3 reasons all countries should embrace the Global Compact for Migration

Rohingya UN News 2018

UNHCR/Roger Arnold Thousands of new Rohingya refugee arrivals cross the border near Anzuman Para village, Palong Khali, Bangladesh.

This article is brought to you thanks to the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Anne Gallagher, Independent Scholar and Legal Adviser to the United Nations and ASEAN, President of the International Catholic Migration Commission

The Global Compact for Migration, which is expected to be adopted in December, is the first ever attempt to develop an internationally shared vision of what safe, orderly and regular migration might look like, and how it could be achieved. The Australian government has recently signalled the possibility that it may withdraw from the process – which would make it the third UN member state after the US and Hungary to do so. There is a risk that others may follow, jeopardizing a fragile, hard-won consensus at its most critical stage.

This is the case for the Global Compact that deserves to be heard.

1. The Global Compact will directly benefit all countries

The purpose of the Global Compact is to strengthen international cooperation on migration. There is no question that such cooperation is urgently needed and much overdue. While the international community has made extraordinary progress is regulating other areas of common interest and concern – from trade to terrorism, from finance to use of force – migration has long been sidelined as too difficult.

But times have changed, and there is now widespread agreement that no country can “deal” with migration alone – that working together is the only way to make sure migration works for everyone. The Global Compact process has given every member state of the UN the chance to participate in creating a set of broad operating principles within which future cooperation can be structured and implemented. To stand outside that process, or to abandon it just short of the finishing line, is to deny the stark reality of our interdependence when it comes to migration.

It makes little sense that those countries most worried about irregular migration are the ones questioning the Global Compact. This initiative was born directly out of the European migration crisis of 2015 and related worries around security and criminality. That history is reflected in the final text, which focuses squarely on the factors that compel people to move in the first place; on migrant smuggling; and on human trafficking. Failing to cooperate on these urgent issues effectively means giving up: abandoning hope of any long-term, sustainable solution to irregular, exploitative migration. This would be a universal disaster, but with a particularly vicious impact on wealthy countries of destination.

And those questioning the value of the Global Compact must be reminded that it is about much more than irregular migration. It is also about the need to develop a strong evidence base, so that migration policies everywhere are smarter and better attuned to the needs of both sending and receiving countries. It is about promoting regular migration pathways that benefit everyone. It is about making sure that migrant workers – the backbone of many developed economies, including those of Australia and the United States – are able to move, live and work in safety and dignity.

2. The Global Compact is not a threat to any country’s sovereignty

The US, Hungary and Australia have all asserted the Global Compact for Migration represents a threat to their sovereignty; that it will force them to take actions against their interests; that it will create some kind of unelected authority to sit in judgment above their institutions.

This is not the case. When UN member states meet in Morocco in December to sign off on the Global Compact (and its companion, the Compact on Refugees), they will be signalling two things: first, their assent to its basic principles, and second, an intention to do their best to implement what has been agreed. Development of the Global Compact was only possible because all countries agreed, from the beginning, that it would not impose legal obligations. A core guiding principle of the final text explicitly affirms “the sovereign right of states to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction in accordance with international law”.

Image: UNHCR Global Trends Report

3. The Global Compact is pragmatic and balanced – even on the most difficult issues

The Global Compact addresses some of the thorniest aspects of migration, marking out narrow but important areas of accord.

The issue of return is one example. Subject to certain protections being in place, states are entitled to remove migrants who do not have a legal right to remain in their territory. But without cooperation from the country of origin, repatriation is invariably slow and often hostile. The Global Compact identifies the complementary responsibilities of countries of destination and countries of origin to “facilitate[e] safe and dignified return and readmission, as well as sustainable reintegration”. By doing this, it creates a framework that can be the basis of a genuine partnership. This won’t solve the problem of return and reintegration, but it’s much better than what we have now.

Detention of irregular migrants – a highly charged political issue for many countries – provides another example of small but significant progress. One government has singled out the Global Compact’s provisions on detention as a potential dealbreaker, asserting that they would compel changes in policy, thereby encouraging the operations of criminal smuggling gangs. But these claims do not hold up. First, the Compact cannot force any government to do anything it doesn’t want to do. Second, its provisions on detention are balanced and finely nuanced – as would be expected with more than 190 countries involved in crafting them.

The Global Compact does not reject detention of migrants: rather, it carefully and judiciously recognises that detention should be seen as a measure of last resort and encourages states to work towards non-custodial alternatives. It reminds states of their existing legal obligation to ensure that the human rights of detained migrants are respected and that decisions about detention are made in accordance with the law. It further urges that detention not be used as a tool to punish or deter migrants. It highlights the special vulnerabilities and needs of children in detention. None of this is a threat. Rather it is a decent, achievable goal that all fair-minded countries can work towards without feeling that their security and sovereignty is being trampled upon.

