Philanthropy is at a turning point. Here are 6 ways it could go

philanthropy

(Luca Zanon, Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Rhodri Davies, Head of Policy, Charities Aid Foundation


This is a difficult time for philanthropy. Challenges like global climate change are demanding collective action on an unprecedented scale. Technology, meanwhile, is creating new social problems at the same time as providing new tools to address existing ones. Added to this, shifting demographics and social trends are changing our notions of community, society and nationhood beyond recognition.

But it’s not just the ongoing need to remain relevant that poses a challenge: at the same time, the very concept of philanthropy is coming under attack. Critics are questioning whether philanthropy is effective, how it should be viewed in the wider context of global inequality, and whether it can remain legitimate within a democratic society.

For those who continue to believe in the value of philanthropy – the idea that private assets used for public good can be a powerful force to shape society for the better – there is a lot of work to be done. New efforts are required to help philanthropy adapt to changing times, to craft a compelling narrative about its role, and to find models and approaches that can answer the criticisms.

So what needs to be done?

Acknowledging how money is made

The recent controversy surrounding the donations of the Sackler family in light of their role in the opioid crisis has made it clear that how money is given away can no longer be separated from how it is made.

The idea that some donations are “tainted” has been brought to the foreground once more. This is a criticism with a rich history: many of the major industrial philanthropists of the early 20th century, such as John D Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, found their giving placed under sharp scrutiny by those who thought their business practices unacceptable. But conversely, there were always those who argued that pragmatism should trump ideological purity, and that it is better to put even the most questionable money to charitable ends. (George Bernard Shaw, for instance, derided the idea of tainted donations as an “individualist fantasy”.)

It seems clear from the Sackler case, however, that there is a growing consensus that ethically dubious funds cannot legitimately be put to philanthropic ends. So a principle of “first do no harm” must apply to wealth creation, before we even think about giving it away.

And it’s not just how money is made that is the problem, either: how it is then used is also a growing issue for philanthropy. High-profile divestment campaigns have already been aimed at universities and arts institutions, and they are undoubtedly a sign of what is to come for the wider world of philanthropy in terms of scrutiny of investment practices.

Embracing structural change

For some high-profile critics such as Anand Giridharadas, author of Winners Take All, it is not specific acts of wealth creation that are the problem, but rather the structural inequality in society that makes it possible for some to gain vast wealth while many languish in poverty. Likewise the Dutch historian Rutger Bregman, in his viral appearance at this year’s World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, criticized philanthropy on the grounds that taxation is the only real mechanism for addressing the fundamental challenges posed by inequality. For these critics, philanthropy is only ever part of the problem rather than part of the solution, and it provides an unhelpful distraction from the real work to be done in driving structural change.

Image: Statista

Many within the nonprofit world would agree that inequality and tax justice are crucially important issues, but would disagree that philanthropy is incapable of addressing them. It may not always be easy, but rather than abandoning philanthropy altogether, there are plenty working to craft approaches to it that can deliver genuine structural reform.

Democratizing philanthropy

A crucial part of making philanthropy capable of addressing inequality is to ensure that it is not seen as merely a tool for the powerful to entrench their advantage. It is thus vital to find ways to give away not only money, but also power. Some are seeking to do this by encouraging big donors to focus on funding organizations that have a broader base of mass support to reduce the risk of their choices introducing a plutocratic bias. Others are developing models of participatory grant-making, in which those who would traditionally be seen as the beneficiaries of philanthropy are given a genuine say over how resources are used.

We are also seeing the rise of new networked models of protest and social change, such as #BlackLivesMatter, #MeToo and the youth climate strikes. These are powerful examples of people and communities taking issues into their own hands using the new capabilities afforded by technology. If donors can find ways of supporting these networked movements that empower them without stifling them, it could help to democratize philanthropy even further.

Reflecting diversity

Genuine shifts of power within philanthropy can only happen if the field reflects the diversity of the societies in which it operates and the people and communities it serves. To this end, some nonprofit organizations are asking themselves difficult questions about whether the balance of gender, ethnicity and background in their staff and boards of trustees is right. Meanwhile, as philanthropy grows around the rest of the world, it is important that it does so in ways that reflect local traditions of giving and support. A burgeoning middle class could be a major new driver of philanthropy: research by the Charities Aid Foundation shows that if the emerging middle class in the global south gave at the same levels as people in the UK, it would result in $345bn per year for charity. However, when the members of this new middle class do engage with giving, we must not assume that they will do so using Western models or approaches.

Innovation and discovery

Stanford philosopher Rob Reich’s recent book Just Giving raises challenging questions about how we balance the freedoms given to philanthropy with the requirements of justice and equality within a democratic society.

One answer may be in the idea of “discovery” – the ability to bring new issues to light and to find new ways of addressing them. At its best, philanthropy can be a powerful driver of discovery. However this may raise difficult questions within the context of a democracy, because the freedom to innovate often requires autonomy and the ability to run counter to the status quo.

This tension is evident in the growing number of donors placing “philanthropic big bets”. High-profile tech entrepreneurs such as Elon Musk and Larry Page are putting a lot of their resources towards the development of space travel, while others like Dustin Moskovitz are focussing on countering the threat of takeover by superhuman artificial intelligence. For some, these represent the best of philanthropy – taking risks and driving innovation in a way that the government cannot. But for others, they represent its worst excesses – self-indulgent crusades by donors whose view on issues is entirely shaped by the industries in which they made their money.

Transparency and openness

A key challenge for philanthropy in the coming years will be ensuring that it is open and transparent. While a degree of anonymity may sometimes be required to protect a donor or recipient, in general we should aspire to openness. Not only is this a crucial part of maintaining legitimacy in the face of questions about where money comes from or the potentially disruptive effect of philanthropy on democratic processes, but it could also help to spur further discovery if data is made accessible and innovation can thus be decentralized.

