3 reasons all countries should embrace the Global Compact for Migration

Rohingya UN News 2018

UNHCR/Roger Arnold Thousands of new Rohingya refugee arrivals cross the border near Anzuman Para village, Palong Khali, Bangladesh.

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Anne Gallagher, Independent Scholar and Legal Adviser to the United Nations and ASEAN, President of the International Catholic Migration Commission

The Global Compact for Migration, which is expected to be adopted in December, is the first ever attempt to develop an internationally shared vision of what safe, orderly and regular migration might look like, and how it could be achieved. The Australian government has recently signalled the possibility that it may withdraw from the process – which would make it the third UN member state after the US and Hungary to do so. There is a risk that others may follow, jeopardizing a fragile, hard-won consensus at its most critical stage.

This is the case for the Global Compact that deserves to be heard.

1. The Global Compact will directly benefit all countries

The purpose of the Global Compact is to strengthen international cooperation on migration. There is no question that such cooperation is urgently needed and much overdue. While the international community has made extraordinary progress is regulating other areas of common interest and concern – from trade to terrorism, from finance to use of force – migration has long been sidelined as too difficult.

But times have changed, and there is now widespread agreement that no country can “deal” with migration alone – that working together is the only way to make sure migration works for everyone. The Global Compact process has given every member state of the UN the chance to participate in creating a set of broad operating principles within which future cooperation can be structured and implemented. To stand outside that process, or to abandon it just short of the finishing line, is to deny the stark reality of our interdependence when it comes to migration.

It makes little sense that those countries most worried about irregular migration are the ones questioning the Global Compact. This initiative was born directly out of the European migration crisis of 2015 and related worries around security and criminality. That history is reflected in the final text, which focuses squarely on the factors that compel people to move in the first place; on migrant smuggling; and on human trafficking. Failing to cooperate on these urgent issues effectively means giving up: abandoning hope of any long-term, sustainable solution to irregular, exploitative migration. This would be a universal disaster, but with a particularly vicious impact on wealthy countries of destination.

And those questioning the value of the Global Compact must be reminded that it is about much more than irregular migration. It is also about the need to develop a strong evidence base, so that migration policies everywhere are smarter and better attuned to the needs of both sending and receiving countries. It is about promoting regular migration pathways that benefit everyone. It is about making sure that migrant workers – the backbone of many developed economies, including those of Australia and the United States – are able to move, live and work in safety and dignity.

2. The Global Compact is not a threat to any country’s sovereignty

The US, Hungary and Australia have all asserted the Global Compact for Migration represents a threat to their sovereignty; that it will force them to take actions against their interests; that it will create some kind of unelected authority to sit in judgment above their institutions.

This is not the case. When UN member states meet in Morocco in December to sign off on the Global Compact (and its companion, the Compact on Refugees), they will be signalling two things: first, their assent to its basic principles, and second, an intention to do their best to implement what has been agreed. Development of the Global Compact was only possible because all countries agreed, from the beginning, that it would not impose legal obligations. A core guiding principle of the final text explicitly affirms “the sovereign right of states to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction in accordance with international law”.

Image: UNHCR Global Trends Report

3. The Global Compact is pragmatic and balanced – even on the most difficult issues

The Global Compact addresses some of the thorniest aspects of migration, marking out narrow but important areas of accord.

The issue of return is one example. Subject to certain protections being in place, states are entitled to remove migrants who do not have a legal right to remain in their territory. But without cooperation from the country of origin, repatriation is invariably slow and often hostile. The Global Compact identifies the complementary responsibilities of countries of destination and countries of origin to “facilitate[e] safe and dignified return and readmission, as well as sustainable reintegration”. By doing this, it creates a framework that can be the basis of a genuine partnership. This won’t solve the problem of return and reintegration, but it’s much better than what we have now.

Detention of irregular migrants – a highly charged political issue for many countries – provides another example of small but significant progress. One government has singled out the Global Compact’s provisions on detention as a potential dealbreaker, asserting that they would compel changes in policy, thereby encouraging the operations of criminal smuggling gangs. But these claims do not hold up. First, the Compact cannot force any government to do anything it doesn’t want to do. Second, its provisions on detention are balanced and finely nuanced – as would be expected with more than 190 countries involved in crafting them.

