We must work together to build a new world order. This is how we can do it

cold war 2018

“Now the trumpet summons us again, not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need; not as a call to battle, though embattled we are – but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle…” – John F. Kennedy Twilight Struggle is a two-player game simulating the forty-five year dance of intrigue, prestige, and occasional flares of warfare between the Soviet Union and the United States. (Unsplash, 2018)

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Gülnur Aybet, Senior Adviser to the President, Office of the President of Turkey and member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Europe, Professor Yildiz Technical University


It is almost 30 years since the former Warsaw Pact countries were invited to a NATO gathering for the first time. It was a last-minute decision to invite them and some name plates were missing. I remember a delegate from an Eastern European country asking me in a somewhat embarrassed tone, “Sorry miss, but I do not seem to have a nameplate”.

It was the end of the Cold War, we were unprepared for the drastic changes taking place but at the same time, all of us, no matter how small our roles, had to think fast on our feet. I rushed to the stationery cupboard, found a cardboard box, a pair of scissors and a marker. The gentleman nodded at me with a gracious smile, his eyes beaming at the makeshift representation of his country at the NATO Parliamentary Assembly’s annual event. As a young intern in 1991, that was my contribution to the end of the Cold War.

The need to act expeditiously in times of great change is as relevant as ever. However, the West’s strategy to deal with change in the international order has been one of intransigent denial, while zealously clinging onto what we inherited from the Cold War.

Much of this denial to face change has been embedded in what was the original ‘transatlantic bargain’ and the fact that it was much too good a deal to be jettisoned for something else. The transatlantic bargain was to economically rebuild Europe from the ashes of a devastating war so that it became the principal strategic partner in a global political economy, while the US provided the bulwark of security against the Soviet Union with extended nuclear deterrence.

The moral imperative behind this deal, which strengthened the social legitimacy of its international institutions, was the need to defend a certain ‘way of life’ against a different one. That murky definition was coloured with the principles of freedom, democracy and human rights, but there were parts of the so-called ‘Western bloc’ that did not fall within these principles at all.

It was only after the Cold War that putting the defence of principles before the practicality of military defence became a reality. This was not because of any benign intent. The immediate post-Cold War period rested on a grand design to absorb the post-communist world into the transatlantic institutions that were inherited from the Cold War, and the forebearer of that absorption were norms and values.

Even then a European scholar had commented that wars like Yugoslavia may not have had a direct bearing on the West’s economic and security interests, but they constituted ‘bad examples’ at a time when ‘we’ in the West were trying to advance enlargement of institutions through universal values. It was a time when values and norms did become the interests at hand.

Eventually, the past 27 years evolved into a struggle of maintaining that post-Cold War grand design with the enlargement of the EU and NATO, whilst a battle of norms ensued as Russia and China also took a stab at owning international norms to fit their own designs.

At the heart of Russia’s realpolitik ventures in its own region, was an attempt to curb Western normative expansion in its neighbourhood. While the intervention in Georgia in 2008 was framed as one undertaken under ‘international humanitarian law’, the annexation of Crimea was presented as one of championing ‘self defence’. Both were concepts used quite widely in the break-up of Yugoslavia and the ensuing NATO interventions in both Bosnia and Kosovo.

China, on the other hand, prefers to promote and soften its growing international influence by referring to ‘cooperation’, and a ‘win-win’ approach under a globalist outlook. China’s use of infrastructure-for-resources loans in Africa, as well as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) have been put forward as a new regional and globalist ‘win-win’ strategy.

Underlying this approach are nevertheless serious challenges to the persistent transatlantic-centred liberal world order. Not only does the BRI present new challenges to the management of the global commons as primary trade routes, but it also presents a new path paved with investment, not just trading routes, that grow together with alternative new institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

At the end of the day, what has not changed since the 1990s is that power and influence are still being dressed up in normative language to legitimize expansion. The only difference being in the 1990s the ‘transatlantic core’ held the original copyright, whereas today other powers are playing the same game.

This has exacerbated the transatlantic core’s tendency to refuse to accept change in the global order. At the heart of this has been a persistent rejection of Russian attempts to circumvent international norms, that have proved to be both disturbing and frustrating for the West.

Another reason why this denial of change persisted so long was the impending doom of replacing that order with a downward spiral into chaos. It was the vision of a lack of alternatives that stoked this fear of not letting go of the 1990s. What lay behind this was the erroneous belief that, the mission of shaping the world through essentially western institutions and norms, “gave diverse people a sense of a shared mission and a common vocabulary.” This is likely to be less and less the case.

However, does this necessarily mean the international order will have no alternative but to descend into chaos or something far worse? Furthermore, we should ask ourselves if a changed international order, ought to necessarily be an illiberal one? The answer to both questions is if the emergent, the rising and the declining, can manage change together. Surely this is the true ‘win-win’ scenario that all can benefit from. Perhaps a brave new world in the making, one that we can all embrace and shape together is not so far-fetched an idea.

