Why protectionism spells trouble for global economic growth

trump 2019.jpg

UN Photo/Cia Pak President Donald Trump of the United States addresses the seventy-third session of the United Nations General Assembly.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jonathan D. Ostry, Deputy Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF)


It is sometimes alleged that for all the microeconomic distortions that protectionist policies inflict, there can be a silver lining in terms of macroeconomic gains: more jobs, more output and a stronger trade balance. Indeed, some economies today are seemingly using commercial policy to pursue macroeconomic objectives. Tariffs can dampen imports, boost net exports (the difference between exports and imports, or the trade balance), and so boost GDP, other things being equal.

Economists, however, have generally been skeptical. Since the time of Adam Smith (or maybe even before), open and competitive markets have been seen as most likely to maximize output by directing resources more productively. Tariffs, on the other hand, encourage both the deflection of trade to inefficient producers and smuggling in order to evade them; such distortions reduce any beneficial effects. Further, consumers lose more from tariffs than producers gain, so there is deadweight loss. And the redistributions associated with tariffs tend to create vested interests, so harm tends to persist. Broad-based protectionism can also provoke retaliation, which adds further costs in other markets.

Moreover, economists believe macroeconomic policies (fiscal and monetary policies such as interest rates or the budget deficit) to be the natural instruments for achieving macroeconomic goals, such as raising growth and jobs. Tariffs are more likely to lead to offsetting changes in exchange rates that frustrate the achievement of macroeconomic objectives; less imports and a stronger trade balance increase demand for the domestic currency, and so its value.

The economic effect of tariffs

These results are for the full country sample as listed in Table 2 of NBER WP 25402/CEPR DP13389.

There is in addition a powerful lesson from history. Protectionist policies helped precipitate the collapse of international trade in the 1930s, and this trade shrinkage was a plausible seed of World War II. So while protectionism has not been much used in practice as a macroeconomic policy, most economists emphatically consider that this is as it should be.

But times change. Some economies today are using commercial policy seemingly for macroeconomic objectives. Can we say something about what the likely practical consequences of such actions are likely to be? In a recent study covering the vast majority of developed and developing countries in the world, and half a century’s-worth of macroeconomic data, we examined the responses of six key macroeconomic variables to changes in the tariff rate: real GDP, productivity, the unemployment rate, the real exchange rate, the trade balance and inequality.

We found that tariff increases have adverse domestic macroeconomic and distributional consequences: these effects are robustly and statistically significant, and are large enough in an economic sense to merit the attention of policymakers.

We also found that output (GDP) falls after tariffs rise because of a significant decrease in labour productivity. When firms in the import-competing sectors receive protection, resources are reallocated within the economy to relatively unproductive uses, and this is harmful to the added value generated by the economy. That is, the wasteful effects of protectionism lead to a meaningful reduction in the efficiency with which labour is used, and thus to a fall in output. Nor did we find an improvement in the trade balance after a rise in tariffs, plausibly reflecting our finding that the real exchange rate tends to appreciate as a result of higher tariffs (a prediction that is in line with theory and much earlier empirical evidence). We also found that protectionism leads to a small increase in unemployment, further bolstering the case against protectionism, and that tariff increases lead to greater inequality after a few years.

 

We found that the hit to economic growth from a tariff increase is more pronounced if the tariff increase is undertaken during an economic expansion. It is also larger for advanced countries than it is for developing countries. This is worrisome, since tariffs are currently being used as a macroeconomic instrument in buoyant economic conditions and in advanced economies.

