Trump’s denial of Paris climate agreement; the US Republicans lash out against the world

President Trump making a statement regarding the Paris Accord. June 1, 2017, The White House. (Snapshot from a video; US government work).

Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the UN Paris Climate Agreement is a major foreign policy step, rather difficult to understand. For one thing, the American environmental industry technologically spearheads the world in this domain. The US is a global leader in electric vehicles production, where mainstream vehicles are one of the major contributors to air pollution. The reason given by Trump to justify this move – that he wants to support the US steel and carbon sector was in a few hours shot down. He said, “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris”. However, the mayor of Pittsburgh, in the heart of the American steel and coal industry, Bill Peduto, answered that his city is to wholeheartedly apply the Paris agreement. Then why did Trump take this monstrous step?

It’s true that he had promised so to his voters. Then again, he has promised even more important things and did exactly the opposite. He was elected as the President of the ‘left behind’ Americans. Instead of taking care of them, he did what he could to make the New York bankers immensely richer. Then, his first choice for Labor Secretary was Andrew Puzder, the most callous American employer. Puzder was obliged to withdraw because even the conservative Republican lawmakers refused to endorse him, due to his anti-labor opinions. Trump also appointed as education Secretary an enemy of the state schooling and university systems, which is the only way for the underprivileged to ascend the social ladder. Then why oblige his voters in Pittsburgh? Let’s dig a bit into it.

The whole world disagreed

In many ways, Trump’s decision to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement was not an internal American affair. It was more of a major Washington’s foreign policy ‘pronunciamiento’, against the entire world. Not a sole country, of the 197 parties that have signed the Paris Agreement followed Trump’s step. His decision was not supported either by any major US trade union not even by the American fossil carburant industry or the heavy manufacturing business, in favor of whom he supposedly acted.

Apart from the technology giants like Google, Apple, Tesla, Facebook , Uber, Amazon, IBM and others, more CEOs from key corporations strongly opposed Trump’s decision. ExxonMobil, Dow Chemical, General Electric and even the mammoth banking group Goldman Sachs Group regretted the decision. So, it was not corporate America who wanted to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.

No need to mention that all the 147 countries of the world, which have already ratified the environmental pact reacted negatively (the signatories parties are 197). Reactions from leaders of major economies like China, Japan, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, Britain and Canada ranged from overwhelm to anger. Reading the Press releases aired by the bigger three EU countries (Germany, France and Italy) or by Japan and China in response to Washington’s announcement, one understands that they feel like being ruthlessly attacked where it hurts. More precisely, EU and China must have sensed that Trump was aiming directly at them, with his appalling comments while presenting the withdrawal. They responded by issuing their first ever joint statement, pledging full implementation of the Paris Agreement.

Only the Republicans agreed

The only positive comments about this Trump’s incomprehensible act came from Mitch McConnell, the leader of the US Senate Republican Majority, a group of lawmakers this is currently the most powerful body of the world. He congratulated Trump “for dealing yet another significant blow to the Obama administration’s assault on domestic energy production and jobs.” This is a deeply divisive statement urging the autocratic Republican US President, to apply all his powers against the other half of America and of course in direct opposition to the rest of the world.

It’s as if Obama was a traitor, serving the rest of the world to undermine the ‘American jobs’. Schematically, one could term those two parts of America as the ‘people’ and the ‘elites’. But who are the elites, if not the technology giants and the New York Banks, which have already opposed the withdrawal?

Who are served?

McConnell knows it best. An outside observer though can detect what McConnell represents. He is a product of the Republican establishment, representing the inner power circles of Washington, which are traditionally closely tied with the military-industrial complex and the inner administration structures. This is currently McConnell’s part of America, which has been brought to power by the semi-fascist, super-neoliberal ‘tea parties’ groups. That’s why the Republican establishment has gone as far as altogether rejecting the role of the Inland Revenue Authority and has repudiated the obligation of income taxation.

In relation to the rest of the world, they demonstrate an obviously imperialist attitude, disapproving even of the United Nations. Their super-neoliberal ideology preaches the law of the jungle internally and globally, where the more powerful prevail and the weak are good only to serve as helots. Last year, after the 8 November election they won the House of Representatives, the Senate and the White House and they are presently omnipotent.

Who controls Trump?

They also very effectively control Donald Trump, with four independent investigations against him, for his alleged relations with Russia. The House, the Senate, the FBI, and the independent investigator Robert Muller all keep examining Trump and his close aids even for treason, with the impeachment threat clearly appearing in the horizon. The fact that the Republicans have sure allies the Democrats, in whatever they decide against Trump, has created a real Damoclean Sword above the head of the President.

