Antitrust: Commission imposes binding obligations on Gazprom to enable free flow of gas at competitive prices in Central and Eastern European gas markets

Vestager Gazprom 2018

Commissioner Vestager is addressing the press about the decision of EU to not sanctions GAZPROM. © European Union , 2018 / Source: EC – Audiovisual Service.

This article is brought to you in association with the European Commission.

The European Commission has adopted a decision imposing on Gazprom a set of obligations that address the Commission’s competition concerns and enable the free flow of gas at competitive prices in Central and Eastern European gas markets, to the benefit of European consumers and businesses.

Commissioner in charge of competition policy, Margrethe Vestager, said:

“All companies doing business in Europe have to respect European rules on competition, no matter where they are from. Today’s decision removes obstacles created by Gazprom, which stand in the way of the free flow of gas in Central and Eastern Europe. But more than that – our decision provides a tailor-made rulebook for Gazprom’s future conduct. It obliges Gazprom to take positive steps to further integrate gas markets in the region and to help realise a true internal market for energy in Europe.And it gives Gazprom customers in Central and Eastern Europe an effective tool to make sure the price they pay is competitive. As always, this case is not about the flag of the company – it is about achieving the outcome that best serves European consumers and businesses. And the case doesn’t stop with today’s decision – rather it is the enforcement of the Gazprom obligations that starts today.”

Gazprom is the dominant gas supplier in a number of Central and Eastern European countries. In April 2015, the Commission sent a Statement of Objections to Gazprom. It set out the Commission’s preliminary view that the company breached EU antitrust rules by pursuing an overall strategy to partition gas markets along national borders in eight Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia). This strategy may have enabled Gazprom to charge higher gas prices in five of these Member States (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland).

Today’s Commission decision puts an end to this behaviour by Gazprom. Furthermore, it imposes on Gazprom a detailed set of rules that will significantly change the way Gazprom operates in Central and Eastern European gas markets:

  • No more contractual barriers to the free flow of gas: Gazprom has to remove any restrictions placed on customers to re-sell gas cross-border.
  • Obligation to facilitate gas flows to and from isolated markets: Gazprom will enable gas flows to and from parts of Central and Eastern Europe that are still isolated from other Member States due to the lack of interconnectors, namely the Baltic States and Bulgaria.
  • Structured process to ensure competitive gas prices: Relevant Gazprom customers are given an effective tool to make sure their gas price reflects the price level in competitive Western European gas markets, especially at liquid gas hubs.
  • No leveraging of dominance in gas supply: Gazprom cannot act on any advantages concerning gas infrastructure, which it may have obtained from customers by having leveraged its market position in gas supply.

Combined, these obligations address the Commission’s competition concerns and achieve its objectives of enabling the free flow of gas in Central and Eastern Europe at competitive prices.

Therefore, the Commission has decided to make these obligations (so-called “commitments”) legally binding on Gazprom (under Article 9 of the EU’s antitrust Regulation 1/2003).

If a company breaks any of these obligations, the Commission can impose a fine of up to 10% of the company’s worldwide turnover, without having to prove an infringement of EU antitrust rules.

More generally, effective competition in Central and Eastern European gas markets does not only depend on the enforcement of EU competition rules but also on investment in gas supply diversification, well-targeted European and national energy legislation and their proper implementation. This is why it is a key priority of the Commission to build a European Energy Union.

 

graph EN

 

Details on Gazprom’s obligations

To address the Commission’s competition concerns, Gazprom has to comply with a set of obligations aimed at ensuring the free flow of gas at competitive prices across Central and Eastern Europe. These obligations on Gazprom will be in place for eight years.

They reflect feedback from stakeholders in a market test, which the Commission launched in March 2017 on an earlier version of the proposal. This market test resulted in a significant number of replies from a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, national competition authorities, gas wholesalers, industry associations and academics, which helped to clarify and ensure the effectiveness of the final obligations.

1)   Gazprom has to remove barriers to the free flow of gas in Central and Eastern Europe

The Commission was concerned that Gazprom imposed territorial restrictions in its supply agreements with wholesalers and some industrial customers in all eight Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia). These restrictions include export bans and clauses requiring the purchased gas to be used in a specific territory (destination clauses) and other measures that prevented the cross-border flow of gas.

In response, the Commission decision requires Gazprom to remove all such contractual barriers to the free flow of gas in Central and Eastern European gas markets, regardless of whether they make cross-border sales impossible or merely financially less attractive. Gazprom will also not re-introduce such clauses in the future.

Furthermore, Gazprom has to adapt provisions in its contracts regarding the monitoring and metering of gas in Bulgaria, which have isolated the Bulgarian gas market from neighbouring EU gas markets. This will allow the transfer of control from Gazprom to the Bulgarian operator of the gas transmission infrastructure. Following the market test, Gazprom clarified a number of technical elements to ensure the obligation would be fully effective.

