The needs, challenges and power dynamics of refugee resettlement

UNHCR resettlement 2018

© UNHCR/Johan Bävman

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Adèle Garnier, Lecturer in Politics and Public Policy, Macquarie University & Kristin Bergtora Sandvik, Research Professor in Humanitarian Studies, Peace Research Institute Oslo & Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Professor of International Law, Human Rights and Refugee Law, Universidade Católica de Santos, Brazil

This fall, the 73rd General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) was held in New York. The 193 UN member states gather annually to discuss, and sometimes act upon, global issues. Refugees were on the agenda in 2018, not only because numbers are historically high (25.4 million at the end of 2017) but also because the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was there to present its proposal for a Global Compact on Refugees (GCR).

The GCR results from a two-year process that began with the adoption of the New York Declaration in 2016, led by UNHCR. The final GCR draft lists three main focus areas for refugee protection: reception and admission; meeting needs and supporting communities; and solutions. The GCR builds on the three traditional durable solutions to refugees – local integration, voluntary repatriation and resettlement – and adds other local solutions and complementary protection to the fold. Resettlement is dealt with in paragraphs 90 to 93 of the GCR and is presented as a mechanism of burden- and responsibility-sharing. Yet it is unlikely that the resettlement commitments put forward in the GCR will significantly change how resettlement is used globally, in spite of increasing resettlement needs.

Refugee resettlement is only considered and used by UNHCR and states as a durable solution to forced displacement for a minority of refugees, with 1.19 million refugees in need of resettlement in late 2017, up from 691,000 in 2014. Still, only a fraction of resettlement candidates are resettled annually – in 2017, 65,109 were. Worryingly, the last two years have witnessed a significant downward shift in the offering of resettlement places, with a global drop of 54% in 2017 and a considerable decline of resettlement in the US under the Trump Administration.

As we argue in our new edited volume, Refugee Resettlement: Power, Politics and Humanitarian Governance, the limited availability of refugee resettlement, as well as annual variations in resettlement numbers, can be attributed to power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement. We use a broad definition of power that encompasses forms of power over others, such as coercion and authority, as well as power with others, such as persuasion and negotiation.

Contrary to the right of asylum, refugee resettlement is not codified in international law. Resettling refugees is entirely at the discretion of resettling states. No other actor has the power to override state authority in the offering of resettlement places. Therefore the GCR, which is a non-binding UN document, cannot impose the expansion of resettlement upon states.

It is in this context that the very modest resettlement aspirations of the GCR have to be understood. For instance, there is no demand to set a global target of resettlement places. A resettlement target had in fact been suggested by civil society in the lead-up to the adoption of the New York Declaration, but this target was not included in the Declaration.

Still, some of the GCR’s resettlement demands are less vague than the relevant sections of the New York Declaration (sections 77 to 79). The GCR promotes the adoption of a three-year strategy to expand the pool of resettlement places, as well as the adoption of specific targets in regards to elements of the resettlement caseload to be submitted by UNHCR to resettling states. In doing so, it refers to regional agreements, capacity building in new resettling states and a stronger involvement of private actors.

In addition, the GCR recommends that resettling states admit at least 25% of resettlement submissions made by UNHCR within 6 months of a UNHCR referral. It also advocates for at least 10% of states’ resettlement caseload to be set aside for cases deemed urgent by UNHCR, and for resettlement to be used strategically.

The setting of these firmer targets can be considered to reflect UNHCR’s power to persuade new states, as well as private actors, to engage more strongly in resettlement than in previous decades. Since the 1990s, UNHCR has expanded its efforts to persuade states to resettle particularly vulnerable refugees by developing guidelines regarding vulnerable refugee categories. These can be seen in the UNHCR Resettlement Handbook and in the GCR, with reference made to women and girls at risk and persons in protracted situations.

This focus in refugee resettlement on the most vulnerable refugees has led us, in our edited volume, to label refugee resettlement as an instrument of humanitarian governance: ‘humanitarian’ because of its emphasis on helping the most vulnerable, and ‘governance’ given that a range of actors are involved in resettlement practice beyond states.

Focusing on the most vulnerable implies an ethics of care, yet there is also a danger that the rights of those who are the recipients of humanitarian governance are neglected, as priority is given to saving lives rather than preserving human dignity and autonomy. There is also often very limited accountability for humanitarians towards refugees, and resettled refugees face significant socioeconomic barriers in resettling states. The imbalance of power to the detriment of refugees throughout the resettlement process can be daunting.

It is important to note that the GCR makes references to human rights treaties, though it does not use much rights-based language in its resettlement-focused paragraphs. A more assertive human rights-focused language would be welcome, as it is likely that the current decline of resettlement places will not be reversed in the near future, as mentioned above. In addition, the decline of resettlement places could have a negative impact on the autonomy and rights of resettlement candidates and resettled refugees.

