Trump’s denial of Paris climate agreement; the US Republicans lash out against the world

President Trump making a statement regarding the Paris Accord. June 1, 2017, The White House. (Snapshot from a video; US government work).

Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the UN Paris Climate Agreement is a major foreign policy step, rather difficult to understand. For one thing, the American environmental industry technologically spearheads the world in this domain. The US is a global leader in electric vehicles production, where mainstream vehicles are one of the major contributors to air pollution. The reason given by Trump to justify this move – that he wants to support the US steel and carbon sector was in a few hours shot down. He said, “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris”. However, the mayor of Pittsburgh, in the heart of the American steel and coal industry, Bill Peduto, answered that his city is to wholeheartedly apply the Paris agreement. Then why did Trump take this monstrous step?

It’s true that he had promised so to his voters. Then again, he has promised even more important things and did exactly the opposite. He was elected as the President of the ‘left behind’ Americans. Instead of taking care of them, he did what he could to make the New York bankers immensely richer. Then, his first choice for Labor Secretary was Andrew Puzder, the most callous American employer. Puzder was obliged to withdraw because even the conservative Republican lawmakers refused to endorse him, due to his anti-labor opinions. Trump also appointed as education Secretary an enemy of the state schooling and university systems, which is the only way for the underprivileged to ascend the social ladder. Then why oblige his voters in Pittsburgh? Let’s dig a bit into it.

The whole world disagreed

In many ways, Trump’s decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement was not an internal American affair. It was more of a major Washington’s foreign policy ‘pronunciamiento’, against the entire world. Not a sole country, of the 197 parties that have signed the Paris Agreement followed Trump’s step. His decision was not supported either by any major US trade union not even by the American fossil carburant industry or the heavy manufacturing business, in favor of whom he supposedly acted.

Apart from the technology giants like Google, Apple, Tesla, Facebook , Uber, Amazon, IBM and others, more CEOs from key corporations strongly opposed Trump’s decision. ExxonMobil, Dow Chemical, General Electric and even the mammoth banking group Goldman Sachs Group regretted the decision. So, it was not corporate America who wanted to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.

No need to mention that all the 147 countries of the world, which have already ratified the environmental pact reacted negatively (the signatories parties are 197). Reactions from leaders of major economies like China, Japan, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, Britain and Canada ranged from overwhelm to anger. Reading the Press releases aired by the bigger three EU countries (Germany, France and Italy) or by Japan and China in response to Washington’s announcement, one understands that they feel like being ruthlessly attacked where it hurts. More precisely, EU and China must have sensed that Trump was aiming directly at them, with his appalling comments while presenting the withdrawal. They responded by issuing their first ever joint statement, pledging full implementation of the Paris Agreement.

Only the Republicans agreed

The only positive comments about this Trump’s incomprehensible act came from Mitch McConnell, the leader of the US Senate Republican Majority, a group of lawmakers this is currently the most powerful body of the world. He congratulated Trump “for dealing yet another significant blow to the Obama administration’s assault on domestic energy production and jobs.” This is a deeply divisive statement urging the autocratic Republican US President, to apply all his powers against the other half of America and of course in direct opposition to the rest of the world.

It’s as if Obama was a traitor, serving the rest of the world to undermine the ‘American jobs’. Schematically, one could term those two parts of America as the ‘people’ and the ‘elites’. But who are the elites, if not the technology giants and the New York Banks, which have already opposed the withdrawal?

Who are served?

McConnell knows it best. An outside observer though can detect what McConnell represents. He is a product of the Republican establishment, representing the inner power circles of Washington, which are traditionally closely tied with the military-industrial complex and the inner administration structures. This is currently McConnell’s part of America, which has been brought to power by the semi-fascist, super-neoliberal ‘tea parties’ groups. That’s why the Republican establishment has gone as far as altogether rejecting the role of the Inland Revenue Authority and has repudiated the obligation of income taxation.

In relation to the rest of the world, they demonstrate an obviously imperialist attitude, disapproving even of the United Nations. Their super-neoliberal ideology preaches the law of the jungle internally and globally, where the more powerful prevail and the weak are good only to serve as helots. Last year, after the 8 November election they won the House of Representatives, the Senate and the White House and they are presently omnipotent.

Who controls Trump?

They also very effectively control Donald Trump, with four independent investigations against him, for his alleged relations with Russia. The House, the Senate, the FBI, and the independent investigator Robert Muller all keep examining Trump and his close aids even for treason, with the impeachment threat clearly appearing in the horizon. The fact that the Republicans have sure allies the Democrats, in whatever they decide against Trump, has created a real Damoclean Sword above the head of the President.

