Blockchain is facing a backlash. Can it survive?

United Nations Bitcoing

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017)

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jem Bendell, Founding Director, The Institute for Leadership and Sustainability

Not so long ago, the internet was hailed as the solution to humanity’s ills. It would shine a light on all corners of the globe, bringing new knowledge and exchange. But growing concerns about fake news, surveillance, cybercrime, social media addiction and monopolised power have tarnished that shine. Without ignoring the internet’s positive impact over the past few decades, these difficulties remind us that a technology-driven utopia – or technotopia – is a fiction. People and governance always shape the use and impact of a technology.

Today’s advocates of blockchain and digital currencies describe the potential for more privacy, transparency, accountability, efficiency and competition in all forms of commerce, finance and bureaucracy. Some see blockchain as providing technologies for democracy itself, from elections to budgeting. While some claims seem overblown or premature, there are already some fascinating applications in the fields of logistics, inventory and supply chain management.

Despite these advances, there has been a growing backlash from opinion leaders as the technology’s drawbacks become better known. Perhaps you’ve heard that Bitcoin alone uses 0.25% of the world’s electricity? Other blockchain systems, such as Ethereum, use similar approaches that require computers to burn electricity unnecessarily. Perhaps you are concerned about the number of accidents, hacks and scams possible in this new space, where the law has not yet found its feet? Or you may have heard that crime and terror networks could use these technologies to transfer funds. Blockchains and digital currencies pose important questions to both their advocates and regulators.

Pioneers in the industry are alert to such concerns and have attempted collective self-regulation. The Brooklyn Project, an industry-wide initiative to support investor and consumer protection, was launched in November 2017.

“By acting responsibly today, we can help make sure we are collectively able to reap the benefits of this powerful technology tomorrow,” explained co-founder of Ethereum Joseph Lubin. The following month, a coalition of cryptocurrency organizations and investors representing $650m in market capitalization established Project Transparency. It seeks to protect investors by enabling more disclosure within the digital currency sector.

These initiatives are welcome, but neither address how the technology affects wider society and the environment. If this sector is going to disrupt incumbent organisations (management-speak for people losing their jobs) then the general public will soon ask what the upsides really are.

In recent months, many blockchain projects explicit about their social mission have launched. Bflow.io offers a system for reporting corporate sustainability. Alice.si strives for greater accountability from charities. Provenance.org tracks tuna from shore to plate, giving consumers confidence in sustainability. BitLandGlobal is seeking a step change in land registration by the rural poor. Specialist think-tank Blockchain for Good has been established to promote blockchain’s benefits for worthy causes. Nevertheless, on closer analysis, many of these ‘4good’ projects miss a crucial factor – the impact of their code itself.

Is it appropriate for people apparently seeking economic justice and equal opportunity to use a blockchain in which only heavily invested actors receive new tokens? Is it appropriate for those seeking to put a new medium of exchange in the hands of the masses to use a blockchain whose tokens are mostly hoarded by speculators? Is it appropriate for a carbon emissions reduction project to use a blockchain which emits as much CO2 as a small country?

These are not hypothetical examples. Most blockchain projects bolt a purpose onto code and governance systems that were designed without such public interests in mind. Just as it would not be acceptable to clear the ancient Borneo jungle to raise money for homeless orangutans, it should not be acceptable for a project to deploy socially regressive or climate-toxic code.

Fortunately, there is a new wave of mission-driven blockchain projects conscious about their total social impact. Initiatives like Holochain, Faircoin, Yetta and LocalPay explicitly connect their code base to their social cause. Faircoin uses a codebase that requires little electricity and allows the distribution of coins to socially useful projects. Providing the same smart contract functionality as Ethereum, the new Yetta blockchain is intended to be sustainable by design, with the low energy requirements of its codebase being moderated further by automated rewards for those nodes using renewable energy. It will also enable automated philanthropy to support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Two of the most integral technology projects in this field take a post-blockchain approach. By sharing data and not using a single blockchain, Holochain reduces the energy and time involved, while avoiding being dependent on the decisions of unaccountable groups of computing “miners”, as so many blockchain projects are. Shunning digital tokens entirely, LocalPay runs on code that means its users in more than 300 local communities do not need to purchase or mine a currency to begin transacting. For them, currency is simply a unit that comes into being, for free, when they wish to trade.

