The EU Commission vies to screen Chinese investment in Europe

Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission (on the left), receives the Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang at the opening of the 12th EU-China Business Summit, ‘Strengthening the pillars of global trade and investment’. (02/06/2017, Brussels – Palais d’Egmont.© European Union, 2017, EC – Audiovisual Service/Photo: Etienne Ansotte).

Last week, Jean-Claude Juncker, the head of the powerful European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union, announced a plan to screen foreign investments. The idea is to hold back or even effectively block business acquisitions or other investment plans financed by third country companies, in key sectors allegedly considered to be sensitive from a security perspective or being economically strategic. Juncker said it plainly: “If a foreign, state-owned, company wants to purchase a European harbor, part of our energy infrastructure or a defense technology firm, this should only happen with transparency, with scrutiny, and debate”.

It’s as if the President of the Commission described the Chinese investments in Greece, Spain and Portugal in details. The Chinese maritime conglomerate COSCO group has recently acquired the company operating the largest part of the port of Piraeus, the largest Greek sea harbor and one of the largest in the Mediterranean Sea. All analysts agree that the new Commission plan directly aims at controlling or even blocking the Chinese investments in the Union. The idea is to create one more layer of foreign investments checks and controls, on top of the rigorous screening schemes which 15 member states of the EU already operate.

Aiming at Chinese investments

According to Brussels sources, the new Commission scheme will be initially enforced – if ever – to foreign investments in the sectors of infrastructure, energy, transport, space, artificial intelligence, robotics, semiconductors and financial settlement. These sectors practically account for more than half the entire European economy. It’s absurd or rather deceptive to call all those business activities either economically strategic or security sensitive.

There are more problems in this respect. Under the Juncker proposal, Brussels will be challenging the sacrosanct right of private property, protected by the constitutions of all and every EU member state. When contradicting the right of the shareholders of a company to sell it to whomever they choose, the Commission will be committing a major blunder, even if it comes in the form of non binding Commission ‘advice’. There is a lot to discuss about all that in practical, historical, ethical and ideological levels. Let’s try.

Is it a liberal idea?

What Juncker indirectly accepts with this proposal is that Europe is in favor of the free economic play and the unimpeded international transactions but only in one way; Europe’s implication in overseas business activities is allowed, but not the other way around. The West has for centuries been exploiting the resources of the rest of the world. Now, however, that some third countries have achieved a high level of economic and technological development, they are impeded from operating freely in the West’s internal markets.

During the past many decades, trade protectionism options and foreign investment screening or even blocking by second and third world countries was anathema for the West. Related action was politically exorcised by Europe and the US and even militarily reversed, together with the daring government. Africa, Latin America, the Middle East and other parts of the world have bitter and bloody experience of that and still suffer from western aggression. The United States and many European countries, thirsty for natural resources, have been strongly opposing with all available political or unspeakable means – including outright military interventions – any attempt of a second or third world country to obstruct free trade or investments.

Rediscovering neo-colonialism

This colonial and neo-colonial practice was also being dressed with economic theorizing, about free trade making all the parties richer, the well known win-win rig, usually advertised as an equitable pact. As history has proved though, never has there existed such a thing as a fair contract – regarding natural resources exploitation – between the western powerful nations and second or third world countries or regions. Just count the recent destructions of Somalia, Niger, Mali, Chad, the bloody aftermath of the South Sudan ‘construction’, not to say anything about the invasions and the obliteration of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria to mention only the recent West’s ‘interaction’ with the rest of the world.

On many occasions, where there was a blatant invasion in other people’s countries and lives, the western powers justified their multifaceted interventions on ‘democratic’ grounds or invoking local economic development needs, allegedly served only by West’s ‘growth supporting investments’ and free trade. How much the West values democracy in the rest of the world is questionable, to say the least.

