Trump fines China with $50 billion a year plus some more…

This is how the trade war started. On March 9, 2018 the American President Donald J. Trump signed the Section 232 Proclamations on Steel and Aluminum Imports, imposing extra tariffs of 25% and 10% respectively (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)

The New Yorker President of ‘America first’, Donald Trump, has figured out the cash China has to pay the US every year, in order to continue exporting her products to the largest market of the globe. It’s something like the ‘protection’ cash New York shopkeepers have to pay the gangs in order to get on ‘peacefully’ with their business.

The Washington administration and, more precisely, U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross explained: “It’s not something that’s going to be cataclysmic a 25 percent tariff on $200 billion of goods would only amount to $50bn a year, equal to less than 1 percent of China’s economy”. Ross added “President Donald Trump now feels that it’s potentially time to put more pressure on China to modify their behavior.”

Just…$50bn a year

In detail, the Trump administration is preparing to impose new tariffs on imports of goods from China of a value of $200 billion. Initially, the tariff was expected to be set at 10%, but now the White House has increased it to 25%. The ‘calculation’ of the extortion money is very simple; 25% on $200bn makes $50bn. This is what Trump wants China to pay America every year in order to keep open her US shops/exports. The ‘calculation’ Ross made summing it up to less than 1% of China’s GDP, is similar to the reckoning of the ‘protection’ money New York shopkeepers had or probably still have to pay to Mafia in order to get on with their business. But, let’s get a glimpse of the global picture.

Washington has recently agreed an economic truce with Brussels. On Wednesday 25 July, President Trump and the European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, concluded a trade armistice between the US and the EU. According to the ‘European Sting’, “the two sides agreed to lower or even zero the tariffs and the non-tariff barriers on industrial goods and cars and the European Union agreed to raise her imports of US natural gas….and soybeans”.

The EU finally sides with the US

Indirectly, but very clearly, Juncker also reassured Trump that Europe supports America in her trade conflict with China. The two sides included this reassurance as fourth clause in their joint statement. It seems that the European Union and, most probably, Germany, finally gave in to the American demands, but it’s not clear yet if Paris is to follow Berlin in this direction.

The relevant paragraph of the EU-US joint statement goes: “Fourthly, we agreed today to join forces to protect American and European companies better from unfair global trade practices. We will therefore work closely together with like-minded partners to reform the WTO and to address unfair trading practices, including intellectual property theft, forced technology transfer, industrial subsidies, distortions created by state owned enterprises, and overcapacity”. Almost all the American complaints against China are included in the above text, undersigned by Juncker.

Peaceful Atlantic but the Pacific in flames

Washington then, having secured a trade truce in the Atlantic Ocean, has now concentrated her aggression in the Pacific and, precisely, against China. This emboldened the US administration and so it decided to more than double the tariffs from 10% to 25% on the package of the threatened measures against the Chinese imports.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer explained this unprecedented development. He clarified that Trump increased the tariffs because China ‘dared’ to take retaliatory measures and refused to comply with the US demands. It must be mentioned that the US has already imposed tariffs on Chinese imports of a value of $34bn.

Declaration of a trade war

All these American measures and hostile comments are very indicative of Washington’s belligerent intentions towards China. Add to that the above blatant calculation of the sum which practically constitutes a ‘toll fee’ and you end up with an outright declaration of a trade war. The situation has being dangerously aggravated by the fact that there have not been anymore contacts at a high political level between the two countries for a few weeks now, despite the continuation of talks on official levels.

Who opposes Trump?

At this point, it must be noted that within the US the opposition to this White House aggressive Chinese strategy is not too strong. It is authentically expressed by the largest business lobby of the US, the American Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber stated “Escalating tariffs against China is the wrong approach to address legitimate concerns U.S. businesses have with China’s harmful practices”. Obviously, the Chamber accepts that China follows harmful trade practices and disagrees only with the methods to solve the ‘problem’. On top of that, Trump is ready to spend $12bn more on subsidies to the agricultural sector, to make it up to producers for the losses of the Chinese markets.

China retaliates moderately

This brings us to the retaliation China is undertaking to answer the extra American tariffs. Last Friday, Beijing included the American natural gas and crude oil in the list of potential retaliatory measures, punishing US products of a value of $60bn in total. The levies will be implemented if the US realizes her $200bn package. China is the largest world importer of crude oil and the second largest in natural gas. Already, the Chinese energy companies are diversifying their supply sources to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Russia, Iraq and elsewhere. This will badly hurt the American effort to become the largest energy exporter of the world. Last Saturday, Beijing said that the $60bn list of US imports to be punished is a rather restrained response to the American aggression and blackmail. This is how Beijing characterizes the American action.

