The needs, challenges and power dynamics of refugee resettlement

UNHCR resettlement 2018

© UNHCR/Johan Bävman

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Adèle Garnier, Lecturer in Politics and Public Policy, Macquarie University & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik, Research Professor in Humanitarian Studies, Peace Research Institute Oslo & Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Professor of International Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law, Universidade Católica de Santos, Brazil

This fall, the 73rd General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) was held in New York. The 193 UN member states gather annually to discuss, and sometimes act upon, global issues. Refugees were on the agenda in 2018, not only because numbers are historically high (25.4 million at the end of 2017) but also because the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was there to present its proposal for a Global Compact on Refugees (GCR).

The GCR results from a two-year process that began with the adoption of the New York Declaration in 2016, led by UNHCR. The final GCR draft lists three main focus areas for refugee protection: reception and admission; meeting needs and supporting communities; and solutions. The GCR builds on the three traditional durable solutions to refugees – local integration, voluntary repatriation and resettlement – and adds other local solutions and complementary protection to the fold. Resettlement is dealt with in paragraphs 90 to 93 of the GCR and is presented as a mechanism of burden- and responsibility-sharing. Yet it is unlikely that the resettlement commitments put forward in the GCR will significantly change how resettlement is used globally, in spite of increasing resettlement needs.

Refugee resettlement is only considered and used by UNHCR and states as a durable solution to forced displacement for a minority of refugees, with 1.19 million refugees in need of resettlement in late 2017, up from 691,000 in 2014. Still, only a fraction of resettlement candidates are resettled annually – in 2017, 65,109 were. Worryingly, the last two years have witnessed a significant downward shift in the offering of resettlement places, with a global drop of 54% in 2017 and a considerable decline of resettlement in the US under the Trump Administration.

As we argue in our new edited volume, Refugee Resettlement: Power, Politics and Humanitarian Governance, the limited availability of refugee resettlement, as well as annual variations in resettlement numbers, can be attributed to power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement. We use a broad definition of power that encompasses forms of power over others, such as coercion and authority, as well as power with others, such as persuasion and negotiation.

Contrary to the right of asylum, refugee resettlement is not codified in international law. Resettling refugees is entirely at the discretion of resettling states. No other actor has the power to override state authority in the offering of resettlement places. Therefore the GCR, which is a non-binding UN document, cannot impose the expansion of resettlement upon states.

It is in this context that the very modest resettlement aspirations of the GCR have to be understood. For instance, there is no demand to set a global target of resettlement places. A resettlement target had in fact been suggested by civil society in the lead-up to the adoption of the New York Declaration, but this target was not included in the Declaration.

Still, some of the GCR’s resettlement demands are less vague than the relevant sections of the New York Declaration (sections 77 to 79). The GCR promotes the adoption of a three-year strategy to expand the pool of resettlement places, as well as the adoption of specific targets in regards to elements of the resettlement caseload to be submitted by UNHCR to resettling states. In doing so, it refers to regional agreements, capacity building in new resettling states and a stronger involvement of private actors.

In addition, the GCR recommends that resettling states admit at least 25% of resettlement submissions made by UNHCR within 6 months of a UNHCR referral. It also advocates for at least 10% of states’ resettlement caseload to be set aside for cases deemed urgent by UNHCR, and for resettlement to be used strategically.

The setting of these firmer targets can be considered to reflect UNHCR’s power to persuade new states, as well as private actors, to engage more strongly in resettlement than in previous decades. Since the 1990s, UNHCR has expanded its efforts to persuade states to resettle particularly vulnerable refugees by developing guidelines regarding vulnerable refugee categories. These can be seen in the UNHCR Resettlement Handbook and in the GCR, with reference made to women and girls at risk and persons in protracted situations.

This focus in refugee resettlement on the most vulnerable refugees has led us, in our edited volume, to label refugee resettlement as an instrument of humanitarian governance: ‘humanitarian’ because of its emphasis on helping the most vulnerable, and ‘governance’ given that a range of actors are involved in resettlement practice beyond states.

Focusing on the most vulnerable implies an ethics of care, yet there is also a danger that the rights of those who are the recipients of humanitarian governance are neglected, as priority is given to saving lives rather than preserving human dignity and autonomy. There is also often very limited accountability for humanitarians towards refugees, and resettled refugees face significant socioeconomic barriers in resettling states. The imbalance of power to the detriment of refugees throughout the resettlement process can be daunting.

It is important to note that the GCR makes references to human rights treaties, though it does not use much rights-based language in its resettlement-focused paragraphs. A more assertive human rights-focused language would be welcome, as it is likely that the current decline of resettlement places will not be reversed in the near future, as mentioned above. In addition, the decline of resettlement places could have a negative impact on the autonomy and rights of resettlement candidates and resettled refugees.

