Brexit negotiations: back to square one, tougher words, no good faith

On 5 February, Theresa May, Prime Minister of UK received at 10 Downing Street Michel Barnier, the Chief EU negotiator for Brexit (in the middle) and his British counterpart, government minister David Davis. (Photo UK government work).

This past week, the EU and UK  Brexit negotiators’ solemn exchanges became for the first time, really aggressive and plain. Since the beginning of September 2017, during the Michel BarnierDavid Davis meetings there had being difficult moments. Nevertheless, the two chief negotiators never questioned the good faith of the other side; not any more.

Only twelve months before the official divorce day and nobody can be sure, even if a cliff edge is to be avoided. Until now it was common knowledge the two sides were close to an agreement about an interim period after the exit day of 29 March 2019. Suddenly, this prospect became mistier than the winter skies above the narrow sea channel separating the shores of Dunkirk and the cliffs of Dover.

The new conflict started on Monday 5 February. A spokesperson for 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the British Prime Minister said loudly, the UK will “leave the European Union customs union and Single Market after the official Brexit day” of 29 March 2019. Until now the two sides had an understanding that during the interim period of less than twenty four months, after March 2019 nothing will change and Britain will continue as a quasi member of the customs union and thus have full access to the EU markets. By the same token, Britain would be obliged during that time to provisionally apply the entire package of the EU legislation, accept the authority of the EU Courts and recognize the Brussels supervision.

Who needs to adjust?

Such an interim period after Brexit is considered as ‘sine qua non’ for the British business community. The idea is that all businesses, including the golden square mile of the London City, irrespective of size they need this adjustment period to adapt to the long term trade relations between the two sides, after December 2021. Theoretically, within the next twelve months and before 29 March 2019 the future trade relation of the UK with the EU and the rest of the world will be clarified. So, the business community will have an interim period of up to December 2020 to make the needed investment and hiring decisions.

According to the BBC news group, Adam Marshall, the general director of the British Chamber of Commerce said “In the long term, we should aim to avoid imports and exports being subjected to two sets of customs checks, and to ensuring the smoothest possible future trade relationship between the UK and EU.” He clearly estimates that the ‘smoothest possible future trade relationship’ must be with the EU and not with any other trade partner. So, according to this British business representative, the prime target in negotiating Brexit has to be set accordingly.

Saying no to customs union

However, the latest statement by Theresa May’s spokesperson about Britain leaving the EU Customs Union and the Single Market on 30 March 2029, points to the other way. In a direct response, an EU spokesperson said “As Michel Barnier has said on several occasions, ‘frictionless trade’ is not possible outside the single market and customs union.” In this way, the EU clearly denounces the 10 Downing Street statement that Britain will leave the customs union on 30 March 2019, but retain its right of a fully frictionless trade with the EU in the subsequent interim period.

Last Tuesday, before boarding the plane to London, to participate in the latest Brexit negotiations, Michel Barnier severely questioned this new UK’s option. He went as far as to cast doubt on the very possibility for the mere existence of a transition period. He clearly said a transition period after the Brexit of 2019 ‘is not given”.

Wide divergence

Barnier also cited wide divergence between UK and the EU, regarding key issues of the interim period. Firstly, the freedom of movement for mainland Europeans in Britain is far from being agreed during that time, while the UK also avoids defining the future of the mainland Europeans already living and working in Britain. Secondly, he said if the UK decides to leave the EU customs union and single market in March 2019, the enactment of hard borders in Ireland is inevitable. In the middle of this green island there is a theoretical border line of 400 km, separating Northern Ireland, a part of UK from the Republic of Ireland, a solid member of the European Union. For decades now nobody has any perception of this theoretically existing border, because both sides belong to the EU.

The moment the UK leaves the EU customs union and the single market though, the enactment of hard borders with physical checks and controls separating the two parts of the island, becomes necessary. The EU cannot tolerate a ‘hole’ of 400 km in its only land borders with the UK. On 27 November 2017 this newspaper published a leading article containing this passage: “As things stand now, the Irish people on both sides of the line cannot stomach a new partition. More so, because the freedom of crossing has constituted the base for the Good Friday or Belfast Agreement, which brought an end to the long and deadly civil conflict in Northern Ireland … The political scenery in the entire island both in Eire and the North is now crumbling only in view of the likelihood real borders are being again enacted.” Undoubtedly, the Irish question is not only an economic matter.

Trading obligations

However, Barnier went even further. He brought about an issue the British tend to forget. In December last, the 27 EU leaders in their last 2017 summit decided that during the interim period the UK cannot sign free trade agreements with other countries of the world without the approval of Brussels.

According to a document seen by the German news group Handelblaltt “During the transition period, the United Kingdom may not become bound by international agreements entered into in its own capacity in the fields of competence of Union law, unless authorized to do so by the Union.” The idea is that the UK in full knowledge of the soft points of the EU’s trade agreements with third nations, may take advantage of this knowledge in striking its own deals.

A ‘vassal state’?

In reference to the above issue, the same source revealed that “Brexit Minister David Davis…fighting off concerns that Britain will become something of a ‘vassal state’ of the European Union during any transition phase once the country leaves the 28-nation bloc”. In this way Davis authentically expresses the hard Brexitees of his political party. Obviously, there is a strong and unbending opposition within the British governing party, the Tories, about this thorny affair. Truly it’s a bit farfetched for Brussels to demand that after Brexit and until the end of the interim period, London should not be able to negotiate let alone strike trade agreements with third nations for the era after December 2020, without the consent of the EU.