These projects aren’t just putting lipstick on clones of existing projects. Their founders went back to the drawing board and created mission-driven roles for coders, entrepreneurs, investors, philanthropists, regulators and policymakers. They designed a technology to fit into an ecosystem, rather than to dominate it. They set up incentive structures for fair contributions and rewards. This generation of “integral blockchain” and digital currency initiatives aligns its codebase and internal governance with positive social and environmental outcomes. These projects strive to be an integral part of a healthy society, rather than ends-in-themselves.

Will blockchain technologies be killed in their infancy by regulators? Will they grow into monsters that consume energy while enabling tax evasion, crime and capital flight? Or could they provide meaningful services to humanity? Greater cross-sectoral dialogue and guidance is needed to help this last scenario emerge.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Pharmaceuticals conceal drug side effects with the EU’s Court blessing

Guterres censures terrorist attacks in Nigeria, pledges UN ‘solidarity’

This fascinating map shows how food moves around the US

Burning Amazon rainforests: Darting towards the doom of Human Race

Laws must protect, ‘not reject’ says UNAIDS chief on Zero Discrimination Day

What we know about the Wuhan coronavirus and urgent plans to develop a vaccine

Why are the Balkans’ political leaders meeting in Geneva this week?

State aid: Commission approves €300 million public support for the development of ultrafast broadband network in Greece

Brexit: Is there anybody supporting a non-violent separation?

Business can be profitable AND drive progress on societal priorities

This tool shows you which cities will flood as ice sheets melt

We must work together to build a new world order. This is how we can do it

Commission supports normalisation in Greece through activation of post-programme framework

Brands can be a force for good and for growth. Here’s how

These are the fastest trains in the world

COVID-19: Commission presents guidelines for border measures to protect health and keep goods and essential services available

No end to Deutsche Bank’s problems: new litigations in the US and frailty in EU stress test

SMEs are driving job growth, but need higher investment in skills, innovation and tech to boost wages and productivity

Darfur: Inter-communal tensions still high despite improved security, Mission head tells Security Council

This is how travel hotspots are fighting back against overtourism

Draghi reveals how failing banks will be dealt, may cut interest rates soon

European Solidarity Corps: Commission opens new call for project proposals

Will GDPR block Blockchain?

The latest technology isn’t enough – you need the business model to go with it

Busting the myths about coronavirus

IMF’s Lagarde: Ukraine must fight corruption

When is necessary understand the cultural marks in health-disease process

Coronavirus update: UN scales back major conference

Coronavirus: Macro-financial assistance agreement provides for €80 million disbursement to North Macedonia

A Sting Exclusive: “Consumer expectations for the 2015 UN summit on climate change”, Director General of BEUC Monique Goyens outlines from Brussels

Ensuring the ‘lungs of the planet’ keep us alive: 5 things you need to know about forests and the UN

Parliament cuts own spending to facilitate agreement on EU budget

8 amazing facts to help you understand China today

Secretary-General repeats call for support to Lake Chad countries after latest Boko Haram attack

Progress made at COP25, despite lack of agreement to increase climate ambition

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

90% of European Jews say antisemitism is getting worse

Code of Practice against disinformation: Commission calls on signatories to intensify their efforts

World-famous cultural institutions closed due to coronavirus are welcoming virtual visitors

In this Tokyo cafe, the waiters are robots operated remotely by people with disabilities

The inhumane face of crisis mirrored in numbers

Ukraine: The West and Russia negotiate shares of influence

Barriers to healthcare: are they real?

Malta and Slovakia: MEPs warn of lack of judicial independence and corruption

After John Lewis: 21 civil rights leaders who are shaping America

Impact Investment needs global standards and better measurement

These Harvard scientists think we’ll have to socially distance until 2022

Croatian Presidency outlines priorities to EP committees

The world is too complacent about epidemics. Here’s how to change

Rise in number of children killed, maimed and recruited in conflict: UN report

Capital Markets Union: Making it easier for insurers to invest in the real economy

Commission reports on the risks of investor citizenship and residence schemes in the EU and outlines steps to address them

Women’s rights face global pushback from conservativism, fundamentalism – UN experts warn

A clean energy future with hydrogen could be closer than we think

EU budget: Will Germany alone manage Britain’s gap?

How technology will transform learning in the COVID-19 era

After COVID-19, we must rethink how we find and produce new drugs

EU-Turkey deal on migrants kicked off but to who’s interest?

A revolution, an ecosystem, an ocean: 5G is just the beginning

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s