Apple Vs. EU: Will the US tech giant ever pay for taking advantage of Ireland’s taxation?

Press conference by Margrethe Vestager, Member of the EC, on Apple’s antitrust case in Ireland
Date: 30/08/2016. Location: Brussels – EC/Berlaymont.© European Union, 2016 Source: EC – Audiovisual Service. Photographer: Georges Boulougouris

Apple Inc. together with the Irish government showed up yesterday at the EU’s second-highest court to appeal for the 13 billion euros EU tax order. The US corporation has decided to legally challenge the 2016 European Commission’s decision by claiming that its products and services are created in the US and thus the profits were due there.

However, the EC has been insisting that Apple took an unfair advantage towards the rest of the competition channeling most of its EU sale through the subsidiaries in Cork, Ireland. This appeal is likely to change the current status quo of Ireland as a tax heaven for multinationals.

But let’s take it from where all started; back in 2016.

Background

Almost three years ago, in August 2016, the European Commission ordered Ireland to collect €13 billion in back taxes from the US giant technology company Apple Inc., following an investigation into the multinational company’s affairs. The Commission argued that Ireland extended preferential tax treatment to Apple for years which resulted in Apple paying only minimal taxes to the Old Continent. Both Apple and Dublin appealed the ruling, saying that no such “sweetheart deal” has ever been in place and that Apple’s tax treatment was in line with Irish and European Union law.

Apple has already lodged the 13 billion euros into an escrow account during the second trimester of 2018 whereas the appeal is still in progress and is currently heard by the EU’s General Court. A two-day hearing began yesterday at the General Court in Luxembourg with California-based company to be represented by its Chief Financial Offer, Luca Maestri, and a delegation of six people.

Apple and Ireland against European Commission

During the first day of the hearing, Apple’s lawyer Daniel Beard challenged the 13 billion euros EU tax order. Mr Beard stated that:  “The commission contends that essentially all of Apple’s profits from all of its sales outside of the Americas must be attributed to two branches in Ireland. The branches’ activities did not involve creating, developing or managing those rights. Based on the facts of this case, the primary line defies reality and common sense”.

On the same side, the lawyers who represent Ireland in the appeal against the EC’s decision told yesterday that the case is “inconsistent” and “fundamentally flawed” in an attempt to show that this case is untenable. More specifically, former attorney general Paul Gallagher, who leads the team representing Ireland, stated: “Ireland has been the subject of entirely unjustified criticism. It is the commission that should be criticised.” Furthermore, Barrister Maurice Collins, another lawyer representing Ireland, mentioned that the EU executive body “set out during its investigation of Apple’s Irish tax payments to invent a novel and completely profit attribution theory to what was due to the Republic.”

Commission fights back

The European Commission lawyer Richard Lyal said that the aim of this order was to make sure that Apple’s Irish subsidiaries are taxed properly putting the blame to the Irish government as well. In detail, Richard Lyal stated: “To a large extent that (Apple’s argument that all its intellectual property-related activities take place in the United States) is perfectly correct and perfectly irrelevant… They (Ireland) simply accepted an arbitrary method proposed by the Apple Ireland subsidiaries. That in itself gives rise to a presumption of a special deal, exceptionally advantageous treatment. It is clear that the tax authorities made no assessment in 1991.”

General Court judges’ decision

Today is the second and last day of this hearing with the court five judges to be expected to rule in the coming months. Regardless of the outcome, the losing party is likely to appeal to the EU Court of Justice for final judgment which could take many years. This is a very crucial case as it will change or leave intact the Irish regime to protect and be a tax heaven for tech multinationals. That is also why Ireland has already spent 7,1 million euros in mostly legal fees and is expected to pay much more as it may take a decade till the final verdict.

All in all, it doesn’t matter whether Apple is the largest tax payer in the world, what matters is whether the US tech giant and its peers are taking advantage of EU special tax regimes or paying their rightful tax burden.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN court increases sentence of former Bosnian-Serb leader to life imprisonment

Alarming level of reprisals against activists, human rights defenders, and victims – new UN report

Can Argentina’s new president save the country’s economy?

