Why protectionism spells trouble for global economic growth

trump 2019.jpg

UN Photo/Cia Pak President Donald Trump of the United States addresses the seventy-third session of the United Nations General Assembly.

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jonathan D. Ostry, Deputy Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF)


It is sometimes alleged that for all the microeconomic distortions that protectionist policies inflict, there can be a silver lining in terms of macroeconomic gains: more jobs, more output and a stronger trade balance. Indeed, some economies today are seemingly using commercial policy to pursue macroeconomic objectives. Tariffs can dampen imports, boost net exports (the difference between exports and imports, or the trade balance), and so boost GDP, other things being equal.

Economists, however, have generally been skeptical. Since the time of Adam Smith (or maybe even before), open and competitive markets have been seen as most likely to maximize output by directing resources more productively. Tariffs, on the other hand, encourage both the deflection of trade to inefficient producers and smuggling in order to evade them; such distortions reduce any beneficial effects. Further, consumers lose more from tariffs than producers gain, so there is deadweight loss. And the redistributions associated with tariffs tend to create vested interests, so harm tends to persist. Broad-based protectionism can also provoke retaliation, which adds further costs in other markets.

Moreover, economists believe macroeconomic policies (fiscal and monetary policies such as interest rates or the budget deficit) to be the natural instruments for achieving macroeconomic goals, such as raising growth and jobs. Tariffs are more likely to lead to offsetting changes in exchange rates that frustrate the achievement of macroeconomic objectives; less imports and a stronger trade balance increase demand for the domestic currency, and so its value.

The economic effect of tariffs

These results are for the full country sample as listed in Table 2 of NBER WP 25402/CEPR DP13389.

There is in addition a powerful lesson from history. Protectionist policies helped precipitate the collapse of international trade in the 1930s, and this trade shrinkage was a plausible seed of World War II. So while protectionism has not been much used in practice as a macroeconomic policy, most economists emphatically consider that this is as it should be.

But times change. Some economies today are using commercial policy seemingly for macroeconomic objectives. Can we say something about what the likely practical consequences of such actions are likely to be? In a recent study covering the vast majority of developed and developing countries in the world, and half a century’s-worth of macroeconomic data, we examined the responses of six key macroeconomic variables to changes in the tariff rate: real GDP, productivity, the unemployment rate, the real exchange rate, the trade balance and inequality.

We found that tariff increases have adverse domestic macroeconomic and distributional consequences: these effects are robustly and statistically significant, and are large enough in an economic sense to merit the attention of policymakers.

We also found that output (GDP) falls after tariffs rise because of a significant decrease in labour productivity. When firms in the import-competing sectors receive protection, resources are reallocated within the economy to relatively unproductive uses, and this is harmful to the added value generated by the economy. That is, the wasteful effects of protectionism lead to a meaningful reduction in the efficiency with which labour is used, and thus to a fall in output. Nor did we find an improvement in the trade balance after a rise in tariffs, plausibly reflecting our finding that the real exchange rate tends to appreciate as a result of higher tariffs (a prediction that is in line with theory and much earlier empirical evidence). We also found that protectionism leads to a small increase in unemployment, further bolstering the case against protectionism, and that tariff increases lead to greater inequality after a few years.

 

We found that the hit to economic growth from a tariff increase is more pronounced if the tariff increase is undertaken during an economic expansion. It is also larger for advanced countries than it is for developing countries. This is worrisome, since tariffs are currently being used as a macroeconomic instrument in buoyant economic conditions and in advanced economies.

To summarize: the aversion of the economics profession to the deadweight losses caused by protectionism seems warranted. While the case against protectionism has typically been bolstered by theoretical or microeconomic evidence, the macroeconomic case for liberal trade is also strong. Higher tariffs seem to lower output and productivity, while raising unemployment and inequality, and leaving the trade balance unaffected. These results are wholly consistent with conventional wisdom from standard economics, and bolster the case for free trade. Protectionism just weakens the macroeconomy.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Under fire, UN refugee agency evacuates 135 detained in Libya to Niger

EP Group leaders on Brexit: “the agreement is not open to renegotiation”

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

“Beating pollution for our planet”, a Sting Exclusive by Mr Erik Solheim, the Executive Director of the United Nations Environment

Give a chance to the brothers of Ailan: reception of refugees in Greece

Changing world of work needs new jobs strategy

The challenges of the universalization of the health system in Brazil. What can we change?

