much profit they attract from high-tax countries and what the effective corporate income tax rate is. To name a few examples: Germany loses $20bn each year, corresponding to 29% of their corporate tax receipts. Similarly, France loses 24% of its corporate tax return and the United States loses 17%.

Which countries lose the most corporate tax revenue because of tax havens?
Which countries lose the most corporate tax revenue because of tax havens?
Image: The Missing Profits of Nations

Interestingly, the corporate tax havens of the world are also the biggest tax collectors of the world. That is, countries like Ireland, Luxembourg and Puerto Rico, despite applying effective tax rates of less than 5%, manage to attract such large artificial profits that they end up collecting more tax revenue than any other country. This displays the perverse incentives of the current corporate tax code and helps to explain how countries have entered into a race-to-the-bottom of cutting corporate tax rates.

Which firms are the most aggressive profit shifters?

Based on corporate tax returns from South Africa and public annual reports from Bureau Van Dijk, a publisher of business information, my co-author Hayley Reynolds and I investigate what characterizes a profit-shifting firm. We find that the majority of multinationals firms do not shift any profits to tax havens, but that this is dwarfed by the enormous amounts shifted by very large multinationals. As a result, we estimate that 98% of profits shifted to tax havens are shifted by the 10% largest multinational firms, as below.

An estimated 98% of profits shifted to tax havens are shifted by the 10% largest multinational firms
An estimated 98% of profits shifted to tax havens are shifted by the 10% largest multinational firms

Furthermore, as documented by Zucman (2014), US-owned firms seem to be particularly aggressive – shifting 60% of their foreign earned income to tax havens, as opposed to the global average of 40%. Despite the frequent focus on “digital” firms, my research with Thomas Tørsløv and Gabriel Zucman does not suggest there are any systematic differences in profit shifting across industries.

How do we fix this?

When your car doesn’t start, you have essentially two options: fix it or scrap it and get a new vehicle. So far, the world as a whole has been scrapping corporate tax, albeit in a very gradual way. As a response to globalism and the issues that this has brought to corporate taxation, countries have cut tax rates and instead relied more heavily on consumption taxes. In the last 40 years, we have hence seen the global average corporate tax rate fall by more than 50%.

What would it take to change this trajectory? What would a fair, functional global tax system look like in ten years from now, in 2030?

The root cause of profit shifting is 1) the incentive to shift profits (differences in corporate tax rates) and 2) the possibility to do so (the separate tax accounting of multinational entities). To solve the problem, these two root causes have to be eliminated.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about tax?

The World Economic Forum has published its Davos Manifesto 2020, calling on business leaders to sign up to a series of ethical principles, including:

“A company serves society at large through its activities, supports the communities in which it works, and pays its fair share of taxes.”

Additionally, the Forum’s Trade and Global Economic Interdependence Platform provides a vital link between trade and tax communities to enable coherent policymaking which responds to societal needs and reflects business realities.

Taking its lead from OECD-led reforms, the work brings technical issues to a high-level audience and enables honest dialogue among diverse stakeholders on polarizing topics. You can find relevant publications here.

Let’s start with the easiest: corporate tax harmonization. If countries could agree on a global minimum corporate tax rate of say 25%, the problem of profit shifting would largely disappear, as tax havens would simply cease to exist.

This was already suggested by the EU Commision’s Ruding Committee in 1992, which proposed a minimum EU corporate tax rate of 30%. Skeptical readers might have a hard time seeing tax havens such as Malta, Hong Kong or Luxembourg agree to this and kill a major revenue source. And the failure of any global agreement suggests that these readers are right.

There is, however, a solution to that also. Say Google reports $22bn dollars of profits in Bermuda to be taxed at 0%. The US tax authority can in this case choose to cash in the residual tax payment of 25% by itself. A version of this model was implemented with the Trump tax reform – the only problem being that the minimum tax rate imposed was only 13% (with loopholes built in) and hence still left firms with an incentive to shift profits.

The second solution: formula apportionment. Instead of treating the multinational firm as a collection of national entities we need to treat them as one firm. Concretely, if, for example, Google reported $30bn in consolidated global earnings, and 10% of its revenue comes from France, then France should get to tax 10% of Google’s global earnings ($3Bn). In order for the company to shift their earnings to Bermuda, they have to ask their customers to move.

The likelihood that these two solutions will see the light of day? Surprisingly, not completely impossible. OECD’s secretariat’s recent proposal indeed suggests similar (diluted, but similar) solutions. The timeline for 137 member countries agreeing on this is end of 2020. The public pressure has never been higher to fix the corporate tax and a trade war looms if countries fail to collaborate. If a global agreement is reached, it is very conceivable that new and bolder global reforms can be made. In other words – a fair and effective corporate tax system is in no way out of reach.


