The needs, challenges and power dynamics of refugee resettlement

UNHCR resettlement 2018

© UNHCR/Johan Bävman

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Adèle Garnier, Lecturer in Politics and Public Policy, Macquarie University & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik, Research Professor in Humanitarian Studies, Peace Research Institute Oslo & Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Professor of International Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law, Universidade Católica de Santos, Brazil

This fall, the 73rd General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) was held in New York. The 193 UN member states gather annually to discuss, and sometimes act upon, global issues. Refugees were on the agenda in 2018, not only because numbers are historically high (25.4 million at the end of 2017) but also because the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was there to present its proposal for a Global Compact on Refugees (GCR).

The GCR results from a two-year process that began with the adoption of the New York Declaration in 2016, led by UNHCR. The final GCR draft lists three main focus areas for refugee protection: reception and admission; meeting needs and supporting communities; and solutions. The GCR builds on the three traditional durable solutions to refugees – local integration, voluntary repatriation and resettlement – and adds other local solutions and complementary protection to the fold. Resettlement is dealt with in paragraphs 90 to 93 of the GCR and is presented as a mechanism of burden- and responsibility-sharing. Yet it is unlikely that the resettlement commitments put forward in the GCR will significantly change how resettlement is used globally, in spite of increasing resettlement needs.

Refugee resettlement is only considered and used by UNHCR and states as a durable solution to forced displacement for a minority of refugees, with 1.19 million refugees in need of resettlement in late 2017, up from 691,000 in 2014. Still, only a fraction of resettlement candidates are resettled annually – in 2017, 65,109 were. Worryingly, the last two years have witnessed a significant downward shift in the offering of resettlement places, with a global drop of 54% in 2017 and a considerable decline of resettlement in the US under the Trump Administration.

As we argue in our new edited volume, Refugee Resettlement: Power, Politics and Humanitarian Governance, the limited availability of refugee resettlement, as well as annual variations in resettlement numbers, can be attributed to power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement. We use a broad definition of power that encompasses forms of power over others, such as coercion and authority, as well as power with others, such as persuasion and negotiation.

Contrary to the right of asylum, refugee resettlement is not codified in international law. Resettling refugees is entirely at the discretion of resettling states. No other actor has the power to override state authority in the offering of resettlement places. Therefore the GCR, which is a non-binding UN document, cannot impose the expansion of resettlement upon states.

It is in this context that the very modest resettlement aspirations of the GCR have to be understood. For instance, there is no demand to set a global target of resettlement places. A resettlement target had in fact been suggested by civil society in the lead-up to the adoption of the New York Declaration, but this target was not included in the Declaration.

Still, some of the GCR’s resettlement demands are less vague than the relevant sections of the New York Declaration (sections 77 to 79). The GCR promotes the adoption of a three-year strategy to expand the pool of resettlement places, as well as the adoption of specific targets in regards to elements of the resettlement caseload to be submitted by UNHCR to resettling states. In doing so, it refers to regional agreements, capacity building in new resettling states and a stronger involvement of private actors.

In addition, the GCR recommends that resettling states admit at least 25% of resettlement submissions made by UNHCR within 6 months of a UNHCR referral. It also advocates for at least 10% of states’ resettlement caseload to be set aside for cases deemed urgent by UNHCR, and for resettlement to be used strategically.

The setting of these firmer targets can be considered to reflect UNHCR’s power to persuade new states, as well as private actors, to engage more strongly in resettlement than in previous decades. Since the 1990s, UNHCR has expanded its efforts to persuade states to resettle particularly vulnerable refugees by developing guidelines regarding vulnerable refugee categories. These can be seen in the UNHCR Resettlement Handbook and in the GCR, with reference made to women and girls at risk and persons in protracted situations.

This focus in refugee resettlement on the most vulnerable refugees has led us, in our edited volume, to label refugee resettlement as an instrument of humanitarian governance: ‘humanitarian’ because of its emphasis on helping the most vulnerable, and ‘governance’ given that a range of actors are involved in resettlement practice beyond states.

Focusing on the most vulnerable implies an ethics of care, yet there is also a danger that the rights of those who are the recipients of humanitarian governance are neglected, as priority is given to saving lives rather than preserving human dignity and autonomy. There is also often very limited accountability for humanitarians towards refugees, and resettled refugees face significant socioeconomic barriers in resettling states. The imbalance of power to the detriment of refugees throughout the resettlement process can be daunting.