Commission announces actions to make Europe’s raw materials supply more secure and sustainable

‘Massive and protracted’ humanitarian crisis in DR Congo can be ‘beaten back’ if donors step up

Competition: The European Commission launches a process to address the issue of collective bargaining for the self-employed

Mental health problems costing Europe heavily

We need to talk: UN gears up for 75th anniversary with Global Conversations

Tropical Cyclone Idai affects 1.5 million across Mozambique and Malawi, as UN ramps up response

Coronavirus has exposed human rights gaps. We need to fix this

Commission supports normalisation in Greece through activation of post-programme framework

Do not take the EP’s consent on MFF for granted, says Budget Committee Chair

The Juncker Plan at work: bringing investment back on track in Europe

At least 2.5 million migrants were smuggled in 2016, first UN global study shows

EU invests in green projects and bans single-use plastics while climate change requires more to be done

Work to make the world a better place: 5 things you need to know about ‘green jobs’

Ending extreme poverty crucial to sustainable future for all: UN chief

Brazil identifies a clear pathway for aligning its transfer pricing framework with the OECD standard

Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into proposed acquisition of Metallo by Aurubis

From Shadows to Sunlight, Paraguay’s Road to Transparency

Macron plans for Europe, Brexit and banks but vague on France

Trade: EU-Singapore agreement to enter into force on 21 November 2019

In The Bahamas, Guterres sees impact of ‘Category Hell’ hurricane, ‘powered by climate change’

World Malaria Day: 7 things to know about the deadly disease

How poor countries can deal with the economic shock of COVID-19

EU Commission – US hasten talks to avoid NGO reactions on free trade agreement

Further reforms will promote a stronger and more inclusive Hungarian economy

UN welcomes progress in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia naming dispute

Europe is now practically divided as in the Cold War

Why youth unemployment is so difficult to counter

Destroying nuclear waste to create clean energy? It can be done

The cuts on 2014 Budget will divide deeply the EU

Future EU-UK Partnership: European Commission takes first step to launch negotiations with the United Kingdom

Spain will soon overtake Japan in life expectancy rankings. Here’s why

Yemen: Tackling the world’s largest humanitarian crisis

MEPs cap prices of calls within EU and approve emergency alert system

What does strategy have to do with a platform approach?

Coronavirus: Commission continues expanding future vaccines portfolio with new talks

The vehicles of our future

Taxation: Commission refers Germany to the Court for its failure to apply EU rules on VAT for farmers

The ‘American Dream’ can be best achieved in the Nordic nations, says Finland’s PM

Horn of Africa: UN chief welcomes Djibouti agreement between Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia

Strong multilateral institutions key to tackling world’s dramatic challenges, UN chief says In Moscow

Coronavirus COVID-19 wipes $50 billion off global exports in February alone, as IMF pledges support for vulnerable nations

Brexit must not put UK university research at risk

As Alan Turing makes the £50 note, how do countries design their currencies?

Ireland’s planning to make its Emerald Isle even greener

Coronavirus fears may have driven over 300,000 UK smokers to quit

The different ways of care: Is there a general rule to follow?

‘All atrocity crimes are preventable’ and can never be justified – UN chief

European Innovation Scoreboard 2018: Europe must deepen its innovation edge

‘Exercise restraint’ Guterres urges Sri Lankans, as political crisis deepens

Renewable energy could power the world by 2050. Here’s what that future might look like

Here’s how we reboot digital trade for the 21st century

Climate change and health: an everyday solution

Trump’s trade wars: Aiming at long term gains for America

Four key challenges for cybersecurity leaders

Minsk “ceasefire” leaves more doubts than safety, with EU already planning steps further

Pandemic mental health: the urgency of self-care

This disease once wiped out 60% of Europe’s population – and now it’s back

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s