The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU funds must reach media and creative sector, say MEPs

4 ways the circular economy can help heavy industry reduce emissions

Inclusion and diversity isn’t just good for employees – it’s good for the bottom line

Hunger and obesity in Latin America and the Caribbean compounded by inequality: UN report

Drugs cost too much. There is a better way to fund medical innovation

MWC 2016 Live: Roshan CEO opens up on Afghanistan challenges

Will Merkel ever steer the EU migration Titanic and restore her power in Germany?

Northern Ireland: Parliament wants to secure post-Brexit regional funding

Thailand gave healthcare to its entire population and the results were dramatic

European Commission adopts new list of third countries with weak anti-money laundering and terrorist financing regimes

Young people struggling in digital world, finds latest OECD PISA survey

Botswana has decriminalized gay sex. But, it’s still illegal in 70 countries

Cultural leaders envision a post-COVID world

State aid: Commission approves €50 million Italian support scheme for production and supply of medical equipment and masks during Coronavirus outbreak

Britain’s May won the first round on the Brexit agreement with the EU

Pandemics are here to stay. Here’s how to prepare for the next one

Anti-vaccination scaremongering: What should we know about anti-vaccine argument?

How personalized care can tackle the late-life loneliness epidemic

GSMA Announces New Keynote Speakers, Event Updates for 2019 “MWC Los Angeles, in Partnership with CTIA”

FROM THE FIELD: New sensors protect vulnerable Malawians against deadly lightning

Unequal burden: how the COVID-19 pandemic is adding to women’s workloads

“What a Wonderful World”: the unsettled relationship between Climate Change and Human Health

Robots, Artificial intelligence and Dentistry

Can the Tokyo Olympics help bring the world together?

Impacts of COVID-19: lessons and strategies for the future

Ebola in DR Congo: New transmission chain risks reversing major gains

Cocaine and opium production worldwide hit ‘absolute record highs’ – major threat to public health says UN study

Mental Health: In Times of COVID-19

The unpleasant truth of plastic straws

‘Jerusalem is not for sale’ Palestinian President Abbas tells world leaders at UN Assembly

Breaking news on European Youth Employment: European Youth Forum Guide tackles poor quality internships!

European Border and Coast Guard: Council adopts revised regulation

UN chief appeals for calm as Mali presidential election draws to a close

Fairer, simpler, more flexible EU farm policy: MEPs vote on post-2020 reform

This app uses augmented reality to rewrite ‘herstory’

‘We need to do more’ to transform the world, deputy UN chief tells African audiences

Bayer’s cross at night (Copyright: Bayer AG)

The EU clears Bayer-Monsanto merger amid wide competition and environmental concerns

Long-term EU budget: It is not possible to do more with less, say MEPs

How TV has brought mental health issues into the light – and helped to banish stigma

Trade Committee advocates lower tariffs in Western Sahara

UN chief welcomes South Sudan’s Unity government, lauds parties for ‘significant achievement’

1 in 4 Africans had to pay a bribe to access public services last year

EU Trust Fund for Africa: Can it be beneficial for Italy and tackle the migration crisis in the Mediterranean?

One-third of young people still optimistic despite COVID’s dramatic hit on education and jobs

Earth already has a perfect recycling system. So why not use it?

Financing fossil fuels risks a repeat of the 2008 crash. Here’s why

Here’s why the tech sector could be the next target for Chinese investment in Africa

Asia-Pacific showing ‘decisive leadership’ on road to 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, deputy UN chief tells key forum

Future EU-UK Partnership: European Commission receives mandate to begin negotiations with the UK

‘Stronger’ effort must be made to cement peace deal for South Sudanese women and girls: UN Women chief

Why sustainable packaging is good for profits as well as the planet

Polish de facto ban on abortion puts women’s lives at risk, says Parliament

2018 Sakharov laureate Oleg Sentsov receives his award

Science leads the response to COVID-19. These 25 scientists are tackling the other global challenges

Khashoggi murder trials must public and meet international standards, UN expert urges

Cybersecurity should be a source of hope, not fear. Here are 5 reasons why

Use “blockchain” model to cut small firms’ costs and empower citizens, urge MEPs

UN chief welcomes resolution to 27-year-old disagreement over renaming the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Africa-Europe Alliance: two new financial guarantees under the EU External Investment Plan

We need a global convention to end workplace sexual harassment

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s