The great challenge of the 21st century is learning to consume less. This is how we can do it

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption UN

© UNDP / Vladimer Valishvili

This article is brought to you based on the strategic cooperation of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jason Hickel, Anthropologist, London School of Economics

Ecological collapse is hard to miss in the headlines. From deforestation to soil depletion, species extinction to climate change, the past few years have brought countless troubling reports. We are living in the age of the Anthropocene, and we’re reminded on a daily basis of our uncertain future on an unstable planet.

Whenever I give public talks, there is always someone who sticks their hand in the air and tells me that really, it all comes down to overpopulation. They are almost always a white man, and their argument generally comes with a helping of racism. People in poor countries just have too many babies, and they need to get it under control. They’re ruining everything for the rest of us.

What astounds me about this position is that it gets it completely backward. We do have a population problem, it’s true. But it has nothing to do with poor countries. The real problem is that there are too many rich people.

Unbalanced consumption

There’s an easy way to show this. In recent years, scientists have published estimates of the world’s total consumption of material stuff, including everything from fish to livestock, minerals to metals, forests to fossil fuels. It comes to more than 80 billion tons of stuff per year. A sustainable level of consumption is about 50 billion tons per year, scientists believe. We are overshooting the mark by 60%.

This means we are eating away at the web of life on which we all depend for our survival. This might sound impossibly abstract, but we can see the consequences around us. Fish stocks are collapsing. Pollinators are dying off. Agricultural topsoils are turning to dust. Huge swathes of coastal ocean have become dead zones.

However, material consumption is not evenly distributed across the human population. People in rich nations consume vastly more than their counterparts in the rest of the world, according to the most recent data. The average resident of the average high-income country burns through 28 tons of stuff every year. By contrast, people in low-income countries use less than two tons every year. Indians consume 3.6 tons. People in upper-middle-income countries such as China and Brazil consume about 12 tons. That’s right on the world average, and less than half the amount consumed by their counterparts in nations such as Britain and the US.

If everybody in the world consumed as much as the average person in the average high-income country, we would need 3.8 Earths to sustain us. By contrast, if everyone consumed as much as the average person in the rest of the world, we would sit right at the level of sustainability, with a little breathing room.

If we want to know who is to blame for our ecological crisis, the data are clear. Since 1990, annual global consumption has increased by a whopping 33 billion tons, pushing us deep into the emergency zone. Growth in the per capita consumption of rich countries accounts for 81% of this. In other words, almost all of our overshoot is driven by the global rich.

Not every human is causing the crisis

This is the problem with the language of the Anthropocene. The word itself leads us to assume that humans, in some abstract, generic form, are destabilizing our planetary biome. If that’s your starting point, then of course you are going to worry about population growth in the Global South. But there are no generic humans in the world. People live in different kinds of societies, with different values, histories and economic systems. It’s not humans per se who are causing our crisis, it’s a particular subset of humans. It’s those who live in societies – mostly in North America and Western Europe – that see material consumption as a paramount virtue, and who insist that their economies deliver more of it each year, on an exponential curve, regardless of the consequences.

If we are going to have a decent shot of surviving the Anthropocene, rich countries will have to scale down their consumption, and fast. This may sound scary. People worry that cutting consumption by 75% – the amount needed for rich countries to operate at the safe boundary – means poverty and misery. But it doesn’t have to be so. We have been told that high levels of consumption are necessary for high levels of human development, but it’s simply not true.

Consider Costa Rica, for example. Costa Rica’s per capita consumption is just over the sustainable level, yet they have some of the highest human development indicators in the world. Costa Ricans can expect to live longer than Americans, and with a level of well-being and life satisfaction that rivals even Scandinavian countries. In this sense, Costa Rica is one of the most efficient economies on Earth: it delivers high levels of human well-being with relatively little ecological pressure. We have been thinking about development all wrong. We have been holding countries such as the US and Sweden up as our goal, when we should have been paying attention to those such as Costa Rica.

How do we get there?

The first step is to introduce caps on resource consumption, ideally by an international treaty, much as we have done for carbon emissions. This would change prices to reflect the true cost of resource use. We could enforce the caps with fines for overconsumption.

The second step would be to introduce new indicators of progress. This would mean switching from GDP to a more balanced measure such as the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), which accounts for figures such as pollution and natural asset depletion. Focusing on GPI would help us maximize social goods while minimizing ecological bads.