In conclusion, the force and the clarity of McConnell’s statement regarding the abandonment of the Paris Agreement, is a Republican pronouncement about what they plan for our brave new world. It’s as if they tell the rest of the globe, ‘We will go on polluting as much as we like and you have to clean up the mess, as you did in the last financial crisis’.

It’s a US foreign policy plan, which is reserves for the rest of the world a servant position for the interests of the US, without any checks and controls from the UN, the World Trade Organization, the G7 or the G20. The question is, if the Democrats and corporate America – apart from the inward looking military-industrial complex – with vital vested interests in the rest of the world, are to cooperate in such a plan. For the time being they do not.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Cameron’s “No Brexit” campaign wins top business support as Tory front breaks

Seaweed, enzymes and compostable cups: Can ‘Big Food’ take on plastic and win?

A new European banking space is born this year

The EU Consumer Policy on the Digital Market: A Behavioral Economics View

Low quality healthcare is increasing the burden of illness and health costs globally

Can the US deal a blow to EU and Russia together over Ukraine?

Do men and women really have different leadership styles?

The German banks first to profit from public subsidies of trillions

How leaders can use ‘agile governance’ to drive tech and win trust

Right2Water initiative: Is the Commission ready to listen to citizens?

Removing sweets from supermarket checkouts could help fight obesity

EU budget: Commission proposes to increase funding to support the environment and climate action

EU-China relations under investigation?

UN Security Council urged to act against ‘worst-case scenario’ Syria’s war-battered Idlib

Costa Coffee products (Copyright: Costa Coffee; Source: Costa Coffee website, Press area)

The start of the “Caffeine rush”: Coca-Cola acquires Costa Coffee days after Nestlé-Starbucks deal

‘Time is of the essence’ for refugees on Greek islands – UN agency

The JADE Spring Conference 2017 is casting its shadows before

EU Migrant Crisis: Italian Coast Guard Headquarters and Italian Navy to give host national opening addresses at Border Security 2016 in Rome

COP21 Breaking News_04 December: Launch of CREWS, climate risk & early warning systems

Feeding families remains complex task in war-torn Syria – UN relief agency

FROM THE FIELD: How the smell of fresh bread transformed one refugee life

ECB: The bastion of effective and equitable Europeanism keeps up quantitative easing

High-technology manufacturing saves the EU industry

EU: The Member States to pay for national banking problems

MWC 2016 LIVE: Mobile World Congress shows off planes, trams and automobiles

Is deflation a real danger for Eurozone?

To Brexit, or not to Brexit…rather not: 10 Downing Street, London

A Sting Exclusive: “Delivering on the Environmental Dimension of the new Sustainable Development Agenda”, Ulf Björnholm underscores from UNEP Brussels

EU budget: the Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2020

Saudi Arabia: UN experts push for prompt release of women human rights defenders

Finally an answer to the hottest question of European youth today: How to make sure Juncker’s Investment Plan works for youth

UN gender agency hails record-breaking number of women in new US Congress as ‘historic victory’

MEPs to vote on overhaul of road transport rules in July

YO!FEST ENGAGES 8,000 YOUNG EUROPEANS IN FUTURE OF EU

Youth2030: UN chief launches bold new strategy for young people ‘to lead’

Parliament compromises on Banking Union but sends market abusers to jail

The succesful cooperation

Polish PM chooses to focus on economy, amid questions on rule of law in Poland

Education and Training: where do we stand in 2014?

What makes America the world’s most competitive economy?

Sustainability, peace, security ‘best guarantee against instability’ Guterres to Security Council

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

G20 LIVE: World Leaders in Turkey for G20 Summit. Global Economy will be discussed in Antalya

How will Brexit affect higher education in the EU?

The New Year 2016 will not be benevolent to Europe

The US bugged Europe: Is this news?

EU should promote immigration as a humanitarian issue in order to provide a more permanent solution

The European Parliament fails to really restrict the rating agencies

Drowning in the Mediterranean this summer? Many happy returns

Cyber defence: MEPs call for better European cooperation

Is Eurozone heading for disinflation?

The US + Britain trivialize mainland Europe, NATO and the EU

5G mobile is nearly here – but we should share networks to make it affordable

Women’s rights in Asia – how far have we come?

Trying to cure bank cancer with analgesics

Migration Crisis: how to open the borders and make way for the uprooted

Data show EU Economy in a stubbornly subdued state

MEPs propose more transparent legislative drafting and use of allowances

The next EU President will first have to drink his tea at Downing Street

European Union: From financial consolidation to deeper political division

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s