Why protectionism spells trouble for global economic growth

trump 2019.jpg

UN Photo/Cia Pak President Donald Trump of the United States addresses the seventy-third session of the United Nations General Assembly.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jonathan D. Ostry, Deputy Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF)


It is sometimes alleged that for all the microeconomic distortions that protectionist policies inflict, there can be a silver lining in terms of macroeconomic gains: more jobs, more output and a stronger trade balance. Indeed, some economies today are seemingly using commercial policy to pursue macroeconomic objectives. Tariffs can dampen imports, boost net exports (the difference between exports and imports, or the trade balance), and so boost GDP, other things being equal.

Economists, however, have generally been skeptical. Since the time of Adam Smith (or maybe even before), open and competitive markets have been seen as most likely to maximize output by directing resources more productively. Tariffs, on the other hand, encourage both the deflection of trade to inefficient producers and smuggling in order to evade them; such distortions reduce any beneficial effects. Further, consumers lose more from tariffs than producers gain, so there is deadweight loss. And the redistributions associated with tariffs tend to create vested interests, so harm tends to persist. Broad-based protectionism can also provoke retaliation, which adds further costs in other markets.

Moreover, economists believe macroeconomic policies (fiscal and monetary policies such as interest rates or the budget deficit) to be the natural instruments for achieving macroeconomic goals, such as raising growth and jobs. Tariffs are more likely to lead to offsetting changes in exchange rates that frustrate the achievement of macroeconomic objectives; less imports and a stronger trade balance increase demand for the domestic currency, and so its value.

The economic effect of tariffs

These results are for the full country sample as listed in Table 2 of NBER WP 25402/CEPR DP13389.

There is in addition a powerful lesson from history. Protectionist policies helped precipitate the collapse of international trade in the 1930s, and this trade shrinkage was a plausible seed of World War II. So while protectionism has not been much used in practice as a macroeconomic policy, most economists emphatically consider that this is as it should be.

But times change. Some economies today are using commercial policy seemingly for macroeconomic objectives. Can we say something about what the likely practical consequences of such actions are likely to be? In a recent study covering the vast majority of developed and developing countries in the world, and half a century’s-worth of macroeconomic data, we examined the responses of six key macroeconomic variables to changes in the tariff rate: real GDP, productivity, the unemployment rate, the real exchange rate, the trade balance and inequality.

We found that tariff increases have adverse domestic macroeconomic and distributional consequences: these effects are robustly and statistically significant, and are large enough in an economic sense to merit the attention of policymakers.

We also found that output (GDP) falls after tariffs rise because of a significant decrease in labour productivity. When firms in the import-competing sectors receive protection, resources are reallocated within the economy to relatively unproductive uses, and this is harmful to the added value generated by the economy. That is, the wasteful effects of protectionism lead to a meaningful reduction in the efficiency with which labour is used, and thus to a fall in output. Nor did we find an improvement in the trade balance after a rise in tariffs, plausibly reflecting our finding that the real exchange rate tends to appreciate as a result of higher tariffs (a prediction that is in line with theory and much earlier empirical evidence). We also found that protectionism leads to a small increase in unemployment, further bolstering the case against protectionism, and that tariff increases lead to greater inequality after a few years.

 

We found that the hit to economic growth from a tariff increase is more pronounced if the tariff increase is undertaken during an economic expansion. It is also larger for advanced countries than it is for developing countries. This is worrisome, since tariffs are currently being used as a macroeconomic instrument in buoyant economic conditions and in advanced economies.

