Here’s how the WTO can help address plastic pollution

plastic pollutions

(Brian Yurasits, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Carolyn Deere Birkbeck, Senior Researcher, The Graduate Institute, Geneva; Senior Research Associate, Global Economic Governance Programme, University of Oxford


The WTO has a vital role to play in the trade-related aspects of tackling plastics pollution.

⦁ Governments are implementing positive and negative trade-related policies in relation to plastics.

⦁ Countries need to work cooperatively to support a more environmentally-sustainable global economy.

 

Trade plays a central role in plastic pollution and in the global plastics economy. Amid impressive and multiplying efforts across the globe to address plastic pollution, however, the relevance of trade to the production, consumption and disposal of plastics has been underestimated. At the same time, the important ways that cooperation on trade and trade policies could support global efforts to reduce plastic pollution are yet to attract the focused attention they deserve.

The WTO – the core multilateral forum for cooperation on trade – has a vital role to play in supporting greater understanding, dialogue and action on the trade-related aspects of tackling plastics pollution. It is a uniquely positioned forum through which Member States could work together to support and complement inter-governmental efforts to reduce plastic pollution, including at the UN Environment Assembly and the Basel Convention on the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes.

The policy context

Policy attention to the nexus of plastic pollution and trade must be grounded in the following understandings:

⦁ While plastics are versatile, useful and cheap materials, with an impressive array of applications, many uses are excessive and unnecessary, as exemplified by many single-use plastics.

⦁ Business-as-usual predictions forecast a quadrupling of plastic production by 2050 and rising demand for plastics in growing developing country markets. Although many governments and stakeholders are scrambling to prevent, reduce and clean up plastic pollution, investors are meanwhile continuing to support new, expanded plastic production capacity, often with government support.

⦁ The price of plastic fails to reflect its environmental costs. The fossil fuel feedstocks and infrastructure vital to plastic production are heavily subsidized, for instance, resulting in the low prices of virgin plastic and many plastic products.

⦁ Plastic pollution occurs across the life cycle of plastics production, manufacture, use and disposal. The catch-all term “plastics” refers to a range of plastic polymers and applications, which have distinctive properties and purposes; present different recyclability and waste management challenges; and offer varying risks to the environment and human health.

Public outcry about the dramatic impacts of plastic litter and microplastics in the oceans has spurred greater attention to the multiple health, environmental and economic impacts of plastic pollution on land and in the air as well across the plastic life cycle.

To address the “downstream” challenges of plastic waste and pollution by businesses and consumers, we need to focus “upstream” on the production and use of polluting plastics in the first place – that is, on transforming the global plastics economy. Here, stronger attention to the nexus of trade and plastic pollution is vital for three reasons:

1. The significance of trade in the global plastics economy

International trade is significant across the life cycle of plastics and in plastic supply chains. There are important international trade flows in the fossil fuel feedstocks that are key inputs for 98% of the world’s plastic production as well as in primary/virgin plastics (in the form of pellets, resins, fibres), multiple plastic end-products, synthetic textiles, plastic packaging, products wrapped in plastic, plastic waste, secondary waste materials, and recycled plastic.

In 2015, for instance, total exports in primary forms of plastic reached 42% of the total volume of production that year. In addition, total exports in synthetic textiles reached 60% of the total volume of global production of synthetic textiles that year. Tens of millions of tonnes of plastic packaging are integral to thousands of products traded internationally each year, from electronic goods to bottled water, and chocolate bars.

Trade flows of “empty” plastic packaging (that is, shipping containers full of plastic packaging) alone account for almost 10% of plastic packaging produced annually. Plastic is also embodied in countless other products that are widely traded and consumed across the world – from cars to household appliances, children’s toys, and construction equipment, rubber tyres, and paints.

In the last few years, the fact that most of the massive and growing scale of plastic waste produced each year is not recycled has shocked consumers around the world. Rather it has been shipped across borders, winding up mostly in developing countries with little capacity to manage the ever-rising tide of plastic waste.

