Brexit may finally not really happen; The Brits have second thoughts

British Prime Minister Theresa May met the President of the European Parliament Antonio Tajani at 10 Downing Street on 20 April 2017. Credit: Jay Allen. Copyright: Crown Copyright, some rights reserved.

Last Thursday the European Sting, alone amongst the English language media, announced that “At last Britain considers a super-soft Brexit”. Only hours later the British government published a policy paper envisaging the continuation of the European Union’s supervision of UK borders, even after the ‘full’ realization of Brexit. One of the two alternatives described in this government document about the after Brexit era, proposes a “new customs partnership” which “would exclude altogether the existence of a UK-EU customs border”. It’s difficult to imagine a softer Brexit, than maintaining the current full membership customs union arrangement, regarding the future trade between the two sides, the EU and Britain.

In detail, on Sunday 20 August, the prestigious Reuters news agency reported from London that: “Last week, the UK published a policy document proposing two possible models for British-EU customs arrangements after withdrawal from the EU in 2019. The first model was a ‘highly streamlined customs arrangement’…An alternative proposal was the ‘new customs partnership’ which would remove the need for a UK-EU customs border altogether. Under this model, the UK would operate as if it was still part of the bloc for customs purposes”, at least in an interim period.

An expendable PM?

If this is not the softest version of Brexit, words have lost their meaning. At the same time it betrays the total defeat of the Brexiteers faction within the London political elite, and more precisely within the governing Tory Party. By the same token, Prime Minister Theresa May proves to be an expendable political quantity, after losing the 8 June election and panicking before the exit complexities. Politics is a nasty affair.

When succeeding David Cameron last year, she, a Bremainer, turned up to represent the Brexiteers’ attempt to isolate Britain from Europe. She embraced the plans for a ‘triumphant sail’ of Britain on world seas, after a spectacular U-turn abandoning her Brimainer position. Now, she is obliged to make another full policy turn around, this time adopting the softest version of Brexit, being pressed by reality and the all powerful British business and financial community. May is to be sidestepped soon, after the Brexiteers’ total defeat and their return to…gardening or other more idiosyncratic hobbies, and Britain is to be left where they found it – in Europe.

Brexiteer economics fail

Along the same line of developments in a rearguard battle, the hard Brexit group of British neoliberal economists overstepped reality and offered an obsessive idea to their countrymen. Those deranged scientists propose now that Britain should abolish all trade tariffs and barriers in order to boost the economy. In their minds, this is to happen after the country had fictitiously followed a hard Brexit option. Reading a BBC report on that is quite revealing. It informs us that a leading neoliberal Brexiteer economist, Professor Patrick Minford of Cardiff Business School argues that “a hard Brexit is economically much superior to soft”.

The most interesting part though is that Minford, the lead author of a report from ‘Economists for Free Trade’, says “eliminating tariffs, either within free trade deals or unilaterally, would deliver huge gains”. Of course all mainstream economists called this ‘a suicide policy’. Disarming Britain, or even worse the entire European economy, by applying zero tariffs and no barriers at all, vis-à-vis the imports from low cost countries is a sure way to catastrophe. The professor forgets that the British industrial triumphs of the 19th Century and the German achievements in the 20th were accomplished in a highly protected from foreign competition economic environment.

Coming back to reality, 10 Downing Street doesn’t mind making more full policy reversals, now discussing apparent non-Brexit options, at least during an ‘interim period’ of some years beyond 2019. Under the second alternative for the future UK-EU customs deal, as presented above (actually removing the need for a UK-EU customs border altogether), Britain also has to accept the Brussels management of it. You cannot have the one without the other. No borders between EU and UK mean Britain has to enforce the EU trade rules on her own borders, understandably under Brussels supervision. In short, the May government accepts that in this version of invisible Brexit, the EU will continue overseeing the borders of the entire UK, as is the case today. All EU member states’ borders are under the supervision of the Brussels authorities, making sure the EU trade rules are rightly applied.

EU law to rule

According to a recent Reuters report, the EU authorities “slammed lax UK border controls and recommended the European Commission reclaims €2 billion”. It was OLAF, the EU anti-fraud bureau that fined Her Majesty’s Customs for errors and omissions during the past few years. As expected, the UK Customs authority will contest OLAF’s decision, and most probably the case will be brought before the European Court of Justice, the highest European court. Consequently, if Britain embraces the option of ‘business as usual’ after Brexit, as far as internal or external trade crossings are concerned, London has to accept not only the checks of the EU authorities (OLAF), but also the authority of the European Court in resolving disputes.