To summarize: the aversion of the economics profession to the deadweight losses caused by protectionism seems warranted. While the case against protectionism has typically been bolstered by theoretical or microeconomic evidence, the macroeconomic case for liberal trade is also strong. Higher tariffs seem to lower output and productivity, while raising unemployment and inequality, and leaving the trade balance unaffected. These results are wholly consistent with conventional wisdom from standard economics, and bolster the case for free trade. Protectionism just weakens the macroeconomy.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Davos on Climate Change: citizens demanding more actions while CEOs tried to balance profit with sustainability

Malta: investigation risks being compromised while Prime Minister is in office

New UN report shows record number of children killed and maimed in conflict

Most people on the internet live in this country

100 years on, UN labour agency mission focussed on growing inequality, says Director-General

‘Trickle-down’ tax cuts don’t work, study says

COP21 Business update: Companies urge now for carbon pricing as coal is still a big issue

This is how drones and other ‘tradetech’ are transforming international trade

How to make primary healthcare a favourable career choice for medical students: Strategies and reflections

It’s a lie Eurozone isn’t competitive

European Investment Bank to borrow €70 billion in 2013

EU-Russia summit in the shadows of Kiev’s fumes

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

External action: more funds for human rights, development and climate change

Banking on sunshine: world added far more solar than fossil fuel power generating capacity in 2017

Declaring commitment to ‘peace and stability’ for Libya, top UN envoy steps down as stress takes its toll

EU Commission: The banks are not obliged to finance the real economy

MEPs debate Brexit and relations with China following EU spring summit

Indonesia is buzzing with entrepreneurial spirit. And others in ASEAN aren’t far behind

UN agriculture agency digs in to help forests and farms build resilience to climate change

EU Citizenship: New survey shows EU citizens are more aware of their rights

Mental health in a pandemic: what to do to ease the burden on people with disabilities?

European Parliament backs CO2 emissions cuts for trucks

We can feed the world in a sustainable way, but we need to act now

CO2 can help the construction industry emit less CO2. Here’s how

Libya: Heavy shelling and civilian deaths ‘blatant violation’ of international law – UN envoy

The challenges of the vaccination campaign in Brazil, including the state of Amazonas

Powering a climate-neutral economy: Commission sets out plans for the energy system of the future and clean hydrogen

UK: Crawley group wins European Citizens’ Prize

5 charts that show renewable energy’s latest milestone

On Grexit: Incompetence just launched the historic Ultimatum that could open “pandora’s box”

The EU slowly exits from “Excessive Deficit Procedure” and hopefully from ‘Excessive Austerity Procedure’ too

LETTER FROM AFGHANISTAN: Elections serve up food for thought, for Afghan youth

The cost of generating renewable energy has fallen – a lot

A roadmap for destination management in the digital economy

Here’s why the tech sector could be the next target for Chinese investment in Africa

‘Still time’ to stop a ‘bloody battle’ for Libya’s capital, insists Guterres

Could play be a game-changer for the world’s forests?

We’re facing a ‘cold crunch,’ and it’s nothing to do with the polar vortex

Making Europe’s businesses future-ready: A new Industrial Strategy for a globally competitive, green and digital Europe

Microplastics have been found in Rocky Mountain rainwater

Peer-to-peer learning: a way to develop medical students’ trainings

MEPs urge EU states to ensure better care of transported animals

This Filipino journalist is fighting for press freedom in COVID-19 lockdown

ECB ready to counter the rise of the euro?

The US is withdrawing from a 144-year-old treaty. Here’s the context

2nd Global Consultation on Migrant Health 21-23 February 2017 in Sri Lanka

World Economic Forum launches COVID Action Platform to fight coronavirus

International Women’s Day 2019: women’s power in politics

Why rich countries are seeing more poverty

Coronavirus: Commission waives customs duties and VAT on the import of medical equipment from non-EU countries

Aid teams respond to escalating southwest Syria conflict: 750,000 civilians are at risk

Italy’s dilemma after Merkel-Hollande agreed loose banking union

COVID-19 Vaccination Campaigngs: anti-vaccine movement is still a challenge

Bring killers of journalists to justice: UN agency seeks media partners for new campaign

What’s behind South Korea’s elderly crime wave?

Guterres underscores UN role in achieving a free, secure Internet

Von der Leyen on Coronavirus Global Response: World stands united against coronavirus and will win

ECB’s new money bonanza handed out to help the real economy or create new bubbles?

These countries are leading the charge to clean energy

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s