2. Trade policy dimensions of plastics pollution

Governments are implementing a range of trade-related measures and policies relevant to plastics production and pollution. The purposes of these efforts vary and can include:

⦁ Support for domestic plastics producers;

⦁ Support for exports of domestic plastic industries;

⦁ Reducing plastic pollution by restricting or banning imports of certain plastic products and waste on environmental grounds.

In 2018, the entry into force of China’s ban on imports of certain kinds of plastic waste spurred a massive reorganization of the global plastic waste trade. When waste trade flows shifted from China toward Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, India and Taiwan among others, these countries were equally unprepared for the volumes of incoming plastic waste, with some also implementing import bans and sending rubbish back.

Last year, rising concern about the environmental and economic challenges arising from poorly regulated plastic waste trade, especially for developing countries, spurred 180 governments to adopt the 2019 “Plastic Amendments” to the Basel Convention, signalling the powerful potential for trade-related policies to contribute to global efforts to reduce plastic pollution.

As of 2018, some 127 countries had legislation to regulate plastic bags, mostly in the form of restrictions on manufacturing, distribution, use and imports and to a lesser extent, fees and recycling targets.

Between 2009 to 2018, WTO Members notified 128 measures affecting trade in plastics for environmental reasons. This number has been growing, with 71 out of 128 notified in the last three years alone. Most measures – more than 80% – were notified by developing countries.

Other measures with important trade dimensions that could help support the economic transformation and transition required to reduce plastic pollution include:

⦁ the removal of subsidies that promote plastic production and trade;

⦁ environmental standards and labelling requirements for plastics;

⦁ government procurement policies to reduce use of single-use plastics;

⦁ extended producer responsibility schemes;

⦁ circular economy initiatives and related industrial policies, such as subsidies and tax incentives to spur recycling as well as innovation and technology transfer in plastic substitutes, more biodegradable plastics, and waste management technologies.

Spurred by stakeholder campaigns to “break free from plastic”, a growing array of companies are advancing initiatives with important trade dimensions, including efforts to move towards a more circular economy for plastics and new commitments to disclose and reduce the plastic footprint of their global supply chains and distribution networks .

3. To achieve impact, countries need to work cooperatively

At present, the use of trade policy to help reduce plastic pollution is occurring in an uncoordinated and disjointed manner, thereby reducing effectiveness; and trade policy frameworks are not well aligned with the many domestic efforts underway around the world to tackle plastic pollution.

Looking forward, there are a number of concrete options for action on plastic pollution at the WTO that would support, reinforce and add value to cooperation in other international processes.

Options for a WTO Initiative on Plastic Pollution

⦁ Strengthen coherence between trade policy frameworks and domestic policies to reduce plastic pollution.

⦁ Reduce trade barriers for products and services that reduce and phase out plastic pollution, including alternatives to plastic products and technologies to improve waste management and boost recycling.

⦁ Encourage voluntary action on targets and pledges to reduce trade in problematic and harmful plastics, including single-use plastics; boost transparency and certification of plastic supply chains; and remove environmentally perverse subsidies to the production and export of plastics.

⦁ Promote transparency, monitoring and information-sharing on trends in plastic trade and supply chains, as well as on trade-related measures targeting plastics and plastic pollution.

⦁ Improve capacity building for trade-related aspects of reducing plastic pollution in developing countries and boost cooperation among the WTO Secretariat, Member States and other international organizations active on plastic pollution.

⦁ To advance dialogue and action on these options, like-minded WTO Member States should launch an Initiative on Plastic Pollution at the WTO’s 12th Ministerial Conference in Kazakhstan in June 2020.

Critically, concerns about plastic pollution transcend the North-South divides that have long thwarted much-needed cooperation on trade and environment issues at the WTO.

Already China – as a major producer and exporter of plastics – is showing leadership, in drawing attention to the value that greater cooperation at the WTO could bring to international efforts to tackle plastic pollution. This presents an opportunity that should not be squandered.

