Commission reports on the risks of investor citizenship and residence schemes in the EU and outlines steps to address them

passport

(Unsplash, 2019)

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.


For the first time, the Commission has presented a comprehensive report on investor citizenship and residence schemes operated by a number of EU Member States.

The report maps the existing practices and identifies certain risks such schemes imply for the EU, in particular, as regards security, money laundering, tax evasion and corruption. A lack of transparency in how the schemes are operated and a lack of cooperation among Member States further exacerbate these risks, the report finds.

Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship Dimitris Avramopoulos said: “Legally residing in the EU and in the Schengen area comes with rights and privileges that should not be abused. Member States must at all times fully respect and apply existing obligatory checks and balances – and national investor residence schemes should not be exempt from that. The work we have done together over the past years in terms of increasing security, strengthening our borders, and closing information gaps should not be jeopardised. We will monitor full compliance with EU law.” 

Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, Věra Jourová, said: “Becoming a citizen of one Member State also means becoming an EU citizen with all its rights, including free movement and access to the internal market. People obtaining an EU nationality must have a genuine connection to the Member State concerned. We want more transparency on how nationality is granted and more cooperation between Member States. There should be no weak link in the EU, where people could shop around for the most lenient scheme.

Investor Citizenship Schemes (‘golden passports’)

In the EU, three Member States (Bulgaria, Cyprus and Malta) currently operate schemes that grant investors the nationality of these countries under conditions which are less strict than ordinary naturalisation regimes. In these three Member States, there is no obligation of physical residence for the individual, nor a requirement of other genuine connections with the country before obtaining citizenship.

These schemes are of common EU interest since every person that acquires the nationality of a Member State will simultaneously acquire Union citizenship. The decision by one Member State to grant citizenship in return for investment, automatically gives rights in relation to other Member States, in particular free movement and access to the EU internal market to exercise economic activities as well as a right to vote and be elected in European and local elections. In practice, these schemes are often advertised as a means of acquiring Union citizenship, together with all the rights and privileges associated with it.

The Commission’s report has identified the following areas of concern:

·    Security: checks run on applicants are not sufficiently robust and the EU’s own centralised information systems, such as the Schengen Information System (SIS), are not being used as systematically as they should be;

·    Money laundering: enhanced checks (‘due diligence’) are necessary to ensure that rules on anti-money laundering are not circumvented;

·    Tax evasion: monitoring and reporting is necessary to make sure that individuals do not take advantage of these schemes to benefit from privileged tax rules;

·    Transparency and information: The report finds a lack of clear information on how the schemes are run, including on the number of applications received, granted or rejected and the origins of the applicants. In addition, Member States do not exchange information on applicants for such schemes, nor do they inform each other of rejected applicants.

Investor Residence Schemes (‘golden visas’)

Investor residence schemes, while different from citizenship schemes in the rights they grant, pose equally serious security risks to Member States and the EU as a whole. A valid residence permit gives a third-country national the right to reside in the Member State in question, but also to travel freely in the Schengen area. While EU law regulates the entry conditions for certain categories of third-country nationals, the granting of investor residence permits is currently not regulated at EU level and remains a national competence. Currently, 20 Member States run such schemes: Bulgaria, Czechia, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and the United Kingdom. The Commission’s report has identified the following areas of concern:

·    Security checks: There are certain security obligations under EU law that must be carried out before issuing a visa or residence permit to foreign investors. However, there is a lack of available information on the practical implementation and discretion in the way that Member States approach security concerns;

·    Physical residence requirement: Residence permits obtained by investment, with limited or no required physical presence of the  investor in the Member State in question, could have an impact on the application of and rights associated with the EU Long-Term Residence Status, and may even provide a fast-track to national and thereby EU citizenship;

·    Lack of transparency: The report stresses a lack of transparency and oversight of the schemes, in particular in terms of monitoring and the absence of statistics on how many people obtain a residence permit through such a scheme.

Next steps

The Commission will monitor wider issues of compliance with EU law raised by investor citizenship and residence schemes and it will take necessary action as appropriate. For this reason, Member States need to ensure, in particular, that:

·         All obligatory border and security checks are systematically carried out;

·         The requirements of the Long-Term Residence Permit Directive and the Family Reunification Directive are properly complied with;

·         Funds paid by investor citizenship and residence applicants are assessed according to the EU anti-money laundering rules;

·         In the context of tax avoidance risks, there are tools available in the EU framework for administrative cooperation, in particular for exchange of information.

The Commission will monitor steps taken by Member States to address issues of transparency and governance in managing these schemes. It will establish a group of experts from Member States to improve the transparency, governance and the security of the schemes. That group will be tasked, in particular, with:

·     Setting up a system of exchange of information and consultation on the numbers of applications received, countries of origin and on the number of citizenships and residence permits granted/rejected by Member States to individuals based on investments;

·     Developing a common set of security checks for investor citizenship schemes, including specific risk management processes, by the end of 2019.

