Adoption of new rules to better protect children caught in cross-border parental disputes

baby mother

(Alexander Dummer, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


What is the Brussels IIa Regulation?

The Brussels IIa Regulation is the cornerstone of EU judicial cooperation in cross-border matrimonial matters (divorce, separation, marriage annulment) and matters of parental responsibility, including custody and access rights, and international child abduction. The Regulation has applied in all Member States, except Denmark, since 1 March 2005.

With the rising number of international families, now estimated at 16 million, cross-border disputes on family matters have increased in the EU. There are about 140,000 international divorces per year in the EU. There are around 1,800 cases of parental child abduction within the EU every year.

The Council adopted today improvements to the EU rules (“Brussels IIa Regulation”) that protect children in the context of cross-border disputes relating to parental responsibility and child abduction. The new rules (“Brussels IIa Recast Regulation”) make court proceedings clearer, faster and more efficient. They are based on the proposal made by the European Commission in 2016.

 

Which cases does the Regulation apply to?

The Regulation applies only in cross-border cases within the EU:

  • It sets out rules determining which country’s courts are responsible for dealing with matrimonial matters, parental responsibility and child abduction in disputes involving more than one country.
  • It ensures that judgments issued in one EU country are recognised and enforced in another EU country.

The Regulation focusses on settling procedural aspects of cross-border cases only.

Member States retain the sole responsibility of any substantive rules, for example, on how to exercise access rights or on which criteria apply when attributing custody rights to a parent.

 

What are the main changes adopted today?

Since its entry into application in 2005, the Brussels IIa Regulation has worked well, apart from some issues in the area of parental responsibility. The new Brussels IIa Recast Regulation will improve matters in this area. The new rules will enter into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal.

The new rules aim to further enhance cross-border judicial proceedings on the basis of mutual trust between EU countries.  By removing the remaining obstacles to the free movement of decisions, simplifying the procedures and enhancing their efficiency, the best interests of the child will be better protected. The new rules will bring legal certainty, reduce costs and, most importantly, limit the length of proceedings in international child abduction cases, for the benefit of both children and their parents.

 

The changes concern mainly proceedings related to parental responsibility matters and international child abduction and will have a positive impact on all procedures involving children by:

  • Settling cross-border child abduction cases faster

The deadlines applying to different stages of the child return procedure will be limited to a maximum periodof 6 weeks for the first instance court and 6 weeks for each court of appeal. Also Central Authorities will process applications for return faster.

  • Ensuring the child is heard

Children who are capable of forming their own views, will be given the opportunity to express these views in all proceedings concerning them. This will apply to matters of parental responsibility and international child abduction cases. Determining how and by whom the child is heard is a matter left to national law.

  • Ensuring effective enforcement of decisions in other Member States

With the new rules, the exequatur, an intermediate procedure required to obtain cross-border enforcement, will be abolished for all decisions.

Under the new rules, enforcement can be rejected or suspended largely under the same conditions in all Member States, increasing legal certainty for all citizens and in particular the children concerned.

  • Improving cooperation between Member States’ authorities

Good cooperation between the Central Authorities of different Member States in handling child cases is an indispensable prerequisite for mutual trust. The new rules promote better cooperation between Central Authorities, which  are the direct point of contact for parents. Also, child welfare authorities will be better integrated into this cross-border cooperation.

The new rules also clarify the sensitive issue of the placement of a child in another Member State, and set up a clear procedure to obtain consent from the Member State where the child is to be placed.

  •  Setting out clearer rules on the circulation of authentic instruments and agreements

 Considering the growing number of Member States which allow out-of-court agreements on legal separation and divorce or on matters of parental responsibility, the new rules will facilitate the circulation of the instruments and agreements.

 

What are the main benefits of the new rules for children and their parents?

The new rules ensure legal clarity, reduce costs related to proceedings and legal assistance and, most importantly, shorten the length of proceedings, to limit the negative impact on the children as much as possible.

  • More efficient return proceedings

Currently, average return proceedings for cross-border parental child abduction take up to 24 weeks, and it can also be much longer in some cases, especially where Member States have several levels of appeal.

With the new rules, return proceedings before a court will be capped to a maximum period: 6 weeks for the first instance court and 6 weeks for each court of appeal. In addition, the Central Authority will have to efficiently process the application, with the new rules introducing  a 5-day deadline to confirm receipt of the application.

In order to speed up enforcement, the court that issued the return decision will be able to declare it provisionally enforceable. If the return decision cannot be enforced within 6 weeks, the parent will be informed about the reasons for the delay. In cases where children need to be placed in a foster family or an educational institution in another Member State, the receiving Member State will have to approve or refuse the placement within 3 months.

  • Reduced costs

Citizens will avoid the heavy costs usually linked to court proceedings. For example, in case of return proceedings, parents will be invited to engage in mediation. This saves possible litigation costs which represent on average € 2,200 for the entire proceedings. The new recast Regulation now also abolishes exequatur proceedings, which involve costs of around € 1,100 to 4,000 per case in some Member States. In addition, speedier enforcement will allow families to save money for the work of a specialised lawyer estimated, depending on the Member State, at between € 1,000 and 4,000 per every additional 10 working hours.