All in all, the fact is that the unresolved key questions regarding the long term future trade relations between the EU and the UK are reemerging now during the negotiations for the interim period. It’s about the following three issues. The fate of the people who will be caught next year working in the wrong shore of the Channel, is far from being resolved. The Irish question is getting rather worse and there is no discussion about the divorce cost yet.

The ineluctable consequences

So, not without good reason Barnier concluded that Britain has to “accept the ineluctable consequences of its decision to leave the EU, to leave its institutions and its policies”. Truly, last week the Brexit negotiations returned to square one, with Britain not being able to determine what kind of divorce she wants and the EU not showing any intention for a moderate attitude.

The latest clashes between the EU and the UK have surpassed any conflict of the past months in aggressiveness and use of strong language. It seems the ticking clock’s beats have got into the nerves of everybody. If there is no agreement for the interim period in a few weeks, then the true negotiations for the long term future trade deal will not start before summer and will not be concluded before the official exit date. This will bring about a disaster for the economy on both sides of the Channel, the repercussions of which cannot be estimated or foreseen.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

Impressions of China

Commission goes less than mid-way on expensive euro

EU elections 2019: Trump’s share in the support of populism

Irish Presidency: Not a euro more for EU budgets

Addressing the consequences of digitalisation in the Russia & CIS region

The Brexit factor in the US-China trade war and other conflicts

EU members commit to build an integrated gas market and finally cut dependency on Russia

Hostages to a rampant banking system

Meet Alice, the battery-powered plane that could herald the age of electric air travel

European elections: A chance to repel both nationalism and no-deal Brexit

Imported and EU fisheries products should be treated equally

Glaringly false reassurances about the repercussions of the EU-US free trade agreement

Will the outcome of the UK referendum “calm” the financial markets?

Scientists in Sweden are studying the climate-cooling effects of spruce forests

In Sweden you can roam anywhere you like, without the landowner’s permission

Dieselgate: Parliament calls for mandatory retrofits of polluting cars

The punishment gap: how workplace mistakes hurt women and minorities most

OECD Donor countries need to reform development finance to meet 2030 pledge

Presentation of Juncker’s Investment Plan: Can 315 billion euros save the EU?

5 steps that could end the plastic pollution crisis – and save our ocean

The refugee crisis seen through the eyes of a young doctor from Turkey

“Will TTIP solve the massive EU-US unemployment? Absolutely not!” A revealing Sting Exclusive with Tim Bennett from the Transatlantic Business Council

This is why people live, work and stay in a growing city

4 bold new ways New York is going clean and green

Statelessness for terrorists’ families, never an acceptable option, urges UN rights chief

‘Historic moment’ for people on the move, as UN agrees first-ever Global Compact on migration

DR Congo: days ahead ‘critical’ to ‘historic election process’ Security Council hears

Ireland’s planning to make its Emerald Isle even greener

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

The influence of the multilateral agreement on migrant health

Here are 10 of Nelson Mandela’s most inspirational quotes

Somalis ‘will not be deterred’ by Friday’s terror attacks – UN chief

Accountability for atrocities in Myanmar ‘cannot be expected’ within its borders – UN investigator

To rebuild trust in the media, we must empower its consumers

The big challenge of leadership and entrepreneurship in Europe

Europe led by Germany seems vulnerable to Trump’s threats

GSMA Announces First Keynote Speakers for 2019 “MWC Los Angeles, in Partnership with CTIA”

Tragedy of Mediterranean deaths continues, as seven drown, 57 rescued: UN migration agency

Yemen: UN Envoy ‘guilty’ of optimistic hope that war is ‘nearing the end’

EU-Ukraine Summit: moving forward together in solidarity

Second Ebola death confirmed in Uganda as UN health agency mulls global emergency call

Under-fives’ daily screen time should be kept to 60 minutes only, warns WHO

Back to school: Schoolchildren to receive milk, fruits and vegetables at school thanks to EU programme

A day in the life of a Rohingya refugee

FROM THE FIELD: Weaving profits in Azerbaijan

Migrant caravan: UN agency helping ‘exhausted’ people home

OECD household income up 0.7% in first quarter of 2018, outpacing GDP growth

European Union presents its progress towards sustainable development

Tax Inspectors Without Borders making significant progress toward strengthening developing countries’ ability to effectively tax multinational enterprises

Korea must enhance detection and reinforce sanctions to boost foreign bribery enforcement

Refugee crisis update: Commission still in panic while Turkey is to be added in the equation

Does the Commission subsidise a forced labour scheme in Britain?

COP21 Breaking News_09 December: List of Recent Climate Funding Announcements

Why the ECB suddenly decided to flood banks with money?

Europe bewildered by radicalisation and terrorism

Climate change is speeding up. Our response needs to be even faster

Syria still suffering ‘staggering levels’ of humanitarian need, Security Council hears

How India is solving its cooling challenge

World’s human rights watchdog spotlights Afghanistan, Yemen and 12 others: Here’s the scoop

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s