6 ways China and the United States could jumpstart trade reforms

President Xi 2018 China

Mr Xi JINPING, President of the People’s Republic of China. Copyright: European Union Event: EU-China Summit 2018

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, Co‐founding Chief Executive, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development & Shuaihua Cheng, Managing Director, ICTSD China, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD)


Whether they’re new best friends or estranged fellows, President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping have confirmed their bilateral meeting at the November G20 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. This will be a high-stakes encounter, as the future of US-China relations has not been so uncertain since President Nixon’s visit to China in 1972.

If this meeting is not to be wasted, it is crucial that President Trump and President Xi focus not on skirmishes to seek reciprocal concessions, but rather offer political support for a durable resolution of their differences. The review and refreshment of multilateral and plurilateral rules and covenants, through World Trade Organization (WTO) reforms, would enable this. The Presidents would not only help each other’s economies, but more importantly, spare the globalized economy from the perils of fragmentation and a return to the law of the jungle.

China’s difficulties

In spite of pressure from Washington, President Xi is unlikely to swallow any bilateral concessions at the G20 meeting, for two reasons.

Firstly, President Xi understands that bilateral deals with this US Administration are politically vulnerable. In May, Xi’s envoy Vice Premier Liu brought home a joint statement in which both sides agreed to continue high-level dialogue and seek to resolve disputes in a “proactive manner”, not imposing tariffs during ongoing negotiations. But Trump threw away that truce in the blink of an eye and imposed 25% tariffs on 250 billion Chinese products. High-pitched China-bashing rhetoric during the US midterm elections may have exacerbated China’s worries about further embarrassment.

Secondly, from a legal perspective, China is not allowed to offer bilateral concessions exclusively in favour of US exporters. If it does so, it would violate the WTO’s principle of non-discrimination. When China lowers its tariffs or liberalizes the services sector, or strengthens regulations on intellectual property protection, it must do so universally for all other 163 WTO members, including the US.

Why WTO reforms?

The clock is ticking. While much US business is holding its breath in the wake of Washington-Beijing tariff races, other countries are sparing no effort in tapping into the Chinese market. The popularity of the China International Import Expo in Shanghai in November proved this.

As for President Trump, he has the tiger of tariff war by the tail. He can neither hold it, nor safely let go. If he continues these tariffs, they are sure to backfire. It is only a matter of how many more quarters he can wait before his re-election campaign. Economists widely believe that tariff wars may cause inflation of consumer product prices in the US, impact efficiency and cut off the profits of American firms involved in cross-border value chains, making the US less attractive to foreign investors.

How to let the tiger go

The WTO provides a space for the US and China to resolve their dispute in a “non-politicized” way, as suggested by its Director-General Roberto Azevedo. This is what the WTO is designed for: to address trade-related differences between members within an international law architecture that balances rights and obligations, and serves as a “safety valve” to keep politics at bay as much as possible. The WTO is both a permanent platform to negotiate new rules and market liberalization, and a system to resolve disputes.

Already, the rest of the world has started preparations to persuade their US and Chinese counterparts to take part in discussion of WTO reforms, as shown in the Ottawa ministerial communiqué in October. Canada, the EU, Japan and 10 other WTO members at diverse levels of development joined this important exercise.

The G20 trade and investment ministerial meeting in September also paved the way for President Xi and President Trump’s discussion about reinvigorating the international trade system. In their statement, ministers “recommend our leaders consider these important topics”, including how “to improve the WTO to face current and future challenges”; what the G20 can do to address the current situation “in a collaborative manner”; and how to come forward with ideas to “ensure that the WTO continues to be relevant”.

6 approaches to consider

To balance the interests of the US, China and other members, President Trump and President Xi might consider the following six actions key to WTO reforms.

  1. Revisit the rules of subsidies

These should be clearer and stricter about all forms of industrial subsidies. Attention should be paid to: the insufficiencies of the current agreement in levelling the playing field for state-owned enterprises (SOEs); stricter rules on fishery subsidies that contribute to overcapacity and overfishing; and distorted subsidies provided to farming.

  1. Enhance monitoring and transparency

A rules-based system can hardly be effective when it operates in the dark. Furthermore, the legitimacy of 21st-century governance will be increasingly dependent on breaking asymmetries to information. Every possible way to provide full transparency about measures and policies affecting trade rules and enabling better negotiations must be explored.

The US and China would do well to involve new information technologies and critical stakeholders in trade policy review processes; put their weight behind a real overhaul of the relevant provisions and means to ensure compliance with notification obligations; and encourage counter-notification.

  1. Trigger real, evidence-based and deeper discussion about technology transfer and the role of intellectual property right devices

In particular, review 20th-century governance to fit the new context of global innovation networks and practices driving technology advancement and transfer. Clear rules should be made with respect to the extent that governments will or will not be involved in technology exporting and importing.

