Blockchain is facing a backlash. Can it survive?

United Nations Bitcoing

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017)

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jem Bendell, Founding Director, The Institute for Leadership and Sustainability

Not so long ago, the internet was hailed as the solution to humanity’s ills. It would shine a light on all corners of the globe, bringing new knowledge and exchange. But growing concerns about fake news, surveillance, cybercrime, social media addiction and monopolised power have tarnished that shine. Without ignoring the internet’s positive impact over the past few decades, these difficulties remind us that a technology-driven utopia – or technotopia – is a fiction. People and governance always shape the use and impact of a technology.

Today’s advocates of blockchain and digital currencies describe the potential for more privacy, transparency, accountability, efficiency and competition in all forms of commerce, finance and bureaucracy. Some see blockchain as providing technologies for democracy itself, from elections to budgeting. While some claims seem overblown or premature, there are already some fascinating applications in the fields of logistics, inventory and supply chain management.

Despite these advances, there has been a growing backlash from opinion leaders as the technology’s drawbacks become better known. Perhaps you’ve heard that Bitcoin alone uses 0.25% of the world’s electricity? Other blockchain systems, such as Ethereum, use similar approaches that require computers to burn electricity unnecessarily. Perhaps you are concerned about the number of accidents, hacks and scams possible in this new space, where the law has not yet found its feet? Or you may have heard that crime and terror networks could use these technologies to transfer funds. Blockchains and digital currencies pose important questions to both their advocates and regulators.

Pioneers in the industry are alert to such concerns and have attempted collective self-regulation. The Brooklyn Project, an industry-wide initiative to support investor and consumer protection, was launched in November 2017.

“By acting responsibly today, we can help make sure we are collectively able to reap the benefits of this powerful technology tomorrow,” explained co-founder of Ethereum Joseph Lubin. The following month, a coalition of cryptocurrency organizations and investors representing $650m in market capitalization established Project Transparency. It seeks to protect investors by enabling more disclosure within the digital currency sector.

These initiatives are welcome, but neither address how the technology affects wider society and the environment. If this sector is going to disrupt incumbent organisations (management-speak for people losing their jobs) then the general public will soon ask what the upsides really are.

In recent months, many blockchain projects explicit about their social mission have launched. Bflow.io offers a system for reporting corporate sustainability. Alice.si strives for greater accountability from charities. Provenance.org tracks tuna from shore to plate, giving consumers confidence in sustainability. BitLandGlobal is seeking a step change in land registration by the rural poor. Specialist think-tank Blockchain for Good has been established to promote blockchain’s benefits for worthy causes. Nevertheless, on closer analysis, many of these ‘4good’ projects miss a crucial factor – the impact of their code itself.

Is it appropriate for people apparently seeking economic justice and equal opportunity to use a blockchain in which only heavily invested actors receive new tokens? Is it appropriate for those seeking to put a new medium of exchange in the hands of the masses to use a blockchain whose tokens are mostly hoarded by speculators? Is it appropriate for a carbon emissions reduction project to use a blockchain which emits as much CO2 as a small country?

These are not hypothetical examples. Most blockchain projects bolt a purpose onto code and governance systems that were designed without such public interests in mind. Just as it would not be acceptable to clear the ancient Borneo jungle to raise money for homeless orangutans, it should not be acceptable for a project to deploy socially regressive or climate-toxic code.

Fortunately, there is a new wave of mission-driven blockchain projects conscious about their total social impact. Initiatives like Holochain, Faircoin, Yetta and LocalPay explicitly connect their code base to their social cause. Faircoin uses a codebase that requires little electricity and allows the distribution of coins to socially useful projects. Providing the same smart contract functionality as Ethereum, the new Yetta blockchain is intended to be sustainable by design, with the low energy requirements of its codebase being moderated further by automated rewards for those nodes using renewable energy. It will also enable automated philanthropy to support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Two of the most integral technology projects in this field take a post-blockchain approach. By sharing data and not using a single blockchain, Holochain reduces the energy and time involved, while avoiding being dependent on the decisions of unaccountable groups of computing “miners”, as so many blockchain projects are. Shunning digital tokens entirely, LocalPay runs on code that means its users in more than 300 local communities do not need to purchase or mine a currency to begin transacting. For them, currency is simply a unit that comes into being, for free, when they wish to trade.

