Blockchain is facing a backlash. Can it survive?

United Nations Bitcoing

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017)

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jem Bendell, Founding Director, The Institute for Leadership and Sustainability

Not so long ago, the internet was hailed as the solution to humanity’s ills. It would shine a light on all corners of the globe, bringing new knowledge and exchange. But growing concerns about fake news, surveillance, cybercrime, social media addiction and monopolised power have tarnished that shine. Without ignoring the internet’s positive impact over the past few decades, these difficulties remind us that a technology-driven utopia – or technotopia – is a fiction. People and governance always shape the use and impact of a technology.

Today’s advocates of blockchain and digital currencies describe the potential for more privacy, transparency, accountability, efficiency and competition in all forms of commerce, finance and bureaucracy. Some see blockchain as providing technologies for democracy itself, from elections to budgeting. While some claims seem overblown or premature, there are already some fascinating applications in the fields of logistics, inventory and supply chain management.

Despite these advances, there has been a growing backlash from opinion leaders as the technology’s drawbacks become better known. Perhaps you’ve heard that Bitcoin alone uses 0.25% of the world’s electricity? Other blockchain systems, such as Ethereum, use similar approaches that require computers to burn electricity unnecessarily. Perhaps you are concerned about the number of accidents, hacks and scams possible in this new space, where the law has not yet found its feet? Or you may have heard that crime and terror networks could use these technologies to transfer funds. Blockchains and digital currencies pose important questions to both their advocates and regulators.

Pioneers in the industry are alert to such concerns and have attempted collective self-regulation. The Brooklyn Project, an industry-wide initiative to support investor and consumer protection, was launched in November 2017.

“By acting responsibly today, we can help make sure we are collectively able to reap the benefits of this powerful technology tomorrow,” explained co-founder of Ethereum Joseph Lubin. The following month, a coalition of cryptocurrency organizations and investors representing $650m in market capitalization established Project Transparency. It seeks to protect investors by enabling more disclosure within the digital currency sector.

These initiatives are welcome, but neither address how the technology affects wider society and the environment. If this sector is going to disrupt incumbent organisations (management-speak for people losing their jobs) then the general public will soon ask what the upsides really are.

In recent months, many blockchain projects explicit about their social mission have launched. Bflow.io offers a system for reporting corporate sustainability. Alice.si strives for greater accountability from charities. Provenance.org tracks tuna from shore to plate, giving consumers confidence in sustainability. BitLandGlobal is seeking a step change in land registration by the rural poor. Specialist think-tank Blockchain for Good has been established to promote blockchain’s benefits for worthy causes. Nevertheless, on closer analysis, many of these ‘4good’ projects miss a crucial factor – the impact of their code itself.

Is it appropriate for people apparently seeking economic justice and equal opportunity to use a blockchain in which only heavily invested actors receive new tokens? Is it appropriate for those seeking to put a new medium of exchange in the hands of the masses to use a blockchain whose tokens are mostly hoarded by speculators? Is it appropriate for a carbon emissions reduction project to use a blockchain which emits as much CO2 as a small country?

These are not hypothetical examples. Most blockchain projects bolt a purpose onto code and governance systems that were designed without such public interests in mind. Just as it would not be acceptable to clear the ancient Borneo jungle to raise money for homeless orangutans, it should not be acceptable for a project to deploy socially regressive or climate-toxic code.

Fortunately, there is a new wave of mission-driven blockchain projects conscious about their total social impact. Initiatives like Holochain, Faircoin, Yetta and LocalPay explicitly connect their code base to their social cause. Faircoin uses a codebase that requires little electricity and allows the distribution of coins to socially useful projects. Providing the same smart contract functionality as Ethereum, the new Yetta blockchain is intended to be sustainable by design, with the low energy requirements of its codebase being moderated further by automated rewards for those nodes using renewable energy. It will also enable automated philanthropy to support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Two of the most integral technology projects in this field take a post-blockchain approach. By sharing data and not using a single blockchain, Holochain reduces the energy and time involved, while avoiding being dependent on the decisions of unaccountable groups of computing “miners”, as so many blockchain projects are. Shunning digital tokens entirely, LocalPay runs on code that means its users in more than 300 local communities do not need to purchase or mine a currency to begin transacting. For them, currency is simply a unit that comes into being, for free, when they wish to trade.