One can only hope that local mobilization in resettling states will generate more political willingness to open new avenues of resettlement in the future, and that UNHCR can be an agent of change in this context. In light of the challenges discussed here, this would mean a significant transformation of the power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement within states, among states and in the international community more broadly.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

3 reasons all countries should embrace the Global Compact for Migration

Public health through universal health coverage can help to attain many SDGs

Not faith, ‘but those who manipulate the faithful’ driving wedge between religions, UN-backed forum in Baku told

Syria: ‘Violence, displacement’ and cold kill 11 infants ‘in the past two days’

The Brussels bureaucracy blocks the Youth Guarantee scheme

7 ways to break the fast fashion habit – and save the planet

ECB: The bastion of effective and equitable Europeanism keeps up quantitative easing

The global suicide rate is growing – what can we do?

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: Libya civil war, African displacement, global trade tensions, terrorists’ children ‘secretly detained’, and more

A Sting Exclusive: “Youth voice must be heard in climate change negotiations!”, Bérénice Jond Board Member of European Youth Forum demands from Brussels

A male gynecologist in Iraq: red line violated

Six months into DR Congo’s deadliest Ebola outbreak, top UN official praises ‘brave’ response effort

10 Downing street: Another desperate attempt to unite Britain on Brexit

Further reforms in Sweden can drive growth, competitiveness and social cohesion

Draghi joined Macron in telling Germany how Eurozone must be reformed

Preparing Africa for ravages of climate change ‘cannot be an afterthought’ – COP24

MEPs wants to increase research funding to €120 billion in 2021-2027

Prospect of a nuclear war ‘higher than it has been in generations’, warns UN

A strong European Union is a united European Union

Commission’s action plan: financial world mandatory links to environmental targets

EU Commission accuses Germany of obstructing growth and the banking union

Royal Navy to unveil future surveillance and reconnaissance requirements next February in Rome

MEPs agree on future regional and cohesion funding

Two days left until General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), lots of newsletter opt-outs but does the EU citizen really know?

‘Refrain from violence’ UN chief urges, as presidential election result is announced in DR Congo

2018 ‘terrifying’ for Yemenis but ultimately a ‘year for hope’ says UN Special Envoy

UN urges ‘maximum restraint’ as Israel-Hamas tensions rise over rocket attack

The Italian crisis may act as a catalyst for less austerity

China’s cities are rapidly becoming more competitive. Here’s why

The global liberal order is in trouble – can it be salvaged, or will it be replaced?

Scotland in United Kingdom: It’s either the end or the beginning of the end

Eurozone: Sovereign debt decreases for the first time since 2007

Destroying nuclear waste to create clean energy? It can be done

How smart farming is helping Brazil feed the world

Rising insecurity in Central Africa Republic threatens wider region, Security Council told

MEPs demand Bulgaria’s and Romania’s swift accession to Schengen area

EU to relocate 40,000 migrants across the bloc: first step of a long due substantial reform?

UN-backed intercultural dialogue forum urged to keep working to ‘bridge gap between the like-minded’

Immigration crisis at its very worst: EU to outsource rescue business to North Africa?

A sterilised EMU may lead to a break up of Eurozone

Africa-Europe Alliance: European Commission committed to a sustainable African agri-food sector

How dearly will Germany pay for the Volkswagen emissions rigging scandal

European Youth Forum celebrates 20 years of fighting for youth rights

Venezuela: Parliament recognises Guaidó, urges EU to follow suit

Agreement reached on new EU measures to prevent electricity blackouts

Children are so hungry in one British town they are eating from bins

EU-U.S. Trade Talks: European Commission presents draft negotiating mandates

To Brexit, or not to Brexit…rather not: 10 Downing Street, London

Why EU’s working and unemployed millions remain uncertain or even desperate about their future

UPDATED: Thousands flee fighting around Libyan capital as Guterres condemns escalation, urges ‘immediate halt’ to all military operations

These are the 10 most in-demand skills of 2019, according to LinkedIn

Business should be joyful – just ask the sports world

EU shapes its ambitious strategy on India

African continent ‘an example of solidarity’ towards migrants and refugees: UN chief

A new world that demands new doctors in the fourth industrial revolution

Global economy to see ‘steady’ growth of three per cent in 2019 despite risks, says UN

Worth going ‘extra mile’ for a new Syrian constitution, UN envoy urges

The world’s e-waste is a huge problem. It’s also a golden opportunity

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

More Stings?

Comments

  1. Just do it. International treaty and if they don’t comply a financial penalty of some kind. One that doesn’t cause more human rights abuses to those citizens who are entrapped by the state that does not comply. The world needs to change now. Self interest only is obselete and part of the extinctionist branch for earth. Straight forward and obvious.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s