European Banking Union: no one is perfect

What the next 20 years will mean for jobs – and how to prepare

Outgoing UN official praises Iraq’s ‘exemplary peaceful transfer of power’ at the top

OECD welcomes French plans to increase and better target foreign aid

What brands get wrong about China – and how to put it right

Scientists have created a new kind of plastic that could be infinitely recyclable

I have a rare disease. This is my hope for the future of medicine

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

They won this year’s Nobel for economics. Here’s why their work matters

We need to deep clean the oceans. Here’s how to pay for it

Multiculturalism, social diversity and tolerance

Youth not prioritised in new Commission

GSMA Mobile 360 Series – Europe – 14 June 2016

Technology is delivering better access to financial services. Here’s how

European Parliament the most trusted EU institution

Lack of investment and ambition means Youth Guarantee not reaching potential

World Health Organisation and young doctors: is there any place for improvement?

Here are six bold ideas to accelerate sustainable energy innovation

Deepening Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union: Commission takes stock of progress

Future of Insurance Claims in Focus at Fourth Annual Connected Claims Europe Summit

WhatsApp to face scrutiny from EU regulators task force over data sharing with Facebook

This new way of understanding disease is changing medicine

Malta and Slovakia: MEPs warn of lack of judicial independence and corruption

G20 LIVE: Fact Sheet from the G20 Leaders Summit and key outcomes (G20 Antalya 2015 Summary)

Civilians ‘continue to pay highest price’ in Ukraine conflict, with peace prospects losing ‘momentum’

Why AI will make healthcare personal

Independent UN rights expert calls for compassion, not sanctions on Venezuela

“We are in Europe, but not of it”, from Churchill to Cameron: British Exceptionalism now threatens the entire EU Edifice

Bangladesh elections: Hold those responsible accountable for ‘violent attacks and intimidation’

UN human rights chief denounces grave ‘assaults’ on fundamental rights of Palestinian people

The untold story of who caused and who pays for the economic crisis

How painful is the Greek tragedy for the Germans?

Monday’s Daily Brief: WFP mulls ‘last resort’ Yemen aid suspension, top peacekeeping awardee announced, abuzz over Bee Day, Ebola threat ‘very high’

Trust links up supply chains. How do you establish it in the digital era?

Wind farms now provide 14% of EU power – these countries are leading the way

Erasmus+: an expected budget of €3 billion to be invested in young Europeans and to help create European Universities in 2019

ICC Appeals Chamber acquits former Congolese Vice President Bemba from war crimes charges

Macron in St. Petersburg didn’t oppose Trump on Iran, in Putin’s presence

‘More time’ agreed for buffer zone, to spare three million Syrian civilians in Idlib

Antitrust: Commission fines Google €1.49 billion for abusive practices in online advertising

We can’t tell if we’re closing the digital divide without more data

Nordic noir: The unhappiness epidemic affecting young people in the world’s happiest countries

Youth Parliament to finalise millennials´ priorities for future of the EU

Thousands risk lives fleeing fighting in Syria’s last ISIL stronghold

Will the three major parties retain control of the new EU Parliament?

Security Council hails ‘historic and significant’ joint peace declaration by Ethiopia and Eritrea

JADE Spring Meeting 2017 – day 3: JADE Academy trainings, networking session and gala dinner – Excellence Awards winners revealed

Mobile young people create the European labour market of tomorrow

An FTA between EU-US to hurt South Korea

Commission launches debate on more efficient decision-making in EU social policy

Why business can no longer turn a blind eye to poor vision

ECB offers plenty and cheap liquidity to support growth in all Eurozone countries

We need to bin disposable items for good. Here are 5 ways to do it

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s