The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

104 countries have laws that prevent women from working in some jobs

Conflicts and extreme climate change threatens access to food in 39 countries – UN agriculture report

Changing for the change: Medicine in Industry 4.0

EU unveils plan to accelerate Capital Markets Union ahead of London’s departure from the bloc

Here are 6 big ideas to help the environment

After Brexit and Grexit, Brussels to deal with Poloust

Brexit uncertainty keeps shaking the world’s financial markets

Look Mom, even the House of Lords says the #righttobeforgotten is not right

UN chief ‘alarmed’ by violations of UN-backed ceasefire in Libya

ILO: Progress on gender equality at work remains inadequate

Will Eurozone be able to repay its debts? Is a bubble forming there?

An entrepreneurial point-of view on tackling the migration crisis and the risks of abolishing Schengen

This Syrian national has been trapped at Kuala Lumpur airport for 3 months

How women are transforming the Arab world’s start-up scene

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

Elections in Britain may reserve a surprise for May’s Tories

How the United States can win back its manufacturing mojo

How can consumers be effectively protected from insurance sellers?

The Indian case: health policies need to keep pace with public health literacy

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

A renewed agenda for Research and Innovation: Europe’s chance to shape the future

Women in Iceland have walked out of work to dispute the gender pay gap

MEPs propose measures to combat mobbing and sexual harassment

No barriers to free flow of non-personal data in the EU

Has the treacherous theory about the ‘French patient’ finally prevailed?

The completion of the European Banking Union attracts billions of new capital for Eurozone banks

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

Youth employment crisis easing but far from over

On Kristallnacht anniversary, UN chief urges renewed fight against ‘crime’ of anti-Semitism

New York and London mayors call on cities to divest from fossil fuels

VW emissions scandal: EU unable to protect its consumers against large multinationals

Trump’s trade war splits the EU; Germany upset with Juncker’s “we can be stupid too”

Community Manager – 1289

Oleg Sentsov awarded the 2018 Sakharov Prize

The European Parliament double-checks the EU 2014-2020 budget

Nagasaki is ‘a global inspiration’ for peace, UN chief says marking 73rd anniversary of atomic bombing

On youth unemployment: unemployment is even bleaker for youth with disabilities

Sponsored content: when QUALITY meets OPEX in manufacturing

4 things to know about the state of conflict today

Skeptic France about Trump-Juncker trade deal favoring German cars; EU’s unity in peril

Your smartphone may know more about your mental health than you

In the future of work it’s jobs, not people, that will become redundant

European Accessibility Act: Parliament and Council negotiators strike a deal

Switzerland to introduce strict restrictions on executive pay

European Parliament and Eurovision sign partnership for European Elections

Austerity lovers to put a break on Renzi’s growth vision for Europe? the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Draghi: printing a full extra trillion non negotiable to help all borrow cheaply

Is the EU denying its social character favouring a banking conglomerate?

UN chief welcomes event reuniting families on the Korean Peninsula

This is how AI can help you make sense of the world

EU Commission expects consumer spending to unlock growth

This is why Dutch teenagers are among the happiest in the world

Draghi left alone with no hope of boosting EU growth as Merkel just focuses on next elections

EU and China seize momentum to enhance trade agreements in response to Trump’s administration

TTIP update: postponed vote and INTA meeting shuffle cards again

Chinese economy to raise speed and help the world grow

Child victims of DRC Ebola outbreak need ‘special attention and care’: UNICEF

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: Banking moguls continue brandishing financial Armageddon to intimidate us all but in Davos they worry about the very distant future

Governments can fight corruption by joining the digital payment revolution

Entrepreneurship’s key to success showcased by a serial young entrepreneur

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s