At a time of uncertainty about the WTO’s role and relevance, a political decision to pursue concrete action on plastics pollution at the WTO could help build public confidence in the multilateral trading system’s ability to deliver on its core objective of sustainable development and support a more environmentally-sustainable global economy.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Syria: UN food relief agency ‘doing everything we can’ to reach Idlib civilians

UN summit tackles climate change-induced threat to mountain water supplies

Consumers suffer three defeats

‘Answer the call of Afghans’ to reduce impact of conflict, UN urges all parties amid increase in civilian airstrike deaths

Madagascar: UN chief commends nation on first round of peaceful elections

The European Parliament rewrites the EU budget in a bright day for the Union

Capital markets selloff: The financial moguls send messages to monetary authorities

‘We cannot lose momentum’ on the road to peace in Yemen, UN envoy warns

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Launch of CREWS, climate risk & early warning systems

Here’s how the global financial crisis is still affecting your wages

UN launches new project to address link between terrorism, arms and crime

MWC 2016 Live: Industrial world prepares to reap digital benefits

Bugged Europe accepts US demands and blocks Morales plane

Geographical Indications – a European treasure worth €75 billion

ECB to people: Not responsible if you lose money on Bitcoin, your governments are

UN migration agency launches $10 million appeal to support hurricane recovery in The Bahamas

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Climate emergency, call to support breastfeeding, rising political heat and new investigation board for Syria

Travel the world, find yourself

Coronavirus update: UN scales back major conference

How did Facebook fool the Commission that easily during the WhatsApp acquisition?

Venezuela: UN human rights office calls for ‘maximum restraint’ by authorities in face of new demonstrations

Brexit: Only Corbyn and May in concert can make the needed compromises

UN ‘regrets’ new US position on legality of Israeli settlements

Bill Gates’ top 10 breakthrough technologies of 2019

10 months were not enough for the EU to save the environment but 2 days are

Trust links up supply chains. How do you establish it in the digital era?

Planet’s Health is Our Health and the Reverse is True

Working when sick is rising and harms you and your employer. This is why

Mental health at stake: A silent epidemic of 21st century

The European Youth raises their voices this week in Brussels at Yo!Fest 2015

7 shocking statistics that show the cost of corruption

5G will change the world – but who will keep it safe?

‘Endemic’ sexual violence surging in South Sudan: UN human rights office

UN chief condemns suspected Boko Haram attacks targeting Eid al-Fitr celebrations in Nigeria

Mental Health x Meditation, in times of pandemic: cognitive and behavioral modifications

EU revengefully shows no mercy to Cameron by demanding a fast and sloppy Brexit now

Eurozone recession subsides

Innovating together: connectivity that matters

Deadlock broken, South Sudan on road to ‘sustainable peace’, but international support still key

Brexit negotiations: Can May’s Britain bounce back?

JADE Team at the European Business Summit 2017

Here are 10 of Nelson Mandela’s most inspirational quotes

New UN Global Climate report ‘another strong wake-up call’ over global warming: Guterres

UN Middle East Coordinator strongly condemns ‘arrests and violence’ by Hamas security forces during Gaza protests

Monday’s Daily Brief: UN chief talks climate action at G7, WFP official visits camp in Central African Republic, Deadly violence at Lesvos migrant centre, Security Council meets on AU-UN Darfur mission

European Commission Joint Research Centre opens world-class laboratories to researchers

UN expert condemns new sentence for jailed Venezuelan judge as ‘another instance of reprisal’

Can We(esterners) ever understand (the) Chinese

EU Budget: InvestEU Programme to support jobs, growth and innovation in Europe

COVID-19: What the evidence so far means for containment

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

United States: UN chief ‘deeply saddened’ by deadly California wildfires

Croatian Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

More children killed by unsafe water, than bullets, says UNICEF chief

Visa Facilitation and Readmission: the European Union and Belarus sign agreements

Civilians ‘continue to pay highest price’ in Ukraine conflict, with peace prospects losing ‘momentum’

These floating homes could protect people from flooding as sea levels rise

Ozone on track to heal completely in our lifetime, UN environment agency declares on World Day.

Consumer protection: Deal on EU-wide rules for those sold faulty products

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Peta Hallen says:

    More needs to be done with plastic production up the value chain beyond banning bags and straws. Too much plastic exists in product packaging from manufacturers. There are good initiatives to cleanup plastics but we need to eliminate it before it arrives in our oceans. I’m using Ekoru.org as a search engine because they use their revenues to clean plastic from oceans. We need to address it before it gets there.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s