To build a circular economy, we need to put recycling in the bin

recyclings

(Paweł Czerwiński, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Alexandre Lemille, Co-founder and general secretary, African Circular Economy Network


Too often the concept of a circular economy is muddled up with some kind of advanced recycling process that would mean keeping our industrial system as it is and preserving a growing consumption model.

This idea is based on a belief that recycling will take care of everything.

One of the most startling examples of this is the part of the European Union’s Circular Economy Action Plan which aims to increase recycling rates: up to 70% of all packaging waste by 2030 and 65% of all municipal waste by 2035. In a properly built circular economy, one should rather focus on avoiding the recycling stage at all costs. It may sound straightforward, but preventing waste from being created in the first place is the only realistic strategy.

While we obviously need to continue recycling for quite some time, putting the emphasis on genuine circular innovations – that is, moving us away from a waste-based model – should be our sole objective.

Recycling is linear

In a linear economy, we do not account for the side-effects generated by a product once sold to an end customer. The aim is to sell a maximum number of products at minimal cost. Continuous pressure to reduce costs leads to the creation of many of these side-effects – called externalities by economists. The higher a company’s rate of production and the higher its efficiency, the more successful it will be at selling its goods in a fiercely competitive environment.

Circular economy

What is a circular economy?

The global population is expected to reach close to 9 billion people by 2030 – inclusive of 3 billion new middle-class consumers.This places unprecedented pressure on natural resources to meet future consumer demand.

A circular economy is an industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design. It replaces the end-of-life concept with restoration, shifts towards the use of renewable energy, eliminates the use of toxic chemicals and aims for the elimination of waste through the superior design of materials, products, systems and business models.

Nothing that is made in a circular economy becomes waste, moving away from our current linear ‘take-make-dispose’ economy. The circular economy’s potential for innovation, job creation and economic development is huge: estimates indicate a trillion-dollar opportunity.

The World Economic Forum has collaborated with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation for a number of years to accelerate the Circular Economy transition through Project MainStream – a CEO-led initiative that helps to scale business driven circular economy innovations.

Join our project, part of the World Economic Forum’s Shaping the Future of Environment and Natural Resource Security System Initiative, by contacting us to become a member or partner.

This worked well in the 20th century when resources were easily available and raw material prices kept decreasing. Waste, as an economic externality, was not the producers’ responsibility. Managing waste cycles, dumping it out of sight or, at best, recycling it – but only when it was cost-effective – were under the control of our national institutions.

Visionary manufacturers, who understand the upcoming challenges of increasing their economic resilience, know better: a product that is returned for repair will cost less to fix and sell again, than manufacturing it from scratch.

In our current model, we extract resources, transform them into products, and consume or use them, prior to disposing of them. Recycling only starts at the throwing-away stage: this is a process that is not made to preserve or increase value nor to enhance materials.

We need to understand that recycling is not an effective strategy for dealing with unused resource volumes in a growth model. We will find ourselves in a never-ending pursuit of continuously generated waste, rather than seeing the avoidance of waste as a path to beneficial innovations on many levels.

Of course, it is easier to think about recycling. This avoids changing the whole of our volume-based production model. But in a world where we have to shift our consumption patterns and use less energy, recycling no longer has all the answers.

Recycling is ‘business-as-usual’

Since we cannot stop the volume of waste overnight, investments in the recycling industry are needed. But truly meaningful investment in developing a circular economy takes place outside of the recycling space. Indeed, the more we recycle and the more we finance recycling factories, the more we stay ‘linear’. We mistakenly believe this is the best route to solve our problems – but by staying in a recycling-based economy, we will delay the transition to an advanced circular economy.

In a circular economy, resources do not end up as recyclables since products are made to last several lifecycles. Products’ lifespans are extended via maintain, repair, redistribute, refurbishment and/or re-manufacture loops, thus they never end up in the low-value, high-need-for-energy loop: recycling.

We live in a world in dire need of disruptive innovations. Closing loops next to where customers live while avoiding waste is a short and longer-term win-win for any leading re-manufacturer. Short-term because you are in direct contact with your customers, and taking back a product that needs maintenance is an opportunity to better understand their needs and help them with additional services. Long-term because you will lower your exposure to future financial risks. Any of the feedback loops that exist prior to the recycling loop are an opportunity to take back control over your stock of resources – taking control away from the raw material markets, which may become highly volatile. Increased interactions with your customers, both commercial and financial, and an in-depth understanding of their needs, would increase customer loyalty and a business’ overall resilience.

Re-using, re-distributing and/or remanufacturing strategies are the preferred approaches in a circular economy, as they are based on parts durability. Caring for and preserving the value of product components increases corporate economic resilience, while diminishing external market risks. Whether you are acting in a highly advanced or a developing economy, these strategies make crystal-clear sense: they are less costly in the long-run because repairing a product made to last is always less expensive than producing it from scratch.

Leapfrogging into valued supply chains

Following this approach, we must move away from activities that devalue the material, such as recycling, and instead invest in those activities that preserve it: reuse and remanufacture. These two are especially important since they create many more secure jobs. Walter R. Stahel, the godfather of the modern circular economy, introduced the metric of labor input-per-weight ratio (man-hour-per-kg, or mh/kg) to measure job creation in relation to resource consumption. He found that the ratio of mh/kg when building a remanufactured engine from used resources compared to making the same engine from virgin materials is 270:1. The impact on employment is huge.