This brings us to the hardest part in answering these questions. How can change be managed together? There are no easy answers but the starting point has to focus on what needs to be done. There are a long list of challenges that impact us all, from creating sustainable peace and growth, to curbing the growing global refugee crisis, and tackling climate change.

By working together in a global functional framework, we can create a ‘Mitrany’ model for the world, of pragmatic international cooperation, where transnational and international webs of transactions focusing on a particular activity will eventually lead to more solid, normative bonds in international relations.

Mitrany’s model of functionalism worked in creating those bonds in post-War Europe. With the building of bonds and trust through functional cooperation we can thus create a Mitrany model for the world, where we will eventually write our own common norms that bind us together. Perhaps these will be the same norms that were embedded in the transatlantic bargain that created a liberal world order, but they will no longer be empty words, but tangible deeds attached to values that mean something.

In 1945, the focus was to rebuild after a devastating war. Despite the onslaught of the Cold War, there was much that brought people and states together. What was behind the original transatlantic bargain was not a vision laced with fancy words but deeds that built order from ashes. That is what gave meaning to those values and the institutions that upheld them.

Perhaps we will move from an order of ‘interlocking institutions’ to ‘interlocking regions’. Interlocking institutions was a phrase coined in the 1990s that referred to reconstituted transatlantic institutions such as NATO, the European Union and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at the heart of a renewed and expanding liberal world order.

This is now likely to be replaced with interlocking regions, where there is no institutional or normative core, but competing and cooperative structures of convenience forming global webs of transactions between different regions and different regional institutions. This has to be the heart of managing change together.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Pakistan: UN strongly condemns terrorist attack that leaves scores dead and wounded at election rally

5 surprising ways digital technology is changing childhood

ECB intervenes to clean May’s and Schäuble’s mess

Guterres expresses ‘grave concern’ following explosion at large political rally for reform-minded Ethiopian Prime Minister

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

How to end overfishing in the global South

Facebook and Google to treat Europe as the 51st State of the USA

GSMA announces speakers for Mobile 360 Series-West Africa

Germany’s fiscal and financial self-destructive policies

High-flyers: China is on top of the world for skyscraper construction

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Impossible Brexit options: WTO or new referendum?

European Young Innovators Forum @ European Business Summit 2014: Europe for StartUps, vision 2020

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

Grexit no longer a threat but how to manage a “tutti frutti” government if not with fear?

US-China trade war at point of no return: Washington’s demands go beyond tariffs

Parliament seals 2014 EU budget and the spending ceiling until 2020

Why the ECB suddenly decided to flood banks with money?

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

Five years down the drain

The ‘yellow vests’ undermined Macron in France and the EU

It’s Brexit again: Nigel Farage launches a personal campaign to lead the ‘No’ front

“France will be there, it will always be there!”, French President Hollande says in a rather disorganised speech; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

Will Western Balkans respond positively to EU initiatives?

Dealing with stress among healthcare professionals: are we missing the elephant in the room?

Deutsche Bank chased away from US, threatened with more fines

Biggest London City Banks ready to move core European operations to Frankfurt or Dublin?

In Yemen, Special Envoy sees UN role in preserving ‘essential’ aid pipeline at country’s major port

Terrorists potentially target millions in makeshift biological weapons ‘laboratories’, UN forum hears

Climate change and health: an everyday solution

ECB: Reaching the limits of its mandate to revive the Eurozone economy

An EU first: youth Ministers debate youth participation in live broadcast

Energy Union: deals on efficiency targets and governance

These are the most desirable cities for overseas workers

A long German political winter is on the way

The 27 EU leaders did nothing to help May unlock the Brexit talks

A conceptual approach to Violence Against Healthcare in Turkey from SDG’s

EU regional differences betray an unjust arrangement

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ clean-up project launches trial run: UN Environment

To entrepreneurship and beyond!

EU steps up its strategy for connecting Europe and Asia

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2015: The power of an individual and how we can awaken Europe’s Youth

How secure is blockchain?

Why do overwhelming proportions of EU’s youth feel excluded?

Novartis and Johnson & Johnson to deprive Europeans of their right to Health

Can China deal with climate change without the U.S.?

UN recognises role of sport in achieving sustainable development

EU unfolds strategy on the Egypt question

What will the US look like under Trump? Was his election campaign a big scam?

Why the euro may rise with the dollar even at lower interest rates

Future of our planet hinges on action by today’s youth – UN deputy chief

First-ever global conference of national counter-terrorism chiefs will strengthen cooperation, build ‘resilient’ States, says top UN official

More ‘political commitment’ needed urgently for HIV prevention: UNAIDS chief

Trade Committee MEPs give greenlight to landmark EU-Japan trade agreement

Somalia: UN urges steps to ensure future elections not ‘marred’ by rights abuses seen in recent polls

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s