The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Nitrate pollution of water sources: new impulses for EU Water Policy?

The ECB again takes care of the bankers not the people

Draghi joined Macron in telling Germany how Eurozone must be reformed

Cyprus banks under scrutiny

Does the world have strong enough institutions to handle risks like Trump and Brexit?

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

What does the future of energy look like, how do we get there, and who will benefit?

Trump’s trade wars: Aiming at long term gains for America

Local innovation, international impact: SMEs and the ITU Telecom World Awards

Civil society organisations disenchanted with “Youth Guarantee”

230 Junior Entrepreneurs and over 70 guests attended the International Congress on “Entrepreneurial Skills for Youth”

Russia to cut gas supplies again: can the EU get back to growth without a solid energy market?

Medical students as the critical link to address climate change

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

“Beating pollution for our planet”, a Sting Exclusive by Mr Erik Solheim, the Executive Director of the United Nations Environment

EU finally agrees on target for 40% greenhouse emission cuts ahead of Paris climate talks

European Youth calls on European Council for urgent action on “humanitarian crisis” and questions the EU/Turkey deal respect of human rights

Berlin favours economic and social disintegration in certain Eurozone countries

Europe moulds global defense and security chart given US new inward vision

Trump ‘used’ G20 to side with Putin and split climate and trade packs

A Sting Exclusive: “Leading by example! EU must push for UN deal to avoid dangerous climate change”, European Parliament Vice-President Ulrike Lunacek cries out from Brussels

Biggest London City Banks ready to move core European operations to Frankfurt or Dublin?

Politics needs to “Youth UP” in order the ensure the future of our democracies

Brexit uncertainty keeps shaking the world’s financial markets

EU Commission: Once in every 20 beef meals you eat…horse probably with drugs in it

The EU moulds a new compromise for growth and financial sustainability

The IMF overstates the risks for Eurozone and downgrades the threats for the US economy

The International Federation of Medical Students’ Associations (IFMSA) on the arrest of Turkish Medical Association leaders

Egypt: The road to hell paved with western advices for democracy

Interview with ourselves: the mental health of health professionals

ECB readies itself for extraordinary monetary measures defying Germany

ECB with an iron hand disciplines the smaller Eurozone member states; latest victim: Greece

Is poverty and exclusion the necessary price for EU’s recovery?

Trump’s pounding of Iran less harsh than expected, leaves arrangement open

Parliament to ask for the suspension of EU-US deal on bank data

European Youth Capital 2018 : Cascais

Human rights in Brussels and in Beijing: a more balanced approach needed

The JADE Spring Meeting is about to begin

At the edge of humanity: refugee healthcare in Greece and the EU

Climate Change Revolution: by-laws for the world

The strong version of the EU banking union gains momentum

A Sting Exclusive: “One year on from the VW scandal and EU consumers are still in the dark”, BEUC’s Head highlights from Brussels

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union will impact young people’s future the most

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

Two major EU projects falter; the Schengen Agreement now freezes and Eurozone fails to resolve the Greek enigma

Can Europe and the US reverse their nationalist and xenophobic drift? Is the West becoming belligerent?

What happens when the Eurogroup decides to help Greece

Happens now in Brussels: Green Week sets the EU and global climate policy agenda

EU Commission: The banks are not obliged to finance the real economy

Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

The hostilities in south and eastern Ukraine resume; where could they lead?

Climate change update: will the UN member states regain momentum despite the little progress at COP23?

Commission tries to solidify the EU statistical system

Catalan Pro-Independence vote: how many hits can Brussels sustain at the same time?

Inflation not a problem for Europe

Chinese “BeiDou” GPS goes to market

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

The world is a book and those who do not travel read only one page

Brexiteer May gets lip-service from Trump and Turkish promises from Erdogan

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s