For example, the US and Europe embrace the harshest dictatorship of the world in Saudi Arabia, where people are publicly beheaded just for having attended a protest rally. By the same token, they threaten Iran, where at least there are regular legislative and the presidential elections. It may be true, though, that Saudi Arabia doesn’t know and never exercised any other governance mode other than their own. In some respect, the West may be right not to question that. Europe and the US have to recognize the same right to others.

Trump’s US and Germanic Europe

Unfortunately it seems, in Trump’s America and in Germanic Europe the time has come for the West to repudiate even its sacrosanct ideas about economic freedom and equal opportunities. The US and the European Union in parallel moves are currently trying to block the Chinese and other foreign presence in their economies. For centuries, both those economic powers have been taking advantage of lagging behind countries, and now that China has acquired the means to invest all over the world, the US and the EU are erecting walls. At the same time, they accuse China of not recycling the reserves she has accumulated through exports, amidst a conjuncture when this country is actually doing exactly that in a large scale, by investing all over the world. The ‘One Belt One Road Initiative’ does exactly that.

The West argues that some Chinese companies get government subsidies or other forms of state support, so they are better equipped than others, when competing for a major business buyout overseas or plan an investment abroad. Europe and of course the US are forgetting that the wealth the Chinese businesses are creating is the product of an entire nation, based on the contributions of labor, capital and natural resources.

The Wealth of Nations

As Adam Smith taught us, the wealth of all nations is the outcome of their own historically developed way of doing business. It’s absurd to accuse the Chinese or any other nation of the world for not having had an economic, social and even political history similar to the West’s. If one accuses China of having just one political party, one shouldn’t forget what the vast majority of voters say about elections in the US and Europe; ‘if things could change with elections they would have been outlawed’.

Coming back to today’s problems, last week, Juncker in his speech about the “State of the Union” has only opened a discussion about this Commission proposal, to scrutinize foreign in all member states. As mentioned above, his scheme amounts to an additional level of screening foreign economic presence in Europe, in this case operated by the Brussels bureaucracy. Given that, it will be rather difficult for the President of the Commission, to secure a qualified majority of member states in favor of it.

Not many in favor

The reasons for that are many. For one thing, many EU countries wouldn’t accept the Brussels bureaucracy telling them how to treat foreign investments on their soil. Already, many member states have strong bilateral relations with China and in general they strongly favor foreign investments. Greece, Spain, Portugal and the central European countries would never agree to the introduction of a Brussels ‘passport’ for foreign investments. They badly need a strong foreign growth push for their economies. The second reason is that many EU countries won’t accept Juncker’s proposal in this affair, because he is clearly and openly following a ‘dictum’ from Germany and France, plus the always uncertain Italy, at times complementing the hated ‘Le directoire’ of the EU.

Stupidly enough, the three corresponding ministers of Finance rushed to noisily applaud Juncker’s ‘initiative’. The majority of the EU countries won’t accept the Brussels authority in this subject, despite that Juncker meant it as non-binding procedure. Everybody knows that the EU Commission has the redoubtable expertise, to turn a non-binding procedure into shackles for the smaller member states. The obvious source of Juncker’s idea was Berlin and Paris, and this will make things difficult to pass it through the EU Council of 27+1 member states, the highest authority of the club.

Finally, there is one more crucial reason why the Juncker proposal will be ill-fated. At the time of Brexit, the closely avoided Grexit, a reemerging Italexit and the growing resentment of the Brussels bureaucracy by the hard working and badly paid Europeans, the Commission’s authority is fading fast. The part of Europeans who feel left behind is growing and they tend to vote for centrifuge political forces. In such an environment the Commission shouldn’t be seen as vying to further strengthen the Brussels’ autocracy, and Juncker’s idea falls into this category.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Global Compact on Refugees: How is this different from the migrants’ pact and how will it help?