These obligations will remove contractual obstacles created by Gazprom, which stand in the way of the free flow of gas in Central and Eastern Europe.

2)   Gazprom has to take active steps to integrate gas markets in Central and Eastern Europe

For gas to actually flow freely across Central and Eastern Europe, it is also necessary to have infrastructure in place for its transport, namely interconnectors that link national gas markets with each other. Such infrastructure already exists in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. However, infrastructure connecting Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania with neighbouring EU gas markets is not yet sufficiently available. This limits the ability of Gazprom’s customers to re-sell their gas to and from these countries, even if they have spare volumes.

Gazprom will now “replace” the lack of interconnection by giving relevant customers an option to deliver gas to and from these countries. In particular, customers that have bought gas, originally for delivery to Hungary, Poland or Slovakia, can choose to have Gazprom deliver all or part of it to Bulgaria and/or the Baltic States instead (and vice versa):

  • Swaps offered to a wide range of Gazprom customers: Gazprom has to make this option available to relevant customers that have (or will have) gas contracts for the delivery of gas to certain delivery points in Central and Eastern Europe. Following the market test, this will apply to contracts with a duration of at least 18 months. The mechanism would not be workable for shorter contracts, since the minimum duration for gas delivery to a new delivery point is twelve months preceded by a four-month notice period to Gazprom.
  • Swaps available in both directions, to and from isolated markets: Relevant Gazprom customers have the possibility to ask Gazprom to deliver their gas to the Baltics and Bulgaria instead of the originally agreed delivery points (from Poland or Slovakia to the Baltics and from Slovakia or Hungary to Bulgaria). Following the market test, such swaps will be possible in both directions. This will make the mechanism more effective and lead to a better integration of Central and Eastern European gas markets.
  • Fixed and transparent service fees for the delivery: The fees that Gazprom can charge for this service are fixed and transparent. Following the market test, they were significantly reduced to make the mechanism financially attractive.
  • Flexibility for Gazprom’s customers to exercise this option: Following the market test, Gazprom’s customers can exercise these options for smaller quantities of gas (50 million m3) and at shorter notice (four months).
  • Limited grounds for Gazprom to refuse to perform the swap: Following the market test, Gazprom can only refuse to perform the swap if there is no transmission capacity. This will be closely monitored by an independent trustee.

This mechanism enables gas to flow to and from the Baltics and Bulgaria, as if gas interconnectors with EU neighbours existed already. It will allow Gazprom’s customers to seek new business opportunities even before interconnectors become available, to the benefit of consumers and businesses in Bulgaria and the Baltic States.

3)   Gazprom is committed to a structured process to ensure competitive gas prices in Central and Eastern Europe in the future

The Commission was concerned that Gazprom may have been able to charge higher prices in five Member States (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland).

In response, the Commission decision gives Gazprom’s customers with long-term contracts in these countries an effective tool to make sure the gas price they pay in the future is competitive:

  • Customers can demand lower price when their gas price diverges from competitive Western European price benchmarks: Gazprom’s customers will have a contractual right to ask for a lower gas price, if the price they pay diverges from competitive Western benchmarks, including prices at liquid hubs. They can exercise this option at frequent intervals (every two years), with an additional “joker” every five years. Following the market test, existing customers can exercise this right immediately after the Commission decision and Gazprom must offer this right also to new customers.
  • New gas price must be set in line with price level in competitive Continental Western European gas markets: The new price must reflect competitive Continental Western European price benchmarks, including prices at liquid hubs. Following the market test, this guidance was considerably improved to explicitly refer to the price level in competitive Continental Western European gas markets, including prices at the most relevant liquid hubs in Continental Europe, namely TTF in the Netherlands and NCG in Germany. The new lower price will be applied retroactively from the date of the price revision request.
  • Arbitration if Gazprom does not agree within a strict deadline: If Gazprom and its customer do not agree on a new price within 120 days, the dispute can be referred to an arbitrator. The arbitrator will then impose a competitive gas price that takes full account of the above-mentioned Western European benchmarks. Furthermore, arbitration must take place within the EU. Arbitration tribunals in the EU are under an obligation to respect and apply EU competition law. The Commission has the right to intervene in such cases as amicus curiae.

This will ensure competitive gas prices in these regions and avoid that gas prices under the oil-indexed contracts significantly diverge from competitive price benchmarks in the future. The obligation applies to all contracts with a duration of three years or more as the pricing concerns in this case are only relevant for long-term contracts where new developments over time can lead to a significant deviation from competitive benchmarks.

4)   Removing demands obtained by leveraging of market position

Finally, the Commission was concerned that Gazprom leveraged its dominant market position on the gas supply market to obtain advantages with regard to the access to or control of gas infrastructure. The Statement of Objections raised concerns in relation to the South Stream project in Bulgaria and the Yamal pipeline in Poland.