  1. Foster establishment of new or adapted rules for digitally-enabled trade

About half the WTO membership has been engaged since December 2017 in exploratory work towards future negotiations on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce. Imperative now is to articulate new cross-cutting provisions that enable economic actors to use digitization to get the most out of existing rules on goods, services and intellectual property. Similarly pressing is to craft new frameworks to address growing unilateral protectionist inclinations in the absence of adequate competition, and draft taxation and facilitation regulations that ensure more predictable and inclusive market conditions in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

  1. Shed new light on development, including greater responsibilities for emerging economies

It has become an urgent matter to move away from inadequate GDP comparisons that define a country’s eligibility to special treatment, and to design smart and dynamic rules based on sector-specific, purpose-defined thresholds. Legacy issues need resolution, such as crippling tariff peaks in developed economies and the update of rules governing trade in services. The US and China could also share ideas on how to re-engineer domestic policies and social contracts to help those disadvantaged by globalization.

  1. Agree on an effective dispute settlement mechanism

This is imperative for good governance on terms of engagement for the global economy. Fundamental disagreements on the functioning of the WTO Appellate Body cannot leave its members without recourse to justice.

Alternatively, a new bifurcated system with two parallel tracks could be developed – one track for trade remedy and rules cases, and the other for all other issues. Remedy cases require additional legal and accounting expertise. At the heart of the US pushback to the existing system is a 20-year-old disagreement about the WTO’s rulings related to anti-dumping investigations. The US and China could pioneer a substantive discussion on the use of remedies in the new economy.

In a time of hardliners getting headlines, the G20 rendezvous offers President Xi and President Trump a precious opportunity to have a fireside talk. They ought to be reminded of the responsibilities of their respective superpowers to their peoples, to the struggling global economy and to the Agenda 2030.

Rules, not concessions, are crucial to solving their feuds in a sustainable way. The WTO reforms provide a timely platform for both sides to get out of the woods without being bitten by the tariff tiger.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Pakistan: UN strongly condemns terrorist attack that leaves scores dead and wounded at election rally

5 surprising ways digital technology is changing childhood

ECB intervenes to clean May’s and Schäuble’s mess

Guterres expresses ‘grave concern’ following explosion at large political rally for reform-minded Ethiopian Prime Minister

Chart of the day: This is what violence does to a nation’s GDP

How to end overfishing in the global South

Facebook and Google to treat Europe as the 51st State of the USA

GSMA announces speakers for Mobile 360 Series-West Africa

Germany’s fiscal and financial self-destructive policies

High-flyers: China is on top of the world for skyscraper construction

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

The 28 EU leaders care more about fiscal orthodoxy than effectively fighting youth unemployment

Impossible Brexit options: WTO or new referendum?

European Young Innovators Forum @ European Business Summit 2014: Europe for StartUps, vision 2020

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

Grexit no longer a threat but how to manage a “tutti frutti” government if not with fear?

US-China trade war at point of no return: Washington’s demands go beyond tariffs

Parliament seals 2014 EU budget and the spending ceiling until 2020

Why the ECB suddenly decided to flood banks with money?

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

Five years down the drain

The ‘yellow vests’ undermined Macron in France and the EU

It’s Brexit again: Nigel Farage launches a personal campaign to lead the ‘No’ front

“France will be there, it will always be there!”, French President Hollande says in a rather disorganised speech; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

Will Western Balkans respond positively to EU initiatives?

Dealing with stress among healthcare professionals: are we missing the elephant in the room?

Deutsche Bank chased away from US, threatened with more fines

Biggest London City Banks ready to move core European operations to Frankfurt or Dublin?

In Yemen, Special Envoy sees UN role in preserving ‘essential’ aid pipeline at country’s major port

Terrorists potentially target millions in makeshift biological weapons ‘laboratories’, UN forum hears

Climate change and health: an everyday solution

ECB: Reaching the limits of its mandate to revive the Eurozone economy

An EU first: youth Ministers debate youth participation in live broadcast

Energy Union: deals on efficiency targets and governance

These are the most desirable cities for overseas workers

A long German political winter is on the way

The 27 EU leaders did nothing to help May unlock the Brexit talks

A conceptual approach to Violence Against Healthcare in Turkey from SDG’s

EU regional differences betray an unjust arrangement

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ clean-up project launches trial run: UN Environment

To entrepreneurship and beyond!

EU steps up its strategy for connecting Europe and Asia

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2015: The power of an individual and how we can awaken Europe’s Youth

How secure is blockchain?

Why do overwhelming proportions of EU’s youth feel excluded?

Novartis and Johnson & Johnson to deprive Europeans of their right to Health

Can China deal with climate change without the U.S.?

UN recognises role of sport in achieving sustainable development

EU unfolds strategy on the Egypt question

What will the US look like under Trump? Was his election campaign a big scam?

Why the euro may rise with the dollar even at lower interest rates

Future of our planet hinges on action by today’s youth – UN deputy chief

First-ever global conference of national counter-terrorism chiefs will strengthen cooperation, build ‘resilient’ States, says top UN official

More ‘political commitment’ needed urgently for HIV prevention: UNAIDS chief

Trade Committee MEPs give greenlight to landmark EU-Japan trade agreement

Somalia: UN urges steps to ensure future elections not ‘marred’ by rights abuses seen in recent polls

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s