Let’s not kid ourselves. This is going to require a radical paradigm shift. Right now, our primary economic goal is growth, growth, growth. This objective may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it’s no longer fit for purpose, especially for rich countries. It’s time to evolve towards a different kind of economy, focused on achieving well-being for all within the limits of our planet’s ecology. This is the challenge of the 21st century. We are the generation that has to make it happen.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

‘Business as usual’ will not achieve global education goals

ECB to support only banks not Peoples

COP21 Breaking News_12 December: The New Draft Agreement!

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

Stress, overtime, disease, contribute to 2.8 million workers’ deaths per year, reports UN labour agency

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s speech from World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of New Champions

Should we be worried about third-hand smoke?

Online radio and news broadcasts: Parliament and Council reach deal

Uncovered liabilities of €5 billion may render EU insolvent

Nicaragua must end ‘witch-hunt’ against dissenting voices – UN human rights experts

Reintegrating former rebels into civilian life a ‘serious concern’ in Colombia: UN Mission chief

2019 Innovation Scoreboards: The innovation performance of the EU and its regions is increasing

Solitary Britain sides with US aggressing Russia and chooses hard Brexit

Yellen and Draghi tell Trump and markets not to expedite the next crisis

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

Is Germany yielding to pressures for more relaxed economic policies?

Google and Apple suddenly realise that doing business in EU is tough?

Neither side stands to benefit in US-China trade spat, UN says

Can green bonds help us manage climate risk?

6 things to know about press freedom around the world

4 essential qualities for digital leaders

UN highlights profound implication of population trends on sustainable development

Nigeria: Top UN officials say more support needed to ease humanitarian crisis and rebuild lives in conflict-ravaged north-east

EU finally agreed to cut roaming charges in 2017 but criticism is always there

Checks, fines, crisis reserve: MEPs vote on EU farm policy reform

Wednesday’s Daily Brief: Diplomacy for Peace Day, #VaccinesWork, the cost of war on Afghans, tech and well-being

EU Council approves visa-free travel for Ukraine and cement ties with Kiev

Commission threatens Chinese firms with trade penalties

A Sting Exclusive: “eHealth can change many dimensions of how the healthcare area functions”, Polish MEP Michal Boni underscores from Brussels

Africa-Europe Alliance: European Commission committed to a sustainable African agri-food sector

The Fourth Industrial Revolution can close the digital divide. This is how

Polish PM chooses to focus on economy, amid questions on rule of law in Poland

Jellyfish are taking over the world – and climate change could be to blame

UN Chief ‘strongly rejects’ Guatemala decision to expel anti-corruption body

Time to measure up: 5 ways the fashion industry can be made more sustainable

Now is the time to seize ‘unprecedented opportunity’ of the Sustainable Development Forum, says ECOSOC President

ECB’s billions fortify south Eurozone except Greece; everybody rushes to invest in euro area bonds zeroing their yields

New UN Syria envoy pledges to work ‘impartially and diligently’ towards peace

Impact of high debt levels on least developed countries ‘cannot be overstated’, says UN

Humanitarian visas would reduce refugees’ death toll

How a more integrated approach could help to end energy poverty

More needs to be done to bridge the digital gender divide

How Finland is fighting fake news – in the classroom

These countries have some of the highest voter turnout in the world

EUREKA @ European Business Summit 2014: A European patent system can help European businesses lead industrial research and innovation on a global scale

Human trafficking cases hit a 13-year record high, new UN report shows

European Youth, quo vadis?

Food supply chain: A step closer to ending unfair trading

Good grub: why we might be eating insects soon

In dreams and in love there are no impossibilities

Why the ECB had to clarify it caters for the entire Eurozone not just Germany?

Moscow’s Eurasian Union lost significance after the crisis in Ukraine

Yemen war: UN chief urges good faith as ‘milestone’ talks get underway in Sweden

Why and how did ISIS and Muslim fundamentalism gain momentum this year?

A new era of computing is coming. How can we make sure it is sustainable?

How the world’s best teacher is changing lives in Africa

Human rights: breaches in Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan

EU to Google: How to dismantle European search engines in 13 steps

New UN bullying report calls for ‘safe, inclusive’ schools for all children

Guterres censures terrorist attacks in Nigeria, pledges UN ‘solidarity’

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s