The Global Compact does not reject detention of migrants: rather, it carefully and judiciously recognises that detention should be seen as a measure of last resort and encourages states to work towards non-custodial alternatives. It reminds states of their existing legal obligation to ensure that the human rights of detained migrants are respected and that decisions about detention are made in accordance with the law. It further urges that detention not be used as a tool to punish or deter migrants. It highlights the special vulnerabilities and needs of children in detention. None of this is a threat. Rather it is a decent, achievable goal that all fair-minded countries can work towards without feeling that their security and sovereignty is being trampled upon.

However we may feel about it, migration is our common future. Finally, after too long, the chance to influence the shape and direction of that future is within our grasp. No country deserves to be left out. The modest first step that the Global Compact represents is one that should – that must – be taken together.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Eating less beef and more beans would cut deaths by 5-7%

The European Parliament hemicycle in Strasbourg (Copyright: European Union, 2017 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Mauro Bottaro)

EU Parliament sends controversial copyright law reform back to discussion

Here are five ways we can make mental healthcare better

IMF’s Lagarde indirectly cautioned Eurozone on deflation

Who holds the key to the future of biotechnology? You do

Eurozone: New data show recession and debt closer to explosion

Ethiopia will soon introduce visa-free travel for all Africans

How smart farming is helping Brazil feed the world

Could robot leaders do better than our current politicians?

Facilitating the access to finance and risk capital for SMEs and midcaps

Can elections in Italy and Germany derail Eurozone?

This is how people in Europe are helping lead the energy charge

Policymakers can ensure the 4IR is fairer than the last three

London, Berlin, Paris to fight over EU budget

UN receives ‘Humanium’ wristwatch gift, symbolizing peaceful transformation

Mine ban agreement ‘has saved countless lives’, but ‘accelerated efforts’ needed to end scourge for good: Guterres

Why does the whole world want Britain to stay in the EU?

Will Qualcomm avoid Broadcom’s hostile takeover post the 1 bn euro EU antitrust fine?

World Summit Awards 2016: Sustainable impact through digital innovation

168 hours left for MEPs – ECOFIN Council to deliver a Banking Union

The global appetite for meat is growing, and it’s harming the planet

The vicious cycle of poverty and exclusion spreads fast engulfing more children

Can a Bavarian Oktoberfest beer indulger bring down the Berlin government?

Travel the world, find yourself

Confronting neo-mercantilism: why regulation is critical to global trade

EU leaders agree on 2030 Climate and Energy Package: is “flexible” brave enough?

Greece @ MWC14: Greek-born mobile champions at MWC 2014

Deutsche Bank chased away from US, threatened with more fines

UN rights office calls on Zimbabwe Government to end ‘crackdown’ in response to fuel protests

The dangers of data: why the numbers never tell the full story

Berlin repels proposal for cheaper euro

This is where teachers are most (and least) respected

New roadmap toward healthier and cleaner oceans adopted by UN Environment and European Commission

Syria: UN Humanitarian Coordinator calls for unimpeded access from within the country

Tax crimes: MEPs want EU financial police force and financial intelligence unit

Launch of Pact for Youth: European Youth Forum calls for real business engagement

Ukraine: Is there a political force able to undo the division?

Draghi tells the EU Parliament his relaxed policies are here to stay

Tenants ‘forced out their homes’ by global investment firms, say UN experts

No agreement in sight on EU budget

Brexit talks stalled at launch; issues with European Court’s authority in Britain

Remembering Kofi Annan

Look Mom, even the House of Lords says the #righttobeforgotten is not right

Giving humanitarian help to migrants should not be a crime, say MEPs

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, who gets it and who pays the bill?

What makes Copenhagen the world’s most bike-friendly city?

Security spillovers from Trump’s trade wars: China, Germany prepare for global disorder

This project is turning abandoned fishing gear into volleyball nets

The Fourth Industrial Revolution must not leave farming behind

Crucial medical supplies airlifted to north-east Syria to meet ‘desperate need’

World must do more to tackle ‘shadowy’ mercenary activities undermining stability in Africa, says UN chief

Parliamentary bid to democratize Myanmar constitution a ‘positive development’ says UN rights expert

South Sudan: ‘Horrific acts’ by government may constitute ‘war crimes’ says UN, demanding justice

Contact the Sting

Four ways we can fix economics in 2019

EU Budget: InvestEU Programme to support jobs, growth and innovation in Europe

Christine Lagarde: the three priorities for the global economy

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

THE ROAD TO GANESHA

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s