In conclusion, Washington, having secured Brussels’ backing, has raised the stakes in its Chinese trade assault. China  seems determined to respond moderately but straight away. The whole thing may escalate and turn a serious trade dispute into an all out geopolitical confrontation, between the first and the second largest economies of the world.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Parliament approves €34m in EU aid to Greece, Poland, Lithuania and Bulgaria

What we know about the Wuhan coronavirus and urgent plans to develop a vaccine

Eurozone: Black economy loves the South

The world’s e-waste is a huge problem. It’s also a golden opportunity

The EU’s trading partners: US, China and the rest

The European Parliament x-rays the troika’s doings

Paris is building the world’s greenest business district. What can other cities learn from it?

Growing a future free of terrorism: UN News special report from Cameroon

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is about to hit the construction industry. Here’s how it can thrive

Algeria must stop arbitrary expulsion of West African migrants in desert: UN migration rights expert

Job automation risks vary widely across different regions within countries

How well you age depends on what you think of old age

18th European Forum on Eco-innovation live from Barcelona: What’s next for eco-labelling?

Mental health: the challenge of society

Investment, not debt, can kick-start an entrepreneurial Europe

World in grip of ‘high impact weather’ as US freezes, Australia sizzles, parts of South America deluged

Climate change is a security threat. We must act now

Smoking VS Vaping: is it a battle?

MEPs and European Youth Forum call on EU to Invest in Youth

EU’s tougher privacy rules: WhatsApp and Facebook set to be soon aligned with telcos

UN experts decry torture of Rakhine men and boys held incommunicado by Myanmar’s military

UN boosts humanitarian appeal to help tackle Zimbabwe’s ‘worst-ever’ hunger crisis

The Eurogroup protects Germany and blames others

Marking international day, UN experts call for urgent action to end racial discrimination, in wake of New Zealand anti-Muslim attack

Air pollution, the ‘silent killer’ that claims seven million lives a year: rights council hears

US pardons for accused war criminals, contrary to international law: UN rights office

The role of students in a migration crisis in Roraima, Brazil

EU approves disbursement of €500 million in Macro-Financial Assistance to Ukraine

Is Erdogan losing game and match within and without Turkey?

This ‘hidden killer’ is responsible for one in five deaths, and you might never have heard of it

Is blockchain overhyped? 5 challenges to getting projects off the ground

Parliament criticises Council’s rejection of money laundering blacklist

The 13th round of TTIP negotiations hits a wall of intense protests and growing concerns

Draghi tells the EU Parliament his relaxed policies are here to stay

This incredibly detailed map of Africa could help aid and development

This is how climate science went mainstream

Backed by UN agency, countries set to take on deadly livestock-killing disease

Refugee crisis update: Commission still in panic while Turkey is to be added in the equation

Cohesion Policy after 2020: preparing the future of EU investments in health

Lithuania finds the ways to maintain its energy security

More answers from Facebook ahead of Parliament hearing today

Here are 10 of Nelson Mandela’s most inspirational quotes

Syrian civilians must be protected amid ISIL executions and airstrikes: Bachelet

For the future of Europe youth remains a priority

Libya’s migrants and refugees with tuberculosis ‘left to die’ in detention centres

How to change the world at Davos

The EU Commission implicates major banks in cartel cases, threatens with devastating fines

Why the ocean holds the key to sustainable development

This plastic-free bag dissolves in water

Take care of your borders and then expand them

UN sees progress in fight against tobacco, warns more action needed to help people quit deadly product

Can collective action cure what’s ailing our food systems?

Collective action now, the only way to meet global challenges, Guterres reaffirms in annual report

Visa liberalisation: Commission reports on fulfilment of visa-free requirements by Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership countries

Siege of Syria’s eastern Ghouta ‘barbaric and medieval’, says UN Commission of Inquiry

Climate adaptation could make the world more peaceful

Food finally features in the climate debate. Now what?

We need greater protection for our oceans. We can’t let politics stand in the way

How to rebuild trust and integrity in South Africa

Sri Lanka PM: This is how I will make my country rich by 2025

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s