These projects aren’t just putting lipstick on clones of existing projects. Their founders went back to the drawing board and created mission-driven roles for coders, entrepreneurs, investors, philanthropists, regulators and policymakers. They designed a technology to fit into an ecosystem, rather than to dominate it. They set up incentive structures for fair contributions and rewards. This generation of “integral blockchain” and digital currency initiatives aligns its codebase and internal governance with positive social and environmental outcomes. These projects strive to be an integral part of a healthy society, rather than ends-in-themselves.

Will blockchain technologies be killed in their infancy by regulators? Will they grow into monsters that consume energy while enabling tax evasion, crime and capital flight? Or could they provide meaningful services to humanity? Greater cross-sectoral dialogue and guidance is needed to help this last scenario emerge.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

UN chief welcomes ‘first concrete step’ in normalizing Eritrea-Ethiopia relationship

European Business Summit 2014 : The Sting Report, Day II – Business, Politics and EBS 2015

Climate change will never be combatted by EU alone while some G20 countries keep procrastinating

Amid strong outlook for U.S. economy, risks abound

EU to manage external borders against the will of member states; Greece to be the first target

Does research make sense any more? The dire need for new ways to measure success

Syria: WHO appeals for funding to sustain critical health care for millions trapped by conflict

UN rights experts call on Russia to release Ukrainian film-maker whose life is in ‘imminent danger’

Financing the 2030 Agenda: What is it and why is it important?

Historical success for the First ever European Presidential Debate

The mental health of health professionals: is it worth it?

Central Africa: Security Council concerned by ‘grave security situation’, calls for better agency cooperation

EU Commission expects consumer spending to unlock growth

5 ocean success stories to chase away the blues

New York high school students are getting free water bottles to cut plastic waste

Here’s how to find a job you really love

ECB’s new money bonanza handed out to help the real economy or create new bubbles?

Greenpeace’s saints and sinners in the tech world

The West – the EU and the US – is writing off Turkey’s Erdogan

ECB to buy corporate bonds: Will government financing be the next step?

Humanitarian Aid 2016: The needs, the highlights, the crisis and the relief

How ducks are helping Bangladeshi farmers cope with cyclones

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Unprecedented Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction to Combat Climate Change

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

What the buoyant US economy means for the rest of the world

MWC 2016 LIVE: Industry looks to reduce mobile gender gap

MWC 2016 LIVE: T-Mobile US reveals 5G trial plans

The EU Parliament sidesteps the real issues about banks, while the US target the Eurozone lenders

European Junior Enterprises to address the significant skills mismatch in the EU between school and employment

Climate change update: consistent global actions urgently needed as we are running out of time

WHO study reveals ‘game-changer’ drug with potential to save thousands of women’s lives in childbirth

‘Habitual residence’ rules deprive EU workers from social benefits

Sanctions on Russia to be the biggest unity test at this European Council

EU Telecoms deal: Fees on calls across the EU capped and 5G network by 2020

Senior UN adviser sees ‘rare’ victory for humanitarian diplomacy as aid convoy reaches desert camp in Syria

The US + Britain trivialize mainland Europe, NATO and the EU

Global Citizen-Volunteer Internships

India m2m + iot Forum Hosts Successful 4th Editions of India Smart Cities Forum and India Smart Villages Forum

A strong European Union is a united European Union

UN forum spotlights cities, where struggle for sustainability ‘will be won or lost’

Give a chance to the brothers of Ailan: reception of refugees in Greece

168 hours left for MEPs – ECOFIN Council to deliver a Banking Union


Re-thinking citizenship education: bringing young people back to the ballot box

‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ clean-up project launches trial run: UN Environment

Will the Greek economy ever come back to growth?

A Sting Exclusive: EU Commissioner Mimica looks at how the private sector can better deliver for international development

Nigeria: UN chief ‘appalled’ by killing of aid worker; calls for release of remaining hostages

Four ways Artificial Intelligence can make healthcare more efficient and affordable

More than just a phone: mobile’s impact on sustainable development

Hungary: people born in the 2020s won’t have legal rights any more to buy tobacco

Energy: new target of 32% from renewables by 2030 agreed by MEPs and ministers

The European Sting writes down the history LIVE from G20 Leaders’ Summit in Turkey

Menu for change: why we have to go towards a Common Food Policy

Does Draghi have another ace up his sleeve given his Quantitative Easing failure?

Brain Drain remains a crucial and unresolved issue

Creating shared value: an opportunity and challenge for entrepreneurship

ECB to people: Not responsible if you lose money on Bitcoin, your governments are

EU Commission indifferent on Court of Auditors’ recommendations

German banks suffer of nausea amidst rough seas

Main results of Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) – 18-19/10/2018

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s