One can only hope that local mobilization in resettling states will generate more political willingness to open new avenues of resettlement in the future, and that UNHCR can be an agent of change in this context. In light of the challenges discussed here, this would mean a significant transformation of the power dynamics at the core of refugee resettlement within states, among states and in the international community more broadly.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Croatian Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

‘We all must step up’ collective action on disability inclusion – UN deputy chief

Easier Schengen Visas for non-EU holiday makers: A crucial issue for south Eurozone countries

How data can empower patients to personalize and improve their cancer treatment

What Ghana can teach us about integrating refugees

It’s time to build a responsible media supply chain

Coronavirus: EU Civil Protection Mechanism activated for the repatriation of EU citizens

Lack of investment and ambition means Youth Guarantee not reaching potential

Why leaders need to upgrade their operating systems

What does a good digital ID look like?

EP President at the European Youth Event: “Your ideas are key in shaping EU’s future”

Central Asia: the European Union matches political commitment with further concrete support

Berlin wants to break South’s politico-economic standing

2021-2027 EU Budget: €378,1 billion to benefit all regions

7 surprising and outrageous stats about gender inequality

European Commission pledges additional €30 million in immediate support for Lebanon

Over 40 million people still victims of slavery

UN chief condemns deadly Burkina Faso mosque attack

An Easter Special: Social protection of migrants in Europe as seen through the eyes of European youth

EU budget: Commission helps prepare new Cohesion programmes with Regional Competitiveness Index and Eurobarometer

Tokyo Olympics postponed to 2021 over coronavirus concerns

European Union: More taxes out of less income

Draghi: A bridge from Brussels to Berlin

A question of trust: the UN political chief working behind the scenes to prevent tomorrow’s wars

Gig workers among the hardest hit by coronavirus pandemic

A Brussels antithesis reveals where the EU is heading

Asylum seekers in Sri Lanka fear for their safety, in wake of Easter Sunday terror attacks

UN health agency welcomes Facebook pledge to stop vaccine misinformation from going viral

EU Parliament: Follow the fraudulent money and confiscate it

Japan’s population is shrinking by a quarter of a million people every year

European Business Summit 2013: Where Business and Politics shape the future

What Mary Poppins teaches us about behavioural economics

European Commission issues first emission of EU SURE social bonds

Margrethe Vestager, EU Commissioner in charge of competition policy, during a recent press conference in Brussels / Berlaymont. (Copyright: EU, 2018 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

EU opens investigation into Qatar Petroleum over potentially restrictive gas contracts

E-energy declaration: will energy digitalization be beneficial to the climate?

Rule of Law in Poland: concerns continue to grow among MEPs

Japan to invest in euro values

UN chief praises Japanese climate resilience, as Typhoon Hagibis cleanup begins

Can the EU afford to block China’s business openings to Europe by denying her the ‘market economy status’?

UN Human Rights Council stands firm on LGBTI violence, Syria detainees and Philippines ‘war on drugs’

A giant marine heatwave has descended on Alaska

“Fortress Europe”, “Pegida” and its laughing stocks

45th Anniversary of the French Confederation (Confédération Nationale des Junior Entreprises)

Mobility in 2020: a female perspective

A European student just sets the question of the day: What kind of education policies are missing in Europe?

‘Bleakest period yet’ in Occupied Palestinian Territory: UN human rights expert

CEOs as activists: should leaders speak up about social causes?

This new initiative aims to make cybercrime harder – and riskier – to commit

Alexis Tsipras ready to test Eurozone’s political sturdiness; Up to what point?

‘Water-forecasting’ and fish farms fed on waste: how innovation is driving the blue economy

A reflection of health inequity in recent epidemics

Yemen: 11 more ‘terrible, senseless’ civilian deaths reported, following attack in Sana’a – top UN official

Coronavirus has exposed human rights gaps. We need to fix this

Peacekeeping chief highlights challenges facing UN Police

Aung San Suu Kyi suspended from the Sakharov Prize Community

EU-China trade: closer ties as US-China trade battle brews

Governments can fight corruption by joining the digital payment revolution

PM May fosters chauvinism, declares trade war on Europe

Why rich countries are seeing more poverty

This new form of currency could transform the way we see money

More Stings?

Advertising

Comments

  1. Just do it. International treaty and if they don’t comply a financial penalty of some kind. One that doesn’t cause more human rights abuses to those citizens who are entrapped by the state that does not comply. The world needs to change now. Self interest only is obselete and part of the extinctionist branch for earth. Straight forward and obvious.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s