The re-localization and the re-sizing of activities closer to customers become critical. Production sites should migrate from a highly centralized global hub to units designed to fulfill local needs. In developed markets, a possible plan could be to develop strategic partnerships with local service providers, who can provide the infrastructure. In emerging markets, where there is often an urgent need for jobs, leapfrogging straight into a national re-manufacturing strategy is the way forward. Becoming the next ‘world factory’ hub is an obsolete vision today.

One way to start thinking like a leader in the next economy while creating jobs could be in order of priority:

Reuse by repairing (goods) through re-hiring (people), while sharing the radical benefits (awareness) of such a model

Redistribute by promoting access (goods) through collaboration (people), while sharing information (awareness) about this model

Remanufacture via the ease of disassembly (goods) by training (people), while sharing the acquired knowledge (awareness) through this model

Migration of recycling activities by diverting (goods) to service models, transferring skills (people) to remanufacturing processes (awareness).

All of the above make sense in a world where planetary limits have already hit most economies.

Adopting a circular strategy by avoiding reliance on recycling is the way forward.

This is about genuine innovation derived from genuine leadership.

This article was originally published in UNIDO’s Making It magazine

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

‘Amid stormy global seas, UN charter remains our moral anchor’, says Guterres on United Nations Day

The rise of techno-nationalism – and the paradox at its core

Crisis hit countries cut down public spending on education

Sudan: Health challenges in the Sustainable Development Goals era

Here’s how data can shine a light on financial crime

Friday’s Daily Brief: hunger in North Korea, human rights in Iran, updates on DR Congo and Benin

Denouncing attacks against Baghdad protesters, UN warns ‘violence risks placing Iraq on dangerous trajectory’

JADE Team at the European Business Summit 2017

Why European manufacturing SMEs in the South face fatal dangers

Superbugs: MEPs advocate further measures to curb use of antimicrobials

JADE Romania Celebrates the 4th Anniversary

Mexico: Helping refugees go into business, a ‘win-win situation’, says UNHCR’s Grandi

How the EU crisis hit countries saved the German and French mega-banks from bankruptcy and still pay the costs

EU labour mobility: Inconvenient truths for everybody

MEPs approve boost to workers’ rights in the gig economy

Could implants treat people with brain disease? A young scientist explains

Australia wants to build a giant underground ‘battery’ to help power the nation

10 of Albert Einstein’s best quotes

Eurozone: Subdued inflation can lead to more recession

Monday’s Daily Brief: drug-resistant diseases, Venezuelan refugees, fighting in Tripoli, and hate speech

Alarm over violent attacks on lawmakers, opposition in Malawi, ahead of elections

Mirrored classroom display highlights scale of massive education crisis

Love unlimited

Public Health equality in a trench

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

Asking for more restriction on intra EU immigration: Unproductive and politically dangerous

A Valentine’s Special: heart has nothing to do with it, it’s all Brain

Swedish PM Löfven: “Our common values must guide us to an even better future”

Who will win the AI race? If countries work together, then the answer could be all of us

Thai cave boys spared thundershowers, highlighting extreme climate disruption: UN weather agency

Around 52 million in Near East, North Africa, suffering chronic undernourishment, new UN food agency report reveals

Four ways Artificial Intelligence can make healthcare more efficient and affordable

This wall of shoes is for the women killed by domestic violence

‘Terror and panic’ among Rohingya who may be forced to return to Myanmar – UN rights chief

OECD welcomes French plans to increase and better target foreign aid

What is digital equality? An interview with Nanjira Sambuli

Waste-free consumption: 3 reasons why cities will lead

Easing US-China trade tensions could save millions of jobs: Asia-Pacific UN report

This is the state of the world’s health, in numbers

Rising human trafficking takes on ‘horrific dimensions’: almost a third of victims are children

We must treat cybersecurity as a public good. Here’s why

Why and how Germany had it again its own way in Cyprus

This is what CEOs around the world see as the biggest risks to business

The EU responds to US challenges by fining Apple with €13 billion

An FTA between EU-US to hurt South Korea

Why we need both science and humanities for a Fourth Industrial Revolution education

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2014: European Youth, Change Now Patiently

The Venezuelan exodus to Roraima and its repercussions

Improvements to pension systems have made them better placed to deliver pensions

Afghanistan probe: ‘at least 60 civilians’ killed after US military airstrikes on alleged drug labs

Agreement reached on digital copyright rules

Labels for tyres: deal for greener and safer road transport

How universities can become a platform for social change

EU-US Privacy Shield data exchange deal: US must comply by 1 September, say MEPs

The Next Web 2014, the biggest European conference on Internet so far and the Absence of Brussels from Amsterdam

Search Engine neutrality in Europe in danger: Are 160.000 Google filtering requests good enough?

Eurozone: There is a remedy for regional convergence

These four countries are the happiest in the European Union

The European Sting’s 2018 in most critical review

How much is nature worth? $125 trillion, according to this report

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s