Ludvig Wier, Thomas Tørsløv and Gabriel Zucman. The Missing Profits of Nations, NBER working paper 24701, revised September 2019. See [Appendix & data webpage].

Ludvig, Wier, and Reynolds Hayley. Big and ‘unprofitable’: How 10% of multinational firms do 98% of profit shifting. No. 111. World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), 2018.

Taxing Across Borders: Tracking Personal Wealth and Corporate Profits, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014, 28(4): 121-148. [Appendix]. [Data].

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Senior UN children’s advocate says they ‘should never be targeted by violence’

The Philippines is reopening a ‘cesspool’ island after a six month clean up

The EU’s outermost regions: strengthened partnership bears fruit

Guterres calls for ‘maximum restraint’ following drone assault on key Saudi oil facility

Health services for Syrian women caught up in war, foster safety and hope: UNFPA

This is how music festivals are tackling plastic waste

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

EU/African, Caribbean and Pacific partnership: MEPs list key aims for renewal

How drones can manage the food supply chain and tell you if what you eat is sustainable

Europe led by Germany seems vulnerable to Trump’s threats

Mobile technology saving lives: How simple technological solutions can improve our health care system

Scourge of slavery still claims 40 million victims worldwide, ‘must serve as a wakeup call’

Brexit casts a shadow over the LSE – Deutsche Börse merger: a tracer of how or if brexit is to be implemented

International partners pledge $1.2 billion to help cyclone-hit Mozambique recover, ‘build back better’

The Irish Presidency bullies the Parliament over EU budget

How cities can lead the way in bridging the global housing gap

Marginalized groups hit hardest by inequality and stigma in cities

Myanmar companies bankroll ‘brutal operations’ of military, independent UN experts claim in new report

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

EU job-search aid worth €2 million for 500 former shipbuilding workers in Spain

‘Pioneering’ former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet officially appointed new UN human rights chief

TTIP’s 11th round major takeaways and the usual “leaked” document

Denmark plans ‘Silicon Valley’ on 9 artificial islands off Copenhagen

There is a mental health crisis in entrepreneurship. Here’s how to tackle it

Glaringly false reassurances about the repercussions of the EU-US free trade agreement

The 5 things you need to make your teams more effective, according to Google

Why developing new antibiotics is a matter of life and death

Countries must invest at least 1% more of GDP on primary healthcare to eliminate glaring coverage gaps

Urban Waste Water: Commission decides to refer Slovenia to the European Court of Justice over waste water treatment

UN and civil society team up to make cities more sustainable and inclusive

Coronavirus: a Disease that spreads as fastly as its fake news

We must stop turning a blind eye to the world’s health crises

Trust in facial recognition technology can be achieved. Here’s how

Trump fines China with $50 billion a year plus some more…

‘We will not give up on looking for peace for South Sudan’: UN deputy chief

‘Open, cordial, and frank discussions’ held over future Somalia-UN relationship

Fairness should be at the heart of the agricultural goods trade

Summer 2019 Economic Forecast: Growth clouded by external factors

Regional competitiveness and growth: a Gordian knot for Europe

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

‘Growing alarm’ over Fall Armyworm advance, with cash crops ‘under attack’ across Asia

Future EU financing and recovery: MEPs to assess summit outcome

Coronavirus: Commission launches data sharing platform for researchers

Iraq: Security Council told ‘despair’ has ‘given way to hope’ but road to stability ‘long and far from easy’

Bangladesh, South Africa and Bolivia all beat the US for women’s representation in politics

There are 3 barriers blocking good menstrual hygiene for all women. Here’s how we overcome them

New Erasmus: more opportunities for disadvantaged youth

70 years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, this is why we need dignity more than ever

From his room with a view, UN chief takes to Instagram with an eye on hope and a brighter future

EU-China Leaders’ Meeting: Upholding EU values and interests at the highest level

Fail fast, fail better: 3 ways companies can master innovation

How do we upskill a billion people by 2030? Leadership and collaboration will be key

Crimean crisis: not enough to slow down European indices

‘Compelling case’ for urgency around global disarmament, UN-led forum told

Parenting in the time of COVID-19? Consider these 6 tips from the WHO

How to fight back against misinformation and polarization

Burned in the Amazonian forest: Your health may be in danger

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

How COVID-19 is taking gaming and esports to the next level

Erdogan vies to become Middle East Sultan over Khashoggi’s killing

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s