However we may feel about it, migration is our common future. Finally, after too long, the chance to influence the shape and direction of that future is within our grasp. No country deserves to be left out. The modest first step that the Global Compact represents is one that should – that must – be taken together.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

While EU Open Days 2013 discuss the 2020 strategy, Microsoft shares a glimpse of EU 2060

We must help developing countries escape commodity dependence

EU Commission accuses Germany of obstructing growth and the banking union

Social, cultural diversity ‘an enormous richness, not a threat’ Guterres declares calling on investment for a harmonious future

Venezuela migrant crisis begs a ‘coherent, predictable and harmonized’ response: UNHCR

Accountability for atrocities in Myanmar ‘cannot be expected’ within its borders – UN investigator

Backed by UN agency, countries set to take on deadly livestock-killing disease

Internet of Things: a Force for Good or Evil?

How to stop plastic pollution at source

World must avoid a new Cold War, UN chief tells economic forum in Russia

Why the 33,000 staff European Commission did not have a real contingency plan for the refugee crisis?

EU Parliament: A catastrophic crisis management by European leaders

Baku forum to push back against ‘rise of hate’ with strong call for cultural and religious tolerance, says UN official

Margrethe Vestager, EU Commissioner in charge of competition policy, during a recent press conference in Brussels / Berlaymont. (Copyright: EU, 2018 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Jennifer Jacquemart)

EU opens investigation into Qatar Petroleum over potentially restrictive gas contracts

Grexit no longer a threat but how to manage a “tutti frutti” government if not with fear?

More than 3,400 classrooms damaged or destroyed by Cyclone Idai in Mozambique, says UN Children’s Fund

Is it true that the G20 wants to arrest tax evasion of multinationals?

DR Congo: Insecurity and attacks mean Ebola will keep spreading, warns world health agency

Commerce is on the cusp of radical change. Is your organization ready?

Elections in Europe: No risks for the EU, leaders readying to face Trump-Brexit

An economist explains how to value the internet

Main results of EU-Japan summit: Tokyo, 17/07/2018

FROM THE FIELD: Murals help heal wounds of bloody conflict in Guatemala

This is what the world’s CEOs really think of AI

Commissioner sings “Volar-e” but the European driver no “Cantar-e”

Copyright: European Union , 2017; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Frank Molter

EU hits deadlock on the future of glyphosate a month before deadline

UN chief sends condolences to families of Malawi flood victims

Draghi drafts a plan to donate more money to bankers, the era of ‘money for nothin’ is flourishing

Cancer is a growing global threat and prevention is key, UN study shows

6 facts to know about EU alternative investment funds

Wednesday’s Daily Brief: Syrian detainees, Zimbabwe hunger crisis, Kabul attack, Mexico disappearances, new tech to feed the world

UN chief condemns deadly attacks in Afghanistan

Hopes for Palestinian State hit by ‘facts on the ground’ : senior UN official

European Commission reacts to the US restrictions on steel and aluminium affecting the EU

Do the giant banks ‘tell’ Britain to choose a good soft Brexit and ‘remain’ or else…?

The London City-EU connection holds despite of Brexit and the ban of LSE-Deutsche Börse merger

MEPs and EU ministers agree on closing information gaps to enhance security

Want a fairer society? This economist says he has the answer

Future EU farm policy: Agriculture MEPs urge fair funding, no renationalisation

Eritrea sanctions lifted amid growing rapprochement with Ethiopia: Security Council

Big world banks to pay $ 4.95bn for cheating customers; Is it a punishment or a gentle caress?

“We need to use the momentum globally to ensure that corporations pay their fare share of taxation”, EU Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis outlines from the World Economic Forum 2017.

93 million children with disabilities ‘among the most likely to be left behind’: UN rights chief

Education remains an impossible dream for many refugees and migrants

New rules on drivers’ working conditions and fair competition in road transport

Did Draghi ask the Germans to accept a drastic change of austerity policies?

More funding needed to tackle child labour in agriculture says UN, marking World Day

Would you let an AI vote for you?

This crisis cannot be confronted with statistics

Annual UN women activists’ summit opens with focus on services, infrastructure

Who is to pay the dearest price in a global slowdown?

EUREKA @ European Business Summit 2014: Innovation across borders – mobilising national R&D funds for transnational innovation in Europe

These are the world’s most future-proof cities

We can save the Earth. Here’s how

School closures triple in Central and Western Africa as education comes under fire

This Japanese company pays its employees to get a good night’s sleep

5G in Russia: a local and global view on the way forward, in association with The European Sting

Three steps we must take to secure the future of our forests

These are the top countries for travel and tourism in 2019

“We have to do a better job of creating alternatives to violent extremism”, US Secretary of State John Kerry from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s