In conclusion, the force and the clarity of McConnell’s statement regarding the abandonment of the Paris Agreement, is a Republican pronouncement about what they plan for our brave new world. It’s as if they tell the rest of the globe, ‘We will go on polluting as much as we like and you have to clean up the mess, as you did in the last financial crisis’.

It’s a US foreign policy plan, which is reserves for the rest of the world a servant position for the interests of the US, without any checks and controls from the UN, the World Trade Organization, the G7 or the G20. The question is, if the Democrats and corporate America – apart from the inward looking military-industrial complex – with vital vested interests in the rest of the world, are to cooperate in such a plan. For the time being they do not.




















Featured Stings

Water supply a human right but Greeks to lose their functioning utilities

How many more financial crises in the West can the world stand?

Azerbaijan chooses Greek corridor for its natural gas flow to EU

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

Volkswagen scandal update: “We want clarity fast, but it is equally important to have the complete picture”, Commission’s spokesperson underscores from Brussels

European Confederation of Junior Enterprises hosts in Geneva the Junior Enterprise World Conference

A day in the life of a refugee: the role of nations and citizens of the world

The 27 EU leaders did nothing to help May unlock the Brexit talks

German elections: Is Merkel losing ground or Shultz is winning?

Copyright: European Union , 2017; Source: EC - Audiovisual Service; Photo: Frank Molter

EU hits deadlock on the future of glyphosate a month before deadline

Jade Spring Meeting 2017 – day 2: Coporate workshops, general assembly and magna moment

COP21 Breaking News: Conference of Youth Focuses on Hard Skills to Drive Greater Climate Action

The three US financial war fleets

Can the EU afford a trade war with China?

Why do medical students need to emigrate to become doctors in 2017?

Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

Draghi’s top new year resolution: Quantitative Easing

Eurozone: Inflation plunge to 0.4% in July may trigger cataclysmic developments

A rapid deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the war-torn Yemen

From Grexit to Brexit: UK industry now says the in/out referendum is good for your health

On Human Rights Day European Youth Forum calls for end to discrimination of young people

The European Youth Forum needs better signal for its “call” for Quality Internships

Counting unemployment in the EU: The real rate comes to anything between 16.1% and 20.6%

Opening Remarks by H.E. Ambassador Yang Yanyi, Head of the Chinese Mission to the EU at the Chinese Fashion Night

The EU Commission does nothing about the food retailing oligopoly

Eurozone: How safe are our deposits? Which banks will survive?

Eurozone banks to separate risky activities: Can they stay afloat?

The EU Parliament endorses tax on financial transactions

The US + Britain trivialize mainland Europe, NATO and the EU

Lithuania vs Parliament over 2014 EU budget

The US may be “open” to reviving TTIP, while the EU designs the future of trade with China

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

German stock market is not affected by the Greek debt revolution while Athens is running out of time

EU will not deliver on promises without democratic accountability

China revisited by the former Ambassador of Hungary to China

The West castigates Turkey’s Erdogan for the ruthless political cleansing

Eurozone has practically entered a deflation trap

A Sting Exclusive, the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger writes for the Sting on “EU Industry: a major energizer”

Greece: The new government of Alexis Tsipras shows its colors

Managers’ pay under fire

Why Eurozone can afford spending for growth

EU Commission says falling labour remuneration leads to deflation and damages growth prospects

Mario Draghi didn’t do it but Kim Jong-un did

E-Government can be a remedy for the crisis

Education expenditure in the EU not hurt much by crisis

The EU Parliament slams Commission on economic governance

EU is now giving Google new monopolies to the detriment of European citizens and Internet companies

EU Commission: Banking and energy conglomerates don’t threaten competition!

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

Eurozone’s bank resolution mechanism takes a blow

UK’s PM Theresa May asks for a two-year Brexit transition plan as negotiations round kicks off

Twenty days that may remold the future of Europe

France and Poland to block David Cameron’s plans on immigration

A new proposal breaks the stalemate over the Banking Union

Can the EU last long if it cuts Cyprus out?

UN Environment Assembly 2017: where the world convenes to #BeatPollution

The UK to split if May’s hard or no-deal Brexit is pursued

Finally an answer to the hottest question of European youth today: How to make sure Juncker’s Investment Plan works for youth

IMF – World Bank meetings: US – Germany clash instituted, anti-globalization prospects visualized

China Unlimited: the dragon’s long and winding road

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s