The gateway to carbon pricing? Air pollution policy


(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Oliver Harman, Cities Economist, International Growth Centre & Ondine Berland, Masters Student and Research Assistant, Paris School of Economics

  • Buying carbon is too cheap and easy.
  • ‘Gateway tax’, focussing on air pollution, could be initial step.
  • Outdoor air pollution causes 4 million deaths a year.

When it comes to climate policies, of those available, the economist’s preferred tool tends to be the elusive carbon tax’. Despite notable successes, the implementation of carbon taxes is rare or insufficient, as the recent struggles to find a consensus around the COP25 highlight, despite climate change reaching emergency status.

In particular, challenges raised by the ecological transition inhibit change. Firstly, because putting a price on carbon is a hard task: it requires the precise evaluation of consequences to climate disasters in the case of inaction, which is fraught with uncertainty. Secondly, when it comes to measuring the value of access to clean air, economic tools might be inadequate, and the real cost of irreversible change to the environment tricky to assign value.

Despite these limitations, however, there is best practice: IMF calculations and the Stiglitz-Stern Commission suggest that to maintain global warming under the 2˚C target, associated global carbon prices should be at US$75 to US$100 per carbon ton by 2030. Yet, global averages are currently at US$2.

The ink on the 2015 Paris agreement has led to too little action as 80% of global emissions are still not covered by carbon pricing. Even those countries that initially progressed have hit stumbling blocks. For example, in France, equity concerns on the redistribution of gasoline related carbon tax revenues to the economy inhibit progress.

Therefore, while a price on carbon may be the designated first-best solution, in many places, this may not be the right time to implement it. A ‘gateway tax’ as a precursor to a carbon tax, which focuses on air pollution, could be an intermediate pro-productivity, pro-equity alternative – lowering emissions while increasing livelihoods.


The gateway: air pollution and its allocation

Globally air pollution is concentrated in cities, yet both central and municipal government policymakers should care about this as air pollution can drive three significant losses: The loss of health, productivity and equity.

When it comes to the effects of air pollution on health, the effects are stark: worldwide, there are 4 million deaths every year due to exposure to outdoor air pollution. At a city level, it affects all income levels, but with varying magnitudes. For example, there are five deaths a week in Bristol, UK compared to over 500 in Delhi, India.

Air pollution also reduces economic productivity, as it lessens worker’s ability to turn up and function at peak levels. In Mexico City, Mexico, for example, a 20% drop in sulphur dioxide levels saw workers increase their time worked by 3.5% – equivalent to a per worker gain of US$126 from reduced absenteeism. Workers in China saw a 6% increase in value add to their desk-based work when air pollution in the city was low compared to suffocating. Air pollution can also induce forced migration, driving citizens, particularly the young and educated away, who may prefer a loss in income rather than a loss in health.

These adverse effects are felt very unequally hurting the poorest most. For example, 91% of premature deaths occurred in low and middle-income countries, which are also the countries where the intensity of air pollution is highest. Within countries, outdoor pollution is concentrated in cities, which account for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions. The opening image map for example highlights particular urban air pollution peaks – notably around Dhaka, Bangladesh as well as China’s industrial cities of Taiyuan, Linfen, or to a lesser extent Seoul, South Korea. Furthermore, although this is also a problem in wealthier cities, the problem is comparatively small: the first OECD city to enter the worst offenders list, in terms of air pollution, is Batman, Turkey. But it does not even make the top 100.

Even within cities, air pollution is not felt equally. Within European cities, ethnically diverse and deprived areas have higher air pollution levels. Half of London’s deprived lower income and education areas break the legal limits of air pollution compared to just 2% of wealthy areas. Cities can respond to this and are beginning to. However, economic policy response needs to be matched to local context.

Economic options and successful cases of air pollution change in cities

One such response is through market-based policies, such as pollution taxes and tradable permits. These are in theory the most cost-effective – dynamics should ensure producers with the lowest costs of reducing pollution make the largest cuts. However efficiency of such schemes are highly dependent on the quantity of permits supplied and the allocation rule. The particulate trading programme piloted in Surat, India is one example, where current projections expect a reduction in emissions of 29% while simultaneously increasing firm profits. Elsewhere clean air zones (CAZs) are taking hold, intending to discourage most polluting vehicles from entering parts of cities. This reduction can be achieved either with low cost labour intensive or higher cost automated systems.

Alternative control-based policies are typically a less complex way to combat air pollution. Quantity restrictions on use such as in Delhi, Mexico City, and Quito, Ecuador have reduced air pollution by 10%. Similarly, information-based policies, both at the firm level and citizen level, can be effective. The former, as with India’s continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) where providing enhanced information on polluters dramatically reduced pollution. The latter in communicating real health losses to city residents in order to change behaviour.

Highlighting successful policy in a city is one thing. Having necessary data to underpin its implementation is another. Dakar, Senegal, is one of the only cities in Africa measuring daily pollution levels. Accountability must be the precursor of action.

What’s the World Economic Forum doing about climate change?

Climate change poses an urgent threat demanding decisive action. Communities around the world are already experiencing increased climate impacts, from droughts to floods to rising seas. The World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report continues to rank these environmental threats at the top of the list.