  • As regards South Stream, the decision makes clear that Gazprom will not benefit from advantages that it has obtained. Gazprom will not seek any damages from its Bulgarian partners following the termination of the South Stream project. This is without prejudice to whether such claims would have been valid in the first place.
  • As regards the Yamal Pipeline, the Commission’s investigation has shown that the situation cannot be changed by this antitrust procedure, as gas relations between Russia and Poland are determined by intergovernmental agreements. In any event, a decision by the Polish Energy Regulator in May 2015 did not confirm allegations that Gazprom would have foreclosed the Polish gas market with regard to the Yamal pipeline. The regulator found that the owner of the Yamal pipeline, Europolgaz (which is co-owned by Gazprom), is not able to delay or block investments on the pipeline: all investments, such as those enabling reverse flows from Germany, have been implemented as planned by the certified transmission service operator (Gaz-System).

Finally, to better deal with future intergovernmental agreements, the Commission put forward a legislative proposal to make intergovernmental agreements on gas and oil subject to prior scrutiny by the Commission. This proposal has entered into force in 2017.

More information on today’s decision will be available on the Commission’s competition website in the public case register under the case number AT.39816

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

EU decides “in absentia” of civil society

Safer products: stepping up checks and inspections to protect consumers

Minority governments ‘à la mode’ in Europe but can they last long?

Jade Spring Meeting 2017 – day 2: Coporate workshops, general assembly and magna moment

South Eurozone urgently needs fairer distribution of taxation burden

UN rights office calls for action to end ‘repression and retaliation’ in crisis-torn Nicaragua

Samsung’s profits fall as cheaper smartphones gain market share

EU budget: Commission proposes most ambitious Research and Innovation programme yet

Brussels Vs. Google: The €1 bn EU fine and the US response

Here’s how we get businesses to harmonize on climate change

Neelie Kroes at the European Young Innovators Forum: Unconvention 2014

EU to spend €135.5 billion in 2014 or 6.5% less than this year

EU cracks under the weight of its policy on the Ukraine-Russia nub

Lack of investment and ambition means Youth Guarantee not reaching potential

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

Trade in fake Italian goods costs economy billions of euros

At last a solid base for the European Banking Union

A young doctor from Glasgow reports: in the UK refugees are left to rot

“Airbnb and YouTube are two great examples of a crowd based capitalism”, key stakeholders outline the boundaries of the 4th Industrial Revolution in Davos

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

UN Security Council welcomes results of Mali’s presidential elections

The cost of healthcare is rising in ASEAN. How can nations get the most for their money?

SMEs and micro firms sinking together with south Eurozone

Commission hardens its stance against carmakers ensuring emissions reductions targets

Syrian Refugees in Germany face distinctly different challenges than those in Lebanon

UN chief condemns attack targeting international forces in northern Mali

Access to health in the developped and developing world

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Cities & Regions Launch Major Five-Year Vision to Take Action on Climate Change

Better protection against non-cash payment fraud

A new arrangement between Eurozone’s haves and have-nots

ECB: Reaching the limits of its mandate to revive the Eurozone economy

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Global Business Community Comes to Paris with Solutions for Taking On the Climate Challenge Across the Board

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

Right2Water initiative: Is the Commission ready to listen to citizens?

More answers from Facebook ahead of Parliament hearing today

Happens now in Brussels: Green Week sets the EU and global climate policy agenda

China-EU Summit on 16-17 July 2018: “Work together to address common challenges”, by China’s Ambassador to the EU

EU-wide penalties for money laundering: deal with Council

Digital Single Market: New EU rules for online subscription services

The Parliament paves the way for the creation of the European Banking Union

EU Commission: Banking and energy conglomerates don’t threaten competition!

COP21 Breaking News_10 December: the final sprint of the Final Agreement Negotiations

Commission facilitates the activities of ‘merchants of labour’

EU Budgets: Europe hoping for Xmas gifts

JADE @ European Business Summit 2014: Youth Unemployment – a drive to Entrepreneurship

Sweden well ahead in digital transformation yet has more to do

Girls still being treated as aliens in medicine in the 21st century

Merkel had it her way with the refugees & immigrants but can Greece and Turkey deliver?

China Unlimited: an exclusive interview with the former Ambassador of Hungary to China

What UK and EU risk if Brexit “wins” these elections

The Fourth Industrial Revolution is changing how we grow, buy and choose what we eat

The COP22 is under full deployment while Donald Trump threatens openly to withdraw the US from the Paris agreement

India m2m + iot Forum Hosts Successful 4th Editions of India Smart Cities Forum and India Smart Villages Forum

Road to Brexit: the UK seeks early agreement on Data Privacy with the EU

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

Eurogroup president swallows statement on savings confiscation

EU-Turkey relations: Will Turkey manage to revive the EU accession process talks?

Rohingya cannot become ‘forgotten victims,’ says UN chief urging world to step up support

CHINA: five letters that could mean…

Politics needs to “Youth UP” in order the ensure the future of our democracies

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s