The first to warmly embrace the idea of UK not leaving the EU customs union at least in the ‘interim period’ was Britain’s National Farmers’ Union. Right after 10 Downing Street invoked the option of staying in the EU customs union in order to avoid a “cliff-edge” departure, NFU President Meurig Raymond rejoiced at the idea. According to BBC, the Welsh Government went even further and “said it was ‘disappointed’ a permanent post-Brexit customs union was not explored”. Mind you, Wales voted last year for Brexit, but seemingly the strong presence of an agricultural community in this part of the UK has reversed the public opinion towards ‘Bremain’.

Rather not to Brexit

In conclusion, it’s not difficult then to imagine an ‘interim period’ of no change at all extending for at least four years after March 2019, to gradually evolving to something very close to today’s conditions. There are strong signs that the majority of the Brits are bewildered by the quite severe and dangerous repercussions a hard Brexit could entail and now tend to contest it.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

A Sting Exclusive: Paris Climate Change Summit, a defining moment for humanity, by Ulf Björnholm Head of UNEP Brussels

The financial war touches Frankfurt and Berlin

Germany: A grand coalition may trouble employers and bankers

Happens now in Brussels: Green Week sets the EU and global climate policy agenda

Eurozone closer to a deflation – stagnation trap

Parliament cuts own spending to facilitate agreement on EU budget

Who is to lose from the 6-month extension of the EU economic sanctions against Russia?

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

Draghi’s 2018 compromise: enough money printing to revive inflation and check euro ascent

EU-wide rules for safety of drones approved by European Parliament

The US may be “open” to reviving TTIP, while the EU designs the future of trade with China

JADE Spring Meeting 2016 highlights

GradList Launched At TheNextWeb 2014

The EU slowly exits from “Excessive Deficit Procedure” and hopefully from ‘Excessive Austerity Procedure’ too

EU: Tax evasion and fraud flourish under political protection

Social inclusion: how much should young people hope from the EU? 

EU Parliament: The surplus countries must support growth

Banks cannot die but can be fined

Why is the EU launching a doomed policy in stopping immigrant waves? What are the real targets?

The Cold War had an unintended side effect: It created a European wildlife paradise

EU finally to extend sanctions on Russia despite arguments; Greece again in Europe’s spotlight

We need greater protection for our oceans. We can’t let politics stand in the way

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

The sad plight of fledging doctors

Hundreds of thousands of lives still lost each year to small arms, UN conference hears

MWC 2016 LIVE: Ericsson/Cisco partnership on track, insist execs

The EU patent space and Unified Court are born

Why do medical curricula shouldn’t neglect the Sustainable Development Goals

Why lay people don’t expect anything good from G20

Draghi proposes timeframe for full Banking Union in five years

The G7 should take the lead on ocean targets for 2020

Trump questions US – Europe kinship, approaches Russia

#TwitterisblockedinTurkey and so is Erdogan

MWC 2016 LIVE: Getty chief says one in four new images from phones

Cameron’s Conservatives and UKIP are exploiting and cultivating anti-EU immigration sentiment but Labour party isn’t?

Commerce is on the cusp of radical change. Is your organization ready?

Trump to subject the Fed, challenge the ECB and make Wall St. bankers even richer

New Report Offers Global Outlook on Efforts to Beat Plastic Pollution

Commission’s action against imports from China questioned

China confirms anti-state-subsidy investigation on EU wine imports

A hot autumn after a cool summer for Europe

Why Microsoft is a regular to Almunia’s

Cutting money transfer fees could unlock $15bn for developing countries. Here’s how

EU Commission accuses Germany of obstructing growth and the banking union

Cross-roads

Financial abuse of elderly ‘rampant, but invisible’, says UN expert

Tsipras doesn’t seem to have learned his “almost Grexit” lesson and Greece faces again financial and political dead end

At last a solid base for the European Banking Union

COP21 Breaking News: China has promised to cut emissions from its coal power plants by 60% by 2020

Cape Town’s crisis shows us the real cost of water

China in My Suburbs

European Parliament calls on Russia to end occupation of Georgian territories

JADE Spring Meeting 2015: a step forward for Youth Entrepreneurship

Why Italy will not follow the Greek road; Eurozone to change or unravel

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

China revisited by the former Ambassador of Hungary to China

Cyber defence: MEPs call for better European cooperation

Why will Paris upcoming “loose” climate change agreement work better than the previous ones?

EU Leaders’ meeting in Sofia: Completing a trusted Digital Single Market for the benefit of all

G20 LIVE: G20 Statement on the fight against terrorism

More Stings?

Comments

  1. The U.K. will leave the EU. There is no alternative now that the process has got this far.
    It has little to do with the levels of immigration and everything to do with the U.K. being the masters of its own destiny. It is not as if the Eu is without its own huge problems. How long will the other EU countries tolerate Germany’s ‘beggar thy neighbor’ policy of running a permanent and growing €300 billion per year trade surplus?.

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s