The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Trade deals’ pure realism: it may take 10 years for a post-Brexit agreement

Threat to biodiversity risks a flood of economic ruin

Assassinations in Ethiopia amidst regional ‘coup’ attempt, condemned by UN chief

Mixed news about the Eurozone economy

Parliament compromises on Banking Union but sends market abusers to jail

Deutsche Bank chased away from US, threatened with more fines

Consumer product quality: MEPs take aim at dual standards

Finance for SMEs: Alternative supply mechanisms do exist

COVID-19: More new virus cases outside China than in, ‘no time for complacency’, says UN health agency

Eurozone slowly but surely builds its Banking Union

Globally, youth are the largest poverty-stricken group, says new UN report

‘Two pack’ austerity package in force but with less vigor

Civil society groups matter for Cambodia’s sustainable development: UN expert

China is a renewable energy champion. But it’s time for a new approach

Six children among 53 confirmed fatalities after Libya detention centre airstrikes: Security Council condemns attack

EU and China in search of a win-win agreement through strategic cooperation ahead of the EU-China summit

EU tourism industry expects a new record year in 2014

Consumer protection: Commission welcomes political agreement by Council on the Representative Actions Directive

5 ways the world is rallying around Australia as bushfires rage

EU and Mercosur reach agreement on trade

More solidarity and interaction between generations needed to challenge age stereotypes and ingrained ageism

Family businesses are the lifeblood of the Middle East. How do we ensure they survive?

The EU’s outermost regions: strengthened partnership bears fruit

5 facts to know about Africa’s powerhouse – Nigeria

European Business Summit 2014: The role of youth entrepreneurship education in EU’s Strategy for Competitiveness

Concerned over Haiti’s political crisis, Guterres promises ‘continuous commitment’

How fixing broken food systems can help us meet all the SDGs

International Women’s Day 2019: women’s power in politics

Disaster Medicine in Medical Education: the investment you just can´t afford to ignore

Not faith, ‘but those who manipulate the faithful’ driving wedge between religions, UN-backed forum in Baku told

How bad could British healthcare get for its citizens abroad post-Brexit?

Outgoing UN official praises Iraq’s ‘exemplary peaceful transfer of power’ at the top

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

Privatization and public health: a question of Human Rights

10 cities are predicted to gain megacity status by 2030

Idlib deal could save three million ‘from catastrophe’ says UN chief, as militants are urged to lay down arms

First-ever EU defence industry fund to finance joint development of capabilities

COP25 climate talks: What just happened, and what lies ahead?

More funds needed to counter ‘persistent and multi-faceted humanitarian problems’ in Ethiopia

Parental leave: why we can’t wait a century for equal rights for women

Universal Health Coverage will ‘drive progress’ on 2030 Development Agenda

Where is Egypt leading the Middle East and the Mediterranean economy?

Trade surplus up production down in Eurozone

Realise the beauty of unity in diversity

Terrorism diverts resources from ‘much-needed’ development to ‘costly’ security, warns UN envoy for Central Africa

5 things to know about the Western Balkans

Reforms in the Western Balkans and Turkey: annual assessments and recommendations

JADE Generations Club: Connecting perspectives, changing Europe.

Theresa May’s global Britain against Philip Hammond’s Brexit fog

Venezuela: Parliament calls for urgent EU help for people fleeing the country

“None of our member states has the dimension to compete with China and the US, not even Germany!”, Head of EUREKA Pedro Nunes on another Sting Exclusive

Intensified Al Qaeda and ISIL activity in Yemen ‘deeply worrying’, says UN Human Rights Office

Australia’s bushfires have pumped out half a year’s CO2 emissions

Further reforms will promote a stronger and more inclusive Hungarian economy

Here are five things to know about the future of being human

How to accelerate digital literacy in the enterprise world

External action: more funds for human rights, development and climate change

Libya: UN report urges accountability for deadly attack against migrant centre

Scotland “shows the way” to separatist movements as Catalonia calls a vote on independence

UN, global health agencies sound alarm on drug-resistant infections; new recommendations to reduce ‘staggering number’ of future deaths

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s