To summarize: the aversion of the economics profession to the deadweight losses caused by protectionism seems warranted. While the case against protectionism has typically been bolstered by theoretical or microeconomic evidence, the macroeconomic case for liberal trade is also strong. Higher tariffs seem to lower output and productivity, while raising unemployment and inequality, and leaving the trade balance unaffected. These results are wholly consistent with conventional wisdom from standard economics, and bolster the case for free trade. Protectionism just weakens the macroeconomy.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

No barriers to free flow of non-personal data in the EU

Gender parity has a huge role to play in the fight to save our oceans

UN investigates systematic sexual violence across South Sudan

‘End the ongoing atrocities’ against people with albinism in Malawi, say UN rights experts

This entrepreneur is helping farmers get food to consumers during lockdown

Get out, stay out: how financial resilience helps end poverty

New UN poverty report reveals ‘vast inequalities’ between countries

Czech PM should resolve his conflict of interest as a matter of urgency say MEPs

Global hunger is on the rise. These simple steps could help eradicate it

The EU checks the multinationals for tax fraud but Britain may sail out of the EU via Panama

New UN Global Climate report ‘another strong wake-up call’ over global warming: Guterres

EU tells Britain stay in as long as you wish

These chefs are fighting hunger and poverty with gastronomy

‘Ticking bomb’ health warning over deteriorating conditions facing Cyclone Idai victims

Yes, together we can make a change! YO!Fest and EYE 2016

Can the EU afford to block China’s business openings to Europe by denying her the ‘market economy status’?

It takes far too long for a rare disease to be diagnosed. Here’s how that can change

How Jack Ma sees a thriving future of entrepreneurship in Africa

How to create a world where healthcare is a right, not a luxury

Food safety: more transparency, better risk prevention

Why the West supports the yen’s devaluation and Japanese over-indebtedness

World in grip of ‘high impact weather’ as US freezes, Australia sizzles, parts of South America deluged

Women in video games: ‘Accept it, or don’t buy the game’

Human Rights Council election: 5 things you need to know about it

Peru should help more young vulnerable people into work

COVID-19: Both WHO and Europe must learn from the current pandemic, say MEPs

Better air pollution data is helping us all breathe easier. Here’s how

Does the “climate change” require ombudsman services for environment?

Digital technology helped create the skills gap. Here’s how it can help close it

Did young people just kill television?

Restoring prospect of peace in Middle East is ‘our shared responsibility’ UN envoy tells Security Council

‘We will not give up on looking for peace for South Sudan’: UN deputy chief

EU-Turkey relations: Erdogan plays the refugee card while beefing up gas operations in the Eastern Mediterranean sea

Is Haiti better prepared for disasters, nine years on from the 2010 earthquake?

Timor-Leste Foreign Minister highlights value of UN in resolving conflicts

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

Asia-Pacific showing ‘decisive leadership’ on road to 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, deputy UN chief tells key forum

UN honours peacekeepers who ‘paid the ultimate price’, for the sake of others

FROM THE FIELD: Keeping Morocco’s indigenous culture and conservation in balance

THE COMMITTEES: ‘All roads lead to the Fifth’

‘Building back better’ – here’s how we can navigate the risks we face after COVID-19

Canada leading the way on women’s inclusion and empowerment, says OECD

Facebook: MEPs demand a full audit by EU bodies to assess data protection

Cultural Intelligence: the importance of changing perspectives

Central banking in times of complexity

Here’s how sustainable aviation fuel can take off in Europe

The European Council takes more measures to stem illegal migration

Legendary Harlem Globetrotters slam-dunk at the UN, with message that brings families, nations together

Eastern Partnership: Commission proposes new policy objectives for beyond 2020

ILO and EIB join forces for more and better quality employment

5 things you need to know about water

France-Germany: Divided in Europe, USA united in…Iran

‘Don’t forget Madagascar’s children’, UN appeals for long-term help as emergency worsens

EU Budget 2019: focus on the young, on migration and innovation

Scotland and First Minister Salmond enter the most challenging battlefield for independence: Europe

Take action on air pollution to save lives, and the planet, urges UN chief

‘Pioneering’ former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet officially appointed new UN human rights chief

Parliament ready to fight for a different EU budget

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: prizewinning journalists freed in Myanmar, new tracking tool for suspected terrorists, and a global bid to stop snakebite deaths

UN rights chief slams ‘unconscionable’ US border policy of separating migrant children from parents

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s