One challenge for philanthropic transparency may be the trend for major donors (particularly in the US) to shy away from traditional philanthropic structures, and instead to use commercial structures like limited liability companies (LLC). Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan famously chose this approach for their philanthropy, and John and Laura Arnold recently hit the headlines for shifting from a traditional foundation to an LLC. This brings benefits in terms of flexibility, when it comes to making commercial investments or engaging in political campaigning, but also requires far less transparency on the part of donor – which could undermine efforts to make philanthropy as a whole more open.

Civil Society

What is civil society?

Whether you call it “third sector”, “social sector” or “volunteerland”, civil society includes an array of different causes, groups, unions and NGOs. Their combined aim is to hold governments to account, promoting transparency, lobbying for human rights, mobilizing in times of disaster and encouraging citizen engagement.

Ranging from small online campaigns to giants such as Amnesty International and Greenpeace, civil society employs around 54 million full-time workers and has a global volunteer force of over 350 million.

The World Economic Forum is committed to accelerating the impact of civil society organizations. With a view to this, it created Preparing Civil Society for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, a multi-sectoral platform to support the transformation of the social sector and its inclusion in the governance of emerging technologies.

Civil society is a key stakeholder for driving public-private collaboration and advancing the Forum’s mission. Through dialogue series and platform initiatives, civil society actors from a wide range of fields come together to collaborate with government and business leaders on finding and advocating solutions to global challenges.

Optimism for the future?

There are clearly many challenges facing philanthropy right now. Some require greater engagement with wider technological or societal change, which philanthropy has so far been slow to address. Others, meanwhile, require a degree of introspection: looking at the structures and dynamics within philanthropy to see where problems lie and where it can evolve to become more effective and reflective of the people and communities it serves. None of these are easy, but all are of them are possible. And if philanthropy can step up to the plate in this moment, its role as a positive force to shape our society can hopefully not only be retained, but strengthene

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

4 innovative renewable energy projects powering Europe’s green future

Financing economic recovery, written by United Nations Under-Secretary-General

Is your smart home as safe as you think?

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

A Europe that delivers: EU citizens expect more EU level action in future

Islamophobia is driving more US Muslims to become politically engaged, suggests report

MEPs condemn attacks on civilians, including children, in Yemen

The banks first to benefit from the new euro trillion ECB plans to print

8 fascinating and fearsome frontiers of science you should know about

Making the move to more sustainable mobility – three steps for companies

Colombia: Rights experts condemn killing of reintegrated former rebel fighter, call for respect of peace process

EU-Russia summit in the shadows of Kiev’s fumes

The Parliament sets the way for the European Banking Union

6.1 billion EUR for sustainable fisheries and safeguarding fishing communities

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Safeguarding civilians, strengthening Ebola response in DR Congo, marking Fistula Day, updates on CAR and Syria

This is how India can become the next Silicon Valley

Turkey: Commission continues humanitarian support for refugees

19th EU-China Summit: A historical advance in the Chino-European rapprochement

The woman who wanted to be treated the same as the man

These countries are the most peaceful – in 3 charts

Alternative proteins will transform food, mitigate climate change and drive profits. Here’s how

Estonia: use robust growth to improve income equality and well-being

The use of mobile technologies in Radiation Oncology: helping medical care

These countries are leading the way in green finance

Shenzhen just made all its buses electric, and taxis are next

4 eco-friendly products put sustainable spins on classic practices, from teacups to hankies

Why the future is bright for drone technology

‘Jerusalem is not for sale’ Palestinian President Abbas tells world leaders at UN Assembly

US-China trade war: Washington now wants control of the renminbi-yuan

Look Mom, even the House of Lords says the #righttobeforgotten is not right

Portuguese Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

An economist explains how to value the internet

Investing in rural women and girls, ‘essential’ for everyone’s future: UN chief

Cum-ex tax fraud scandal: MEPs call for inquiry, justice, and stronger tax authorities

Libyan authorities must shoulder the burden to support country’s ‘vulnerable’ south

COVID 19 Vaccine: A new terror or a savior for mankind?

State aid: Commission approves €150 million Austrian subordinated loan to compensate Austrian Airlines for damages suffered due to coronavirus outbreak

The status of the Code of Medical Ethics: loading

UN Security Council offers Yemen Special Envoy ‘their full support’

Over 1 million health consultations provided in Yemen in 2019: UN migration agency

Why the ECB prepares to flood the markets with more and free of charge euro; everybody needs that now

“I believe that startups are for grown-up men, those, who have already achieved something “

Do not jeopardise future-oriented EU programmes, say EP’s budget negotiators

‘Global sisterhood’ tells perpetrators ‘time is up’ for pandemic of violence

One Hundred Years of Qipao History: from Shanghai to EU

Finland is a world leader in clean energy. Here’s what’s driving its success

Nearly four million North Koreans in urgent need, as food production slumps by almost 10 per cent

Will the Greek economy ever come back to growth?

3 important lessons from 20 years of working with social entrepreneurs

At this ‘critical moment’, UN chief urges anti-corruption conference to adopt united front

We are stronger than this pandemic (COVID-19)

EU lawmakers vote to reintroduce visas for Americans over “reciprocity principle”

‘Endemic’ sexual violence surging in South Sudan: UN human rights office

Public Policies for LGBT in Brazil

A faster, fairer way to retire carbon-emitting assets

Amid pandemic detours, mental health matters

Coronavirus: Commission concludes talks to secure future coronavirus vaccine for Europeans

Why hourly workers should have the same benefits as salaried ones

How do we design an inclusive energy transition?

State aid: Commission approves €300 million Austrian scheme to support organisers of events affected by coronavirus outbreak

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s