These technologies are playing a major role at the Cricket World Cup

Eurozone guarantees all banks with…taxpayers’ money

DR Congo: Electoral process advancing despite threat of armed groups, UN envoy tells Security Council

EU free-trade agreements with Canada and US: imagine the fallout if put to national referendums

Mine ban agreement ‘has saved countless lives’, but ‘accelerated efforts’ needed to end scourge for good: Guterres

The Commission calls for a climate neutral Europe by 2050*

G20 LIVE: G20 leaders reaffirm OECD’s role in ensuring strong, sustainable and inclusive growth

Senior UN children’s advocate says they ‘should never be targeted by violence’

Why Obama asks approval from Congress to bomb Syria?

‘Never give up’: UN chief urges all who serve, marking UN Day

Parliament cuts own spending to facilitate agreement on EU budget

Europeans are living beyond Earth’s means

Here’s why the tech sector could be the next target for Chinese investment in Africa

Ebola: EU releases additional €3.5 million to tackle epidemic

New UN rights report paints bleak picture in eastern DR Congo

Saudi Arabia must halt air strikes in Yemen, says UN panel

Trade war or not New York bankers will have it their way

Public health through universal health coverage can help to attain many SDGs

EU-US to miss 2015 deadline and even lose Germany’s support in TTIP’s darkest week yet

TTIP wins first crucial EU test: MEPs give in to the trade agreement

Environment Committee MEPs vote to upgrade EU civil protection capacity

Health is nothing but the main consequence of climate change

Fostering defence innovation through the European Defence Fund

Assembly of European Regions @ European Business Summit 2014: The European regions on the path to recovery

‘Growing alarm’ over Fall Armyworm advance, with cash crops ‘under attack’ across Asia

UN chief calls for ‘immediate end’ to escalation of fighting in southwestern Syria, as thousands are displaced

Annexing Jordan Valley would end ‘illusion’ of a meaningful two-State solution: UN rights expert

Two shipwrecks add to ‘alarming increase’ in migrant deaths off Libya coast: IOM

Banks, insurance giants are free again to abuse the real economy

Everyone has ‘a moral imperative’ to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities, says UN chief

Impact investment favours expats over African entrepreneurs. Here’s how to fix that

EU Commission spends billions without achieving targets

Erasmus+ 2021-2027: more people to experience learning exchanges in Europe

Commission challenges Council over EU 2014 budget

Password managers aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. Here’s why

Yemen war: UN-backed talks to silence the guns due to begin in Stockholm

EU: The Member States to pay for national banking problems

‘All efforts must be made’ to ensure peaceful elections for Guinea-Bissau, Security Council hears

Top UN court rules it has jurisdiction to hear Iranian claim against US over frozen assets

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

Aid spending fell in 2018, for the second year in a row

Palestine refugee crisis ‘expanding’; leaving highest number at risk this century across Gaza

Electronic cigarettes – The alternative we’ve been looking for?

UN Security Council ‘utterly failed’ Syrian detainees; a victim voices her plea to ‘end impunity and stop this horror’

Water is a growing source of global conflict. Here’s what we need to do

UNICEF urges governments to repatriate thousands of foreign children stranded in northeast Syria

Food safety: New rules to boost consumer trust approved by MEPs

‘Laser-sharp focus’ needed to achieve Global Goals by 2030, UN political forum told

Myanmar companies bankroll ‘brutal operations’ of military, independent UN experts claim in new report

5 technologies that will forever change global trade

Davos participants call for digital trade deal

Does the West reserve the fate of Libya and Syria for others? How does this relate to the EU’s Neighborhood Policy?

With field schools in Kenya, UN agriculture agency teaches techniques to combat drought

China has made a shocking food production discovery – electro culture

Latin America is a mass-transit powerhouse. But it needs fine-tuning

UN celebrates books as ‘bridges across cultures’

How can batteries become more sustainable? This young scientist might have the answer

US-China trade war at point of no return: Washington’s demands go beyond tariffs

Yemen talks: Truce agreed over key port city of Hudaydah

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s