The needs, challenges and power dynamics of refugee resettlement

UNHCR resettlement 2018

© UNHCR/Johan Bävman

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Adèle Garnier, Lecturer in Politics and Public Policy, Macquarie University & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik, Research Professor in Humanitarian Studies, Peace Research Institute Oslo & Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Professor of International Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law, Universidade Católica de Santos, Brazil

This fall, the 73rd General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) was held in New York. The 193 UN member states gather annually to discuss, and sometimes act upon, global issues. Refugees were on the agenda in 2018, not only because numbers are historically high (25.4 million at the end of 2017) but also because the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was there to present its proposal for a Global Compact on Refugees (GCR).

The GCR results from a two-year process that began with the adoption of the New York Declaration in 2016, led by UNHCR. The final GCR draft lists three main focus areas for refugee protection: reception and admission; meeting needs and supporting communities; and solutions. The GCR builds on the three traditional durable solutions to refugees – local integration, voluntary repatriation and resettlement – and adds other local solutions and complementary protection to the fold. Resettlement is dealt with in paragraphs 90 to 93 of the GCR and is presented as a mechanism of burden- and responsibility-sharing. Yet it is unlikely that the resettlement commitments put forward in the GCR will significantly change how resettlement is used globally, in spite of increasing resettlement needs.

Refugee resettlement is only considered and used by UNHCR and states as a durable solution to forced displacement for a minority of refugees, with 1.19 million refugees in need of resettlement in late 2017, up from 691,000 in 2014. Still, only a fraction of resettlement candidates are resettled annually – in 2017, 65,109 were. Worryingly, the last two years have witnessed a significant downward shift in the offering of resettlement places, with a global drop of 54% in 2017 and a considerable decline of resettlement in the US under the Trump Administration.

As we argue in our new edited volume, Refugee Resettlement: Power, Politics and Humanitarian Governance, the limited availability of refugee resettlement, as well as annual variations in resettlement numbers, can be attributed to power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement. We use a broad definition of power that encompasses forms of power over others, such as coercion and authority, as well as power with others, such as persuasion and negotiation.

Contrary to the right of asylum, refugee resettlement is not codified in international law. Resettling refugees is entirely at the discretion of resettling states. No other actor has the power to override state authority in the offering of resettlement places. Therefore the GCR, which is a non-binding UN document, cannot impose the expansion of resettlement upon states.

It is in this context that the very modest resettlement aspirations of the GCR have to be understood. For instance, there is no demand to set a global target of resettlement places. A resettlement target had in fact been suggested by civil society in the lead-up to the adoption of the New York Declaration, but this target was not included in the Declaration.

Still, some of the GCR’s resettlement demands are less vague than the relevant sections of the New York Declaration (sections 77 to 79). The GCR promotes the adoption of a three-year strategy to expand the pool of resettlement places, as well as the adoption of specific targets in regards to elements of the resettlement caseload to be submitted by UNHCR to resettling states. In doing so, it refers to regional agreements, capacity building in new resettling states and a stronger involvement of private actors.

In addition, the GCR recommends that resettling states admit at least 25% of resettlement submissions made by UNHCR within 6 months of a UNHCR referral. It also advocates for at least 10% of states’ resettlement caseload to be set aside for cases deemed urgent by UNHCR, and for resettlement to be used strategically.

The setting of these firmer targets can be considered to reflect UNHCR’s power to persuade new states, as well as private actors, to engage more strongly in resettlement than in previous decades. Since the 1990s, UNHCR has expanded its efforts to persuade states to resettle particularly vulnerable refugees by developing guidelines regarding vulnerable refugee categories. These can be seen in the UNHCR Resettlement Handbook and in the GCR, with reference made to women and girls at risk and persons in protracted situations.

This focus in refugee resettlement on the most vulnerable refugees has led us, in our edited volume, to label refugee resettlement as an instrument of humanitarian governance: ‘humanitarian’ because of its emphasis on helping the most vulnerable, and ‘governance’ given that a range of actors are involved in resettlement practice beyond states.

Focusing on the most vulnerable implies an ethics of care, yet there is also a danger that the rights of those who are the recipients of humanitarian governance are neglected, as priority is given to saving lives rather than preserving human dignity and autonomy. There is also often very limited accountability for humanitarians towards refugees, and resettled refugees face significant socioeconomic barriers in resettling states. The imbalance of power to the detriment of refugees throughout the resettlement process can be daunting.

