The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How we can win the war against antibiotic resistance

Record-breaking heatwaves killed about 1,500 people in France

UN chief condemns air strike that hit school bus in northern Yemen, killing scores of children

Charges against Baha’i in Yemen must be dropped: UN experts urge release of detainees

Better outreach to citizens needed to improve effectiveness of European Commission’s public consultations, say Auditors

This South African lawyer is reading while running marathons – for book donations

Intervene, don’t overthink – the new mantra of systems design

How storytelling can be a force for social change

Brexit talks started with a London handicap and Brussels’ sternness

Why the 33,000 staff European Commission did not have a real contingency plan for the refugee crisis?

MEPs call for EU rules to better protect minorities’ rights

The EU learns about fishing and banking from tiny Iceland

Tougher defence tools against unfair imports to protect EU jobs and industry

Iceland’s slowdown underlines the need to fix structural issues

The COP22 is under full deployment while Donald Trump threatens openly to withdraw the US from the Paris agreement

Britain aligns with EU rivaling US on trade and Iran, abandons bilateral ‘Midsummer Night’s Dream’

The EU Parliament blasts the Council about the tax dealings of the wealthy

Parliaments broadly agree on next steps for economic, monetary union

One million facing food shortages, nutrition crisis after Mozambique cyclones: UNICEF

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

UN chief ‘alarmed’ by violations of UN-backed ceasefire in Libya

Millions denied citizenship due to ideas of national, ethnic or racial ‘purity’: UN rights expert

Why press freedom should be at the top of everyone’s agenda

ECB money bonanza not enough to revive euro area, Germany longs to rule with stagnation

Erasmus+: an expected budget of €3 billion to be invested in young Europeans and to help create European Universities in 2019

Court of Auditors: EU spending infested with errors well above the materiality threshold of 2%

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

A Sting Exclusive: “Regulators and the shipping industry collaborating for a sustainable future”, written by the Secretary General of IMO

Nicaragua ‘crisis’ still cause for concern amid murder, torture allegations: Bachelet

Tax evasion and fraud threaten the European project

Meet Cipta: the comic book hero using her powers to tackle bullying in schools

The Ecofin deceives the SMEs with the EIB €10bn capital increase

What does a good digital ID look like?

“The markets have moved on renewables, policy makers must keep up”, A Sting Exclusive by Erik Solheim, Head of UN Environment

Future of Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh ‘hangs in the balance’ – UNHCR chief

How can batteries become more sustainable? This young scientist might have the answer

G20 LIVE: “Our response needs to be robust…otherwise we will only find the fire we are trying to put out”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon just lit up G20 in Antalya Turkey

The Future of Retail: Changing shopping patterns will mean retailers need to invest in costly and complex solutions

EU and New Zealand launch trade negotiations

Lagarde’s metamorphoses, not a laughing matter

The ‘abuse of food relief in Yemen’ must end now

We know ethics should inform AI. But which ethics?

China greenlights first underwater high-speed railway

EU Youth Conference concludes in Luxembourg with concrete plans on how to create real youth participation

EU Parliament shows its teeth in view of 2014 elections

How to stop data leaks

2019 Innovation Scoreboards: The innovation performance of the EU and its regions is increasing

Youth platforms call on German Government to break down legal barriers for young volunteers and pupils

Economic growth ‘exceeds expectations’ but trade tensions are rising: UN report

Now’s the time to take up cycling – here are 6 reasons why

Much more than a ‘lifeline’ for millions of households, remittances can spur global growth, says UN agency

‘Ticking bomb’ health warning over deteriorating conditions facing Cyclone Idai victims

Rapid action needed for people to meet challenges of changing world of work

UN agency chiefs condemn Saudi-coalition led air strike that killed dozens in western Yemen

UN General Assembly President defends ‘landmark’ migration compact

Antibiotics are contaminating the world’s rivers

How young entrepreneurs should be supported: what assistance should governments provide?

Around 23 million boys have married before reaching 15; ‘we can end this violation’ says UNICEF chief

A dangerously hot climate, simmering political tensions: ‘This is not the summer of our youth,’ UN chief warns

Yemen ceasefire deal: ‘Potential’ now to restore humanitarian lifeline to millions

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s