To limit global temperature rise to well below 2°C and as close as possible to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, it is essential that businesses, policy-makers, and civil society advance comprehensive near- and long-term climate actions in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change.

The World Economic Forum’s Climate Initiative supports the scaling and acceleration of global climate action through public and private-sector collaboration. The Initiative works across several workstreams to develop and implement inclusive and ambitious solutions.

This includes the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, a global network of business leaders from various industries developing cost-effective solutions to transitioning to a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy. CEOs use their position and influence with policy-makers and corporate partners to accelerate the transition and realize the economic benefits of delivering a safer climate.

Air pollution taxes – a gateway tax

The three losses; in health, productivity and equity, require public policy response. As they have shown, air pollution taxes and caps in cities are arguably more straightforward to implement than carbon taxes. They are more easily linked to a geographical space with a direct mechanism of change through cleaner air. Furthermore, citizens in cities feel the effects of air pollution changes quickly.

In their implementation, they could help enhance life expectancy, economic productivity and equity – all while critically lowering emissions. Revenues from taxation can be either returned to citizens as a dividend (similar to British Columbia in Canada’s carbon tax), making it a pro-poor revenue-neutral policy. Alternatively, they can fund pollution-mitigating projects such as public transport (similar to London’s Toxicity Charge). Climate change may be won or lost in cities, and air pollution taxes are one way the fightback can be made by urban policymakers, making them a useful gateway for carbon taxes to come.







the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Gender equality: an issue much talked about but less acted upon

Vaccinations and the movement of anti-vaccers

How India’s new consumers can contribute to a $6 trillion opportunity

Draghi reveals how failing banks will be dealt, may cut interest rates soon

Banks worth $47 trillion adopt new UN-backed climate, sustainability principles

‘No justification’ for attacks against civilians, UN envoy says on mounting cross-border violence in Gaza

The experience economy is booming, but it must benefit everyone

The smartest cyber investment is collective action. Here’s why

A Sting Exclusive: Disaster risk resilience, key to protecting vulnerable communities

UN experts urge India to align new anti-trafficking bill with human rights law

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

‘Young people care about peace’: UN Youth Envoy delivers key message to Security Council

Eurozone set to abandon monetary and incomes austerity and adopt growth friendly policies

Rich economies not a promise of education equality, new report finds

Saving the whales is more important than planting trees to stop climate change. This is why

European research priorities for 2021-2027 agreed with member states

Brexit casts a shadow over the LSE – Deutsche Börse merger: a tracer of how or if brexit is to be implemented

Mediterranean migrant drownings should spur greater action by European countries, urge UN agencies

The new EU “fiscal compact” an intimidation for all people

‘Democratic aspirations of the Sudanese people’ must be met urges Guterres, following military removal of al-Bashir from power

Future of our planet hinges on action by today’s youth – UN deputy chief

Most fish consumers support a ban on fishing endangered species, poll finds

Rural Bangladesh has already embraced renewable energy. Here’s what the rest of the world can learn

Iran-US attack in Iraq: Guterres pledges ‘active engagement’ in further de-escalation efforts

Back to the Basics: Primary Healthcare

D-Day for Grexit is today and not Friday; Super Mario is likely to kill the Greek banks still today

All States have ‘primary responsibility’ to protect against hate attacks

How to rebuild trust and integrity in South Africa

Nearly two-thirds of children lack access to welfare safety net, risking ‘vicious cycle of poverty’

Questions and Answers on issues about the digital copyright directive

Central Asia: the European Union matches political commitment with further concrete support

The refugee crisis brings to light EU’s most horrible flaws and nightmares

The European Green Deal sets out how to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, boosting the economy, improving people’s health and quality of life, caring for nature, and leaving no one behind

Why financial services can kickstart Africa’s digital economy

Global ageing is a challenge – and an opportunity

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, who gets it and who pays the bill?

Progress in medical research: leading or lagging behind?

Consumer product quality: MEPs take aim at dual standards

Parallel downfalls of Merkel and Deutsche Bank threaten Germany and Europe

The cost of healthcare is rising in ASEAN. How can nations get the most for their money?

Cash-strapped cities must look to private partners

Will Turkey abandon the refugee deal and risk losing a bonanza of money?

Why business can no longer turn a blind eye to poor vision

First do no harm. Why healthcare needs to change

Global climate change: consequences for human health in Brazilian cities

Poor Greeks, Irish and Spaniards still pay for the faults of German and French banks

This tech company is aiming to plant 500 billion trees by 2060 – using drones

European Employment Forum 2013 and not European Unemployment Forum 2014

‘We need to stand up now’ for the elderly: urges UN rights expert on World Day

A small group of world leaders are standing together against inequality

How privacy tech is redefining the data economy

Brexit preparedness: EU completes preparations for possible “no-deal” scenario on 12 April

Beyond self-regulation: dealing with Europe’s consumption problem

You can make a difference in North Korea. Here’s how

Climate emergency: City mayors are ‘world’s first responders’, says UN chief

UN chief condemns student abductions in north-west Cameroon

How and why Mercedes fakes the EU fuel consumption tests

‘The green economy is the future,’ UN chief says in Beijing, urging climate solutions that strengthen economies, protect the environment

UK: Customs Union with EU or a longer delay of Brexit

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s