It is important to note that the GCR makes references to human rights treaties, though it does not use much rights-based language in its resettlement-focused paragraphs. A more assertive human rights-focused language would be welcome, as it is likely that the current decline of resettlement places will not be reversed in the near future, as mentioned above. In addition, the decline of resettlement places could have a negative impact on the autonomy and rights of resettlement candidates and resettled refugees.

One can only hope that local mobilization in resettling states will generate more political willingness to open new avenues of resettlement in the future, and that UNHCR can be an agent of change in this context. In light of the challenges discussed here, this would mean a significant transformation of the power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement within states, among states and in the international community more broadly.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

A roadmap for repairing rural mobility in Japan – and beyond

Why are the Balkans’ political leaders meeting in Geneva this week?

Have central banks missed the exit train?

Trump’s Russophiles under investigation, Europe remains ‘en garde’

ECB embarks on the risky trip to Eurozone banking universe

‘Uphold human dignity’, dismantle ‘specious notion of racial superiority’ urges UN chief

Human Rights Day celebrates ‘tremendous activism’ of the world’s young people

Climate change: new rules agreed to determine which investments are green

Approving most of EU’s accounts, EP requests new measures to protect EU spending

ECB to people: Not responsible if you lose money on Bitcoin, your governments are

80,000 youngsters at risk in DRC after forcible expulsion from Angola: UNICEF

UN experts urge Turkey to repatriate Irish woman associated with terror group

Can indoor farming feed the world?

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

Cancer is a growing global threat and prevention is key, UN study shows

Parlamentarians to “break up” with reality in the Google antitrust case

Cybersecurity needs a holistic approach. Here are three ways to build protection

Amid pandemic detours, mental health matters

Take action on air pollution to save lives, and the planet, urges UN chief

Eurozone: Even good statistics mean deeper recession

EU recovery and long-term budget: Leaders must do better

The megatrend that will shape our working future

Countries urged to make ‘digital world’ safer for children

Athens urged to fast track asylum seekers amid island shelters crisis – UNHCR

Is Erdogan ready to tear down the bridges with Europe and the West?

Public health through universal health coverage can help to attain many SDGs

DR Congo: UN food agency triples aid in strife-hit Ituri province

Mergers: Commission opens in-depth investigation into joint ventures proposed by Boeing and Embraer

Tusk fights back while charismatic Boris goes against everybody in Brussels pushing the UK to leave the EU now or never

COVID-19’s isolated world is the norm for people for disabilities

Climate resilience is make or break for businesses. Here’s why

How tech can help businesses balance profit and purpose

EDRi @ European Business Summit 2014: Digital Citizenship in Brussels – the case of Net Neutrality

Brazilian officer a ‘stellar example’ of why more women are needed in UN peacekeeping

Nearly 3 billion people around the globe under COVID-19 lockdowns – Today’s coronavirus updates

Window for a Brexit deal: Brussels to think again May’s proposal

Guinea-Bissau: Upcoming elections vital to prevent ‘relapse’ into instability, says UN envoy

UNICEF reports uneven progress in 30 years of child rights treaty

Grexit no longer a threat but how to manage a “tutti frutti” government if not with fear?

How to test if Kiev’s ‘Maidan’ was an authentic revolt or a well-planned operation

How to harness data to tackle rare diseases

COVID-19: EU must step up efforts to tackle medicine shortages

IMF: The global economy keeps growing except Eurozone

Skeptic France about Trump-Juncker trade deal favoring German cars; EU’s unity in peril

Trump’s denial of Paris climate agreement; the US Republicans lash out against the world

Europe turns out more jobs this summer

‘Vaccines are safe’ and save lives, UNICEF declares, launching new #VaccinesWork campaign

Central African Republic: Guterres says UN mission committed to protecting civilians, helping stabilize country, as violence flares

Eurozone examines the prospect of issuing debt paper jointly

Why the internet is yesterday’s news in China’s digital leap forward

Newly displaced fleeing attacks in northeast Nigeria, top 2,000

PM May fosters chauvinism, declares trade war on Europe

Health: The neglected aspect of climate change

The new North America trade deal USMCA punishes German cars

Trump and Brexit: After the social whys the political whereto

“I believe that startups are for grown-up men, those, who have already achieved something “

These are the countries best prepared for the fight against cancer

The four top Americans who flew to Europe perplexed things about Trump’s intentions

The issue of mental health for modern young doctors

How to end overfishing in the global South

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Just do it. International treaty and if they don’t comply a financial penalty of some kind. One that doesn’t cause more human rights abuses to those citizens who are entrapped by the state that does not comply. The world needs to change now. Self interest only is obselete and part of the extinctionist branch for earth. Straight forward and obvious.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s