  • Clearer rules

The new rules will, for example, clarify the procedure for placing a child in a foster family or an educational institution abroad and ensure that such requests are handled quickly. Currently, it is unclear in which cases the receiving State needs to give its consent, and which documents have to be submitted.

Another clarification will make it possible for courts and authorities to request social reports not only on children, but also on adults or siblings if these are of relevance in child-related proceedings. Also child welfare authorities will be able to obtain the necessary information from other Member States through the Central Authorities. The new rules set out minimum requirements for a request for a social report and a 3-month time limit for the requested authority to provide the report.

 

What happens if a parent abducts his or her child ?

If an international couple splits up, the temptation for one of the spouses to return to his or her home country with the child(ren) can be high. If both parents have joint custody for the child, one or other parent taking the child with them without permission violates the rights of custody of the left-behind parent and puts the best interests of the child at risk. The new Brussels IIa Recast Regulation, like the current rules, prevents moving children across borders by establishing a mechanism for the prompt return of the child to the Member State where the child used to live before the abduction. This mechanism is largely based on the return mechanism of the 1980 Hague Convention, which the Regulation supplements.

These return proceedings take place in the Member State to which the child was abducted. If the return is ordered and the child returns, the aim is achieved and the custody case, if the parents wish so, can be heard by the courts of the Member State of the child’s habitual residence.

If the Member State the child was abducted to refuses the return, an additional procedure comes into play to give a final say on the return of the child to the court of the Member State in which the child lived before the abduction.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Militias force nearly 2,000 to leave Libyan capital’s largest shelter for internally-displaced: UNHCR

‘Climate change is the battle of my life’, UN chief tells students living on the frontline in Fiji

Ebola cases rising in DR Congo, but UN health agency cites progress in community trust-building

EU budget 2019 approved: focus on the young, innovation and migration

Can Argentina’s new president save the country’s economy?

ECB to play down IMF’s alarms for deflation danger in the EU

Europe led by Germany seems vulnerable to Trump’s threats

The good news on pensions: sustainable equals profitable

India’s mega-rich are on the rise

This is why coral reefs are so vital for the planet

The Changing Scope of International Economic Relations – Chinese Leadership in the 21st Century

We can end TB right now. Here’s how

Global hunger is on the rise. These simple steps could help eradicate it

Women in Switzerland have gone on strike – this is why

Employers’ organizations work towards improving the enabling environment for sustainable enterprises

JADE Testimonial #2: Jacques @ Process mapping

Two days left until General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), lots of newsletter opt-outs but does the EU citizen really know?

We had the hottest June ever this year – this is what happened around the world

Draghi’s negative interest rates help Eurozone’s cohesion

We must treat cybersecurity as a public good. Here’s why

Mental health at stake: A silent epidemic of 21st century

Further reforms in Sweden can drive growth, competitiveness and social cohesion

GSMA Announces Latest Event Updates for 2018 “Mobile World Congress Americas, in Partnership with CTIA”

America’s student debt crisis explained

Future of Insurance Claims in Focus at Fourth Annual Connected Claims Europe Summit

Youth Forum calls on Parliament to ease entry into Europe for young people

The financial future of Eurozone on the agenda of Friday’s ECOFIN council

‘Bring to life’ precious moments caught on film or tape, UN agency urges on World Day

Joris in Indonesia

Business models inspired by nature are the future

Hatred ‘a threat to everyone’, urges Guterres calling for global effort to end xenophobia and ‘loathsome rhetoric’

These are the world’s 10 most innovative economies

A for-profit project has improved nutrition in Rwanda – is it a model that can eliminate hunger across Africa?

A new way to teach active citizenship to students?

China is now heavily endorsing its big investment flow in the Central Eastern European (CEE) countries

Greece lost a month that cannot be found neither in “mini Summits” nor in Berlin

EU’s social crisis and unemployment to deteriorate

Macron defends the idea of European sovereignty

Mining the deep seabed will harm biodiversity. We need to talk about it

An ECB banker wants to change the European social model

Parliament votes for €1 billion in aid to Ukraine

Earthquake: Monte Dei Paschi Di Siena

How to build a paradise for women. A lesson from Iceland

Global response to poverty and environmental goals ‘not ambitious enough’

A Monday to watch the final act of a Greek tragedy; will there be catharsis or more fear?

Europe and UN form bulwark against ‘might makes right’ worldview, EU foreign affairs chief tells Security Council

‘Virtual Biopsy’ device detects skin tumours in 15 minutes

Medical students of today, technological doctors of tomorrow

Is the EU’s enlargement over-stretched?

This credit card has a carbon-emission spending limit

Here are 4 ways investors can influence more secure and responsible innovation

EP President praises Nobel Peace Prize award to Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad

UN must provide redress for minorities placed in toxic Kosovo camps, says rights expert

Russia – US in Syria: Selling Afrin to Turkey but facing off ruthlessly for Ghouta

A Sting Exclusive: “Stronger Cybersecurity for a safer EU against cybercrime and cyber threats”, by MEP Dalli

ECB describes in detail how it exploits the poor

These countries are leading the charge to clean energy

The Collapse of the Brazilian Health Care System

Zero carbon by 2050 is possible. Here is what we need to do

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s