It is important to note that the GCR makes references to human rights treaties, though it does not use much rights-based language in its resettlement-focused paragraphs. A more assertive human rights-focused language would be welcome, as it is likely that the current decline of resettlement places will not be reversed in the near future, as mentioned above. In addition, the decline of resettlement places could have a negative impact on the autonomy and rights of resettlement candidates and resettled refugees.

One can only hope that local mobilization in resettling states will generate more political willingness to open new avenues of resettlement in the future, and that UNHCR can be an agent of change in this context. In light of the challenges discussed here, this would mean a significant transformation of the power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement within states, among states and in the international community more broadly.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

African economies sustain progress in domestic resource mobilisation

Eurozone needs more than some decimals of growth

How energy infrastructure is shaping geopolitics in East Asia

EU leaders agree on 2030 Climate and Energy Package: is “flexible” brave enough?

The hidden risk of virtual reality – and what to do about it

Half of the world’s population lack access to essential health services – are we doing enough?

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile has power to tame transaction fees – PayPal CEO

Rohingya refugee shelters ‘washed away’ in Bangladesh monsoon rains: UN agency

How to get young people in Europe to swipe right on voting

Transparency is key to inclusive employment and government integrity

Capital Markets Union: Making it easier for insurers to invest in the real economy

Myanmar military leaders must face genocide charges – UN report

Why we need artists who strive for social change

Q&A on the 19th China-EU Summit to be held on 01-02 June 2017 in Brussels

Reflections on the the biggest refugee crisis since World War II

Caspian Sea deal an invaluable step towards easing regional tensions, says UN Chief

Development aid drops in 2018, especially to neediest countries

FROM THE FIELD: Rohingya babies conceived out of ‘incomprehensible brutality’

‘Health is a right, not a privilege’ says WHO chief on World Health Day

G20 LIVE: G20 Leaders’ Communiqué Antalya Summit, 15-16 November 2015

What the Amazon rain forest tells us about globalization

EU prepares itself to fight back against hostile propaganda

How can newspapers survive? By measuring their social impact

London is becoming the world’s first National Park City

A Sting Exclusive: “There can be no global deal on emissions without China and the USA”, Conservative MEP Ian Duncan stresses from Brussels

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

These 3 countries are global offshore wind powerhouses

A hot autumn after a cool summer for Europe

Food safety critical to development and ending poverty: FAO deputy chief

Security Council must ‘come together’ to address the plight of children trapped in armed conflict, says UN envoy

Korea should adapt its migration programmes to ensure continued success in the face of expected challenges

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

The current devaluation of primary health care professionals

UN rushes to deliver aid as key Yemeni port city is ‘shelled and bombarded’

What the global Internet’s stakeholders can learn from Europe’s new data law

Here’s why infrastructure will make or break our response to climate change

We can make sure Globalization 4.0 leaves no one behind. This is how

EU budget for 2019: do more for the young, SMEs and the climate, urge MEPs

Three ways the world must tackle mental health

EU and China in search of a win-win agreement through strategic cooperation ahead of the EU-China summit

Four ways innovation can help to beat heart disease

CO2 emissions around the world

How India’s government can build better contracts with blockchain

China dazzles the world with her Silk Road plan to connect, Asia, Europe and Africa

Despite funding crisis, Palestine refugee classrooms set to stay open, says UNRWA

The French army is enlisting sci-fi writers to predict the future

“Two Pack” approved: Is democracy chased away from Brussels?

Human rights breaches in Iran, Egypt and Tanzania

The Collapse of the Brazilian Health Care System

Human rights on film: International festival celebrates mobile phone films for a cause

UN chief hails Libyan leaders’ agreement to hold general election

Turkey needs to step up investment in renewables to curb emissions

Refugee crisis update: EU lacks solidarity as migration figures drop

Is this the way to finally beat corruption?

Europe rethinking its severe austerity policies

Turkey caught in a vicious Syrian circle bringing terror and war at home

Preserving biodiversity vital to reverse tide of climate change, UN stresses on International Day

‘Stand united against anti-Muslim hatred’ urges Guterres, after mosque shootings in New Zealand leave 49 dead

Why do overwhelming proportions of EU’s youth feel excluded?

The EU learns about fishing and banking from tiny Iceland

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Just do it. International treaty and if they don’t comply a financial penalty of some kind. One that doesn’t cause more human rights abuses to those citizens who are entrapped by the state that does not comply. The world needs to change now. Self interest only is obselete and part of the extinctionist branch for earth. Straight forward and obvious.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s