These projects aren’t just putting lipstick on clones of existing projects. Their founders went back to the drawing board and created mission-driven roles for coders, entrepreneurs, investors, philanthropists, regulators and policymakers. They designed a technology to fit into an ecosystem, rather than to dominate it. They set up incentive structures for fair contributions and rewards. This generation of “integral blockchain” and digital currency initiatives aligns its codebase and internal governance with positive social and environmental outcomes. These projects strive to be an integral part of a healthy society, rather than ends-in-themselves.

Will blockchain technologies be killed in their infancy by regulators? Will they grow into monsters that consume energy while enabling tax evasion, crime and capital flight? Or could they provide meaningful services to humanity? Greater cross-sectoral dialogue and guidance is needed to help this last scenario emerge.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Europe, US and Russia haggle over Ukraine’s convulsing body; Russians and Americans press on for an all out civil war

The JADE Spring Meeting is about to begin

Stability in Europe has no chances because of Ukraine

Britain in and out of the EU

Assault on key Yemeni port would endanger 300,000 children and ‘choke off’ aid for millions more: UNICEF chief

GSMA Mobile 360 Series – Europe – 14 June 2016

The EU learns about fishing and banking from tiny Iceland

Yanis Varoufakis in a Sting Exclusive: “Unsustainable debt turns the creditor into Leviathan; Life under it is becoming nasty, brutish and short”

Belgium: Youth Forum takes legal step to ban unpaid internships

Will Brexit shatter the EU or is it still too early to predict?

It’s EU vs. Google for real: the time is now, the case is open

China’s impact as a global investor; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

EU’s new environmental policy on biofuels impacts both the environment and the European citizen

EU’s Finance Ministers draft plan to raise tax bills of online giants like Google and Amazon

EU revengefully shows no mercy to Cameron by demanding a fast and sloppy Brexit now

Here are three technology trends changing the way you travel

FROM THE FIELD: Finding refuge in the ‘beautiful game’

If Macron defies Britain about the banks, Paris and London to clash over ‘La Manche’

A day in the life of a refugee: We should be someone who helps

“C’est la vie”? French recession and unemployment to linger in Eurozone

Draghi indirectly accuses Germany of using double standards in financial issues

Business uncertainty rises as US grants only temporary exception to EU for steel and aluminium tariffs

The European Sting at the Retail Forum for Sustainability live from Barcelona

Regional policies slowed down by EU bureaucracy

Youth unemployment: think out of the box

Why growth is now a one way road for Eurozone

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

EU unfolds strategy on the Egypt question

Climate change and health: an everyday solution

We have to learn to trust Artificial Intelligence. Here’s how

EU-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement sees the light as Moscow’s reaction once more looms

Eurozone to enter the winter…

Negative inflation hits Eurozone, ECB to print and distribute one trillion euro earlier than expected

Will Europe be able to deal with the migration crisis alone if Turkey quits the pact?

Trump: Hostile to Europe, voids Tillerson’s “ironclad” ally pledge

Deutsche Bank slammed by the US-based trio of IMF, Fed and Moody’s

The Commission tells Berlin it is legally obliged to help Eurozone out of stagnation

Guinea President Alpha Condé: “We must tackle the root causes of migration”

EU leaders agree on 2030 Climate and Energy Package: is “flexible” brave enough?

Access to healthcare: what do we lack?

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union will impact young people’s future the most

European banking stress tests 2014: A more adverse approach for a shorter banking sector

“We have to do a better job of creating alternatives to violent extremism”, US Secretary of State John Kerry from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

How young entrepreneurs should be supported: what assistance should governments provide?

The EU Parliament endorses tax on financial transactions

The Parliament sets the way for the European Banking Union

This is the state of the world’s health, in numbers

Heat-resistant crops, ‘green’ infrastructure, can prepare Near East and North Africa to better tackle droughts – UN agency

Trump ‘used’ G20 to side with Putin and split climate and trade packs

Migration crisis update: The “Habsburg Empire” comes back to life while EU loses control

A young European voice on Grexit: too high a bill and too big a deal!

EU cracks under the weight of its policy on the Ukraine-Russia nub

Eurozone: Bankers-politicians rig keeps robbing taxpayers

Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

EU countries invested €5 trillion abroad

Far from a healthy Health Workforce: lack of workforce planning leaves our citizens without access to proper care

The big five EU telecom operators in dire straights

The IMF sees Brexit’s ‘substantial impact’ while the world’s economy holds its breath

Minsk “ceasefire” leaves more doubts than safety, with EU already planning steps further

Rise in violent conflict shows prevention ‘more necessary than ever’: UN chief

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s