Finally, concerning third countries setting up similar schemes, which may have security implications for the EU, the Commission will monitor investor citizenship schemes in candidate countries and potential candidates as part of the EU accession process. It will also monitor the impact of such schemes by EU visa-free countries as part of the visa-suspension mechanism.

Background

Investor citizenship schemes allow a person to obtain a new nationality based on investment alone. Investor residence schemes allow third-country nationals, subject to certain conditions, to obtain a residence permit to live in an EU country.

The conditions for obtaining and forfeiting national citizenship are regulated by the national law of each Member State subject to due respect for EU law. Principles laid out in international law require the existence of a “genuine link” between the applicant and the country or its nationals. As national citizenship is the precondition for EU citizenship and access to Treaty-based rights, the Commission is reporting on investors’ schemes granting national citizenship in Member States. The granting of an investor residence permit is not regulated at EU level and is currently governed by national law. However, EU law does regulate the entry conditions for certain categories of non-EU nationals.

Today’s report follows the European Parliament resolution of 16 January 2014 which called on the Commission to look into the various national citizenship schemes in the light of European values and the letter and spirit of EU legislation and practice.

In its 2017 Citizenship Report, the Commission announced that it would release a report on national schemes granting Union citizenship to investors.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

If on a summer’s night: is UK businesses’ “new deal” the only key to the “best of all worlds”?

How much more social deterioration can the EU people endure?

Global trade is broken. Here are five ways to rebuild it

Cum-ex tax fraud scandal: MEPs call for inquiry, justice, and stronger tax authorities

MEPs call for EU Magnitsky Act to impose sanctions on human rights abusers

Mexico needs a new strategy to boost growth, fight poverty and improve well-being for all

Antitrust: Commission fines Valve and five publishers of PC video games € 7.8 million for “geo-blocking” practices

Mental health in medical students: the deciphered quandary

The British are the most positive in Europe on the benefits of immigration

These chefs are fighting hunger and poverty with gastronomy

EU and China discuss economic and trade relations at the 7th High-level Economic and Trade Dialogue

Business uncertainty rises as US grants only temporary exception to EU for steel and aluminium tariffs

Consumer product quality: Parliament takes aim at dual standards

How tiny countries top social and economic league tables (and win at football, too)

These charts show where the world’s refugees came from in 2017 – and where they’re heading

Privatisation and public health: a question of Human Rights

How AI can ensure your transition to remote work is equitable

It’s not your imagination, summers are getting hotter

75 years after Auschwitz liberation, antisemitism still threatens ‘foundations of democratic societies’

Trump blocks US warmongers from bombing Iran

Commission calls on Leaders to pave the way for an agreement on a modern, balanced and fair EU budget for the future

UNICEF urges ‘transformative shift’ in family-friendly work policies to reap ‘huge’ benefits

Draghi rehabs ECB into a tool to support growth and employment; a departure from Teutonic orthodoxy

Sahel States need international support ‘now more than ever’– UN peacekeeping chief

COVID-19: National authorities should do more to raise awareness of EU action

UN chief welcomes decision to delay formation of South Sudan unity government

Which countries’ workers spend the longest (and shortest) in retirement?

This is why mountains matter more than you think

New Erasmus: more opportunities for disadvantaged youth

How a bionic arm is helping one little girl enjoy the things most take for granted

Merkel had it her way with the refugees & immigrants but can Greece and Turkey deliver?

MEPs want to fund crucial areas to stimulate European growth

Malaria: Focus on pregnant women and children, stresses UN health agency report

Brexit may finally not really happen; The Brits have second thoughts

Banking package: Parliament and Council reach an agreement

Discussions kick off among MEPs and national MPs on economic governance

Europeans show record support for the euro

The digital building blocks of better communities

Do the giant banks ‘tell’ Britain to choose a good soft Brexit and ‘remain’ or else…?

New SDG Advocates sign up for ‘peace, prosperity, people’ and planet, on the road to 2030

The Junior Enterprise concept, one of the best ways to develop practical skills

Guterres hails historic Convention banning violence and harassment at work

8 ways ASEAN consumer habits will change by 2030 – shaped by COVID-19, tech and more

Livelihoods of millions in East and Southeast Asia at risk from Swine Fever epidemic

EU consumers will soon be able to defend their rights collectively

Human rights breaches in Eritrea, Nicaragua and Saudi Arabia

How upskilling could help cities rebuild after Coronavirus

More than one million sexually transmitted infections occur every day: WHO

EP Brexit Steering Group calls on the UK to overcome the deadlock

Finally an answer to the hottest question of European youth today: How to make sure Juncker’s Investment Plan works for youth

The EU risks trade relations with China over the Tata hype about steel

We need a reskilling revolution. Here’s how to make it happen

These tech start-ups are changing what it means to farm

Drugs cost too much. There is a better way to fund medical innovation

Why this is the year we must take action on mental health

China is winning the electric vehicle race

#Travelgoals: why Instagram is key to understanding millennial tourism

Access to health in the developped and developing world

New European frontiers for renewable energy development

Should trade continue to be global after the pandemic?

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s